Home » The Son Of The Practical Helicopter’s Inventor Just Passed, Here’s How Sikorsky Changed Aviation Forever

The Son Of The Practical Helicopter’s Inventor Just Passed, Here’s How Sikorsky Changed Aviation Forever

Sergei Sikorsky Ts
ADVERTISEMENT

For about 76 years, helicopters have served the world as an important alternative to fixed-wing aircraft. Helicopters can go places and do things that airplanes cannot, like save mariners stuck at sea or airlift heavy cargo with precision between two points. The modern helicopter owes its existence to one man, Igor Ivanovich Sikorsky. His son, Sergei Sikorsky, advanced his father’s legacy into the modern day. At 100 years old, Sergei has flown into the sunset, ending one more link to its founding. Let’s take a look at what makes Sikorsky so important.

The folks of Lockheed Martin, the owner of Sikorsky Aircraft, say that Sergei I. Sikorsky passed on September 18 at the age of 100. Reaching such an age is impressive for any person. Sikorsky got to witness most of the formative years for the airplane, the automobile, and the diesel-electric locomotive. He lived through World War II, the Space Race, and the advent of modern electronics and the Internet. But Sergei also got to witness a whole new kind of aviation take form when his father invented the practical helicopter in the United States.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

That only planted the seeds for the future, one where Igor and Sergei would popularize the helicopter into the tool that it is today. The story of Sikorsky is one that’s so huge that I’m not sure aviation would have been the same without it. As the world celebrates the life of Sergei, let’s take a look at the feats of Sikorsky.

Dreams Of Vertical Flight

1941 Vs 300 A Record 1024
Sikorsky

Igor Sikorsky’s invention of the so-called “practical” helicopter in the United States is an important distinction because he didn’t so much invent the helicopter, but made one that actually worked well.

Some of the earliest ideas of rotorcraft date back to China around 400 BC. Back then, there were toys made out of bamboo that were little more than sticks with propellers on top of them. Leonardo da Vinci, Sir George Cayley, Mikhail Lomonosov, and so many more would envision flying machines that flew vertically. According to the textbook, Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, the idea of vertical flight enveloped the thoughts of so many dreamers and inventors that, at least in the 18th and 19th centuries, there were more people trying to create early helicopters than there were people attempting to fly in fixed-wing aircraft.

ADVERTISEMENT
Leonardo Da Vinci Helicopter
Leonardo da Vinci – Public Domain

Even the term “helicopter” was an invention of this dreamer era, and the term is credited to Gustave de Ponton d’Amécourt, who built a helicopter with counter-rotating props and a steam engine in 1863. If you check out the U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission’s website, which was published in 2003, you’ll see that the page notes countless attempts to create vertical flying machines throughout the 1800s. Check these paragraphs out:

A U.S. Confederate soldier, William Powers, designed an attack helicopter in 1862 that made use of Archimedes’ screws powered by a steam engine that was to propel it vertically and forward. He intended to use it to break the Union’s siege of the southern ports. He constructed a non-flying model but did not construct a full-size craft.

Nasm 5033058d84602 002 000002
A model of William Powers’ helicopter design. Gift of Gregory K. H. Bryant – National Air and Space Museum

In the 1880s, Thomas Alva Edison experimented with small helicopter models in the United States. He tested several rotor configurations driven by a gun cotton engine, an early form of internal combustion engine. However, a series of explosions that blew up part of his laboratory deterred him. Later, Edison used an electric motor for power, and he was one of the first to realize from his experiments that a large-diameter rotor with low blade area was needed to give good hovering efficiency. Edison’s scientific approach to the problems of vertical flight proved that both high aerodynamic efficiency of the rotor and high power from an engine were required for successful vertical flight.

At the end of the nineteenth century, inventors had not solved the inherent aerodynamic and mechanical complexities of building a vertical flight aircraft. The hundreds of failed helicopter inventions had either inadequate power or control or experienced excessive vibration. Some of the better-designed early helicopters managed to hop briefly into the air, but they did not attain sustained flight with control. Steam engines were just too heavy for a full-scale helicopter. Not until the internal combustion engine was invented and became available could inventors develop full-sized models.

Part of why all of these helicopters failed, the U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission said, was the fact that getting a vehicle to fly vertically requires a beautiful balancing act of engineering and physics. Some helicopter fans joke that helicopters don’t so much fly through the air as they beat the air into submission. But that’s really simplifying it. Aerodynamics still matter greatly, as does having a powerful enough engine and a light enough airframe. Oh, and just getting the helicopter into the air for a brief flight barely above the ground is one thing, and is something that some inventors of the 1800s did achieve. But actually controlling the helicopter was a whole different story.

The Practical Helicopter

He2g8
U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission – Public Domain

What is considered to be the first manned flight of a helicopter in 1907, when Jacques and Louis Breguet experimented with the Gyroplane No.1, a quadcopter-type of aircraft that was so unstable that it had to be held as it hovered at only two feet above the ground. Later that year, French inventor Paul Cornu took flight in a helicopter only one foot above the ground for 20 seconds, but unlike the previous flight, that helicopter wasn’t tethered.

Inventors and pioneering aviators would begin to set records soon after, as helicopters began to fly higher, for longer, and more frequently. But even these helicopters never really attained a super high altitude or flew particularly far. For example, in 1930, the D’AT3 coaxial helicopter built by Italian engineer Corradino D’Ascanio held records for flying 59 feet high, staying in the sky for 8 minutes and 45 seconds, and covering 3,540 feet of ground.

Dascanio Dat3 (1)
Flight Magazine Archives – CC-By-SA

The designation of the first truly “successful” helicopter is often credited to the Focke-Wulf Fw 61. This helicopter, which made its first flight in 1936, sported a radial engine that powered two counter-rotating rotors. Control was handled through cyclic pitch and asymmetric rotor lift. Some historians call this aircraft the true first practical helicopter. Some folks seem to draw the line on region as well.

ADVERTISEMENT
Fw 61 V
ADL – Hanna Reitsch fliegt mit der Fw 61 V2 – CC BY-SA 3.0

But it would be one Igor Sikorsky who would take the credit for the first so-called “practical” helicopter in the United States, and his design would more or less become the standard for helicopters for nearly a century later. Here’s what Sikorsky Aircraft says:

Igor had tried 30 years earlier, in spring 1909, to build a helicopter at his family home in Kiev, Ukraine. His apparatus consisted of a wood and wire-braced frame built around a 25-horsepower engine connected to a transmission of wooden pulleys and belts that drove coaxial shafts topped with two twin-bladed rotors. He tried again in the spring of 1910 with a second design consisting of two new three-bladed rotors, but the craft could barely lift itself off the ground without a pilot. Realizing that technology would have to catch up with the idea of vertical lift flight, the young engineer abandoned his dream for a more practical career in fixed wing aviation.

Iiis Piloting Vs 300
Sikorsky

“The helicopter was always my father’s first love,” said Igor’s son and company ambassador Sergei Sikorsky, who worked as an apprentice mechanic on “that sweet little ship,” the VS-300 aircraft. “By the late 1930s, my father wanted to prove that after two aviation careers — in Russia before and during World War 1, and in the United States building transoceanic flying boats before the Second World War — that he could design and build a helicopter without knowing how it should be done, and then to try to fly one never having flown one before. That was a challenge many said couldn’t be done.”

In 1938, Igor made a compelling argument to United Aircraft, now United Technologies Corp. The board of directors gave Igor and his team $30,000 to test his single rotor helicopter theory. “Igor settled on a single rotor configuration for its design simplicity, and to enable the optimum placement of major components that would allow precise control of hovering take-offs and landings, and quick conversion to horizontal flight,” said Mark Miller, Sikorsky Vice President of Research & Engineering. “Igor was not the first to conceive a vertical lift rotorcraft, nor did he develop any complex new technologies to ensure success. It was the genius of his design, integrating mature technologies in an innovative way, which enabled efficient vertical lift flight. Three generations later, we at Sikorsky are following a similar design approach with our next-generation X2® co-axial helicopter program.”

Thf198445
From the Collections of The Henry Ford.

The Sikorsky VS-300 was built out of a welded steel tube frame. Attached to it was an undercarriage with wheels and a 75 HP Aircooled Motors Corporation engine, which used a transmission, belts, and gears to drive the main rotor as well as bevel gears to drive the wooden tail rotor. When flying, the main rotor spun at 255 RPM.

To control the VS-300, Sikorsky changed the pitch of the rotors by moving the control column. Side-to-side movements of the stick rolled the helicopter left and right, while moving the stick fore and aft produced pitch changes. Rudder action was achieved by foot pedals that controlled the pitch of the rear rotor.

471580853 10161237222125770 4511
Sikorsky

At the time, Sikorsky was known not for his work in helicopters, but in fixed-wing aircraft. Sikorsky was famously the builder of Pan American World Airways’ iconic clipper flying boats. But Sikorsky never abandoned the helicopter dream, and worked on improving the design at night. Eventually, as technology improved, Sikorsky’s helicopter became closer to reality. Sikorsky continues:

On September 14, 1939, outside the Stratford, Connecticut, factory, Igor sat in the open VS-300 cockpit wearing his trademark overcoat and fedora, the engine vibrating the aircraft. He pulled up on the collective control lever at his left side. The VS-300 cleared the ground for a few seconds to the height of its short tether ropes. Many more such ‘hops’ over the ensuing days and weeks proved the aircraft could be controlled. Sikorsky and other pilots then flew different variations of the VS-300 aircraft for a total of 102 hours and 35 minutes into 1943.

Reflecting on his achievement years later, Igor Sikorsky said, “If a man is in need of rescue, an airplane can come and throw flowers on him. But a direct lift aircraft could come in and save his life.” The U.S. Army placed America’s first helicopter production contract with Sikorsky in 1942 for 131 R-4 helicopters (Sikorsky designation S-47) of different variants. A YR-4A aircraft flew the first ever helicopter rescue mission under combat conditions in Burma in April, 1944.

Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Vs 300
Igor Sikorsky flying the VS-300. Sikorsky

Son Follows Father

While Igor Sikorsky tends to get most of the fame, his eldest son, Sergei, was there all along, helping Sikorsky advance helicopters. Then, Sikorsky’s son kept the empire alive after his passing in 1972. Sergei was born in New York City in 1925, and Lockheed Martin notes that Sergei’s first flight happened when he was only eight years old. Back then, he sat in his father’s lap in the co-pilot seat of a Sikorsky S-38 amphibian.

ADVERTISEMENT

The young Sergei, who got to see aviation icons like Captain Eddie Rickenbacker, the Lindbergh family, Roscoe Turner, and U.S. Air Force Gen. “Jimmy” Doolittle, decided to devote his own life to aviation. According to Sergei, his father built a tiny passenger seat out of a wooden board in the VS-300 and took the young Sergei up into the sky.

Sergei 1925x1125
Sergei Sikorsky. Credit: Sikorsky

In 1942, at the age of 17, Sergei started his aviation career as an apprentice at the Sikorsky factory, working as a junior mechanic on his dad’s helicopters. Then, soon after, during World War II, he Sergei joined the U.S. Coast Guard, where he joined the Helicopter Development Unit and helped develop rescue boats.

In Sergei’s own words, one of the biggest moments of his life was taking part in the development of Coast Guard Lieutenant Commander Frank A. Erickson’s hydraulically powered rescue hoist. Erickson’s hoist was designed to rescue people stranded from sinking ships, swamped cars, forest fires, flooded homes, and any other sort of emergency where a helicopter might swoop in to save someone’s life. Sergei says that his part of the project included testing and demonstration.

16 Sergei On Hoist
Sikorsky

For Sergei, his father’s helicopters and the hoist provided the missing link between helicopters and the ground. Suddenly, helicopters could be used for far more than just transportation. In the decades since, the rescue hoist has saved thousands of people from all kinds of emergencies.

But Sergei didn’t let this moment define his career, and he flew to new heights, from Lockheed Martin:

ADVERTISEMENT

The son of aviation pioneer Igor Sikorsky, the company’s founder and inventor of the first practical helicopter, Sergei began his career with the company in 1951 in international marketing and sales.

He returned to the United States in 1976 at the dawn of the Black Hawk era to become division vice president in Stratford, overseeing the company’s co-production programs. Sergei would later take on marketing and special project roles until retiring in 1992. Even in retirement, Sergei remained active with the company, serving as a goodwill ambassador at major trade shows and other events where he would sign autographs, speak about his family’s legacy and highlight an immeasurable passion for the helicopter and its promise to save lives around the world. The aircraft hangar at Sikorsky’s Stratford facility was dedicated as the Sergei I. Sikorsky Flight Center in 2019. Sergei called it his life’s “single greatest honor.”

Sikorsky Poised To Sustain Germa
Sikorsky

Sergei said that one of the highlights of his career was selling the Sikorsky CH-53 heavy lift helicopter to Germany’s armed forces, a move that, apparently, might have saved Sikorsky from financial ruin during the 1970s.

In the decades after the VS-300, Sikorsky has produced fabled helicopters including the Black Hawk, S-61, CH-53, S-76, and S-92. Then there’s my favorite Sikorsky, the S-64 Skycrane.

Sikorsky Skycrane Carrying House
Sikorsky

From the Pima Air & Space Museum:

In 1959, Sikorsky Aircraft began testing of a proof-of-concept heavy lift helicopter called the S-60. Initial tests proved successful and the U.S. Navy and Army showed interest in the concept. Sikorsky immediately began development of a more powerful version of the helicopter powered by two turbo-shaft engines. Designated the S-64 by Sikorsky and the H-54A by the U.S. Army, it made its first flight in May 1962. The U.S. Army named the helicopter Tarhe, but most people call them Skycranes. The CH-54 served through the last years of the Vietnam War and finally left military service in the early 1990s. Many surplus Skycranes have found new uses in civilian hands, being widely used for fighting forest fires and as heavy lift aircraft for erecting electrical towers, and in the timber industry.

35d7e89fdd16be6325d7fca0d2759d7b
Winnebago

The Sikorsky Archives notes that the Skycrane was unique in that, since speed was not really a concern, neither was reducing drag. So, Sikorsky saved money on the design by not covering up systems in aerodynamic fairings. Also, despite the small cockpit, there was room in there for three pilots and two mechanics. At its most hardcore as the S-64F, a Skycrane had a payload of a whopping 25,000 pounds!

As I’ve written about before, Sikorsky helicopters were even very briefly involved in the RV industry once, when Orlando Helicopter Airways had Sikorsky S-55 helicopters converted into flying motorhomes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Aviation Legends

S 64 2edit
Sikorsky

The passing of Sergei marks the end of an era. Sergei’s father proved the capability and versatility of the helicopter, and Sergei helped sell them and spread the helicopter around the world. I cannot even begin to guess how helicopter history could have played out had Igor never built the VS-300.

What I do know is that history will likely remember these the Sikorskys fondly. For some people, helicopters are the ultimate way to fly, and Sikorsky is a huge reason for that.

The next time you see a flying crane fighting a fire or a Coast Guard chopper pulling someone out of a flood, remember that flying piece of scaffolding from higher in this piece. It may not have been the first helicopter, not by a long shot, but for many, it was when the helicopter finally started making sense.

Top graphic images: Sikorsky

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
28 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marc
Marc
1 month ago

Given the world we now live in, it’s worth mention that Igor Sikorsky was an immigrant born in Kyiv, Ukraine.

RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
Member
RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
1 month ago

Wow, so interesting! Those Skycranes are really neat and they look so trippy…like the bottom was cut w/ huge scissors ha ha. I’ve watched the Coast Guard rescues from ships on The Deadliest Catch, and those are intense! They are also emotional. Another cool thing on that show is when they work on the ship engines in the engine room…plus all the other systems on the ships

RIP Sergei Sikorsky

Cars? I've owned a few
Member
Cars? I've owned a few
1 month ago

Skycranes are so cool! They look almost impossibly weird, but as you pointed out, speed was not the priority.

I never saw one in US Army colors until your last photo.

Haven’t flown in a Sikorsky. Haven’t flown in an Agusta/Westland of any type, either. I’ve been in Bells, several Airbus/Eurocopters, a Hughes/MD, (Oh!) a Boeing Chinook and most scarily some Robinsons. Fortunately, always voluntarily and not on a litter.

Dodsworth
Member
Dodsworth
1 month ago

Great article! If you consider requests, I’d love to hear your thoughts on autogyros. They fascinate me.

Manuel Verissimo
Manuel Verissimo
1 month ago

Holy shit, I read Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics! It was about 10 years ago when I started working at Turbomeca.

The gist of it was that helicopters aren’t supposed to be working and that they barely beat physics into submission until something eventually goes wrong.

Man does time fly (unlike helicopters).

ShifterCar
ShifterCar
1 month ago

In my lifetime we have gone from no internet to *gestures broadly at everything*, but I am consistently surprised when reading articles like this how quickly human aviation matured.
Early 1900s had a couple options for getting several feet off the ground for seconds or a minute at a time, by the 1930s there were over a million annual commercial passengers and first practical helicopters, by the 1960s we had several million commercial passengers annually, manned space missions and a moon landing with a safe return.
Within 125 years we now have over 9 billion annual commercial passengers and multiple private spaceflight companies but I still don’t have a flying car.

Cars? I've owned a few
Member
Cars? I've owned a few
1 month ago
Reply to  ShifterCar

I’ve had that thought. Not only about aviation, but also cars and especially electronics. Computers, cameras, the internet. My three-year-old iPhone so outperforms my 35 mm film and M2/Betacam equipment from back in the day. Other than telephoto lenses.

Dialup to as fast as you want to pay for connectivity. Now even over cellular networks. My first cell phone was in a bag with a big battery and usually plugged into a cigarette lighter socket. And there were long stretches of I-5 where it didn’t have a signal. Now, I can send an SOS to a satellite. From something that fits comfortably in my pocket.

And servers. OMG. VMware Linux VMs run circles around the bare metal stuff 20 years ago.

The other thought I have is God, sitting wherever, going “Hmm. I didn’t think they’d get this smart.” (And also, so stupid. He probably expected that.)

Totally not a robot
Member
Totally not a robot
1 month ago
Reply to  ShifterCar

Any car can fly if you try hard enough.

M SV
M SV
1 month ago

I enjoyed the article more then the video Lockheed Martin put out on the 18th. I couldn’t help but think someone in their pr department had this thing primed and ready for when he died. I guess it’s not that weird in that most people of influence have obits written about them ready to go in just about every newspaper. Just something about the company that bought his father’s company that recently threatened to throw the whole thing away because they were crying they didn’t get a contract just was a bit much.

Prancing Moose
Member
Prancing Moose
1 month ago

Very insightful read!

SlowCarFast
Member
SlowCarFast
1 month ago

A nice tribute, Mercedes, but when discussing helicopter history PLEASE don’t forget that without Juan de la Cierva solving most of the rotor flapping, angle, and tilting rotor control issues, Sikorsky’s helicopter development would likely have taken decades longer. Also credit to WWII shifting autogiro development money over to helicopters, and Juan de la Cierva generously offering his patented technology to the war effort.

Andy Individual
Andy Individual
1 month ago

Years ago I worked on a ‘project’ at Lockheed’s Orlando campus. It wasn’t with the aviation wing, but in graphics/simulation technology. Because we had clearance, we were often given tours of the ‘other stuff’ going on. It was fascinating to see these machines in various states of progress. Picture giant Swiss watches.

Later I assisted a company that built medi-vac equipment. They had to figure out how to harden a lot of electronics to withstand the subtle vibrations from the rotors. You wouldn’t notice them at many frequencies, but they were there and a problem. Worse yet they created some wild magnetic fields that messed with onboard equipment. As computers, often COTS based became common, things like hard disks, could not handle the magnetic fields.

It’s weird to think back about all the esoteric shit I’ve learned that I never set out to.

Pilotgrrl
Member
Pilotgrrl
1 month ago

I just sent this to my niece. She works for a competitor, but I’m sure she has colleagues who’d be interested… And maybe they’ll become Autopians too.

Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
1 month ago

Sikorsky propelled aviation to a higher level

Chewcudda
Chewcudda
1 month ago

Back when I worked tech support, I once took a call from a member of the Pitcairn family. The elderly gentleman claimed to have use an autogyro to go to senior prom.

Ranwhenparked
Member
Ranwhenparked
1 month ago
Reply to  Chewcudda

When I worked in fundraising for a nonprofit outside Philadelphia, one of them quietly bought a table at an awards event I was doing. Nobody knew what the connection was, the honoree didn’t know him, nobody on the committee had reached out, not sure how he found us. I wanted to follow up to see if there was any potential for a continued relationship, but my boss took the lead as being too important for me to handle, then he did absolutely nothing beyond the thank you letter

Fuzzyweis
Member
Fuzzyweis
1 month ago

The history is great but after the article on Matano yesterday I hope we don’t start getting daily obits. The older we get, the people that paved the way for the cars and other vehicles we like will keep passing, it can get a little depressing.

Last edited 1 month ago by Fuzzyweis
John Patson
John Patson
1 month ago

Surely one of the biggest contributions was to standardize controls, with rudders on floor the cyclic on the right and the collective on the left with a motorbike twist grip for the throttle.
Before that controls were all over the place.
It is a bit like the revolution in cars when the clutch was the pedal on the left, then the brake then the throttle. Think I am right in saying the Model T Ford have the brake and the clutch reversed, which has led to many a jerky ride…

RC
RC
1 month ago

I remember reading about Sikorsky bailing to the US during the Russian Revolution, but had no idea that his son was still alive or still involved with the company.

Props to Mercedes for putting together a well-composed history.

And also, props to those mad lads (Sikorsky himself included) in the 1930’s, who put on a 3-piece suit and bowler hat and no helmet to climb into craft assembled with a lot of love but very limited engineering to see what they could do.

Andy Individual
Andy Individual
1 month ago
Reply to  RC

I love the pictures of the early western explorers climbing Everest dressed as they were out for a Sunday stroll. We have totally become soft and squishy.

PlugInPA
Member
PlugInPA
1 month ago
Reply to  RC

I mean I’m not sure what a helmet would do for you if things went wrong.

Totally not a robot
Member
Totally not a robot
1 month ago
Reply to  RC

And also props to the top of the helicopter. Without them we wouldn’t go anywhere.

StillNotATony
Member
StillNotATony
1 month ago

I did the graphics for an S-60 desktop simulator. One of the few aircraft I’ve worked on that actually has keys.

They made me take off the Gumby keychain.

That Belgian Guy
That Belgian Guy
1 month ago

Great story,
But Sikorsky only ‘invented’ an evolution to the helicopter. The Fw 61 is mentioned in the article. And it was practical indeed. Just bombed to pieces a few years after construction.
This was not even the first flying machine, as Hermann Ganswindt flew in july 1901. Well before the wright brothers got their act together.

Hazdazos
Hazdazos
1 month ago

These days we are inundated with Californian companies are on the news every single day, most of them seemingly hell bent on fucking us all over – Facebook, Google, OpenAI just to name a few.

A century ago, the little state of Connecticut was the center of a hell of a lot of innovation. Kind of proud of that fact, not gonna lie.

Hotdoughnutsnow
Hotdoughnutsnow
1 month ago

What an uplifting story.

Zeppelopod
Zeppelopod
1 month ago

Mercedes is exemplary in that she can, among this collective, pitch wonderful stories with little spin.

Ricki
Ricki
1 month ago
Reply to  Zeppelopod

I bet she’d be an excellent guest speaker for a Rotary Club.

28
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x