Home » Southern Colorado SUVs: 1999 Ford Explorer vs 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander

Southern Colorado SUVs: 1999 Ford Explorer vs 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander

Sbsd 5 2 2023
ADVERTISEMENT

Welcome back! Today’s bacchanalia of beaters takes us to the front range of colorful Colorado, where we’ll be looking at a pair of all-wheel-drive SUVs. But first, let’s see which Wisconsin rustbucket you chose yesterday:

Screenshot 2023 05 01 3.28.36 Pm

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Get on your Pontiac and Ride! The W-body takes the win. And I know a lot of you felt these were both overpriced, and you might be right, but that’s where the market is. I don’t price ’em, I just write about ’em. So don’t shoot the messenger, okay?

Today’s choices are from Pueblo, Colorado, a town on I-25 a ways south of Colorado Springs. The weather on the front range can be unpredictable, with snow one day and seventy degrees the next, so 4WD/AWD vehicles are popular. For your consideration, I’ve got the evergreen (and in this case very green) Ford Explorer, and a bit of an outsider in the form of a Mitsubishi Outlander. Which one makes its case better? That’s for you to decide.

1999 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer – $2,500

00i0i Izwibvjnxx2 0ci0t2 1200x900

ADVERTISEMENT

Engine/drivetrain: 5.0 liter overhead valve V8, four-speed automatic, AWD

Location: Pueblo, CO

Odometer reading: 175,000 miles

Runs/drives? Currently driven daily

The Ford Explorer, of course, was one of the most popular vehicles in the country throughout pretty much the entire Clinton administration. You couldn’t go anywhere without seeing at least one of these things, and a surprising number of them are still on the road, especially considering Ford’s propensity for making transmissions out of some form of hard cheese. Most Explorers were powered by a four-liter V6, but Ford’s long-lived 302 cubic inch small-block V8 found its way into some of them, usually in the upper trim levels like this Eddie Bauer edition.

ADVERTISEMENT

00f0f 3kqjkri64i5 0t20ci 1200x900

The Eddie Bauer package probably impressed a lot more people in 1999, but more than twenty years later it mostly means everything is green and tan and the car has a few more gizmos in it. The interior is leather, and I imagine the seats are pretty comfy, from what I know of even the standard-issue Explorer’s seats. The interior of this one isn’t trashed, either.

00u0u Edojcmo80jp 0ci0t2 1200x900

Let me rephrase that: it isn’t trashed if you disregard the spare tire sitting in the cargo area on a garbage bag, instead of being suspended on a chain underneath the floor like it’s supposed to be. Maybe the chain thingy is broken. But hey, maybe you can find a janky overpriced “factory” spare tire carrier for this one, too.

00o0o 62yps2q1sen 0ci0t2 1200x900

ADVERTISEMENT

The seller says this Explorer runs and drives well, and is their current daily driver. It doesn’t have too many miles on it, and it looks fairly well cared-for. The biggest drawback I’ve heard of with the V8-powered Explorers is fuel economy: Don’t expect to ever see a number that doesn’t end in “-teen.” Unless it’s twelve.

2007 Mitsubishi Outlander – $3,800

00b0b Lbfdhz4hahn 0ci0t2 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 3.0 liter overhead cam V6, six-speed automatic, AWD

Location: Pueblo, CO

Odometer reading: 163,000 miles

ADVERTISEMENT

Runs/drives? Doesn’t actually say, but I’m sure it must

Oh, right: Mitsubishi. It exists, and it makes cars, too. It has been easy to forget that for the past twenty years or so. But forgettable or not, Mitsubishi’s products are consistently good, and often a fair bit cheaper than some other Japanese brands. It’s just that if you tell your friends “I got a 2007 Mitsubishi Outlander,” not a one of them could tell you what it looks like.

00k0k Htpd5gqx9sz 0ci0t2 1200x900

This one looks, well, kinda not so great, at least from one angle. It appears to have side-swiped something, and someone tried to pound the dents back out from the inside, and it didn’t work so well. It’s not hideous, but you can tell it suffered some trauma. Perhaps that’s why the previous owner decided to donate it to Habitat For Humanity rather than try to sell it.

00w0w 336etnurwxu 0ci0t2 1200x900

ADVERTISEMENT

That’s right; this forgotten SUV’s proceeds are going to charity. You get a new old vehicle, and a warm fuzzy feeling, all at once! The ad doesn’t actually say anything about its mechanical condition, although I’m sure it runs and drives. If it didn’t, I imagine that would be the first thing they mentioned. It only has 163,000 miles on it, so it should have some life left.

00m0m Hmayv5gqzi4 0ci0t2 1200x900

Apart from the damage on the passenger’s side, it’s in nice condition from what we can see. The styling looks like Mitsubishi was trying to make it look like a RAV4, but not too much like a RAV4. It’s inoffensive, but certainly not exciting. Maybe that’s an argument in favor of the body damage: you can find it in a parking lot more easily.

So there they are, two ways of doing the all-wheel-drive SUV thing. One is a traditional body-on-frame truck with a V8, and the other is a unibody transverse-engine crossover. Which one is the better deal?

ADVERTISEMENT

(Image credits: Craigslist sellers)

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
42 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Harvey Park
Harvey Park
10 months ago

The explorer, for sure. You can probably build one from scratch just collecting parts on the side of the road that fell off running ones in less affluent parts of LA County.

86-GL
86-GL
10 months ago

This is the Outlander that got refreshed with the Lancer face right? I remember thinking it looked crisp and kind of cool back in the day, when most of its mid 2000’s competitors were straight blah.

It’s continues to blow my mind that Mitsubishi has basically dropped off the face of the earth, while it’s equally mediocre competitor Subaru has become a cult and mainstream favourite despite building catastrophically ugly cars with engines that failed regularly at 100k for nearly a decade.

Nlpnt
Nlpnt
10 months ago

Body on frame Ford Explorer. Ford Ranger Wagon, handling so bad a generation thought a Honda Civic was a sports car by comparison.

The Mitsu’s definitely the better choice, I’m not sure if it’s worth well over a grand more (basically a third again) than the Explorer.

Squirrelmaster
Squirrelmaster
10 months ago

Explorer. I have owned many of this vintage and can fix nearly anything and everything that can and will go wrong with it easily and quickly. There also tons of them in junk yards, so finding parts is easy and cheap. While the Mitsubishi may be newer, little of what I just said about the Explorer is true for the Outlander.

Freelivin1327
Freelivin1327
10 months ago

Mitsu”bitch”i!!! Definitely not Ford (Exploder)

Taargus Taargus
Taargus Taargus
10 months ago

Pretty rare that I would choose an Exploder, but maybe the green over tan Eddie Bauer trim just speaks to me more than a second gen Outlander with one very large pretty hideous deformity. At least the Explorer brings nostalgia to the party.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
10 months ago

Tora, tora, tora, I’ll take the Mitsubishi.

Taxi maniac
Taxi maniac
10 months ago

Throw some old firestones on the explorer, lower the air pressure enough to make it proper suv beach mobile and then without re-airing them back up take it for a nice ride down the highway to see if you live to talk about it.

Voted for the explorer. When i think of a nice japanese suv, outlander from 2007 is not one of the ones a i think about.

Beater_civic
Beater_civic
10 months ago

Egads, wasn’t there a RAV4 vs Exploder a few weeks back? That seems like a fair-er fight. These are both old enough that I would take caution before planning any long trips, so the poor economy of the Ford isn’t a big deal. Plus it’s green!

It’s Ford by a mile right now and I’m not surprised at all.

JDE
JDE
10 months ago

This generation exploder was extremely popular with soccer moms and hood rats. the 5.0 is definitely a bonus, and although I have no interest in a Psuedo off road vehicle that appears to already squatting carolina style(possibly rear air ride failure) I would still take that over the over priced Joe Isuzu clone.

SirRaoulDuke
SirRaoulDuke
10 months ago

I am voting for the Exploder for two reasons: it is significantly cheaper, and it has the V8 with a transmission that is actually reliable. Throw in easy parts availability, and it is a no-brainer as a cheap beater.

That said, I owed a 2008 Outlander. I picked it up for cheap pre-plague, it served me well for two years of work car/beater duty. I traded it in for a much newer SUV right when the covid first hit and car dealers were freaking the fuck out and taking stupid offers on vehicles, I’m talking the first two weeks of the lockdowns. It was a surprisingly good vehicle. Smooth V6, decent mpg, center locker, and paddle shifters lol. It was unstoppable in snow and better than it deserved to be on trails. If not for that big booger on the right….

JDE
JDE
10 months ago
Reply to  SirRaoulDuke

if it is to be believed, it has also had a fair amount of the more simple, but still not cheap repairs done to it recently. a beat up 2007 anything is likely to have gone to Habitat because it was unsellable because of overly expensive repair repair requirements.

SarlaccRoadster
SarlaccRoadster
10 months ago

This poll is going exactly as I thought it would: “I used to ride in an Explorer when I was 10” or “my cousin’s brother’s girlfriend had one” so everyone’s voting for it, despite it being.. well, a quarter-century-old Explorer.

I would only not consider the Mitsu a better choice it it had been rolled over and on fire. (not one or the other, but both)

Last edited 10 months ago by SarlaccRoadster
Geoff Buchholz
Geoff Buchholz
10 months ago

I had a same-generation Mercury Mountaineer (better lease deal) with this exact powertrain and it was awesome. +1 for the Ferd.

Brian Carrington
Brian Carrington
10 months ago

ew

Harvey Park
Harvey Park
10 months ago

Succinct, to the point, and crystal clear. COTD.

Ricki
Ricki
10 months ago

I feel like the Explorer has some potential for shenanigans. The body looks like it’s in good shape, parts are everywhere; I could easily see taking that $1300 difference, giving the engine a freshening up, replacing some suspension bits, and having a fun weekend vehicle.

But if I want a daily, it’s that Mitsubishi thingie any day. Thing is, I already have a daily. Explorer it is.

Tyler Anderson
Tyler Anderson
10 months ago

I can’t believe I’m choosing the Explorer.

MaximillianMeen
MaximillianMeen
10 months ago

Don’t forget to write for more information at “Pueblo, Colorado, 81009”!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVCcaf1nM00

Last edited 10 months ago by MaximillianMeen
Arrest-me Red
Arrest-me Red
10 months ago

The bubble on the back of the Outlander look like rust about to blow through.

Explorer for me.

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
10 months ago

The Outlander is better than any Ford from the 90s that isn’t a rebadged Mazda. Especially the Firestone Tire Wagon LOL

Remember that the Explorer only has one more cubic foot of space than the Taurus wagon of the same vintage

Last edited 10 months ago by Dogisbadob
DadBod
DadBod
10 months ago
Reply to  Dogisbadob

peak Exploder era

StillNotATony
StillNotATony
10 months ago

This is a case of “what’s the worst that could happen?” either way. I think it would be less worse with the Explorer.

David Hudson
David Hudson
10 months ago

The old 302 is an excellent engine.

Tbird
Tbird
10 months ago
Reply to  David Hudson

I second this motion.

Tbird
Tbird
10 months ago

Good news, the V8 Explorer uses the 4R70W transmission, the wide ratio version of the tough AODE. These were found behind V8 Crown Vic’s and Lincolns. I had one in my 96′ T’bird w/ the 4.6L Modular V8.

Tbird
Tbird
10 months ago
Reply to  Tbird

These are emphatically NOT made of glass or old hard cheese.

Last edited 10 months ago by Tbird
David Hudson
David Hudson
10 months ago
Reply to  Tbird

If they had anything to do with the old C4s and C6s, they are terrific transmissions. My dad was an independent mechanic in the1970s, 1980s and 90s, working on Fords mainly. I don’t recall he ever had to do a thing to Ford automatic transmissions, apart from adding fluid.

Tbird
Tbird
10 months ago
Reply to  David Hudson

AOD is based on the old (MX) transmission with an added overdrive (4th gear). AODE is an electronically controlled version and and the 4R70W was an update with a different gear ratio spread. These were used on all the Panther cars, Mustangs and some E series vans.

Last edited 10 months ago by Tbird
Robot Turds
Robot Turds
10 months ago
Reply to  David Hudson

Yup. I own a 1955 Mercury that has an old C4 and a 302 in it. I bought it some 20+ years ago and drove it to work for years. It has been an amazingly reliable drivetrain. All I’ve ever done is change the fluids, occasionally clean and tune the carb, change plugs and wire, etc and it just goes and goes.

Jason Smith
Jason Smith
10 months ago
Reply to  Mark Tucker

Can confirm, those were most definitely made of some form of dairy product…

Last edited 10 months ago by Jason Smith
JDE
JDE
10 months ago
Reply to  Tbird

my experience with AOD is in a 91 LTD and a couple 90-93 GT mustangs. the AOD was not the most reliable thing and often was the problem with those cars. perhaps it got better with the E tacked on? I know by 99 the trans behind the 4.6 seemed to survive better, or perhaps they just had less torque and HP to deal with, so survived better.

GreatFallsGreen
GreatFallsGreen
10 months ago

That gen of Outlander was pretty neat – looked good, practical with lots of space and the sorta-clamshell tailgate (like an Element), reviews said it drove well, decent available tech/gadgets for its day. But the condition here…nah. That plus the V8 in the Ford makes the Explorer an easy choice.

PS: the Explorer listing still links to the T&C from yesterday.

GreatFallsGreen
GreatFallsGreen
10 months ago
Reply to  Mark Tucker

It’s fixed now! Whether that was after you said that or I just was a slowpoke in reading and commenting in between you fixing it. 🙂

Nsane In The MembraNe
Nsane In The MembraNe
10 months ago

Rode the nostalgia waves into smashing that MF button for the Explorer. This is very similar to my first car, which was an older version with the 4 liter V6 in the same green over tan. Funny you should mention the transmissions that were made of cheese because I dropped the transmission in mine my senior year of high school…which led to the unfortunate fate of the car being cash for clunkers’d and me losing my car privileges for the rest of the year.

That being said boy was it a fun first car. I remember countless McDonald’s runs, smoking assorted tobacco products (actually, I was too much of a prude for weed in high school), canoodling with girlfriends in the backseat, and driving it entirely too fast. Good times.

V10omous
V10omous
10 months ago

But forgettable or not, Mitsubishi’s products are consistently good

[citation needed]

IRegertNothing, Esq.
IRegertNothing, Esq.
10 months ago
Reply to  V10omous

They’re consistently a good value. As for being good vehicles, you get what you pay for.

42
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x