We’ve already looked at one turbocharged coupe from the ’80s this week, and it did really well, so I’ve found two more for your consideration today. One of these you’ll probably think is driven by the wrong wheels, and the other definitely has the wrong transmission. But I have to work with what I find.
Yesterday, I found a couple of old inline-six trucks that both ran well, despite their appearances. This was a close vote, but in the end, the Ford van won. It was the slotted mags that put it over the top, wasn’t it? Still one of my favorite wheel styles of all time. Someday I will have a car wearing them.
However, when it comes to these two particular vehicles, I think I have to go for the Binder. It looks more honest, and those B-series trucks have a homely, Checker Cab sort of charm to them that I find really appealing. Maybe I’ll drive it up to Sven & Ole’s Pizza, then swing over to International Falls. Yah.

If you wanted something to sound cool and fast back in the ’80s, you had to use the word “turbo.” Judas Priest knew it. So did Kyosho (and Porsche thinks calling a high-performance electric vehicle a “turbo” is something new). Computers had “turbo” buttons. And just about every carmaker would sell you something with a turbocharged engine under the hood, and for those that didn’t, aftermarket kits were ready and waiting. Both of today’s competitors came from the factory with turbocharged engines. One has had some modifications done to it, and the other desperately needs one specific modification. Let’s check them out.
1986 Merkur XR4Ti – $5,500

Engine/drivetrain: Turbocharged 2.3 liter OHC inline 4, three-speed automatic, RWD
Location: Cleveland, OH
Odometer reading: 90,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
I’ve never quite understood why this car existed. Ford already sold two other rear-wheel-drive coupes with the same turbo engine, the Mustang and the Thunderbird, both of which were cheaper than the Merkur. The only real functional difference between those cars and this one was independent rear suspension, and was that really a big enough deal to go through all the trouble of Federalizing a German-market Ford Sierra, importing it under an unknown brand name, and selling it through Lincoln-Mercury dealers? You’d have to ask Bob Lutz, I guess; apparently the whole thing was his idea.

Most XR4Tis were sold with a five-speed manual transmission, but this being America, an automatic was on the option sheet. It’s kind of an afterthought: Ford couldn’t even be bothered to adapt its then-new AL4D overdrive automatic to this car, and just slapped in the old three-speed C3. That’s right; this fine European sports coupe has the same transmission as your Aunt Margie’s Pinto wagon. Worse, the 2.3 turbo four had to be detuned to keep from blowing it up, and it lost 30 horsepower in the process. This one’s transmission has recently been rebuilt, but who cares? I don’t know how difficult a manual swap is on these, but I’d say it’s worth finding out.

Wrong shift lever aside, this one looks decent inside. There are a couple of cracks in the dash, but that’s not surprising on a nearly forty-year-old car. The seats are covered, and we don’t know what shape they’re in underneath the covers, but it doesn’t matter much. A pair of new pale gray racing-style seats are included but haven’t been installed yet. They’ll probably look very silly next to the automatic shifter, but they do look comfy.

There’s something a little funky about the front bumper of this car, though. In the first photo, it looks bashed-in a bit, or maybe melted, it’s hard to tell. And in this photo, it’s straight, but the gray finish is coming off. Was it damaged and then replaced with a junkyard bumper? Or is the damaged photo its actual condition and this one was taken earlier? Very curious. The rest of it is in good shape, though it could use a polishing.
1987 Dodge Shelby Charger – $5,700 Canadian

Engine/drivetrain: Turbocharged 2.2 liter OHC inline 4, five-speed manual, FWD
Location: East Hants, Nova Scotia, Canada
Odometer reading: unknown
Operational status: Runs and drives well
When Lee Iacocca was rebuilding Chrysler in the ’80s, he wasn’t shy about calling on old friends for help. Both Alejandro de Tomaso and Carroll Shelby lent a hand to create special versions of Chrysler vehicles. But to the best of my knowledge, the L-body Dodge Omni 024/Charger was the only car to receive a special edition from both of them: first as the barely remembered Dodge DeTomaso, and later as this car, the Dodge Shelby Charger.

For the first couple of years, the Shelby Charger came with a hot-rodded version of the same carbureted 2.2-liter four as other Chargers, but in 1985, a turbocharger joined the party, giving the stripey little Dodge some seriously quick 0-60 times, along with enough torque steer to yank the steering wheel out of your hands. This one has been upgraded even further, with Chrysler’s intercooled Turbo II engine, and some other go-fast goodies. It also has a new clutch and a new alternator. The seller says it runs well and is reliable.

Shelby put nearly all of his effort into this car under the hood; the interior is pretty much standard Omni parts except for the “CS” logo embroidered on the seat headrests. But the seats are comfy and the driving position is pretty good, so stop complaining and just go for a drive. This one is in good shape, and does have a few little modifications, including some additional gauges and what I believe is a short-throw shift lever. I seem to remember the stock L-body shifter being a lot taller than that.

It will come as no surprise to regular readers that I absolutely love the looks of this car. I’ve wanted one ever since they came out when I was ten years old. I’d rather have silver with blue stripes, but in this condition, red would do nicely. There are a bunch of photos in the ad of the underside, and it’s as close to rust-free as you’ll ever find in a car this age. The gold Shelby Daytona wheels aren’t included; it will come with a set of stock Shelby Charger wheels.
Turbochargers are a dime a dozen these days; every little three-cylinder engine stuck to a CVT has one. But back when these cars were built, they meant that a car was something special. They meant badges and hood bumps and special wheels. One was neutered from the get-go by a single box on its option sheet, and the other has been pushed beyond what it was ever meant to be. Which one would you rather have in your garage?






Neither. Nope. No.
Okay if I have to choose but IMHO it should be the Shelbyville not the Shelby. Never meet your heroes or their mistakes
I always kinda liked the weird XR4Ti exterior. But then again I own a Juke.
Obviously the interior was standard 80s crap.
My folks had a Charger Shelby. They traded it on probably-the-last Bronco II with manual hubs before I came around, since they lived on a farm along a hilly dirt road and “the Shelby” was basically undrivable in winter and mud season, even with the oversized snow tires the dealer squeezed on, but I grew up hearing stories about it.
This one appears to be in fantastic shape, and I’m sure it’d be a barrel of laughs – but mostly, I’d just like to see my ma’s face when one of these pulls into the driveway. (Theirs was blue, and I’d certainly prefer blue, but still – it’s been decades since I’ve seen one of these in any condition.)
For two consecutive days…both!
This is where I’d want a both option – use the Charger until you can manual swap the Merkur
I hovered over the Merkur, ready to click, as I love a good fast Ford (Sierra Sapphire Cosworth anyone) but I just couldn’t do it with that auto box. Loving the push button cassette tape trays though. Eighties-tastic.
I was gonna go Merkur over the fake Charger, til I saw the auto (& white paint) They were interesting cars and are unique…but will have way more fun w/ the Dodge w/ a stick!
Turbo? Abut, EH?
My first car was an XR4Ti with the correct transmission. I’ve always kinda wanted another one, so my vote is for the Merkur, even with that horrible 3 speed abomination. I wonder how difficult it would be to Coyote swap that thing and put in a manual gearbox? I remember some folks doing that with the 5.0 back in the day.
They did it from the factory in South Africa! https://www.whichcar.com.au/features/did-you-know-ford-built-a-sierra-xr8-with-mustang-power
Holy shit! I learned something new today.. thank you!
The Merkur was an attempt to separate Ford from Mercury, make it a more upscale brand while I guess still sharing some basic components for warranty sake? I do recall anything Euro at the time being considered a bit more High Brow, and the Sierra was well enough loved in the UK, despite being as ugly as it is. But we all know that what is loved in the EU is rarely as well regarded across the pond. Maybe Miata’s and Porsche’s are the exception.
I guess the Shelby name and rarity since only 1000 or so were made in 1987 makes me want that thing a bit more, though I would definitely be shopping new rims day one.
“The gold Shelby Daytona wheels aren’t included; it will come with a set of stock Shelby Charger wheels.“
I’ve always wanted a Merkur, but no slush boxes for me. I’ve also wanted the Shelby, so this is a no-brainer.
I voted for the Merkur because a Sierra was the car star of Dept Q.
The Merkur, along with the Pontiac Grand Prix ASC, were my two childhood dream cars. You know which way I voted on this poll.