Electric cars are now part of the wider new car marketplace. Regular new car customers are finding that for doing the mundane stuff like ferrying their filth goblins to school, commuting to their employment cube, or weekend trips to their local big box retailer, they are perfect. Quiet, quick, easy to drive, emissions-free, and if you can charge at home or work, cheap to run, it’s easy to understand why electric cars are finding their place in the automotive landscape.
The trouble is that those characteristics that make EVs the perfect day-to-day tool make them less appealing for those who want a bit more than just mere transportation from a car. A frequent criticism of EVs is that when there are no gears to row or an engine buzzing away under the hood, something essential is removed from a car’s personality. The car is becoming a mobile phone. Yeah, and you know what? Modern phones are fucking brilliant. Another trope is that electric cars are a white goods appliance. Great, so you’ll be ditching your soulless Whirlpool for an authentic washboard experience then? No, I didn’t think so, so shut up. What’s important is that although most new cars are good at most things, we should understand what their limits and capabilities are. You wouldn’t buy a full-size truck for commuting any more than you would buy a small hatch if you regularly drive long distances. Get the right car with the right powertrain for what you want to use it for.
In Europe, for a lot of customers, the right car for a long time was a small front-wheel-drive hatchback, a segment pioneered by the Fiat 127 in 1971. Bundling all the mechanical bits up front freed up space for warm bodies and led to better economy through lighter weight and lower drivetrain losses. The Honda Civic and Renault 5 followed in 1972, but other OEMs were initially reluctant to take the plunge into a smaller, more expensively engineered type of car until successive oil and economic crises forced their hand. By the mid-seventies, nearly every OEM had an offering in the Euro B (US sub-compact) segment. Chic, economical, and with three or five doors, incredibly practical, they were fun and easy to live with, but not particularly fast. Until one day in 1975, a bunch of drunk Volkswagen engineers dropped a bigger fuel-injected engine from the Audi 80 into their new baby to create the Golf GTI. Overnight, a whole new category of enthusiast car was created – the hot hatch.
How To Make A Hot Hatch
The recipe was simple: take your big-selling family hatch, bolt in a more powerful motor, stir in stiffer suspension with wider wheels and tires, garnish with plastic aero pieces and graphics, and serve to taste. Rising insurance rates, thanks to some decidedly knife-edged handling tendencies and popularity with the light-fingered, eventually killed the hot hatch by the mid-nineties, but such a good idea cannot be kept down entirely. The Golf GTI stuck around, although it’s now a more serious and expensive proposition. Ford killed the Fiesta ST and Suzuki the fabulous Swift Sport, but the ICE Mini Cooper and Polo GTI live on, along with newcomers like the Hyundai i20N.

The Alpine A290 is the hot version of the Renault 5 I reviewed back in June, a car I liked a lot. Its modest purchase price and decent range rendered the fact that it was electric irrelevant – a more perfect way of stylishly flitting from book shop to boot shop I cannot imagine. Alpine takes that starting point and time-honored tradition gives the 5 a hotter motor, upgraded suspension and brakes, wilder bodywork, and a reworked interior. There’s a new subframe which repositions the motor lower in the chassis; power is now 180 bhp (30 up on the standard 5) and an optional 210 bhp unit is available on higher trim levels. Weight increases fractionally to 1479 kg (3260 lbs.), probably due to the nicer interior trim combined with bigger wheels and brakes. The 52 kWh battery remains the same: a good thing for weight and cost, but as I found out, not so good for range.
In July, the UK government introduced a grant that lowers the purchase price of some EVs, which both the 5 and the A290 qualify for. This knocks £1500 ($1970) off their respective list prices and means the higher power 210 bhp Alpine A290 starts at £32,745 ($44,172) on the road, including taxes. Press fleets being the way they are, the car our friends at Alpine UK lent me was a Rich Corinthian Leather spec GTS, which has the more powerful motor and every option as standard. This will see you racking up your preferred loyalty points to the tune of £37,500 ($49,355) plus £700 ($921) for the optional Blanc Nival and Noir paint – metallic white with a black roof.

There Are No Cupholders
So underneath, you get a trick new subframe, hydraulic bump stops, bespoke uprights at the front, and Brembo 4-piston Monobloc brakes. That’s the stuff you can’t see, what about what you can? There’s no point in having a go-faster car if you’re not shouting about it. The A290 gets new door skins, which on the rear doors have unnecessary Ford Mustang/MkI Capri style fake vents. There are aggressive new bumpers on both ends, which at the front reposition the DRLs as mini spotlights to better mimic the brand-defining A110 sports car. At the back, the tailgate ditches the dark infill panel of the 5 for a small spoiler, and the black trim wrapping around the lower body is slightly deeper and sharper. Finally, the more overly sporty alloys go up in diameter to 19 inches and in width to 225. These are wrapped in either Pilot Sport EV or Pilot Sport 5S tires – my GTS loaner had the latter.


Inside, it’s mostly as you were with the 5, but with nicer materials. Blue Nappa leather faces the upgraded seats, front door card inserts, the passenger side of the dash, and the steering wheel, which is now hexagonal-shaped and festooned with additional “F1” style controls. I thought the seats had too much lumbar support – forcing me to sit upright like an old man with a cushion at the small of his back. A 250-mile day with my shoulders unsupported resulted in me waking up the next morning in need of painkillers. I found out after the car went back that lumbar support is adjustable, but during my time with the A290 I didn’t discover how. I would have emailed Alpine PR and asked them, but I had another more pressing concern with the interior I needed an answer for – namely why there are no bloody cup holders?

As long as I have breath in my body, I will maintain that America’s two greatest contributions to civilized motoring are right-on-red and the cupholder. Even the most committed helmsman or woman needs somewhere to plonk their vodka valium latte in the morning on their way to work, and given the standard 5 has an adjustable cupholder-cum-storage space between the seats, this seems like a ridiculous omission. The answer I received from Alpine PR was “They will be available as an optional 3D printed part, but in order to optimize the space to the preferred design layout, and given the car’s customer base, permanent spaces weren’t a priority.” Basically, to make the A290 feel more like the A110 (and the rest of the Alpine range), the gear selection buttons were moved to the center console. This makes some sense for brand continuity, but from an ergonomics standpoint, you are not constantly switching between drive, neutral, and reverse on the open road, so I think a less intrusive space could be found – like a lipstick styled stalk to the right of the steering column, as on the standard 5. The rest of the space is taken up with a small lidded cubby for your Johnny Halliday cassettes and a wireless charging pad for your phone.

The dashboard displays and graphics have been given a ‘background mountains in Tron’ makeover, but the functionality is pretty much the same as the standard car. Digging into the menus, there’s a series of driver coaching tips that feel a bit Gran Turismo. I have always felt gamification features and performance driving instructions are out of place on a road car, so those I could happily live without, but otherwise it all works well – even if it does feel a bit Serious Performance Car as opposed to pint-sized funster.
There are various driving modes, and you can save a personal setup with all your preferred combinations of noise, dynamics, and safety settings, which you can access via a button to the right of the steering wheel on startup. Speaking of the steering wheel, the blue cold water faucet adjusts the amount of regen from ‘is it on?’ to ‘facebutt the wheel boss,’ and the red OVR lever is – I kid you not – an overtake button to release an additional ten seconds worth of power. However the same effect can be achieved by simply stabbing the pedal to the floor past a kick-down point. When you do this, the Alpine does a kind of ‘warp speed Mr. Sulu’ thing by subtly emitting more noise from the speakers and changing the speedo display to red with stars rushing past. The overall idea is meant to make you feel like Pierre Gasly on a Sunday afternoon when you’re just nipping out for a pack of Gauloises and today’s copy of Le Monde.



It Torque Steers Like A 1985 Renault 5 GT Turbo
When you do punch the throttle, you get the authentic eighties Renault 5 Turbo experience in the form of torque steer. Despite the new front subframe, stiffer suspension, and bespoke uprights, the Alpine pulls and tugs as the Pilot Sports struggle to put power to the tarmac cleanly, even with the traction control on. Switch the traction control out, and the torque steer goes from wriggling the steering wheel to requiring you really keep a hold of the thing lest you end up in the hedgerow. 210bhp is not exactly an inordinate amount of power through the front wheels these days, so maybe the geometry is still a bit compromised – a suspicion fueled by the fact that the steering itself is not much of an upgrade over the standard 5. It feels too light for a more performance-focused car despite the increase in tire width. Mucking about with the various driving modes didn’t make much difference that I could detect, either.
Likewise the ride, which is adjustable between three settings, all felt the same to me. When I drove the standard 5, one of my only criticisms was that I thought the ride was a touch firm – weirdly, the A290 felt more cushioned, probably because of better tires and more expensive dampers. Grip, as you would expect, was exemplary – even though throughout most of my week with the Alpine it was pissing with rain, a couple of afternoons spent punting it down bendy B roads revealed no obvious vices other than the aforementioned torque steer. The Alpine corners flat and fast, and thanks to its short wheelbase and sticky rubber, it turns in fast enough to fling the keycard out of its charging pad on the center console and across the cabin.
Some decidedly heavy-footed pedal applications failed to elicit much in the way of adjusting cornering attitude – this isn’t the tightrope between ploughing understeer and exiting stage left backwards that hot hatches of old used to exhibit. The Alpine is safe, secure, stable, and – slightly soft steering aside – a lot of fun, helped as usual by its handy size, excellent visibility, and instant throttle response. For the more powerful motor, performance figures are quoted as 6.4 seconds to 60 and a top speed of 106 mph. It certainly doesn’t lack poke at solid motorway speeds, although it’s worth noting that driving in eco mode limits the top speed to 80 or so. And I spent a lot (in fact nearly all) of my time on the motorways in eco mode – because when it comes to efficiency, the Alpine has a major problem.
That Big Problem
When I reviewed the 5, I managed 4.3 miles per kWh without even trying. That was back in June, so I had the AC running constantly. I’m not about to sacrifice comfort in the name of eking out a few more miles because that’s stupid and not representative of how people use their cars. During my week with the A290, it rained most days, but the temperature hovered around 58 – 60 °f (14-15 °c) – so not especially cold. At 100% charge the indicated range was 175 miles, but this was a case of the car telling porky pies because at one point it seemed like one mile on the road equated to two miles off the total range. This is a major bummer in terms of the A290 being a day-to-day proposition.


I asked Alpine PR about the aero figures, but they have not been released for either the A290 or the Renault 5. So is the difference purely down to stickier tires and a more powerful motor? That feels unlikely, but I’m not a powertrain engineer. What majorly queered the pitch for me was the fact that the rapid charger near my house that I usually used to charge EV press loans was out of commission. So I signed up for a BP Pulse account, which is normally $10.57 (£7.85) per month. New subscribers get the first month free, but it means you can access their 7kWh chargers at 44p per kW, as opposed to the pay-as-you-go price of 52p per kW. Such a slow charging speed meant leaving the Alpine overnight in a public car park a few minutes’ walk from my house, a not entirely satisfactory state of affairs. In this situation, you are also liable for parking charges as well – although the overnight price was only £2.30 ($3.11) it’s something to think about. In the interests of doing proper journalism, I debased myself in your service by crawling around to take pictures of the rear axle and discovered there is room for a bigger battery – something the A290 desperately needs.

When I took that long drive down to Essex for a meeting (saying that makes me feel so important), I had to rapid charge twice – once before setting off at a local health spa car park (at least I could get a coffee while I waited) and once before the return journey home. In addtion when I picked the Alpine up from the press office, just outside northwest London I also needed to charge it up for the ninety-mile journey back to my house. In my eight days with the car, I covered 498 miles and charged five times, putting a total of 160 kWh into the battery. That works out to 3.1 miles per kWh, a substantial delta from the 4.3 miles the standard 5 managed. The total cost of all this pissing about was £104.55. For some perspective, the gas station where I fill up my Mini currently charges £6.27 per imperial gallon of regular unleaded. My 2010 Mini Clubman consistently gets 40 mpg, so that £104 would allow me to drive it a rather appropriate 666 miles. And EV evangelists wonder why people who cannot charge at home or work at sensible rates are not making the switch. I’ve said it before, but it bears repeating – with any new technology, customers need to get the same or better than what they currently have for the same or less money.
The Emperor’s New Clothes
While I’m griping, the Devialet premium audio system, which also gives you a suite of Google connected service which came as standard on my top spec GTS loaner is a £780 option on lower models. The subwoofer kicks with enough force to make the rear view mirror jump, but the problem is it’s installed in the cubby under the boot floor, so you lose the ability to store the charging cable out of sight. All right, I know you’re going to be using the charging cable a lot more, but it’s another red cross in the practicality column alongside the lack of cup holders. The Alpine also doesn’t have the external state of charge lights on the hood that the 5 has either; this being swapped out for a simple Alpine graphic that does nothing.

My overall feeling with the A290 is that by making the hot model an Alpine, Renault has given the 5 a suit that doesn’t fit properly. It has all the requisite go-faster uplift parts in terms of powertrain, suspension, interior, and exterior but making it an Alpine it all feels a bit incongruous – something about writing checks it can’t cash. My suspicion is that the standard A290 with the lower power motor (and the better efficiency that would bring) and fabric seats (I’m not a big fan of leather, in cars at least …), without the optional sound system, would be a slightly more rounded choice. If you don’t spec any other options, that version retails for £30,245 ($40,977) on the road.
If you are the type of person who absolutely must have the fast version of a car, there’s a lot to like here. I don’t think the A290 is a bad car, just one that has a slightly confused and compromised mission. Alternatively, Renault could have bolted the upgraded suspension and motor into the standard 5, given it some racier trim inside and out, and slapped some lairy graphics down the side to create a new 5 GT Turbo.
That really would lean into the standard car’s heritage appeal and feel more in keeping with the original hot hatch ethos.

All photos by the author.






“As long as I have breath in my body, I will maintain that America’s two greatest contributions to civilized motoring are right-on-red and the cupholder.”
As an American, I agree with this statement wholeheartedly. When I turn right on red while sipping Mountain Dew from a 32 ounce disposable plastic cup that fits comfortably in any of my truck’s 6 cupholders, I can’t help but mentally salute the flag while a solitary tear runs down my cheek. If that ain’t freedom, I don’t want to be free.
“You wouldn’t buy a full-size truck for commuting…”
I’m very confused by this statement.
What’s confusing about it?
I’m confused as to why you are confused that an American might dispute that statement.
The Alpine looks nice (as do a lot of small European cars), but if I drove something like that here in Florida I would probably get deported. At minimum I would end up on a watch list for suspected Communists.
Also, per Florida law, driving anything smaller than a 1/2 ton truck is evidence the driver practices witchcraft. Technically I should be burned at the stake every time I drive my Tesla instead of my F250, but fortunately the law is rarely enforced.
Oh AC – Where have you been? I was in need of a few dark chuckles today. And you more than delivered. Filth Goblins is 100% a term I’m going to steal and use over and over.
I’ve been ill. The glands in my neck were the size of baseballs.
I learned two terms relevant to your post directly from The Autopian:
-filth goblins, from Adrian Clarke
-crotch goblins, from Jason Torchinsky
Hi Adrian! Glad you are finally back! I missed you in the most exciting moment this year… The firing of Gerry McGovern. I was hoping you would write something about it but as it turned out that whole story was kind of fake news?! Also could have written an email but did not want to bother you in your Offtopian time.
I couldn’t write anything publically as it would have been pure speculation. I’ve been chatting with Richard Porter (he’s much more connected than me obviously) and Wayne Burgess (who is a good mate of mine) about it and while we have made some educated guesses as to what went on it’s not for public consumption. Not for any sordid reasons but purely because I don’t want to get the Autopian sued into oblivion. I expect the whole story will eventually come out, but there’s no doubt it was a MASSIVE PR fuck up on JLR’s part, something they have previous form for.
Yeah. I thought something like that. Anyway, he is close to 70 years now and JLR should have the guts and let somebody younger do a fresh start.
I was very surprised that G. Wagener is stepping down voluntarily at a much younger age.
Adrian, what is your tasteful solution to the auto manufacturer obsession with just plopping a non-instrument cluster screen on the dash? Every single one is an abomination, yet they continue to do it, and even worse, they keep making the screens larger.
Is there a current production car that integrates a screen tastefully?
You are the only designer who can save us. Help!
I’m not as anti-screen as some are – Carplay is an essential in my book and I’m looking at fitting a Carplay headunit into the Mini.
Some OEMs have gone too far – Mercedes and Porsche spring to mind. I think Bentely and RR have screens that rotate and dissappear into the dash which seems like an elegant solution if not suitable for mainstream cars.
Digital displays instead of analog dials I’m fine with – you can configure them and if you can have your map directly in front of you I think that’s a good safety benefit as well. Also with a lot of them you can display the bare minimum of information – like speed and waringing lights, again good for safety.
I like that it weighs less than most current ICE-powered cars. 3,200 lbs is still a bit on the porky side, but by today’s standards, it’s lighter than the vast majority of cars available.
I mentioned it in the 5 piece, but apart from the wight of the cell pack the weight is about the same as a pure ICE Clio.
The A290 has a 0.30 Cd. That’s not all that great, but its efficiency is helped by how light it is relative to other EVs when coupled with a reasonable frontal area.
Now consider what happens when/if they build a new Alpine sports car with a focus on CdA reduction, getting the value somewhere near to or better than a GM EV1. You could cut that pack down to 35 kWh for the same range this A290 gets and get a 2 in front of that curb weight, in a pure EV.
Where did you get that figure? Because Alpine PR specifically told me that they haven’t released the Cd for either car.
My mistake. I did a quick search and relied upon what the AI shit out. You’re right, there is no official released figure.
Sigh. Matron will deal with you later.
Can she bring the whip so I can kiss it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3geidq1qpwU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wp9SVMnfs0
I’d blame the tires and possibly the wheels. The snow tires on my Model Y add 50 watt-hours per mile onto energy expenditure. Same size as the all seasons but different winter compound and lots of grippy siping. Non-aero wheels for highway driving make a difference. If they’re heavier than regular ones city driving is impacted too.
The wheels on the standard 5 don’t look particualrly aero optimised, and neither do the alloys on the A290. FWIW ‘aero’ wheels are a slight con, because there’s a lot of factors that go into how aerodynamic a wheel is, including spoke number, shape and thickness, as well as the radii of fillets. Just having a flat surface is not necessarily that much more aerodynamic.
How are people in Europe charging these things?
I feel like I read a little bit about that a couple of years ago but I haven’t seen an in depth dive into how Europeans are dealing with fast charging vs home charging. If I remember from the r5 article the charging cable storage is under the cargo floor which seems like it would be annoying if people are regularly charging at level 2 as you would need to unload your trunk to access the cable.
Is it mostly dc fast charging or are there opportunities for level 2 charging. I think Europe’s standard 220v residential electric must be a benefit over the US 110v.
7-11kW is labelled as fast charging. These are cheapest as I noted in the article. Rapid charging is something like 50-200kW and more expensive – between about 80-90 pence per kW. The big charge to get me home after my meeting was 48kWh and came to £39.36.
Something like 2 out of 5 UK household have no off street parking. I imagine it’s better on the mainland as they have more space and much newer housing stock.Also nearly every petrol station I saw in France had Rapid chargers, which isn’t the case in the UK.
As this is an EV, I only need one hand to drive it, so I can use my free hand as a cup holder.
I didn’t bother to check the author at the start and was reading along and started thinking to myself, “Self, this is damn good writing. Clever. Insightful. Pulls you in. Who scribed this?”
Looked back at the top, ah, Adrian. That’s why.
Well done.
I aim to please, so thank you.
Long live the cupholder!
I know someone will refute it, but cupholders simply make sense for anyone other than a camel. If I’m driving for a long distance, I want some water with me. Even if I’m not traveling far, I probably want a beverage at my destination. If I’m picking up coffee, I need a place to put it.
Food is another argument.
If I’m going to be in the car more than about half hour, I’m having a road coffee.
Yes! I am not a coffee drinker and my commutes and drives are short enough but any drive over 2 hrs I want some water and cupholders are also useful storage.
Handy for chucking stuff in close to hand, not just coffee I agree.
Anyone old enough to remember when MB bought Chrysler back in the day? The German engineers were appalled that American cars had cup holders. “Does your coffee table have a steering wheel in it” they would ask? No, it doesn’t. Then why would a car need to be an extension of a kitchen with a cup holder?
Kind of ironic from a country that has beer for breakfast.
I remember. I think I saw that in an autoweek or something. Heck I think I have owned something like 10 cars that were too old to have had factory cup holders.
“They will be available as an optional 3D printed part” WTF and where will it go? If there is space for a 3d printed cupholder there is a place for a cupholder from the factory. I guess they can buy those little cupholders that fit in the space between the window glass and door trim for a few dollars like we use to in the 1980s.
4 pack for $2.45 https://shop.advanceautoparts.com/p/autocraft-enduro-cup-holder-black-4-pack-ac733-22-1-0556/25984415-P?selectedStore=7151&searchTerm=cup+holder
It does feel specatcularly half assed. When I picked the car up the PR guy just threw his hands in the air and laughed when I asked him about it (I already knew it had no cup holders).
They’ve screwed up big time and they know it.
You know what is NOT needed in a car? Wireless charging pad. Because, as most of us know, the phone can be charged while connected to a wire, while placed in ONE of the two cup holders.
Sadly I think this is the version we might maybe get in the U.S., bummer s as it sounds like the Renault hits the sweet spot on configuration. Also that may not be torque steer when you floor it but the traction control fighting for survival against the massive torque in a relatively light front end, the Chevy Bolt can act similarly and it has equal axles so also not torque steer, it does feel the same so probably easier to call it that as people will know the feeling.
There;s a guy on Twitter who does ride and handling kits for the A110. He’s did a bit of a deep dive into the A290 and said the issue is probably the lower wishbones at the front, which are stamped and probably too flexible.
if this was another site, this is where the, “Well, ackshually…” crowd would chime in.
“yes I much prefer the backbreaking drudgery of doing my washing by hand for the authentic 1900 analog experience”.
Fucking idiots.
I like appliances that are reliable, get the job done, are inexpensive to purchase, and are cheaply/easily repaired.
I just replaced the lid switch on a 2+ decade old Kenmore 90 series, and while it was a little bit of a hassle, at least the parts were cheap. These “smart”, touchscreen-laden abominations you buy today are 100% disposable, very expensive, you can’t even use the damned thing without a smartphone and an internet connection to use the app you have to download, and are ultimately destined to end up in a landfill. When I just want to wash clothes.
When I need another washer, I’m going to get a Roper. Just look at it. 3 knobs, no touchscreens, no bullshit, and designed to be fixed with basic tools without having to hunt down parts that are no-longer made.
Failing the availability of that and/or electricity, I’ll rig up a pedal-powered system for ultimate redundancy as a backup.
Speed Queen still has models with mechanical dials.
Smart washing machines can get in the fucking sea I agree, but we don’t seem to have those here in UK, at least not that I’ve seen. It’s Bosch all the way for me, or if I can afford when I get my own place a Miele.
“I want to feel the cleanliness!”
”If you aren’t washing your whites in gasoline, are they really clean?”
Well, you wouldn’t. I wouldn’t either. But a whole lotta suburban dads do just that so they can feel like “real men” for a couple hours a day.
The result of their suburban wives telling them they’re ’under performing’ in the bedroom, reacting to that by purchasing an overcompensating vehicle to feel better about themselves, and telegraphing that message to friends and family. The shrinks aren’t wrong on the issue.
You beat me to this. I was going to ask Adrian if he remembers his last trip to the states.
My travelling companion for that trip is disabled and has mobility issues, so getting something big and comfy, with heated seats that was easier for her to get into and out of was a necessity. I wanted a Suburban or an Expedition but none were available.