Cars are more often home to emotions than, say, a refrigerator. I’ve laughed to the point of tears in my car while driving my little sister to school, and I’ve shed tears of sadness after driving home from a breakup. I’ve found myself simultaneously in awe and fear as a Hellcat owner feels the need to punch it when the light goes green.
And I’ve felt pure joy as I photograph race cars just a few feet away from my photo hole as they shake the ground below me when speeding by at 200+ mph. I lost count of how many times I’ve mentioned my love for motorsports, but the truth is that I need to infect everyone with said love for all things competitive vroom, and my best way to do that is with my cameras.


As a combination photographer/videographer/cinematographer/whatever-the-hell-other-hat I’m wearing at the moment, I refuse to just tell you about how cool it is seeing a Stadium Super Truck fly over your head at the Grand Prix of Long Beach; I show you it.

I don’t just watch a modified Hyundai Ioniq 5 N charge up the turns of Pikes Peak, I take a shot of it at absurd altitudes without railings, with a background so blurry, it looks like the world itself is struggling to keep up with the car. And why not show you the intensity of 30-some NASCAR Cup Cars going by me at full speed?

I shoot this way in hopes to also inspire excitement for something I love as much as this, so that I can maybe see you at the track next year when the circus comes back in town for those three days. While I hope I do a good job of it, I got to see an early screening of the blandly named F1: The Movie, and I’m confident in saying it’s the new benchmark in capturing the emotion of motorsports, if not exactly the most amazing film you’ll ever see. Let me tell you about it:
The Plot

The story follows current GT3 racer and F1 has-been Sonny Hayes (Brad Pitt) as he makes his return to the self-proclaimed “pinnacle of Motorsport” with the fledgling team Expensify APX GP F1 Team. He’s joined by the young-talent Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris) as they strive to turn the abysmal backmarker team into one with a race win by season’s end. If they succeed, great! If not, they’ll be sold to some presumably evil private equity group that wants to strip them for parts and take away all the things that make them great, leaving behind only a carcass of the brand and new faces nobody believes in or cares about, for better or for worse.
On top of that, our story begins in the back half of the season, with only nine races left before the finale, adding extra bouts of urgency as the new teammates need to hammer out their relationships and engineers need to frantically develop upgrades to the car that will make them “ready for combat.”
If you’re someone who doesn’t know anything about racing, it’s a compelling enough underdog story that beats to a pretty familiar drum. To F1 motorsport fanatics, there are some things there that could make you cringe if you’re incapable of suspending disbelief. Here are just a few:
- Brad Pitt is 61, and the oldest real driver on the grid is Fernando Alonso, an astoundingly (relatively) old 43. Youth is your friend in F1, simply because reaction times degrade as you get older, so the old guys simply just get slower for the most part.
- The timeline is kind of fudged, meaning you see a handful of drivers in the film that straight up don’t race anymore (Sergio Perez has been gone for a year), or are on different teams now (Lewis Hamilton is shown with Mercedes, despite now being with Ferrari).
- “Our shot, is battling in the turns,” followed by “Who said anything about safe?” You mean to tell me you’re the first people to think of having better aerodynamics to assist you in keeping speed in the turns? That you’re gonna ignore fundamental safety rules in pursuit of bringing your shitbox to the checkered flag? Penske just got blasted into hell for modifying a safety structure on some of their IndyCar chassis, and it didn’t even give them a performance benefit. Be real.
- A GT3 driver jumping to F1 is pretty much the exact opposite of how it happens in real life, with Super License points alone being a huge issue there.
- Just in general: car modifications take a long time, and teams are lucky to pump out one big upgrade a year. For a backmarker to have enough money and resources to bring a dramatic upgrade so close to the end of the season is a bit hard to swallow.
But here’s the thing: I’m not an annoying F1 fan. The suspension of disbelief was pretty damn easy for me because the filmmaking was just so good.
If you saw Top Gun: Maverick, you’re already familiar with the work of Joseph Kosinski and his ability to capture speeds in ways you haven’t seen before. The production worked with Sony to build revolutionary camera tech that essentially removed the camera bits from its computer processing bits, leaving them with an incredibly small package they could fit virtually anywhere in a tiny fighter jet cockpit, providing the viewer with some jaw-dropping images.

With the same team coming back for this film, you’ve got a lot of what made Top Gun cool, just reskinned into a package focused on the global racing series that is F1. Tight shots of the drivers reacting to G-forces under a turn? Check. Wide shots that show the entire car and other drivers around them when they punch it up Eau Rouge? Check.

The sound is all there, too. When watching Top Gun in a Dolby theater, I distinctly remember my chair shaking as the jets really started getting after it with the afterburners on full… afterburn? This film scratches the same itch, with engines revving to kingdom come, massive whooshes of air when the rear wing’s drag reduction flap opens (the rear element folds flat instead of staying at its typical angle that provides the car’s with their insane downforce), and I particularly loved the pops you heard every time the exhaust backfired; something you typically don’t hear on broadcast or in person.

As someone who watches almost every race of the different series I follow and shoot at, some of the shots weren’t incredibly revolutionary to me. In particular, the helmet-mounted cameras I’m fairly sure were introduced at Monaco in ‘23 with Charles Leclerc didn’t feel fresh. Does that mean it’s a boring angle? Not at all; my jaw was on the floor the first time I saw it during a broadcast, and the cameras in the film are significantly higher fidelity, making it quite a bit more impactful as they bump and dart around. Stitched between those are shots that look directly ripped from broadcast, just with even higher-res cameras again.
In that case, it’s a bit of “if it ain’t broke” situation and it certainly ain’t. F1 is basically the gold standard of broadcasting and their audience numbers reflect that, however, Top Gun felt visceral because that’s a world so few of us get to see, shown in a way it’s never been done before, while large chunks of F1 are things you can see at any time across the 24 race weekends in a season. But that’s coming from a diehard fan of this. What does the average person think?
The Common Man

The screening I went to was at the IMAX Headquarters in Playa Vista, and I got an invite from a car club I’m a part of. It was put on by one of the fake F1 team’s real-life title sponsors, IWC Watches, and next to me was a man named David T. (I promise you it’s a different DT than our beloved DT), and we got to talking for a minute before it started. Turns out he got an invite from a watch club he’s a part of called Neighborhood Watch Club (clever name, I can’t lie). He’s an engineer by trade (I swear it’s not DT) who always found F1 interesting from a technical level, but he doesn’t know a dang about the sport at all, so I told him to politely shut his piehole and watch the film before I could ruin any of it for him, and that I’ll be talking to him afterwards. Here’s what he had to say:

“That was intense. Oh boy.” Exactly, David! You get it! What else? “Seeing the intensity, the driving, and the skills, the adrenaline. Yeah, it was pretty exciting.”
I know he thought that, because there were several moments I watched him recoil in his seat and chuckle at some of the frames on display in the more action-heavy moments.
“It was a good introduction. I’ve long been curious about seeing the race in Long Beach, but I always miss it.”
Ignoring the fact that Long Beach is IndyCar and not F1, the point remains that David actually wants to go see a race now, meaning this film is enough of a proof of concept for racing as a whole to the average viewer, and I think that’s an accomplishment in its own right. My roommate, who is actively, annoyingly, anti-car/racing, enjoyed most of the spectacle as well (although he rightfully raised concerns about F1’s rampant wealth and all the Middle Eastern oil-money sportwashing that’s on full display).
I guess I’m bringing up David and my roomie to say that this movie is good enough for the average viewer to have fun and maybe even spend some of their hard earned money to see a race in person, and it’s serviceable enough to longtime fans like me, who can forgive any inaccuracies and enjoy the movie for what it is. That’s no small feat!
To Conclude

I think the film got more right than it did wrong; not in the factual sense, but in the vibes sense. Do I find it weird that the beginning of the film has a scene of our main character holding a wrench while a fellow fictional driver is getting ready to fight him, knowing that just a few minutes later he’s gonna be sharing the circuit with real-life drivers like Verstappen and Hamilton? Yeah, it’s a little strange.
Do I think it’s a massive disservice to the accomplishments of women in motorsports by having the team’s technical director, Kate McKenna (fantastically portrayed by Kerry Condon, a fellow Star Wars alum/former coworker of mine) act as a love interest to Pitt’s Hayes? Yeah, pretty gross, maybe just let the fictionalized first woman TD in Formula 1 history succeed independently of a guy who comes in and does a bit of mansplaining and smooching.

Despite its flaws, I can say that I thoroughly enjoyed the experience, especially the Monza race that had me fidgeting with my rings and got my heart pumping as they dashed through the rain, or the acrobatic attacks from the APX GP cars against Hamilton in the final race that very much feels like a dogfight.
It looks and sounds great with a pretty darn good score from Hans Zimmer (but an original soundtrack that tows the line between serviceable and sterile), but suffers from a third act that overstays its weoclme and has a couple hat-on-a-hat moments to keep knocking the team down in ways that got old for me. But those are critiques from a former film industry worker, not from a racing fan.
My friends know my annoying simple movie rating scale that goes as follows: 10/10 no notes, for the exceptional films (Dune 2 is the first to come to mind); 10/10, some notes (Gladiator 2, wherein we know it won’t be as good as the first but saw some cool action so let’s move on); and 0/10 many notes (sorry Monkey Man, but you were an egregious waste of my time); and with that scale in mind, I’d have to give it a 10/10 some notes. I had fun but wasn’t blown out of my seat like I was with Maverick, and it didn’t say anything about the world, instead opting to be an escapist act that showed bright lights and fireworks blasting just feet above these tiny rocket ships. As for a traditional rating, probably a 7/10.
I think the only thing I learned from the night is that I clearly have no business wearing a $50,000 watch, which is further proved by the loose thread I had on my suit jacket’s sleeve.

Shoutout my friend Stephanie and her team’s work in the editing department of this film, and a huge recommendation for the show Snowfall if you wanna see the beginning of Damson Idris’ career. Phenomenal show.
They should have added a fuel line that will hold an extra gallon of gas for a true competitive advantage
We need to bring you on as the tech advisor on the next one because you get it
Thanks for the review Griffin. I’ve never been much of an F1 fan (Netflix helped as does having an acquaintance in SportsCar / Endurance racing) but I may just go see this in the theater now instead of waiting for it on streaming. As a more casual motorsports fan, the trailers have looked great, even if the premise is a tad bit far-fetched. I think for most of the country it will be a very good, if not great “Summer Blockbuster”. Nice watch!
Thanks for reading! Highly recommend you and the sports car friend see it; y’all would probably get a kick out of it. And once again, it was a pleasure meeting you in Kansas!
I had considered seeing it in theaters, especially after confirmation that the sound is well-done, but…. 2.5 hours. I just don’t see how it needs to be this long, especially as it starts halfway through the season. Will definitely stream it with the volume up.
Yanno, I never actually looked up the runtime, but I’m not surprised to hear it, considering how long that third act felt to me. Cut anywhere from 15-30 minutes off and we’re FLOATING!
Great write up, I got to see an early screening last week and knew going into it this won’t be a movie for F1 fans, but seeing it in IMAX was a good reminder of the magic of a summer blockbuster. If you are willing to hand-wave at the logistics a bit, and get to see it in theaters, I think it was worth the trip.
Agreed on all fronts! Next review, I’m passing you the torch (the object, not the man).
What an honor! I know for certain I am not qualified to handle Torch, lets leave that to the professionals, but I like movies.
I got to see it early thanks to Dolby in one of their certified theaters and I agree that it is probably better to see on the big screen with big sound. The cinematography was excellent and seeing the F1 cars on such a grand scale really put you into the action even if the plot is old as ever. You know old guy gets second chance, finds love along the way, and there is always a bad guy who gets foiled. I put my car guy, racing lover, and trackday enthusiast hat to the side and just enjoyed it for what it was.
I know Griffin wears a lot of hats—well, so maybe it’s mean of me to suggest that he write more. I really enjoyed this. I’d be happy to read more of his writing.
Thanks Doc Funk! I definitely want to/plan on writing more; just got 400 gigs of videos to edit from the taxi trip first…
At least we won’t have to wait for Jason to do it on a Timex-Sinclair.
Very much agreed!
I can talk about this now, but I was sworn to secrecy when I found out about it last summer. A young man who grew up around the corner from us and was a boyhood best friend of my son had something of a role in this movie, both behind the scenes and (very briefly) in front of them. He works for a GT3 team and was asked to provide techincal assistance during filming. This turned into something rather interesting – he wound up being taken via helicopter to a remote desert location in the pre-dawn hours to give Brad Pitt a complete background on the dynamics and characteristics of a GT3 car. He also appears very briefly on-screen as a member of the infield pit team. I’m looking forward to seeing his cameo.
RAD!!!
If you ain’t first, you’re last.
The final word on racing films. I can quote most of that film by heart on account of how much I used to watch it as a kid
I have only a passing knowledge of F1 (a lot thanks in part to Netflix) but love cars. I can skip all the tedious imperfections and just enjoy a movie*. (But yeah, a 60 year old driver??)
*= lots of practice as a Star Wars fan.
Huge Star Wars guy here as well so I’m used to swallowing some pills. The sequels though…not so sure I can swallow all that
Just skip the red ones and the sequels go down a lot easier
If we’re being honest, the one I watch most these days is The Rise of Skywalker out of sheer bewilderment that they made such a bad film. At least once a year, I go “there’s no way it was actually that bad, right?” Then, a couple of hours later, I turn my TV off and say “nope. They really. made something that bad”
You mean they outdid Jar Jar in the Phantom Menace?
Hey Jar Jar was good fun as a kid! Albeit fun that you realized as you grew up was a rather racist caricature of Jamaicans and Patois
Yeah, I think they managed to unify the fan base by making a movie that all of us could agree was absolute trash
Okay Griffin, but how does it compare to Rush? The 2013 version about James Hunt and Nikki Lauda. That’s pretty much the only racing movie my wife has enjoyed, and I’m at least 40% sure it wasn’t just because of Chris Hemsworth.
You can probably predict that by answering this question: does your wife fancy Brad Pitt?
I admit I was more into Alexandra Maria Lara (the secretary in Downfall) than everyone else.
Still, Rush is by far the best racing movie. Not that it’s hard to achieve.
It’s been a long time since I’ve seen Rush, but I can say, without a doubt, that Rush is a better film overall. I think that has a real story to it with high emotions the entire way through, fully realized characters, and an aesthetic that scratches a 70s itch beautifully. The only place where F1 is better is in the technical; the way they shoot the cars at full speed with the new camera tech. I don’t remember Rush lacking in that department, but it’s just clear that F1 focused on visuals more than anything!
Despite my original expectations, I was beginning to look forward to watching this after reading your review. Until I came to the point where you gave “Gladiator II” a 10/10 with notes. Sorry, but our movie tastes are different after all.
LOL my take on Gladiator II is definitely different than most! I just had zero expectations going into it (I also think the first is a teenyyy bit overrated, but still awesome), and it met my expectations of seeing gladiator matches, so why would I complain? And the boat sequence in the coliseum? Hate to say it, but that was pretty rad in my opinion.
I, too find the first part slightly overrated, especially as regards the opening battle. But GII was just a lot more of the bad, with not enough more of the good.
If Hollywood is on the cusp of a motor racing movie trend (probably not) I think WRC leaves a lot more on the table for screen writers to riff on – jumps, crashes, exotic globe-hopping, driver/co-driver comradery (who actually swing a wrench, often in the field), janky fixes and crowd assists.. Not to mention innovative cheating (if we’re throwing back to the 90’s heyday) its all there for the picking! Now get to it!
Group B movie coming when?!
So, basically a 2-hour F1 commercial with a massive budget was adequate overall, but with major plot flaws?
Huh, whoda thunk?
It is a nice write-up and great photos, though 🙂
I wouldn’t necessarily say plot flaws as much as hand-waving to the plot. It’s not like there were story lines that weren’t tied up, leaving holes throughout it, but just ignoring the realities of how a backmarker team staring down the barrel of investors somehow becoming a success story in just a couple of weeks.
But yeah, a 2-hour commercial no doubt. Looked great though!
It’s always seemed to me there’s basically a single racing movie storyline, just with variations on the theme.
1) racing is hard, 2) it will cause problems with your outside-of-racing relationships, including with your safety, and 3) you should ruminate on this, but ultimately choose racing b/c 1).
They range from audience friendly (like clearly this one) to almost offputting (Le Mans), but it’s hard to do one that’s not this.
Here’s my spoiler free response: 1) yes, but it’s moreso racing is addicting despite it’s danger so I’m an adrenaline junky who gotta go fast, and 2) Hayes is kinda just a jackass without friends. It’s not that we see him struggle with relationships; he just didn’t have any. I’d say that’s probably more of the reality of it being an F1 showcase that tries to show spectacle as opposed to a movie that wants to give us fully fleshed, three-dimensional characters with exhaustive story arcs.
this review made me wonder if it’s a modern remake of john frankenheimer’s “grand prix” (1967)…and down the rabbit hole i went!
ya, not a bad analogy…
Perhaps the overall best of the genre. I still enjoy that it originally had an intermission!
I still need to see it! It seems like the way they shot a lot of the races in F1 are super in line with how they did it in Grand Prix. Only difference is the gear is (objectively) better now and can do insane whip pans during the fastest shots without intruding on the car’s overall aerodynamic profile, but something about the ingenuity needed to get those shots back then gets me PUMPED
they rigged up an f1 car as a trailer and towed jack garner behind a gt40 driven by chris amon. (garner used amon’s helmet graphics in the movie).
same gt40 camera car to get high speed action from behind the f1 cars … nothing else at the time was fast enough.
i’m looking forward to seeing ‘f1 the movie’ this summer, think i’m gonna have to spring for imax.
As someone who just got into F1 in the past year I’ve been worried the film would have too much dramatic effect cringe and not enough real action. Sounds like it might be worth a watch after a few drinks.
As an on again, off again fan of F1 since the mid-90s, the sport has had enough cringe-worthy drama over the years to make the Kardashians blush.
My biggest concern with the movie, and the part I’ll struggle with the most while watching it, is having someone over the age of 40 racing competitively. It isn’t that, in theory, someone that old (which I say as someone older than that) couldn’t race competitively, but rather the fact that no F1 team would be willing to risk their brand, reputation, and finances on it (and teams have been upfront and shockingly blunt about that fact over the years).
At the beginning of the ground effect regulations, Alonso definitely made the 40s look good when the Aston Martin was doing well, and Hamilton has obviously done well into his late 30s (obviously has slipped in this era/with Mercedes), but Pitt is 61. When this started filming, he would’ve been 58/59. That’s…old for this world, no doubt. But that being said, they never say his age in the film to my memory, so maybe he’s just a really poorly aged 33 year old!
Hey, Pitt’s still young by the standards of network late night hosts or presidential candidates.
Hell, I went stone-cold sober and had a good time! I don’t think it overdoes a lot of action-y things (this scene from last year’s Vegas Grand Prix was hated on ahead of time but was cut), I don’t think it was parody levels of “I’m Speed Racer, I gotta go fast” either. There are definitely parts in the beginning where you’ll think “hey, this guy would be black flagged into oblivion,” but it works super well in the narrative and is exciting, so I forgive it.
I have a question.
Does Griffin Riley look like the easiest person in the world to get along with to you too? I hope I meet him someday.
The perfect personification of Chill?
I heard he bites
Perhaps, but he sure doesn’t look like it. I still bet I’m correct.
Wouldn’t that be Adrian?
That tracks! I rumored he’s my father who went out to get cigs one day…
That’s a strange rumor to start. “I rumored…” I might have chosen Superman or Jesus because I brag hard.
Isn’t typing on phones fun?
It appears you have been weighed, measured, and found to be likable. You should probably write your parents a Thank You letter for that smile. 🙂
Yes, but I heard they’re love bites.
(Came up with a better one)
From someone who just recently had a great conversation with him, you are absolutely correct. Without a doubt, Chill.
I just…can’t. I know it’s just a film. I know. I’m sure it’s visually stunning.
But the premise of a legit old guy entering F1 and turning a fictional Minardi into a race-winner in nine races by sheer grit…no. Sorry. Can’t do it.
Totally understand! That’s unforgivable for many, and I don’t knock them at all for it. I think its popcorn-y blockbuster nature is good enough to justify seeing, but there’s two caveats: I was invited to a screening so I didn’t pay for a ticket, and even if I went to see it on my own, I have AMC A-list so I wouldn’t reallyyy be paying for it anyways. If I already had a bunch of gripes and had to spend ~30 bucks to see it? Maybe a different conversation.
A decent review. Well written enough it made me consider actually going to a theater to see it. That passed though, and I’m confident I will get around to this move a year or so after it comes out. Thats my SOP anyway.
It’s a perfect streamer or airplane movie, no question about that!
Going to see this in the theater on Saturday at the suggestion of my wife – she has become at least a casual F1 fan thanks to the Netflix series – so I skipped some of the synopsis here to avoid spoilers. It’ll be the first movie I’ve seen in a theater in quite a while but we figured this one deserved a giant screen and sound system.
I’m a huge gearhead but not a big nerd for F1, and I really enjoyed TG Maverick, so I’m sure I can give the inaccuracies a pass for the sake of supporting a motorsport related movie. Car movies are often horrible.
It’s well worth seeing in a theater on a big screen! My advice, if you can swing it, is to hit up a more premium showing. It’s a big screen movie, no doubt, so theaters is better than a small screen at home, but if you go to a bigger screen like IMAX, Dolby, or Prime (AMC’s take on IMAX, assuming there’s an AMC by you), I’d go for that. A lot of sequences shot on IMAX really make it more immersive with a screen bigger than you can turn your head.
We’re seeing it on Primax at AMC.
Good choice! I hope you enjoy it
OK, so conversely, if you love aircraft but got sick of Maverick after 15 minutes and turned it off…will this have the same effect if you love cars? 🙂
(I think the answer is no, I just wanted to Hipster Flex on everyone by sharing that I hated Maverick. I loved Ford v. Ferrari and even Gran Turismo. )
Hating Maverick is a crime around these parts, and I don’t know if I can forgive you Ash!!!
All seriousness, FvF is great, and while Gran Turismo wasn’t my favorite, I think its chief accomplishment is showing how long a second is in racing when they had the antagonist’s car a few seconds ahead on the Mulsanne Straight going 220+ and the camera holds for our protagonist to pass all that time later. Great shot still to this day that I haven’t seen done better to this day!
Oh. I think the opening act of Maverick is by far it’s worse moment, it gets better further on. Not that you don’t have to continually suspend disbelief (“we can’t use stealth planes because of GPS jamming!” “Sir, don’t we install millions of dollars worth of extremely high precision inertial guidance equipment for like, this exact situation?” “Dammit Jenkins, you’ll never make Captain with that sort of talk!”) but it gets and stays pretty fun.