Home » The New BMW 3 Series Looks So Good It Might Just Save The Sports Sedan

The New BMW 3 Series Looks So Good It Might Just Save The Sports Sedan

Fabian Kirchbauer Photography

For several decades, if you only had space for one car and really loved driving, a sport sedan was the de facto choice. Athletic enough to thrill and delight yet pragmatic enough for the shopping run or the morning commute, these often stick-shift machines gave the whole family the experience of performance motoring, and the BMW 3 Series was often the best of the bunch. Now, things have changed. Families are getting into quick crossovers, much of the sport sedan field seems more bloated than ever, but BMW’s coming back for the crown.

Welcome to the seventh-generation BMW 3 Series, codename G50. This isn’t the electric i3, but rather a sharper, sleeker take on the familiar CLAR platform with turbocharged internal combustion power. Dimensions are up fractionally over its predecessor, but the layout of engine up front, differential out back, and a luxurious dash-to-axle ratio remain. Think of this as a heavy makeover of the 3 Series we already know and admire, just with more available power. A lot more available power.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

While a 330i with a two-liter turbocharged inline-four will be available, it carries over the same 255-horsepower peak output from the old 330i. That’s good for zero-to-60 mph in a claimed 5.9 seconds but that’s probably not what you came here for. If you’re buying a sports sedan of this sort, you’re probably more interested in the straight-six-powered M350, which drops the “i” and gains a larger engine designation than the outgoing M340i. So, is everything under the hood new? Not quite. Pull the release in the kick panel twice and you’ll be greeted by a familiar three-liter turbocharged B58 straight-six.

P90657776 Highres The New Bmw M350 Xdr
Photo credit: BMW

However, said B58 has gained a new turbocharger, reshaped intake ports and combustion chambers, and a whole host of tuning tweaks to produce a whopping 443 horsepower right out of the gate. That’s 57 more horsepower than the outgoing M340i while maintaining the same peak torque figure of 398 ft.-lbs. as the new car’s predecessor. Granted, a small portion of that peak power number comes from a 17-horsepower 48-volt mild hybrid system, but the end result should be rapid nonetheless. Thanks to a standard ZF eight-speed automatic transmission and all-wheel-drive, BMW claims zero-to-60 mph in just 3.9 seconds. That’s about as quick as an F80 M3, and there’s more to this new M350 xDrive that makes it curiously strong for an M-Lite-Car.

P90657689 Highres The New Bmw M350 Xdr
Photo credit: BMW

Like the previous M340i, a limited-slip rear differential is standard on the M350 for straight-line traction and, um, big skids. An incoming drift mode that BMW promises to push out via an over-the-air update should make it even easier to vaporize Michelins by sending 100 percent of torque to the rear axle, just like in an all-wheel-drive M car. Add in wider track widths and a revised braking system, and the M350 seems poised to haul the mail. There’s just one drawback: weight. The new M350 has a DIN curb weight some 92 pounds heavier than the previous-generation M340i xDrive, with the official figure landing at 4,100 pounds. That’s hefty for a compact sport sedan, but it’s also nearly 200 pounds lighter than an Audi S5.

P90657716 Highres The New Bmw M350 Xdr
Photo credit: BMW

Still, you might be able to excuse some of the weight gain because of the styling, a sensational adaptation of BMW’s Neue Klasse styling language. Admittedly, it is rather spec-dependent, as earlier spy shots on basketweave-aping wheels were a touch underwhelming, but the new 3 Series is certainly less fussy than the outgoing model. It adopts a clean down-the-road graphic in M Sport trims, with a trapezoidal lower grille nicely balancing out the headlight treatment. Speaking of lighting, those daytime running lights can be flipped between white and yellow, a neat little bit of personalization.

P90657715 Highres The New Bmw M350 Xdr
Photo credit: BMW

Around the side, the only knock here is a really stupid set of door handles. Electromechanical flush-fit handles might have a concept-car wow factor, but if they fail, it can be a headache to get into a car. Beyond that though, the surfacing is minimalistic and clean, with a toned-down interpretation of the sort of shoulder line BMW used to make. Really, the most visually contentious thing on the new 3 Series is the somewhat inelegant plinth on its trunk lid for the badge, but with surprisingly enticing mirrored taillights and functional quad exhaust tips, a small recess seems, well, insignificant.

P90657768 Highres The New Bmw M350 Xdr
Photo credit: BMW

Inside the new 3 Series, there are more things that will make you say “hmm,” starting with the latest version of iDrive. It features an almost rhombus-shaped infotainment screen augmented by a lower windscreen-spanning HUD, and from playing around with the system earlier this year, it’s much nicer to use than the outgoing iDrive 8.5. Absolutely bizarre-looking, but more user-friendly. There’s no longer an infotainment knob in the console though, so if you hate fingerprints, bad news. Beyond that, the steering wheel gets vertical spokes like the one in the i3 and iX3, essential controls sit in the console, and … oh man, why did they have to make the HVAC vents digitally controlled? Hey, at least the fabric on the dashboard and door cards has plenty of texture.

P90657696 Highres The New Bmw M350 Xdr
Photo credit: BMW

Minor quibbles aside, the new BMW 3 Series is looking like the strongest new generation in ages. Not only should it haul the mail and look reasonably sleek, it’s entering the market in a time of deep malaise. The new Audi A5 feels wholly unacceptable, the Mercedes-Benz C-Class is four-cylinder-only and creaks, the Genesis G70 is old, the Alfa Romeo Giulia is even older, and the Volvo S60 is dead. The G50 3 Series didn’t need to up the performance ante this much, but BMW’s engineers couldn’t resist. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Top graphic image: BMW

Follow us on:

Facebook
WhatsApp
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
158 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Data
Member
Data
1 month ago

The way that hood dips into the front, I would have to name this car Moe. Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.

DiscoPotato
DiscoPotato
1 month ago

I don’t love it, but I like it more than the last M3.

I saw the concept at Laguna Seca last month, those lights look better in person.

Cloud Shouter
Cloud Shouter
1 month ago

I believe you are right.

This would’ve made a great Pontiac.

Carbon Fiber Sasquatch
Member
Carbon Fiber Sasquatch
1 month ago
Reply to  Cloud Shouter

It really would have. I can’t unsee Pontiac now

4jim
4jim
1 month ago

yep it is even close to Pontiac red.

Robyn Graves
Member
Robyn Graves
1 month ago

Thomas, between this and the article praising the looks of the new boy-racer AMG car, I am starting to feel like Principal Skinner in the “no, it’s the children who are wrong!” meme…

Maybe I am just not seeing it, but this is… The flush, electric door handles, extremely angular face that clashes with the organic lines of the body, tall proportions with super-high beltline, origami-fold bumpers and faux-diffuser; this is almost every element I can’t stand from modern car design. The only thing it’s missing is someone from management to come along and say “it’s good, but can we make it a crossover? That segment is so hot with the 35-50 demo right now.”

Is it me? Am I hopelessly clinging to the wreckage of the past, refusing to see a glorious future for what it is? I do still think the DeLorean DMC-12 is a great-looking car, maybe it is just me…

Goblin
Member
Goblin
1 month ago
Reply to  Robyn Graves

It’s not you.

We’re getting old. I have friends that absolutely loved the iX the day it was announced, waited for months to get it, and can’t stop looking at it to this day.
And we otherwise agree on pretty much everything.

Commercial Cook
Commercial Cook
1 month ago
Reply to  Goblin

Same here… I am pretty much not saying anything when I am amongst people who are not enthusiasts and into older cars….

the other day people from work were staliking outside together about one of the co-woerkers new X2 and how “sexy”, “amazing” and “beautiful” it was.

I puked a little…

…me with my E28,E39,E38,E53 cars are like from different planets on what is looking good.

but still at least once a day I get a thumbs up from some dude driving by

Last edited 1 month ago by Commercial Cook
CivoLee
CivoLee
1 month ago
Reply to  Robyn Graves

“Wah, it doesn’t look like a car that came out when I was a kid!!!”

-any automotive enthusiast comment section

Robyn Graves
Member
Robyn Graves
1 month ago
Reply to  CivoLee

You’re as entitled to your opinion as anyone else, but in my own defense, I think I sounded a bit more reasonable than that.

Thomas Vanden Abeele
Thomas Vanden Abeele
1 month ago
Reply to  Robyn Graves

No no, CivoLee is right: every car that is released today is perfectly and beautifully designed, and any design you dismiss is because it just doesn’t look like the cars from your childhood.

CivoLee
CivoLee
1 month ago
Reply to  Robyn Graves

It’s not meant to be personal. But it feels to me like everyone has decided that everything created during the 21st century is hot garbage and will only get worse, and I am really getting sick of the constant negativity and looking backwards.

It’s not just on here. All over YouTube and Instagram, the comment sections are full of people crapping on every new design or idea. Just look at what happened when it was announced that the new Toyota Celica is planned to be a hybrid. Cue the comments of “why can’t we just have gas cars anymore”. For what? So they can make big noises and smoke to satisfy your need for spectacle to go along with the performance? Same thing with posts about the CFM Rise open-fan jet engine. “I don’t care if it’s more efficient; it looks stupid,” and GIFs of Jim Carrey gagging. And don’t get me started on music.

I get it, I don’t love the direction cars, aircraft or music have been going in since the 2010s or thereabouts, but I would rather find something, anything to like about those things as they are now, because like it or not, that’s what the world is now. I agree with most people that the current Honda Prelude is overpriced, but besides that it’s the 2+2 liftback the car market has been lacking for years. And I am hoping the new Celica will be like that, only at least 5K cheaper.

Last edited 1 month ago by CivoLee
Footballplaya3k
Member
Footballplaya3k
1 month ago
Reply to  CivoLee

I’m glad you brought up the Prelude; how are it’s sales doing?

CivoLee
CivoLee
1 month ago

I don’t have any hard numbers, but I haven’t seen any in the wild. That said, I don’t think it is price is helping, or the fact that there doesn’t seem to be very many for sale around here.

Toomanyfumes
Member
Toomanyfumes
1 month ago
Reply to  CivoLee

I don’t think I’ve seen even one myself, except in a showroom. I read somewhere that Honda didn’t expect big volume on them, so if that’s true they are doing OK?

Nick Fortes
Member
Nick Fortes
1 month ago

I see a woman in a blue one almost every day on my way to work. Its the only one I ever see lol

Ishkabibbel
Member
Ishkabibbel
1 month ago
Reply to  CivoLee

I think there are some trends in modern vehicles that are distasteful, many of them relating back to requirements that didn’t exist “back when” (like safety regulation).

I personally don’t need every new vehicle to be a timeless classic like a 66 GTO or 69 Charger. but when the roof of my classic car (which has 1” spring spacers) sits 5” lower than my modern daily (itself a sporty car) or everything weighs 1000+ lbs more than comparable vehicles from 30+ years ago, there’s some trends there that I can see people disliking.

Or if you’d rather look at the bright side, consider performance – I can buy an appliance from Toyota that will outperform most muscle cars in every measurable way, and that’s AWESOME.

Last edited 1 month ago by Ishkabibbel
Goblin
Member
Goblin
1 month ago
Reply to  CivoLee

Dismiss a well presented opinion with a snarky oneliner hoping it will work: Epic fail.

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
1 month ago

It has a butt crack for a face, and squinty anime angry eyes for tail lights. But I’m afraid the worst offense is that those will prove to be electric popout door handles. This car is just as ugly as all BMW have been for years now. Different, but still ugly.

Clark B
Member
Clark B
1 month ago

Counterpoint: no, it doesn’t, and no, it won’t.

Goblin
Member
Goblin
1 month ago

Literally every modern sedan and pretty much any non-beaver tooth BMW looks better than this, but yes, within BMW’s own world – it pretty much tastes like a sugar cube after a healthy cup of vinegar, design-wise.

PS: Equaling OLD to Worse in matters of car design nowadays is, errr, debatable. If a law was passed with immediate effect that every sedan going further on has to be a copy of the Giulia – I’d vote with both hands. Slippery slope here.

Last edited 1 month ago by Goblin
Dan Hull
Dan Hull
1 month ago
Reply to  Goblin

Yeah, this isn’t a car I’d pick as “beautiful.” On the other hand, it does have a sort of glorious invisible generic-ness about it… it may be the first BMW you can drive without people immediately noticing that it’s a BMW. I’d wonder if it was a new Sentra or Accord if I didn’t see the badging.

VictoriousSandwich
Member
VictoriousSandwich
1 month ago
Reply to  Dan Hull

Of course I remember when my wife asked if a 1990ish boxy Nissan sentra was an e30…so maybe this is a triumphant return lol

Adrian GH
Adrian GH
1 month ago

Well, if the Giulia is old, give me the old…
With so much electrics, i’d prefer the older models anytime

Nsane In The MembraNe
Member
Nsane In The MembraNe
1 month ago

The exterior design is pretty cohesive until you get to the rear. What in the name of god and all that is holy is going on here? It’s overly cluttered and needlessly aggressive. If this was a hardcore variant of the full M car I’d let it slide, but this is the M Lite. You get this trim because it’s more subtle and practical…and with how much these things cost by the time you get them off lots I imagine the average buyer could swing an M3 if they really wanted to.

The interior is a crime worthy of The Hague and the enshitification of BMW continues at breakneck speed. All I see is monochromatic blandness, way too many fucking screens, and an excess of cheap plastic. Much like with all current low and mid tier BMWs I imagine none of it feels any better than what you’d get in a higher spec RAV4, and probably worse than what you get in a higher spec CRV.

This isn’t luxury. I’m sure it’ll cost $75,000 out the door and be worth half that as soon as the warranty is up due to all the over complicated tech nonsense that can go wrong. 4,100 pounds is downright svelte by German standards these days, but it’s still too damn heavy. I’m really not even sure what the mild hybrid system adds other than complication, weight, and a negligible fuel economy improvement.

The B58 is already ridiculously efficient for how powerful it is. Anyway, this ain’t it, but BMW’s been dead to me for years. I’m sure if you get a decent lease on one of these it’ll be a great daily if you can live with the cyberhell interior. But like all German cars it’s designed to last exactly 4 years….through the initial lease and certified period.

After that? Auf Wiedersehen! Not BMW’s problem. Good luck with the two ton tech brick….

VictoriousSandwich
Member
VictoriousSandwich
1 month ago

Agreed on the exterior, was actually kind of liking this until I saw the back.

The rhombus screen has got to be the corniest bit of “different to be different” interior design, I wish they’d give up on it. I realize we’re never going back to nice analog gauges so personally I can kind of live with the slim strip screen for instruments up top at least in theory seems like an interesting approach to me that might actually be user friendly (unlike virtually everything else) Toyota did this on some of the earlier Prii. And of course my personal ax to grind that pseudo starfighter steering wheel is ungodly awful to look at and I have a strong suspicion whatever those button pod cluster things on the side are likely a usability nightmare.

FormerTXJeepGuy
Member
FormerTXJeepGuy
1 month ago

is the good looking 3 series in the room with us right now?

Arch Duke Maxyenko
Member
Arch Duke Maxyenko
1 month ago

That is the worst looking Mitsubishi lancer ever

Phil
Phil
1 month ago

Needs and EVO wing. Stat.

Protodite
Protodite
1 month ago

I mean wow does it look so so much better than what they’ve been doing. The front looks good, the back is a bit of a mess, and it just doesn’t scream of the elegance some of the E36, E46 and F30 had, but it’s MILES better than the G20 M cars that were just hideous

Edit: I missed the bizarre bowl cut looking brow above the lights-to-hood transition. I’m less enthusiastic now haha

Last edited 1 month ago by Protodite
Mike F.
Member
Mike F.
1 month ago

Just based on the photos, I really like the side view. Front is ok, especially for a current BMW. Back end is a bit much, as is the interior. Maybe I’m the only person in the world with this opinion, but I like having the knob control the iDrive. I can very easily get the menus and such that I need without having to look at the touch screen to make sure I don’t hit the wrong part of it, which I commonly do on our Accord. (I hate trying to get to a Sirius station on that car!)

And for God’s sake, 4100 pounds?

Dustygator
Member
Dustygator
1 month ago

BMW does not make sports sedans, and arguably hasn’t for a long time

They do make performance luxury sedans (very good ones at that). But that is not the same thing as a sport sedan and I’m tired of people pretending like it is.

V10omous
Member
V10omous
1 month ago

Man, I’m old enough to remember when “x50i” meant a V12.

Angel "the Cobra" Martin
Member
Angel "the Cobra" Martin
1 month ago

We have had several friends who bought a BMW and all of them sold and moved to another brand. The repairs were off the charts ridiculous. And, when you watch YouTube people who buy extremely depreciated BMWs, 2016 750i for example, with under 100,000 miles, it is amazing how much they fall apart. This seems to be an ongoing issue with BMW.

Mike F.
Member
Mike F.
1 month ago

This depends entirely on the BMW. I’ve bought used BMWs for the last 30 years, and had very good experiences regarding repairs. Get the wrong ones, though (the 7-series is notorious) and yeah, you are in for a lot of very expensive shop time.

Nsane In The MembraNe
Member
Nsane In The MembraNe
1 month ago

My parents know someone who bought an X5 and as soon as the warranty was up it magically needed over $5,000 in work. These things are designed to be obsolete as soon as the lease is over. BMW milks a few extra thousand out of them by selling them certified and having their dealerships due to unbelievably complex maintenance and repair work, then after that?

Buy here pay here lot. These things are junk. You’re 100% better off buying a loaded “regular” car than any new luxury car in 2026.

Clark B
Member
Clark B
1 month ago

Until about two years ago, there was at least one BMW in my parents’ garage for over 20 years. They’re now driving Porsches and Mercedes, with absolutely no consideration given to BMW when buying their latest cars.

VictoriousSandwich
Member
VictoriousSandwich
1 month ago

but but b58 lol

CoastieLenn
CoastieLenn
1 month ago

Looks good? Subjectively, peak 3-series was E46 followed closely by E39. This new klasse look is attrocious to my eyes.

MazdaLove
MazdaLove
1 month ago

Hundal, have you visited the optometrist lately? This expensive junk looks like an Alpha Romeo Giulia ripoff to me. BMW is lost, from a style perspective. This thing is a tiktok tween fever dream.

06 Z33
06 Z33
1 month ago

So I don’t like it. It is miles better than the mole rate face we have today, but it just doesn’t do it for me. The front is too generic. Doesn’t say BMW to me at all with the kidney grilles now completely gonezo.

And the rear is not great. I don’t like how everything is getting pinched as your eye moves towards the trunk. It makes the car look tall and narrow, the opposite of a sporty stance.

MondialMatt
Member
MondialMatt
1 month ago

Way to tone down the kidneys! Probably still inspire vitriol for overcorrecting.

George Danvers
George Danvers
1 month ago

In our current world of ugly vehicles, this one is “somewhat decent” looking. ( Front End is pretty cool, rear end is revolting ) ( also … black wheels ?? still ?? )

GirchyGirchy
Member
GirchyGirchy
1 month ago

First thought – it’s a new Civic, with two-tiered instrument panel inspired by the mid-oughts version.
Second thought – fuck those door handles.
Third thought – that rear had to have been “designed” by AI.

Summary: “so good” is NOT the first thing that comes to mind. Or at all.

Logan
Member
Logan
1 month ago

Too bad it will weigh 4000 pounds.

Torque
Torque
1 month ago
Reply to  Logan

Over 4000 lbs.
For a compact “sports sedan”!!!
That in itself if Nucking Futz.
Seriously, Im sure the engineers have done a good job with the suspension geometry to do what they can to master the weight, still there is no getting around the laws of physics.

Spikedlemon
Spikedlemon
1 month ago

I”m not sold on it.

Show me the longroof.

Thxcolm
Thxcolm
1 month ago

We can all agree to disagree, but the rear is hot origami garbage.

GirchyGirchy
Member
GirchyGirchy
1 month ago
Reply to  Thxcolm

Origarbage.

MondialMatt
Member
MondialMatt
1 month ago
Reply to  Thxcolm

The logo placement feels like Alfa Romeo.

1 2 3 4
158
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x