I’m told the Winter Olympics are currently happening, which I guess explains why my local curling supply store has been so damn busy lately. And they’re sold out of brooms. Where the hell else do people buy brooms? Anyway, since it’s Olympic time again, it’s a good excuse to play one of my favorite old photograph-based car games, The Parking Lot Game. Essentially, all that means is I’m going to show you a parking lot, and you tell me which car you’re choosing from that lot. Sound good?
This time, we’ll be using a very Winter Olympics kind of picture. In fact, it’s an official Winter Olympics picture, from the 1980 Olympics that were held in Lake Placid, New York. That was the Olympics where the famous “Miracle on Ice” occurred, when the American hockey team eked out a narrow, hard-fought victory over the then dominant team from our old departed rivals, the Soviet Union.
I bet you’ve seen this before, but I’ll show it again, as it’s a pretty dramatic moment:
As you can imagine, that upset earned the US Hockey Team a near-constant presence on Wheaties boxes for years to come.
But let’s get back to a random parking lot photograph from 1980 Lake Placid, this one of the parking lot of the Lake Placid Club, as seen on the Greater Adirondack Ghost and Tour Company’s Facebook page:

I guess this parking lot isn’t so random: the buildings were used as the headquarters of the Olympics while there. The Greater Adirondack Ghost & Tour company has some interesting ghost-related notes about the club, which was, interestingly, founded in 1895 by Melville Dewey, the guy who told us where to stick our books on library shelves. Here’s the spooky stuff:
“For decades, the maze-like building was also rumored to be haunted, with many staff recounting run-ins with the ghost of Annie Godfrey Dewey, the first wife of the founder, who had died in 1922. Her apparition was often said to be glimpsed, seated in a rocking chair in the library.”
Seated in a rocking chair? Yikes.
Anyway, we’re here to pick some cars, so let’s take a look at what we have here. It looks pretty cold and snowy, so it’s worth thinking about which of these cars would actually start after a full day of sitting out there, and once started, which one would you actually want to drive.
In an era where people will use the fact that it sometimes rains as an excuse to buy a four-wheel-drive SUV, it’s remarkable to see so mant RWD vehicles here with notoriously lousy traction. I’m pretty sure every car that made it to this lot had either winter tires or chains or both, or they were just left there since autumn.

Let’s take a closer look at some options. Most prominent (and maybe the best choice for the situation) has to be this Subaru, which I thought was wearing the livery of the US Ski Team (which we used as the inspiration for our own Project Ski Klasse), of which the 4×4 Subaru GL was the official car. But when I look at the figure on the side, it doesn’t quite match the official car. Look:

I think that may be a skater, not a skier, on the one in the parking lot? Whoever is on the side there and whatever sports equipment they have strapped to their feet, the Subaru has to be one of the most likely cars there to be able to start and get through all that snow. That’s probably the safe bet. But what else do we have here?

This is an interesting one! An Audi 100LS. These were FWD cars and perhaps would fare better than a lot of that RWD iron out there. It’s definitely an interesting choice. Will it start? Maybe?

There’s two Pintos in that parking lot, too, an older blue one and a later, square-headlight’d yellow one. I don’t recall these being all that great in the snow, but at least if they blow up, there’s plenty of snow around to quench the flames.

This Suburban is probably a decent choice; I rode around in the back of these an awful lot in the 1980s, as they seemed to be the default choice for Scoutmasters – though, tidily, International Scouts and Travelalls were popular, too. The Suburbans of this era were not the luxury cruisers they are today: they were pretty rough things with plaid vinyl seats and painted metal on the interiors and magazines like Consumer Reports were always giving them bad ratings, but I have a lot of fond memories of these.

Look at this! Just because it’s cold doesn’t mean you can’t be classy. That’s a Chrysler Cordoba, the car that offered – should you be deemed worthy – rich, Corinthian leather.

Here’s another interesting option: a Peugeot 504 wagon! If it’s a diesel one, you may be boned, as I don’t see a block heater or anything like that. Maybe the owner has a lot of kerosene in the fuel, an old cold-weather diesel trick our own The Bishop was telling me about. It’s easy to forget that once there were a decent number of Peugeots on American roads.

You could try your luck with this ’73-ish Pontiac Grand Prix, a car that I suspect is garbage in the snow. But who knows? It got there, after all!

I think that’s a Saab 99 back there, a notchback one. It’s tricky to tell, but I think it is. That’s a good FWD choice, coming from a climate where this kind of weather is just mundane and expected.
That’s not all the cars, though, so comb through this carefully and make your pick! Tell us what you chose in the comments and why! This is important to figure out now, before you fall in a wormhole and end up in 1980 Lake Placid, so choose wisely!









My answer is the 78 or 79 full sized Bronco parked near a tree on the right hand side of the picture. I grew up in one, my family had it until 1991 or thereabouts. I loved that truck, and frustratingly I seem to not be the only one, since any Bronco of that era that is not 90% or more oxides of iron at this point are sold at absurd prices. Drat.
The Subaru!! Second choice would be the Peugeot 504 station wagon especially if it’s a Dangel 4×4 though that one doesn’t look to be lifted like so: https://carjager-dev.mo.cloudinary.net/https://public.carjager.com/production/cms/Dangel_01_Break_ce9868dcef.jpg?tx=w_1024
One of my best friends in college actually lived in one of the neighboring towns; as a teenager she worked as a volunteer in the ’80 Olympics, mainly on the cross-country ski routes (where she got some frostbite in her toes, egad, though thankfully she made a complete recovery.) Her Adirondack-dwelling family *always* had Subarus from the 1970s when Subaru first came to the US through the present so I take that as a stellar endorsement, one of the reasons why I’m picking the Subaru.
Having been in Lake Placid several times to ski Iceface, sorry Whiteface Mt I can tell you without doubt the correct car to use in that photo is the 78-79 full size Bronco in the right side of the photo. Also, if anyone is ever considering visiting the whole Lake Placid area, DO IT. It is a beautiful area worth a few days exploring regardless of the season. The whole Adirondack Park area is amazing.
Since I have only slightly more experience driving in snow than I do in Formula 1, I’ll say fuck it and take the Mustang on the top tier parking, second from left. Let’s see how long how long I can hold a drift before hitting a tree. I’ll set the over/under on number of parked cars I hit before hitting said tree at 15.
Peugeot 504 all the way.
I was hoping this would be about Cortina, and there’d be an 80s metallic copper Lotus Esprit in the lot from which to choose.
Sorry, only English Fords in Cortina.
That Subaru wagon, man. Do want.
The two cars we had in the family when I got my license were a Subaru DL wagon (even cheaper than the GL, if I recall) and a Peugeot 504 diesel. Both cars in Invisible Beige. I miss them both terribly (or at least, I miss what Time allows me to remember of them).
In the Ski Area Parking Lot Olympics, the Subaru might medal in the Starts When Cold event, with the Peugeot possibly a DNF. Below teen degrees F, the Pug frequently needed a jump from the Subaru.
However, in the Drive Home From Skiing 300 Kilometer event, the Pug would podium, while the Subaru’s occupants would need to stop twice for Noise Vibration and Harshness recovery therapy.
Both were a hoot in the snow. The Suby would just go anywhere. I once pulled a friend’s ’68 Olds Vista Cruiser out of a snow bank with it. The Pug would stick ok, but loved tail-out shenanigans. It also had decent ground clearance.
Before I was a teenager, we had a ’74 Pinto wagon, which I have few fond memories of, except for Dad’s cursing of it as it rapidly degraded itself and ruined the driveway with oil leaks. I’m sure it would start, but nobody would want to drive it much after that.
All 3 were manual, of course.
And all 3 rusted out before they were 5 years old.
Audi 100LS, honorable mention to the 504.
No question, absolutely the liveried Subaru Leone GL. It’s the only one that actually looks fun to drive in those conditions, with the exception of that Saab 99, but that one isn’t 4WD so it’s probably a little worse in the snow.
For what it’s worth, it looks like the Subaru is a first generation Leone, but also Subaru had the US ski team association for several years prior to the second-generation launching (the one in production for the 1980 Olympics). Also, I’m pretty sure the graphic is someone cross-country skiing (you can just barely make out poles), so it’s probably still official and just not for the downhill side that gets more attention.
https://www.ebay.ca/itm/304904055357
Yup definitely cross country, you can see the pose..
That Suburban in a northern climate is likely 93% rust, now.
So, Subaru.
Alas, the Subaru is probably 100% rust by now but, yeah, it’s also my pick over the Suburban, lol.
A running joke on USMB (Ultimate Subaru Message Board, an excellent resource for all things Subaru and impressively one of the oldest internet forums still operating) is that those 70s and 80s Subarus would rust on the moon.
We’ve all got rose coloured glasses when we look at making cars like they used to.
The Puegot or the Suburban!
I kinda like the Chevelle wagon that you can just see the tailgate of in front of the blue Pinto. Or the green Valiant (or Duster ?) parked next to the yellow Pinto. The Pinto-adjacent ones, pretty much.
I’d also like the Chevelle wagon, for entirely sentimental reasons. My grandmother had one (and drove in plenty of snow in the 80s in the Berkshires).
I’m taking the ’78 Cordoba because I want to be comfortable while waiting for the ski team in the Subaru to come pull me out of a snowbank.
Peugeot 504 wagon is on the list for my imaginary Jay Leno’s garage. Bonus if it’s a diesel with a stick.
Cordoba all the way
I can feel the rust growing on that Grand Prix, even at this resolution you can see how much of the front fenders have already been left behind.
Anyways I’m gonna take the boring choice and go with the Subaru. Always loved them when I was a kid.
Definitely the Subi. I’ve become used to/immune to the worble of its boxer 4.
I would take the Suburban or that Bronco/Ramcharger?? further down the row and then the Subaru.
I had my eye on that as well…no doubt it’s a Bronco
I relooked and for sure. I posted before I zoomed in. I love the solid front axle big Broncos.
I would not trade the car I owned and drove every day at that time for any of those. I had inherited my grandfather’s 1966 Mercedes-Benz 250S in 1980 and it remains the best car I have ever driven (including lots of modern cars).
I’m going with the Audi, that just looks so good. Audi styling at its best has always been marvelously, artfully simple.
The one you guessed is a Saab 99, I’m thinking might be another Pug, a 504 sedan.
agreed
I grew up driving only rear drive cars, and loved driving in the snow. As long as you had good snow tires, and weren’t in a pickup with an empty bed, they were great. My best was my ’77 MGB with Michelin tires, as the near 50/50 weight distribution made it a very neutral handler, with just enough weight on the rear end. I’d take any of these cars in the pictures. It’s the driver and the tires that are what’s really important in the snow.
That Suburban is still probably around.
Suburban, and it’s not even close. Hopefully it’s a 4×4, though it’s sitting a bit low for that.
Runner up is the Saab 99.
Yeah looks 2WD. I’ll take the Bronco.