Home » The Ford Fathom Electric Pickup Will Cost $28,350, But Don’t Expect 300 Miles Of Range At That Price

The Ford Fathom Electric Pickup Will Cost $28,350, But Don’t Expect 300 Miles Of Range At That Price

Fathom Price Top

$28,350. That’s how much Ford’s all-new Universal Electric Platform-based pickup truck — which it is calling the Ford Fathom — will cost when it hits the market next year. This comes shortly after Slate announced pricing for its truck: $24,950. Which is the better deal? Well, it’s hard to know, especially since we’ve learned that its range will not be 300 miles as I previously thought.

Ok, right away, let’s add some destination charges. The Ford Fathom electric pickup truck comes out to $29,945, while the Slate costs $26,400. That’s $3,545 more for the Ford truck. Is it worth it?

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

I obviously don’t have an answer, since I haven’t seen underneath the Fathom’s camouflage and I haven’t driven it (I have driven the Slate; I found it charming). But I wouldn’t be a journalist if I didn’t at least conjecture a bit, and my guess is that the Ford will offer a decent bit more for the money. Not only will the standard Fathom almost certainly come with power windows, but it also gets an infotainment screen:

Available for pre-order in early 2027, the midsize electric truck, with standard-range battery, has a starting MSRP of $28,350* competing in the heart of the affordable EV market.

But the price is the least interesting thing about it. Projected to have more passenger volume than a Toyota RAV4, with a large, high-resolution touch screen, bidirectional power capability, digital key, as well as a frunk and bed for added cargo flexibility, Fathom seats five adults and is just as comfortable on a workday commute as it is on a weekend adventure.

Advanced technology adds value to the already well-equipped Fathom. Every truck is BlueCruise capable, and the Fathom’s BlueCruise integration with Apple Maps offers a more seamless on-ramp to off-ramp experience. Fathom is also Apple CarPlay and Android Auto capable.

[Note: The “the price is the least interesting thing about it” seems like an odd quote given that the price is the thing. -DT]

It’s worth noting that, later in the press release, Ford writes “It will also maintain compatibility with standard CarPlay and Android Auto.” I’m going to read that as those two being standard on the truck. Another, more important standard feature on the Ford and not on the Slate is four doors, which is pretty much a requirement on any high-volume vehicle in 2026:

Fordspy 5

Slate 8228

But here’s the critical question we don’t have answered yet, and that I myself kind of thought had been answered: How far will the Ford Fathom drive on a single charge? (The Slate will do 205mi).

The reason why I say I thought it had been answered is that, on Ford’s website, there’s a Q&A in which The Blue Oval says its plan is to offer 300 miles of range:

Q: Is the goal to extend range as far as possible on the UEV, or is there a certain threshold of range, say 300 miles, that Ford deems sufficient to balance cost and range anxiety?

A: Our strategy is to meet the expectation of some customers of around 300 miles of range. Instead of using larger, more expensive batteries to achieve this, we are focusing on extreme vehicle efficiency through aerodynamics, weight reduction, and energy management to achieve similar range with a smaller, lower-cost battery.

We all know Ford — and any automaker — can offer an electric vehicle with 300 miles of range; just chuck a big enough battery into it. But the story of the Ford Universal EV pickup is its starting price of under $30,000, so to answer that question by saying the goal is to hit 300 miles of range without pairing that number with another constraint made me think that the other constraint was implied — i.e. it was the $30,000 starting price.

Anyway, it appears I was mistaken. Per Ford, the $28,350 ($29,945 after fees) base Fathom is not expected to achieve an EPA-estimated range of 300 miles. If you want 300 miles of range, you have to pay extra. And we don’t yet know how much. From Ford:

We have said previously that some customers will want to see an EPA-estimated range of around 300 miles and we will have an option for that customer.
When I responded that I’m interpreting this as meaning customers will have to pay more than the base price for 300 miles of range, Ford confirmed: “That’s safe to assume.”

Fordspy 1

The truth is, I suspected $100-per-mile of range was too good to be true. After Autopian member Life’s Short; Drive Fast! commented last month about the truck’s features, I admitted that — at the price point ($30,000; I think Life’s Short; Drive Fast! may have edited in the $40,000 figure after the fact), 300 miles seemed super ambitious:

Screenshot 2026 08 05 At 11.00.52 pm

I guess my intuition was correct, and my reading of Ford’s Q&A response was not. In any case, this all leads me to wonder: How much range does the base Ford Fathom have to offer to be competitive? Or, put another way, how much does the 300-mile truck have to cost to be competitive?

Fordspy 2

Let’s talk about the competition.

You can buy a Nissan Leaf with 303 miles of range for about $33,000 all-in:

Screenshot 2026 08 05 At 11.40.52 pm
Image: Nissan

A Chevy Equinox EV offers 319 miles of range for about $37,000:

Screenshot 2026 08 05 At 11.28.00 pm
Image: Chevrolet

For under $39,000, you can buy a Tesla Model 3 with 321 miles of range:

Screenshot 2026 08 05 At 11.28.19 pm
Image: Tesla

A Chevy Bolt, at $28,995, offers a range of 262 miles:

Screenshot 2026 08 05 At 11.26.45 pm
Image: Chevrolet

And a 245-mile-range Hyundai Ioniq 5 costs about $37,000:

Screenshot 2026 08 05 At 11.30.36 pm
Image: Hyundai

But are these the Fathom’s competitors? I just named a bunch of crossovers/hatchbacks. The Ford Fathom is a small pickup, like the Ford Maverick Hybrid, a $30,000 gas car free from range anxiety and with basically the same base price as the Fathom:

Screenshot 2026 08 06 At 12.05.05 am

Ford has made it clear that the Fathom is not meant to be a car solely for EV enthusiasts; Ford has called the Universal EV Platform the company’s “Model T Moment.” In other words: This vehicle has to appeal to everyone.

If the average person has to choose between a 38 mpg Maverick and a 220 mile Fathom, are they choosing the Fathom? What if its 250 miles? 270?

Fordspy 3

I don’t have an answer. We haven’t even seen what the Fathom looks like, or all the features it will offer. If it’s extremely stylish and feature-rich, maybe I’d be tempted at 250 miles for $30 big-ones? Or maybe I’d drop the $35 grand (or whatever it ends up being) for the 300 mile variant, as that’s still a great price if the vehicle is cool.

Fordspy 7

But with such heavy depreciation on EVs, $30-35 big-ones goes a long way these days on the used market. Though I remain excited about this truck, it’s a lot to think about; when we finally have the base range and the price for the bigger battery, plus a look at the feature list and the styling, I’ll be doing even more thinking about the new, sub-$30,000 Ford Fathom.

Top photo: Ford

 

 

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
328 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mikkeli
Mikkeli
1 hour ago

I suspect I might in the perfect situation to choose between the Fathom and the Slate. My youngest kid will probably take over my ’24 Maverick in 2028. My ranch is 103 miles from my house. Ranch has power, but ideally I’d like to make it there and back on an 80% charge without having to do some charging (available as I have a 220v circuit for welding, would probably need to change the plug). I don’t need AWD or high clearance, but I do need reasonable front and rear angles to cross a dry creek (that may be the deal breaker: my 2wd XL maverick just barely works, and has some rear panel rubbing from when erosion makes it just a tiny bit steeper than expected). And: I am cheap. That’s why I am a maverick owner. Vast majority of my driving time is work commuting but probably half my annual 16k miles is back and forth to ranch (3x per month).

Mike Smith - PLC devotee
Member
Mike Smith - PLC devotee
1 hour ago

I think the Slate is safe. For me the “it has screens, and self driving, and car play, and stuff!” argument falls flat – I don’t want any of that. I want the option of *not* having to pay for all that – thus the Slate.
I also personally want 2 doors, not 4, but I can understand other people in other circumstances wanting 4 doors. It’ll be up to them to decide if they’re willing to pay ~$1500/door.

FastBlackB5
Member
FastBlackB5
44 minutes ago

There is no way I would trust ford not to: 1) have 10 recalls in the first year of this truck 2) not find a way to make sure the base model is not available 3) not use the tech they build in to harvest all the data they can to sell on while feeding me adds on the screens.

Right now, Slate says none of that is going to happen. If I had to buy one or the other, I would buy the open source non spyware version of small truck.

Long Tine Spork
Long Tine Spork
2 hours ago

Since the comparison with Slate keeps coming up, I’ll say the biggest advantage Ford has over Slate at the moment is that you’ll, presumably, be able to lease a Fathom and Slate doesn’t currently have that option. This could be a huge deal for someone who’s more monthly payment sensitive than overall price sensitive, as buying a base price Slate will run about $500/month for a 5 year loan and a 3 year lease will probably be under $350 (using a $30k Maverick as a stand in here).

328
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x