One of the biggest problems with small cars in America is that, at least lately, small has meant cheap. And I don’t just mean inexpensive-cheap, I mean cheap-cheap — loud, unrefined, basic, primitive, hard-plastic-laden, etc. But for some people, a small car is the right car, and for those who don’t want to have to make big sacrifices to comfort, styling, and utility, there is good news: The Kia K4 GT-Line Turbo hatchback is here, and though it costs $33 grand, a quick drive in it convinced me it might be worth it.
There’s a reason why the Kia K4 sedan has become the brand’s second-best-selling vehicle in a country that doesn’t really love small cars: The car offers incredible value amidst an ongoing affordability crisis. The U.S. just doesn’t have enough inexpensive, good cars, and the K4 sedan fits the bill, with Thomas Hundal’s review’s headline reading “The Funky Kia K4 EX Is A Whole Lot Of Car For $25,165.”
Now imagine taking that handsome, inexpensive car, making it look even better, and making it even more useful. Say hello to the Kia K4 hatchback.
[Full Disclosure: Kia hooked me up with a night at a hotel in North Hollywood and basically forced me to stay there even though I live 30 minutes away. I’m grateful for it; it was quite cool. Also, Kia fed me some insanely good fried catfish. -DT]
What Is The Kia K4 Hatchback?

Kia is pretty thrilled with how well its K4 sedan is selling, and the hatchback is meant to build on that success by offering a new variant for folks who are “younger, more male, and more urban than [the] sedan buyer.” The brand had an entire presentation for us journalists, and as I am a huge fan of slideshows, I’m going to share some of it with you, dear reader.
The image above shows a pretty mediocre Venn Diagram, if we’re being honest (in that both circles each feature sporty and fun-to-drive), but that’s typical marketing; the point is that the hatch is supposed to be cooler, more fun, and more practical, whereas the sedan is supposed to be a bit classier. At least that’s what I got out of that slide.

You can see the hatchback’s unique bits over the sedan there in red — the roof and everything aft of the C-pillar. The K4 hatchback is 11 inches shorter but offers the same rear legroom, with an inch more headroom. Cargo room goes up over the sedan, too, as this handy table shows:

The K4 hatch comes in three fun colors and four boring ones:

And the interiors are actually quite cool if you go for the off-white or red options:

The base “EX” model (the other trims are GT-Line and GT-Line turbo) gets the boring black interior, and you sadly can’t get that base trim with gold exterior paint. What’s more, the base car and the regular GT-Line both get a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated 147-horsepower engine hooked to a CVT, while the GT-Line Turbo bolts a 190 horsepower 1.6-liter turbo four cylinder to an eight-speed automatic.

Only the base EX gets a torsion-beam rear suspension, whereas the GT-Lines offer an independent rear suspension that looks like this:

All K4s have a MacPherson strut suspension up front (see below); brakes are vented discs up front and solid ones in the rear, though the GT-Line gets bigger rears than the EX, and the GT-Line Turbo gets both bigger fronts and bigger rears.

Anyway, you get the idea. The Kia K4 hatchback is basically a more useful, sportier K4 that, like the sedan, appeals to younger people looking for tech and good looks. But enough of the presentation; let’s get to the review.
It Looks Fantastic

Kia had a bunch of “sparkling yellow” (gold) GT-Line Turbo cars sitting in our North Hollywood, CA hotel’s parking lot, and I have to say: They looked fantastic.
When the DRLs are off, I’m not the biggest fan of the nose, with its T-shaped vertical LED headlights, thin “Tiger Nose” grille between the headlights, and another gaping grille in black down below. But with the DRLs on, the design looks downright aggressive:

The rear and the side profiles, though, are simply sublime whether lights are on or off.

Here’s a clean look at just the gorgeous side profile:

The way the rear end narrows and then cuts off abruptly, along with the rather wide-looking haunches, it makes the car look like it’s driving 100 mph standing still (if you’ll excuse the cliche):


The only thing that seemed a bit off was that the gold paint looked blotchy:

spacer

Otherwise, no notes. And the inside was equally as nice.
The Interior Is Lovely, And It’s Got The Tech

Hopping into the K4 hatchback, I immediately felt a sense of delight. The two-tone steering wheel and seats are just fun, the ~30-inch display ahead is crystal clear, and overall, the cabin just felt airy and pleasant.


Check out the decent rear visibility:

The screens ahead of the driver show important things like speed, tire pressure, door-ajar warnings, fuel state, coolant temperature, speed limit, engine RPMs, and it’ll even pop up the image from a blind spot camera when you hit the turn signal. On the screen just off to the right side, ahead of the windshield washer stalk, are the HVAC settings, and to the right of that is the big infotainment screen:

It’s a nice, wide screen, and it offers a bunch of fun “display themes,” including Toy Story, Disney, Star Wars, Spider-Man, and more. Here you can see a little bit of the Spider-Man theme in our car’s navigation icon, and you’ll notice the Spider-Man colors used in the speedometer and tachometer:

Switchgear is limited, but appreciated, with a physical volume roller that works as both an on-off push switch and an up-down rotary volume control. HVAC fan and temperature settings are satisfying rocker switches, while physical buttons for the multimedia system’s home screen, maps, media, setup, and more are simple push-switches:

The shifter is a classic T-handle; it’s a bit of a waste of space, and not particularly elegant, but it’s easy to use. Also easy to use is the wireless charging pad ahead of the shifter (a wireless charging pad that actually works!), and there are two USB-C ports and a cigarette lighter thoughtfully placed ahead of the shifter:

The back bench is spacious; I fit my five-foot-eight self in there with loads of legroom and headroom; even my 6-foot-something friend Tommy (from TFL) fit with nary a complaint:

Spacer


Cargo space, too, was plentiful:

And I’ve got to give a shoutout to Kia for offering a spare under the floor:

I don’t have much to complain about the interior overall; it seems to be made of reasonably high-quality materials, there’s plenty of space for passengers, plenty of storage cubbies, and it’s stylish. Maybe I think the door panels are a bit bland when viewed from certain angles (note the heated and cooled seats and the heated steering wheel), and I did have the infotainment system glitch out and reset when I tried to change themes; hopefully that gets stored out before these ship to customers.

Now let’s talk about how the machine drives.
It’s Way Nicer To Drive Than I Expected, But It’s No GTI

The gold GT-Line Turbo’s 190 horsepower and 195 lb-ft of torque pulling about 3,300 pounds offered an excellent power-to-weight ratio, and thanks also to a good eight-speed automatic, I found that accelerating up to freeway speeds was easy and brisk.

Here’s a video of me putting the pedal to the metal, before settling at a nice, quiet, comfortable highway cruising speed around 70 mph:
I bet the 0-60 mph time is in the high-6-second range, which is solid, as is the car’s exhaust note. It’s nothing aggressive, but it’s at least there, and the car definitely feels a bit sportier as a result. But despite that nice acceleration and the exhaust sound, the truth is that the Kia K4 hatchback isn’t a hot-hatch, as became apparent when we hit the fabled Angeles Crest highway through the mountains.

Angeles Crest is a steep and dangerous twisty road through the San Gabriel Mountains, and though the drive reinforced the Kia K4 hatchback’s nice, quiet ride with limited road or wind noise, it definitely didn’t establish the car as a sporty machine. The suspension is soft in the corners, the transmission — even with paddles — often didn’t really do what the driver wanted it to do, and though the brakes felt strong and confidence-inspiring, the steering was just OK. Angeles Crest was probably not the ideal road if Kia’s goal was to emphasize the K4 hatchback’s strongest traits.
Still, it was good enough in the turns, and the freeway drive back featured plenty of potholes and nearby vehicles in traffic, and the car shrugged off the disturbances in a way that was genuinely impressive. Road noise, wind noise, other-car noise, road bumps — none of it stood a chance against what Kia’s dynamics and NVH engineers built into this little economy hatchback.

Kia had us journalists drive around the canyon roads about 50 miles north of LA near Palmdale, and though the K4 hatchback was far from unathletic, it was the refinement that kept standing out to me. “Man, this is a nice car,” I thought to myself.
Maybe it was because I thought I was going to be reviewing a $26,000 economy hatchback. Part of me wishes I had.
A Nice $33K Hatchback That Makes Me Curious About The $26K Base Car

Driving the Kia K4 hatchback GT-Line Turbo just made me want to drive the base “EX” model, because to me, it’s so much more impressive if an automaker can make a decent $26,000 car than if that automaker can make a good $33,000 car.
Here’s what Thomas said about the base powertrain on the Kia K4:
Prod the starter button with a foot on the brake pedal, and Kia’s two-liter naturally aspirated four-cylinder engine sparks to life with the aggressive normalcy of a gas stove. With 147 horsepower and 138 lb.-ft. of torque on tap, it doesn’t exactly provide swift progress, but the butt dyno says that the zero-to-60 mph time should be on the quick side of nine seconds, and the CVT does a pretty good job of keeping the revs low in most conditions. With regular port injection, it’s exactly the sort of engine a compact car needs, something that’ll get the job done without being too high-tech for its own good. However, there is definitely a delay between pressing the throttle pedal and accelerating from a stop, which makes it hard to take off from a light eagerly yet smoothly. If locals near you tend to drive like maniacs, you’re going to notice this initial flinch.
Initial lag aside, there’s lots to love here once you’re up to cruising speeds. The cabin of the K4 is reasonably quiet although not quite as hushed as a Honda Civic, the suspension is soft enough to soak up minor road imperfections but buttoned-down enough not to result in TV cop chase levels of body roll when you fly down an on-ramp far closer to the speed limit than the ramp advisory speed, and the pleasantly weighted steering is extremely predictable, if light on feedback. What’s more, you sit proper low, although the steering column could use a bit more reach adjustment.
It sounds good enough, and if you can combine a good enough powertrain with a nice overall design and good practicality at the low-low price of just over $26,000… well, that sounds good to me, even if Kia sees the hatch topping out around 20 percent of all K4 sales, with the sedan representing 80.
The Mexico-built K4 hatchback will hit markets any day now, and I bet it will be a hit internationally. As for the U.S., I have no idea. I hope people buy these, though fuel economy (28 MPG combined for the turbo, 30 MPG for the base vehicle) isn’t much better than a similarly-sized crossover, and I myself might prefer the Mazda3 hatchback despite its older cabin and bad rear visibility, as it offers a stick, and automatic models offer AWD at a similar price.
Top graphic image: David Tracy









The Autopian promised reviews of ordinary cars, and we get a review of an ordinary car!
Hear, hear, and thank you.
(I still prefer the Mazda3 and Civic to this)
Remember, I used to own a Postal Jeep.
I deliver.
I guess even robots can have bad days spraying cars.It’s weird how some colors just don’t go down easy but how that paint job got through inspection is beyond me.I used to paint cars for a living and that stuff sticks right out to me.I wouldn’t sign the paperwork on a car once when it got delivered because it had so much orange peel.The salesman and manager looked at me like I had lost my mind but the paint almost looked dull.I waited another 5 weeks at the time but I got what I paid for.I wonder if that dash layout is going to be a scratched up flickering mess in 4 years.
That c-pillar door handle is hot garbage along with the rest of the random shapes pasted in around it to presumably just fill in the space. Completely ruins the vehicle and makes it a non-starter for me.
One of my neighbours was complaining about this a while back. Her previous gen Prius was in for some work after a tree branch fell on it and she had a CHR loaner, that has this stupid door handle configuration. She said due to the height and awkward grip, her kids struggled to let themselves into the car, so she had to get out to let them in. Something that had never been a problem before. When I told her the new Prius is now the same, she looked disappointed and said she would not buy another in that case. Similarly, my wife and I had a new Prius ride share around Christmas, my wife even commented on how someone could be so stupid to spec that for an application that sees countless different users of different abilities, entering the vehicle every day.
I get it, the stylists think it’s a cool trend that all the 14 year olds will be talking about. Apparently 14 year olds are all walking around with $40K to buy a car. Yep, to hell with good ergonomic design to impress them, the real target market.
(unironically) I’m excited to rent one of these from Hertz in about six months.
Seems like a nice little hatch! It is pretty impressive for NVH to be that controlled in a mass market entry level hatch like this.
So did they have anything to say about the blotchy paint? That color is probably the only interesting one.
That’s totally a wagon.
Do we need Torch to provide judgement?
There is a wagon version that is a few inches longer but they aren’t selling it in the US.
That because we already have one!
The Euro K4 wagon has a manual transmission and a 113 hp engine. The hatchback is about a foot shorter than the sedan but the wagon is about the same length.
I think I saw one of these up on Stunt Road last week. Saw a gold wagon shaped Kia while I was heading up.
I like the concept and I hope it succeeds because 5-door hatchbacks are rare and this one looks pretty well executed.
Since style is a big part of this review, I’ll just put my two cents out there that everything aft of the C pillar is hideous. It’s better than the tragic ugliness of the sedan, but it’s still a sloppy avante gard approach and H/K does a lot of this “fling it against the wall and see what sticks” nonsense. It’ll appeal to some and that’s great, but it isn’t for me.
The big problem (perhaps the only big problem) with this car in any trim is the Civic hatchback. Both have a low-output base 2.0 with a CVT but I’d trust Honda’s to last longer. And at $30K+ the Honda’s hybrid system is quicker than the Kia’s turbo and will get far better fuel economy.
It does look really great.
I like it, and I would definitely prefer the blue or red, because that “gold” looks like pyrite, and I don’t love a yellowish gold like that. Toyota did a gold like that too and I hated Camry’s that color.
“Check out the decent rear visibility:” <insert picture of the bottom of a coal mine here>
Remember when the Dodge Magnum was absolutely excoriated in the reviews for outward visibility quite a bit better than what is pictured in this article? Pepperidge Farm remembers…
Hey a normal shifter! Would prefer this 10 times out of 10 over the windshield wiper twist shifter in the Tuscon.
Reminds me a bit of the first (Prius-based) Lexus hybrid. CT200h, maybe? I can’t remember alphabet soup names.
I’d still pick a Mazda3 or even a Corolla hatch over this.
Okay, I just had to pause reading the review to scroll down and voice my displeasure over the Kia PR department’s PowerPoint presentation.
Does they not have a graphic designer to polish up and format these slideshows?
On that last point there’s a sense of leaving a lot of white space around “powertrain options” only playing up what’s missing – no manual, no hybrid.
It’s a middle-school level presentation, honestly.
This seems perfectly fine, but the issue is that the other stuff on the market is better than fine. 30 MPG is fine, but 50+ in the Civic Hybrid and the Corolla Hybrid is better. A CVT in 2026 is fine, but others offer 6MTs, and if I’m being forced into an auto, I might as well get the MPG benefit of a hybrid. Hyundai/Kia reliability seems likely to be fine, but for the same money, you could get a Honda/Toyota, which offers better than fine. And lastly, the price on the upper trim is not fine. You are well within Civic Si territory, and if you argue for practicality, you are basically within Rav4 territory. I like the looks of the thing, but basically every competitor offers something this lacks—MPG, price, AWD, stick, or reliability.
Edit: a real spare tire well under the trunk is a big plus of this car.
Exactly – $33K will get you either a Civic Hybrid Sport (50 MPG) or a Civic Si (6MT).
I’ve sat in one of these, the Niro and the Sportage.
I have an amazing amount of hate for the touch screen digital dashboard. I don’t mind a digital info board, but I want knobs and buttons.
I walked away from the Niro because of that dash.
I was nodding along and almost ready to like this thing, until I saw the interior. Nothing but a huge screen for a dash and infotainment display?
No thanks. I don’t trust digital gauges. Analog gauges aren’t affected by things such as “screen lag”, there’s no FPS, and a bug or glitch in the computer won’t make them read incorrectly.
Call me an old fart, but I want 3 gauges to forever stay analog: RPM, Speed, and Fuel. Everything else I guess I can be idiot lights and computerized.
Are those three gauges actually analog, though? Even thirty years ago when I was driving a Dodge Caravan, when you turned the key to start up, every “mechanical” gauge would do a slow sweep from zero to full count and back down to the current value with engine now running. That tells me they were just mechanical data displays.
I even had the speedo needle get stuck behind its zero stop pin, which required a gauge cluster reset by doing a konami code thing with the ignition switch and maybe the radio buttons.
I’m curious if that turbo will be amicable to light tuning. Or if Kia didn’t leave anything on the table.
As a secondary note I hope this is just a good car bought by good people. It’s going to suck if it goes the way of the RSX, GTI, and BRZ where insurance rates skyrocket because it’s primary buyer is young men who will crash it.
I’m surprised at the comment section hate for the exterior on this. I think it looks great. It’s the only one with a floating roof of those its benchmarked against. Some see the window frame rear door handle as a gimmick, but I like what it does to the overall appearance and it doesn’t sacrifice functionality.
Speaking of function, does the front passenger seatback fold forward for carrying longer items? It’s a very useful feature that too many smaller vehicles skip and I’d like to see it called out more often.
IMO it’s a huge improvement over the sedan, even the details that are unchanged from the K4 sedan come off better as part of this more coherent whole.
The invisible rear door handle bugs me. Makes it look like it was photoshopped off the car. Whether here or in the new Prius, I don’t understand it and think it looks awkward.
Gives it a leaner look to me and at certain angles it makes it appear like a coupe. It’s not a perfect illusion but I don’t mind it.
“Check out the decent rear visibility” followed by a picture of massive D columns and a foot tall rear window.
How far our expectations have fallen.
We’re sadly at the point where having rear glass at all is something to be thankful for apparently.
Looks great, but no manual, no care. I really wish we still had the VW Golf/Jetta Sportwagens available.
Same.
Not sure if I ever told you about my brown manual diesel wagon I had. I had started writing a piece about the “Journalist’s Special”, but never got through it.
A good short chute run to get a solid feel for a vehicle is the 23 between Moorpark and Fillmore, CA. Also known as Grimes Canyon, starting is Fillmore is best since you are running uphill: 34.34195231894832, -118.9063508672795
Haven’t driven that one in years, but yeah, great road.
10 more hp but 400 more lb than my car. Guessing a lot of that is insulation (my car is pretty loud inside) and more safety stuff. And no stick.
Looks like my car, checks some boxes, but not enough of them. Pass.
Next car will be a simple “get me from A to B in as boring a way as possible.” {sigh}
Hooray for the hatchbacks! Maybe if the EU is still issuing tourist visas to USians next year I can try to rent a stick-shift model.
The Euro-market manual K4 wagon (it’s a bit bigger than the hatch) has a whopping 113 horsepower.