Home » The Buzzword Of The ’80s: 1986 Merkur XR4Ti vs 1987 Dodge Shelby Charger

The Buzzword Of The ’80s: 1986 Merkur XR4Ti vs 1987 Dodge Shelby Charger

Sbsd 8 28 2025

We’ve already looked at one turbocharged coupe from the ’80s this week, and it did really well, so I’ve found two more for your consideration today. One of these you’ll probably think is driven by the wrong wheels, and the other definitely has the wrong transmission. But I have to work with what I find.

Yesterday, I found a couple of old inline-six trucks that both ran well, despite their appearances. This was a close vote, but in the end, the Ford van won. It was the slotted mags that put it over the top, wasn’t it? Still one of my favorite wheel styles of all time. Someday I will have a car wearing them.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

However, when it comes to these two particular vehicles, I think I have to go for the Binder. It looks more honest, and those B-series trucks have a homely, Checker Cab sort of charm to them that I find really appealing. Maybe I’ll drive it up to Sven & Ole’s Pizza, then swing over to International Falls. Yah.

Screenshot From 2025 08 27 17 02 40

If you wanted something to sound cool and fast back in the ’80s, you had to use the word “turbo.” Judas Priest knew it. So did Kyosho (and Porsche thinks calling a high-performance electric vehicle a “turbo” is something new). Computers had “turbo” buttons. And just about every carmaker would sell you something with a turbocharged engine under the hood, and for those that didn’t, aftermarket kits were ready and waiting. Both of today’s competitors came from the factory with turbocharged engines. One has had some modifications done to it, and the other desperately needs one specific modification. Let’s check them out.

1986 Merkur XR4Ti – $5,500

00v0v Afvsekjcylw 1u8176 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Engine/drivetrain: Turbocharged 2.3 liter OHC inline 4, three-speed automatic, RWD

Location: Cleveland, OH

Odometer reading: 90,000 miles

Operational status: Runs and drives well

I’ve never quite understood why this car existed. Ford already sold two other rear-wheel-drive coupes with the same turbo engine, the Mustang and the Thunderbird, both of which were cheaper than the Merkur. The only real functional difference between those cars and this one was independent rear suspension, and was that really a big enough deal to go through all the trouble of Federalizing a German-market Ford Sierra, importing it under an unknown brand name, and selling it through Lincoln-Mercury dealers? You’d have to ask Bob Lutz, I guess; apparently the whole thing was his idea.

00u0u Alcu2fblgms 1u8176 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Most XR4Tis were sold with a five-speed manual transmission, but this being America, an automatic was on the option sheet. It’s kind of an afterthought: Ford couldn’t even be bothered to adapt its then-new AL4D overdrive automatic to this car, and just slapped in the old three-speed C3. That’s right; this fine European sports coupe has the same transmission as your Aunt Margie’s Pinto wagon. Worse, the 2.3 turbo four had to be detuned to keep from blowing it up, and it lost 30 horsepower in the process. This one’s transmission has recently been rebuilt, but who cares? I don’t know how difficult a manual swap is on these, but I’d say it’s worth finding out.

00f0f L96lvg4eyzg 1u8176 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

Wrong shift lever aside, this one looks decent inside. There are a couple of cracks in the dash, but that’s not surprising on a nearly forty-year-old car. The seats are covered, and we don’t know what shape they’re in underneath the covers, but it doesn’t matter much. A pair of new pale gray racing-style seats are included but haven’t been installed yet. They’ll probably look very silly next to the automatic shifter, but they do look comfy.

00w0w Irjcbrdatw 0ci0t2 1200x900
Image: Craigslist seller

There’s something a little funky about the front bumper of this car, though. In the first photo, it looks bashed-in a bit, or maybe melted, it’s hard to tell. And in this photo, it’s straight, but the gray finish is coming off. Was it damaged and then replaced with a junkyard bumper? Or is the damaged photo its actual condition and this one was taken earlier? Very curious. The rest of it is in good shape, though it could use a polishing.

1987 Dodge Shelby Charger – $5,700 Canadian

537638975 10172255560430302 6002433186865963075 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

Engine/drivetrain: Turbocharged 2.2 liter OHC inline 4, five-speed manual, FWD

Location: East Hants, Nova Scotia, Canada

Odometer reading: unknown

Operational status: Runs and drives well

When Lee Iacocca was rebuilding Chrysler in the ’80s, he wasn’t shy about calling on old friends for help. Both Alejandro de Tomaso and Carroll Shelby lent a hand to create special versions of Chrysler vehicles. But to the best of my knowledge, the L-body Dodge Omni 024/Charger was the only car to receive a special edition from both of them: first as the barely remembered Dodge DeTomaso, and later as this car, the Dodge Shelby Charger.

539202948 10172282167685302 4084393804480110185 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

For the first couple of years, the Shelby Charger came with a hot-rodded version of the same carbureted 2.2-liter four as other Chargers, but in 1985, a turbocharger joined the party, giving the stripey little Dodge some seriously quick 0-60 times, along with enough torque steer to yank the steering wheel out of your hands. This one has been upgraded even further, with Chrysler’s intercooled Turbo II engine, and some other go-fast goodies. It also has a new clutch and a new alternator. The seller says it runs well and is reliable.

537697245 10172282167735302 8930275822517066216 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

Shelby put nearly all of his effort into this car under the hood; the interior is pretty much standard Omni parts except for the “CS” logo embroidered on the seat headrests. But the seats are comfy and the driving position is pretty good, so stop complaining and just go for a drive. This one is in good shape, and does have a few little modifications, including some additional gauges and what I believe is a short-throw shift lever. I seem to remember the stock L-body shifter being a lot taller than that.

536561795 10172255560240302 2228906395208989220 N
Image: Facebook Marketplace seller

It will come as no surprise to regular readers that I absolutely love the looks of this car. I’ve wanted one ever since they came out when I was ten years old. I’d rather have silver with blue stripes, but in this condition, red would do nicely. There are a bunch of photos in the ad of the underside, and it’s as close to rust-free as you’ll ever find in a car this age. The gold Shelby Daytona wheels aren’t included; it will come with a set of stock Shelby Charger wheels.

Turbochargers are a dime a dozen these days; every little three-cylinder engine stuck to a CVT has one. But back when these cars were built, they meant that a car was something special. They meant badges and hood bumps and special wheels. One was neutered from the get-go by a single box on its option sheet, and the other has been pushed beyond what it was ever meant to be. Which one would you rather have in your garage?

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
91 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
It's Pronounced Porch-ah
Member
It's Pronounced Porch-ah
6 months ago

I am with Mark, I have always loved the styling of the “Charger” so it was an easy choice today. I think the Merkur with the correct transmission would be a much better car, but definitely not better looking.

TK-421
TK-421
6 months ago

If the Merkur was a manual it would have been a harder choice, but definitely the Charger. My friend in the Navy in the mid-late 80s had a black one with silver stripe and interior. Even this idiot that thought he needed a V8 Camaro (an 84 and I wish I had tried imports) thought it was pretty cool.

IanGTCS
Member
IanGTCS
6 months ago

I always thought that the Merkurs looked really cool but a 3 speed 80s (OK 70s) auto in a car like this just doesn’t fit. I voted Chrysler despite my general anti Chrysler bias.

Melanie Fuhrman
Member
Melanie Fuhrman
6 months ago

The Merkur is cool, even with the automatic. But that Charger looks to be in so much nicer shape. And the gold and red really works well on it. So I will vote for the Dodge.

SlowCarFast
Member
SlowCarFast
6 months ago

I bought an ’89 Ford SHO that was two years old, and the seats were ALREADY degrading from wear. I have a pretty good idea what horrors lurk under those seat covers.
The included racing seats look cool. Why are they not installed yet?

Anoos
Member
Anoos
6 months ago

Shelby. It’s angular. It has louvers and graphics. I’d be tempted to buy it if I were shopping right now.

Anonymous Person
Anonymous Person
6 months ago

I had to vote for the Charger. I know it’s almost a blasphemy to the Charger name, but it’s a stick-shift, and my dad worked at the Belvidere Assembly Plant (where these were built) for 30 years so there’s a decent chance he helped assemble this one. According to Wikipedia, there were only 1101 made for 1987 if you do not count the extra 1000 GLHS models sent to California.

Last edited 6 months ago by Anonymous Person
Pat Battle-Ship
Member
Pat Battle-Ship
6 months ago

When I got my license in 1991 I soooo wanted a XR4ti but they were $10k and my dad found a 87 Escort GT with 30k miles for $2,800 so that was the first car I bought. Saying that I just cant spend my fantasy internet money on a white automatic Mekur and went with the Dodge.
That Escort did teach me how much fun a front wheel drive manual car can be on twisty roads and as James May said “it’s more fun driving a slow car fast than a fast car slow” After putting more than 32,000 miles on it in a year, high centering 3 times and cracking the unibody it also taught me I’m a truck person first.

Harvey Firebirdman
Member
Harvey Firebirdman
6 months ago

Would have voted the Merkur of it had a stick like others have said here but it does not so I voted for the “charger” if you can even call it that haha. Also I do love the style of these chargers it so such 80s wedge mobile it is awesome just sucks they are terrible (just like Daytona’s were hah)

Last edited 6 months ago by Harvey Firebirdman
JCat
Member
JCat
6 months ago

If the Ford was a stick it would be a harder choice, race winning performance vs FWD style. But the autotragic makes it a win for the Mopar. Absolute rad kit

Weston
Weston
6 months ago

You guys need to add a third choice when voting: “Neither one”.

World24
World24
6 months ago

Despite it being the one of the two actual worst Chargers ever (second to only the ’75-’77, even though many internet trolls stating it’s the 2006+ sedans and the EV), I’m all for this Omni coupe! I freaking love 80’s Mopars!

FloridaNative
Member
FloridaNative
6 months ago

I guess I’m in the minority here… I really don’t like the gold wheels. I’m not a fan of gold accents on cars and they look really off next to the gray/silver rockers/stripes.

If the Merkur had a stick, I probably would have gone that way. But the Charger looks in good shape and is cheaper to boot and – obviously – it has the proper transmission already installed.

Last edited 6 months ago by FloridaNative
SlowCarFast
Member
SlowCarFast
6 months ago
Reply to  FloridaNative

Gold wheels look good on Subarus and maybe some Lamborghinis.
Exception: Those gold BBS basketweaves from the 80’s look good on anything!!

Shop-Teacher
Member
Shop-Teacher
6 months ago

I never cared for the looks of the Merkurs. I might have chosen it anyways, if it had a stick. Torque steer is a go, I’ll have the Charger. They look really cool.

The weird turbo thing I remember from my 80’s childhood, is we had a turbo popcorn popper.

William Domer
Member
William Domer
6 months ago

My younger brother bought an electric blue XR4ti. When driving it and flooring it to get the boost one could actually as lot see the gas gauge going down. It was a hungry thing. However I loved the double spoiler so my opinion is def suspect

Ignatius J. Reilly
Ignatius J. Reilly
6 months ago

I’ve always had a desire for both despite their flaws. But of these two, the slush box in the Merkur makes the Charger the obvious choice. Old turbo engines and automatics are a bad pairing.

Shooting Brake
Member
Shooting Brake
6 months ago

I bet you can use mostly Mustang parts to swap the Merkur’s trans.

MaximillianMeen
Member
MaximillianMeen
6 months ago

Time to learn how to do a manual swap. I have an irrational love of the Merkurs.

A-pillar gauges and “I’m not selling the car with the wheels that are on it” are two red flags that I don’t want to deal with this seller.

FYI, I believe the bumper “meltiness” is just the combination of very faded black plastic that is half-dry after a wash. Note to sellers: if you are going to attempt the “pictures while wet ruse,” don’t let the car get half-dry before snapping the pics.

SAABstory
Member
SAABstory
6 months ago

Yeah, even though I was always voting Merkur, the “wheels” comment is a giant red flag for the seller. If the seller is this way in the ad, I can’t imagine it is better in person.

Lizardman in a human suit
Lizardman in a human suit
6 months ago

Instructions unclear, took pictures of car while it was submerged. Why is my car not selling?

MaximillianMeen
Member
MaximillianMeen
6 months ago

Did you remember to adjust the f-stop? Ya gotta do that for the underwater shots or they come out too murky.

Grey alien in a beige sedan
Member
Grey alien in a beige sedan
6 months ago

I really wanted to love the Merkur… but it absolutely has the wrong transmission installed. Had to go for the shelby.

4jim
4jim
6 months ago

Same!

ToyotaTaxPayer
ToyotaTaxPayer
6 months ago

I’m with the others. The wheels or no deal. But even without, the charger over the scruffy merkur. I always thought they just looked like an escort with a dumb spoiler.

4jim
4jim
6 months ago

I LOVED and really wanted both of theses cars back in high school. The XR4TI being a extra favorite of that era. But for the Shelby the manual clinches and IT HAS REAR WINDOW LOUVERS! how 80s cool.

Martin Ibert
Member
Martin Ibert
6 months ago

What happened to that poor Sierra? Why isn’t it wearing the Blue Oval? And who slapped this horrible slushbox on it?

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
6 months ago
Reply to  Martin Ibert

Maybe VW putting only automatics into the GTI is long-game retribution.

StillNotATony
Member
StillNotATony
6 months ago

I really wanted that Shelby until they said it doesn’t come with the gold wheels.

Okay, confession time. When the XR4Ti came out, but before I heard anyone say the name, I thought it was pronounced ZRAH-tee. Anyone else?

StillPlaysWithCars
StillPlaysWithCars
6 months ago

Shelby but they’re including the wheels that they took pictures of the car with.

ImissmyoldScout
Member
ImissmyoldScout
6 months ago

I want an XR4TI, but not an automatic. Shelby FTW this morning.

1 2 3
91
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x