We’ve already looked at one turbocharged coupe from the ’80s this week, and it did really well, so I’ve found two more for your consideration today. One of these you’ll probably think is driven by the wrong wheels, and the other definitely has the wrong transmission. But I have to work with what I find.
Yesterday, I found a couple of old inline-six trucks that both ran well, despite their appearances. This was a close vote, but in the end, the Ford van won. It was the slotted mags that put it over the top, wasn’t it? Still one of my favorite wheel styles of all time. Someday I will have a car wearing them.
However, when it comes to these two particular vehicles, I think I have to go for the Binder. It looks more honest, and those B-series trucks have a homely, Checker Cab sort of charm to them that I find really appealing. Maybe I’ll drive it up to Sven & Ole’s Pizza, then swing over to International Falls. Yah.

If you wanted something to sound cool and fast back in the ’80s, you had to use the word “turbo.” Judas Priest knew it. So did Kyosho (and Porsche thinks calling a high-performance electric vehicle a “turbo” is something new). Computers had “turbo” buttons. And just about every carmaker would sell you something with a turbocharged engine under the hood, and for those that didn’t, aftermarket kits were ready and waiting. Both of today’s competitors came from the factory with turbocharged engines. One has had some modifications done to it, and the other desperately needs one specific modification. Let’s check them out.
1986 Merkur XR4Ti – $5,500

Engine/drivetrain: Turbocharged 2.3 liter OHC inline 4, three-speed automatic, RWD
Location: Cleveland, OH
Odometer reading: 90,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
I’ve never quite understood why this car existed. Ford already sold two other rear-wheel-drive coupes with the same turbo engine, the Mustang and the Thunderbird, both of which were cheaper than the Merkur. The only real functional difference between those cars and this one was independent rear suspension, and was that really a big enough deal to go through all the trouble of Federalizing a German-market Ford Sierra, importing it under an unknown brand name, and selling it through Lincoln-Mercury dealers? You’d have to ask Bob Lutz, I guess; apparently the whole thing was his idea.

Most XR4Tis were sold with a five-speed manual transmission, but this being America, an automatic was on the option sheet. It’s kind of an afterthought: Ford couldn’t even be bothered to adapt its then-new AL4D overdrive automatic to this car, and just slapped in the old three-speed C3. That’s right; this fine European sports coupe has the same transmission as your Aunt Margie’s Pinto wagon. Worse, the 2.3 turbo four had to be detuned to keep from blowing it up, and it lost 30 horsepower in the process. This one’s transmission has recently been rebuilt, but who cares? I don’t know how difficult a manual swap is on these, but I’d say it’s worth finding out.

Wrong shift lever aside, this one looks decent inside. There are a couple of cracks in the dash, but that’s not surprising on a nearly forty-year-old car. The seats are covered, and we don’t know what shape they’re in underneath the covers, but it doesn’t matter much. A pair of new pale gray racing-style seats are included but haven’t been installed yet. They’ll probably look very silly next to the automatic shifter, but they do look comfy.

There’s something a little funky about the front bumper of this car, though. In the first photo, it looks bashed-in a bit, or maybe melted, it’s hard to tell. And in this photo, it’s straight, but the gray finish is coming off. Was it damaged and then replaced with a junkyard bumper? Or is the damaged photo its actual condition and this one was taken earlier? Very curious. The rest of it is in good shape, though it could use a polishing.
1987 Dodge Shelby Charger – $5,700 Canadian

Engine/drivetrain: Turbocharged 2.2 liter OHC inline 4, five-speed manual, FWD
Location: East Hants, Nova Scotia, Canada
Odometer reading: unknown
Operational status: Runs and drives well
When Lee Iacocca was rebuilding Chrysler in the ’80s, he wasn’t shy about calling on old friends for help. Both Alejandro de Tomaso and Carroll Shelby lent a hand to create special versions of Chrysler vehicles. But to the best of my knowledge, the L-body Dodge Omni 024/Charger was the only car to receive a special edition from both of them: first as the barely remembered Dodge DeTomaso, and later as this car, the Dodge Shelby Charger.

For the first couple of years, the Shelby Charger came with a hot-rodded version of the same carbureted 2.2-liter four as other Chargers, but in 1985, a turbocharger joined the party, giving the stripey little Dodge some seriously quick 0-60 times, along with enough torque steer to yank the steering wheel out of your hands. This one has been upgraded even further, with Chrysler’s intercooled Turbo II engine, and some other go-fast goodies. It also has a new clutch and a new alternator. The seller says it runs well and is reliable.

Shelby put nearly all of his effort into this car under the hood; the interior is pretty much standard Omni parts except for the “CS” logo embroidered on the seat headrests. But the seats are comfy and the driving position is pretty good, so stop complaining and just go for a drive. This one is in good shape, and does have a few little modifications, including some additional gauges and what I believe is a short-throw shift lever. I seem to remember the stock L-body shifter being a lot taller than that.

It will come as no surprise to regular readers that I absolutely love the looks of this car. I’ve wanted one ever since they came out when I was ten years old. I’d rather have silver with blue stripes, but in this condition, red would do nicely. There are a bunch of photos in the ad of the underside, and it’s as close to rust-free as you’ll ever find in a car this age. The gold Shelby Daytona wheels aren’t included; it will come with a set of stock Shelby Charger wheels.
Turbochargers are a dime a dozen these days; every little three-cylinder engine stuck to a CVT has one. But back when these cars were built, they meant that a car was something special. They meant badges and hood bumps and special wheels. One was neutered from the get-go by a single box on its option sheet, and the other has been pushed beyond what it was ever meant to be. Which one would you rather have in your garage?









I am with Mark, I have always loved the styling of the “Charger” so it was an easy choice today. I think the Merkur with the correct transmission would be a much better car, but definitely not better looking.
If the Merkur was a manual it would have been a harder choice, but definitely the Charger. My friend in the Navy in the mid-late 80s had a black one with silver stripe and interior. Even this idiot that thought he needed a V8 Camaro (an 84 and I wish I had tried imports) thought it was pretty cool.
I always thought that the Merkurs looked really cool but a 3 speed 80s (OK 70s) auto in a car like this just doesn’t fit. I voted Chrysler despite my general anti Chrysler bias.
The Merkur is cool, even with the automatic. But that Charger looks to be in so much nicer shape. And the gold and red really works well on it. So I will vote for the Dodge.
I bought an ’89 Ford SHO that was two years old, and the seats were ALREADY degrading from wear. I have a pretty good idea what horrors lurk under those seat covers.
The included racing seats look cool. Why are they not installed yet?
Shelby. It’s angular. It has louvers and graphics. I’d be tempted to buy it if I were shopping right now.
I had to vote for the Charger. I know it’s almost a blasphemy to the Charger name, but it’s a stick-shift, and my dad worked at the Belvidere Assembly Plant (where these were built) for 30 years so there’s a decent chance he helped assemble this one. According to Wikipedia, there were only 1101 made for 1987 if you do not count the extra 1000 GLHS models sent to California.
When I got my license in 1991 I soooo wanted a XR4ti but they were $10k and my dad found a 87 Escort GT with 30k miles for $2,800 so that was the first car I bought. Saying that I just cant spend my fantasy internet money on a white automatic Mekur and went with the Dodge.
That Escort did teach me how much fun a front wheel drive manual car can be on twisty roads and as James May said “it’s more fun driving a slow car fast than a fast car slow” After putting more than 32,000 miles on it in a year, high centering 3 times and cracking the unibody it also taught me I’m a truck person first.
Would have voted the Merkur of it had a stick like others have said here but it does not so I voted for the “charger” if you can even call it that haha. Also I do love the style of these chargers it so such 80s wedge mobile it is awesome just sucks they are terrible (just like Daytona’s were hah)
If the Ford was a stick it would be a harder choice, race winning performance vs FWD style. But the autotragic makes it a win for the Mopar. Absolute rad kit
You guys need to add a third choice when voting: “Neither one”.
Despite it being the one of the two actual worst Chargers ever (second to only the ’75-’77, even though many internet trolls stating it’s the 2006+ sedans and the EV), I’m all for this Omni coupe! I freaking love 80’s Mopars!
I guess I’m in the minority here… I really don’t like the gold wheels. I’m not a fan of gold accents on cars and they look really off next to the gray/silver rockers/stripes.
If the Merkur had a stick, I probably would have gone that way. But the Charger looks in good shape and is cheaper to boot and – obviously – it has the proper transmission already installed.
Gold wheels look good on Subarus and maybe some Lamborghinis.
Exception: Those gold BBS basketweaves from the 80’s look good on anything!!
I never cared for the looks of the Merkurs. I might have chosen it anyways, if it had a stick. Torque steer is a go, I’ll have the Charger. They look really cool.
The weird turbo thing I remember from my 80’s childhood, is we had a turbo popcorn popper.
My younger brother bought an electric blue XR4ti. When driving it and flooring it to get the boost one could actually as lot see the gas gauge going down. It was a hungry thing. However I loved the double spoiler so my opinion is def suspect
I’ve always had a desire for both despite their flaws. But of these two, the slush box in the Merkur makes the Charger the obvious choice. Old turbo engines and automatics are a bad pairing.
I bet you can use mostly Mustang parts to swap the Merkur’s trans.
Time to learn how to do a manual swap. I have an irrational love of the Merkurs.
A-pillar gauges and “I’m not selling the car with the wheels that are on it” are two red flags that I don’t want to deal with this seller.
FYI, I believe the bumper “meltiness” is just the combination of very faded black plastic that is half-dry after a wash. Note to sellers: if you are going to attempt the “pictures while wet ruse,” don’t let the car get half-dry before snapping the pics.
Yeah, even though I was always voting Merkur, the “wheels” comment is a giant red flag for the seller. If the seller is this way in the ad, I can’t imagine it is better in person.
Instructions unclear, took pictures of car while it was submerged. Why is my car not selling?
Did you remember to adjust the f-stop? Ya gotta do that for the underwater shots or they come out too murky.
I really wanted to love the Merkur… but it absolutely has the wrong transmission installed. Had to go for the shelby.
Same!
I’m with the others. The wheels or no deal. But even without, the charger over the scruffy merkur. I always thought they just looked like an escort with a dumb spoiler.
I LOVED and really wanted both of theses cars back in high school. The XR4TI being a extra favorite of that era. But for the Shelby the manual clinches and IT HAS REAR WINDOW LOUVERS! how 80s cool.
What happened to that poor Sierra? Why isn’t it wearing the Blue Oval? And who slapped this horrible slushbox on it?
Maybe VW putting only automatics into the GTI is long-game retribution.
I really wanted that Shelby until they said it doesn’t come with the gold wheels.
Okay, confession time. When the XR4Ti came out, but before I heard anyone say the name, I thought it was pronounced ZRAH-tee. Anyone else?
Shelby but they’re including the wheels that they took pictures of the car with.
I want an XR4TI, but not an automatic. Shelby FTW this morning.