Is it just me, or does Ferrari have a bit of a desirability problem right now? The cars are objectively astounding, yet there’s lots of controversy and depreciation to go around. The love/hate proposition of the 849 Testarossa, surprisingly low resale values for the SF90 Stradale, the bits of plastic trim on the 12Cilindri, the fact that the flagship F80 hypercar only features a V6 … for a second, it felt like Ferrari had lost its object-of-desire touch, but the Amalfi Spider shows that the Modenese company still knows how to do it.
If you aren’t familiar with the Ferrari Amalfi, that’s okay, it’s basically just a heavy update of the Roma grand tourer. Think less braceface and a little more … Prelude or Prius. That’s not to say electrification plays a role here, as you still get a thumping twin-turbocharged V8 under the hood, but instead a revised front end that looks more generic yet far cleaner. Indeed, a lot of effort seems to have gone into tidying things up, from cleaner taillights to removing the weird slab of black plastic on the Spider’s trunk lid. The end result is simply beautiful, almost carrying a whiff of 275 GTB4 NART Spider. You just know that this grand tourer had devilishly handsome ancestors.
Spacer

However, you know what makes grand touring even more special? The open air. That’s why the Amalfi Spider keeps a largely vestigial pair of rear seats but swaps a tin top for fabric. Ferrari claims this five-layer Z-fold top offers the best of both worlds, stowing below deck in 13.5 seconds while offering the same sort of top-up noise insulation as a folding metal roof. Best of all, it only measures 8.67 inches thick when fully folded, which keeps the silhouette low and allows for a modest amount of cargo space in full sunshine mode. Okay, 6.07 cu.-ft. isn’t a great deal of space, but it does beat out the top-down capacity of the Aston Martin DB12. Plus, if you don’t want to ruffle your coiff too much, a motorized wind deflector can extend from the rear seat backrest. Nice.

Inside the Amalfi Spider, the big news is that, like in the coupe, buttons are back. Ferrari rightfully caught some flak a few years back for going capacitive-touch with things like their start buttons and general steering wheel controls, so now we’re in the midst of a rightful course correction. Okay, the new center stack is still screen-heavy, but everything else you twiddle is a button, switch, or knob. It’s the sort of craftsmanship you’d really expect from an exotic grand tourer, really.

Of course, usability and the promise of a hushed cabin often aren’t the reasons people buy Ferraris. That would be power, and the Amalfi Spider is right on track. Its 3.9-liter twin-turbocharged flat-plane crank V8 gains 20 horsepower compared to the variant in the preceding Roma Spider, and Magna’s familiar eight-speed, dual-clutch transaxle helps balance weight distribution while clicking off blink-and-you’ll-miss-it shifts.

Ferrari claims zero-to-62 mph in 3.3 seconds, suitably rapid stuff. At the same time, a combination of adaptive dampers, an electronically variable limited-slip differential, Ferrari’s latest stability control system, and clever aerodynamics complete with an active wing, promises to keep things composed when blasting up a mountain range. After all, this is a grand tourer, and grand touring often comes with bumps, slick patches, and unexpected gravel.

So, what we have here is a grand touring cabriolet that’s potent, more user-friendly than before, and simply gorgeous. On paper, the Ferrari Amalfi Spider ticks all the boxes. It’s a Ferrari dripping with desire, and considering how controversial recent models like the 849 Testarossa have been, this infusion of want is exactly what the company needed. Expect the Amalfi Spider to go on sale early next year, although don’t expect a bargain. The Amalfi coupe already starts at $266,810, and dropping the roof will likely only raise the price.
Top graphic image: Ferrari









Not sure I’ve liked a Ferrari’s looks since maybe the 458? And the FF?
Even if it looks like other cars… it’s the best looking Ferrari in decades.
Too. Many. Models. They need to sell _at most_ three or four at any given time.
It’s very pretty, but it looks like a Jaguar not a Ferrari.
The front end is right off the Prelude…which was right off the damn Prius. I think said front end looks nice on hybrid commuter cars and Toyota’s EVs and such…but on a $300,000+ exotic? Lol. Lmao, even.
They very much got the side profile right, I’ll give them that much. It has 550 Barchetta vibes…and I will die on the hill that that drop top is one of the most beautiful modern Ferraris. In fact it’s at the top of my “if I won the lottery” list. Don’t @ me, nerds.
Anyway what the fuck is going on at the back? It looks like a last gen F Type got a Brazilian butt lift. I can pick up a last gen F Type for like….$20,000 at this point. I’m sure the type of 1% freaks that buy these will be thrilled at that comparison…just as thrilled as they’d be with the Prius one!
Overwrought garbage. Get off my lawn. Ferrari lost most of their desirability when they ditched Pininfarina. I will continue to say they haven’t designed a conventionally pretty car since then, but that’s subjective. They lost what little was left when they decided to be the snootiest and most litigious car manufacturer on the planet.
I get that it’s sort of a legacy thing to an extent. Enzo was a gigantic fucking asshole. The superiority complex is deeply engrained and has been for generations. But when you get to the point that you’re serving cease and desists to the people that own your cars over wraps you’ve well and truly lost the plot.
I know that no one in these circles gives so much as 1/1000th of a shit about what me and my upper middle class bank account have to say about Ferrari, but I AM GOING TO SAY IT, GODDAMMIT!
Ehh I think it looks pretty good, but yeah, preferred the Roma styling. Usability wise new interior looks super nice. biggest issue I have with all the new Ferrari’s, having driven quite a few now for extended periods, is that the steering is quick and precise and nice, but in hard driving, it doesn’t load up at all, which is just unacceptable on a car of that price point.
Looks like the next gen F-Type
More than you can afford, pal. Fer-rar-i.
I’m not sure Ferrari has produced a car in the last 25 years I would actually be interested in. Which is fine, I guess, because I don’t have a hermetically sealed HVAC controlled storage location to place it. Nor do I wish to buy some other Ferrari model(s) to have the chance to buy the one I do want.
Nice thing about new Ferrari’s is the warranty is amazing. So if you actually drive the piss out of it, you really get your money’s worth.
It looks like a little bit of a lot of other cars, none of them a Ferrari. A swing and a miss…
The rear end, profile view, it looks…overinflated.
That car is on my very short list of “Win the Big Lottery” cars.
A fat MX5 Miata – sorry.
Looks like an expensive ND Miata.
All I can see in the front end is a Prelude. Every angle on it is great though, especially compared to a lot of other things Ferrari has been making recently.
I’m not understanding how this is markedly different from the Roma spider apart from the much worse wheels and more distracting front end?
It’s not
The main thing I’ve read is the change to real buttons and switches, which makes the every day use more enjoyable.
Someone please tell Ferrari they can just do that on every car without having to swap on Honda Accord wheels in the process.
Ugly hyper cars with automatic transmissions are why luxuriously priced restomods are accelerating in popularity.
You really think someone who needs a new car to keep for their condo in Monaco or Miami is going to cross-shop a ’69 Chevelle SS Restomod?
I think that the Kimera EVO37 would look right at home on the streets of Monaco, my guy
Ehh at least this isn’t stupid hybrid power, and has a lightning fast DCT. Restomods are their own ball of nightmares honestly, plenty of shitty fly by night shops as well, and the good shops charge a real tax.