Home Ā» This Lumbering Truck Was The First ‘Standardized’ Military Vehicle Ever

This Lumbering Truck Was The First ‘Standardized’ Military Vehicle Ever

Libertytruck Top
ADVERTISEMENT

Have you ever ran a military? We haven’t sent out a reader survey in quite a while, so I have no idea how many of you out there are currently in charge of a major military force. I assume at leastĀ someĀ of you are, commanding armies and navies and forces of air, and I’m sure you’re aware of all of the complexities it takes to operate a military force. Once of these complexities has to do with the machinery used; unless you have standards types of machines and vehicles, the logistical complexity of operating and maintaining a fleet of different kinds of vehicles would be an absolute nightmare. This is a lesson the US Army learned over a century ago, and it’s worth looking at how they ended up solving it.

The US Armed Forces were actually quite late to mechanize travel if you think about it. Well, maybe not the Navy; the Navy had been using steam-powered ships since before the Civil War, and really expanded their use during the Civil War, including ships that did not rely on sail power at all, like theĀ USS MonitorĀ ironclad and the montior-type ships that followed it, such as theĀ PassaicĀ class. But everyone else? It was still a fighting force powered by horsemeat.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Even in 1914, when Gavrilo Princip decided to add some speed holes to Archduke Ferdinand and thereby set off what would come to be known as World War I, somehow didn’t quite sway the US Army to start thinking about motorization in an organized way, even as American truck companies like Mack and GMC were getting swamped with orders for trucks to be shipped over to the war in Europe. In fact, the first actual, official use of motorized trucks in a military operation didn’t happen until 1916, with the Pancho Villa Expedition.

Villa 2
Image: National Archives

Essentially, this was an attempt by the Army to hunt down and capture or kill Mexican revolutionary Francisco “Pancho” Villa, who had attacked a town in New Mexico, part of a larger conflict along the Mexican border. This expedition used about 588 trucks, and while there were certainly a few dominant types – the GMC Model 15 and F.W.D. four-wheel-drive trucks, for example – well over 100 different types of trucks made up this very eclectic fleet.

Villa Gmc Fwd
Images: FWD, GMC

As you can imagine, the maintenance and repair demands of this huge fleet of primitive trucks going over some extremely rugged terrain in the punishing context of a military mission were huge, and trucks were breaking down all the time. Because there were so many different kinds of trucks, getting the right spare parts for the right trucks was incredibly difficult, and broken down trucks were often stripped for parts to keep the rest of the trucks going, because that was easier than trying to repair them.

ADVERTISEMENT
Villa 1
Image: National Archives

In short, it was a huge mess, but it taught the army a very valuable lesson, one that may seem obvious, but likely takes the pain of experience to really drive home: a standardized truck, built with a standard set of parts that could be stocked and made available to any army truck, anywhere, would be a massive improvement.

These hard lessons informed the Army’s Quartermaster Corps who teamed up with the then-young Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) to come up with a design for the Army’s ideal truck, or at least ideal enough given the state of motor vehicle technology of the era. The resulting vehicle, which was ready by 1918, was an impressive and extremely utilitarian machine. It was a very basic design, with a beefy, simple chassis, an inline-four engine displacing nearly seven liters (425 cubic inches) and making all of 52 horsepower, the same as my Nissan Pao. Though, to be fair, the Pao does it with only 997cc, but it does have about eight decades of progress helping out.

Lib Engine
Image: National Archives

This new standardized truck, known as the Standard Liberty truck, was a rear-wheel drive machine, with large spoked wheels and solid rubber tires, so at least flat tires were no problem, and, I suspect, ride comfort was also as unlikely to happen as a flat tire. There was a four-speed transmission, to get everything going, and when it got going, the top speed was only about 15 mph, and it only got around 7 mpg, atĀ best. Considering this was a machine with an over 10,000 pound curb weight and a payload of three to five tons, I suppose these numbers really aren’t all that surprising.

Lib Truck Natarch 3
Image: National Archives

I do like that spring-mounted front bumper, which sort of predicts the energy-absorbing 5 mph bumpers of the 1970s. The first series of Liberty trucks had electric lights front and rear, and a full electrical system with a battery and generator, along with a parallel magneto system for the ignition. A second series of Liberty trucks simplified the electrical system significantly, retaining the magneto-based ignition system but getting rid of the generator-battery electrical system, and with that the electric lights, which were replaced with oil-wick sidelights and taillight, and carbide spotlight mounted on the dash, which you can see in this photo:

Lib Natarchives 2
Image: National Archives

This may be the only example I can think of in all of automotive history where anĀ update to a vehicle switched from electrical lighting to oil/gas lighting?

ADVERTISEMENT

A huge number of companies were contracted to build Liberty trucks and/or Liberty truck parts, including Bethlehem Motor Truck Corporation, Diamond T Motor Car Company, Packard, Pierce-Arrow, Selden Motor Vehicle Company, and more, most or all of which are long gone today. Unfortunately for the Allies in Europe, not all that many really made it to the front before the Armistice that ended the Great War, which isn’t surprising considering how late the United States entered the fight.

All in all, 9,364 Liberty trucks (both versions) were built before the war was over, and while there were about 40,000 orders outstanding, production ended in 1919. Incredibly, some of these beefy old brutes remained in service into 1940, though they had received a lot of updates and mechanical upgrades that pretty significantly changed their abilities.

Lib Natarchives
Image: National Archives

Even if it came a bit too late to be a big part of WWI, the Liberty truck is a huge milestone in US Military history, as it is the very first armed-forces specified, standardized motor vehicle. There would be no Jeep, no Humvee, were it not for the path laid by the slow, heavy Liberty.

If you’re still eager to ponder this influential truck and its legacy, there’s a very comprehensive video here you should enjoy:

ADVERTISEMENT

I think what makes the Liberty so fascinating is that it may be the first time that a mass-produced vehicle type was designed and built based on a set of criteria and use cases from an organization. The Liberty truck wasn’t so much designed as it was cast by the demands and restrictions of what the army wanted and needed. A lot of truly iconic cars came from this approach after the Liberty, cars designed to solve a specific set of problems.

The Jeep, for example, was another military project designed from the demands of a go-anywhere small general-purpose car; the Volkswagen Beetle came from a set of demands that the German people have an affordable car to carry a family down the new Autobahns at 60 mph; and the CitroĆ«n 2CV was designed to get French peasants off their horses and into a car, a car that could go over a field and not break any eggs. There’s more, sure, but I think you get the idea.

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Livernois
Livernois
44 minutes ago

If you want to be annoying, tanks were standardized motor vehicles that went into action in WWI a couple-ish years earlier, so these would be the first standardized wheeled motor vehicles.

Armed forces were using tractors with tracks even before Princip met Ferdinand, although I’m guessing they may have just bought off the shelf from their version of Tractor Supply instead of designing from the ground up.

Cheap Bastard
Cheap Bastard
45 minutes ago

The US Armed Forces were actually quite late to mechanize travel if you think about it.
…..
But everyone else? It was still a fighting force powered by horsemeat.

Not so. Even the mighty German army of WWII was “still a fighting force powered by horsemeat”:

“In his book, ā€œOf Spies and Stratagems,ā€ Stanley P. Lovell, the head of the U.S. Office of Strategic Services during the war, says historians would be wise to dismiss the notion that nerve gas munitions were not used in World War II for humanitarian reasons.

At the war trials at Nuremberg, Nazi leader Hermann Gƶring was asked why the Germans did not use ā€œGas Blauā€ to stop the Normandy invasion. Lovell paraphrases Gƶring’s explanation that it was because they could not create suitable gas masks for horses, which were critical for transporting supplies.”

From ā€œOf Spies and Stratagems,ā€ by Stanley Lovell:

Q. We know you had Gas Blau [a name used for nerve gas] which would have stopped the Normandy invasion. Why didn’t you use it?

A. Die Pferde (the horses).

Q. What have horses to do with it?

A. Everything. A horse lies down in the shafts or between the thills as soon as his breathing is restricted. We never have had a gas mask a horse would tolerate.

Q. What has that to do with Normandy?

A. We did not have enough gasoline to adequately supply the German Air Force and the Panzer Divisions, so we used horse transport in all operations. You must have known that the first thing we did in Poland, France, everywhere, was to seize the horses. All our material was horse-drawn. Had we used gas you would have retaliated and you would have instantly immobilized us.

Q. Was it that serious, Marshal?

A. I tell you, you would have won the war years ago if you had used gas – not on our soldiers, but on our transportation system. Your intelligence men are asses!

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/04/hitler-chemical-weapons/

The German dependence on horsemeat remained constant throughout the war:

The German army relied heavily on horses for transport purposes in the war, and had 2.75 million horses and mules.[93] In 1945, of Germany’s 304 combat units, only 13 were motorized, and the remaining units depended on horses and cattle to carry equipment and heavy weapons.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_welfare_in_Nazi_Germany

I’d have quoted more but it gets into the welfare of the animals which some may find disturbing.

Last edited 44 minutes ago by Cheap Bastard
4jim
4jim
4 hours ago

The older I get and the more I learn about the world wars the more I am impressed by the logistics of how supplies and equipment got all ordered, designed, manufactured, built, transported and delivered all is such short time. Logistics is amazing. Think of everything we as a country during WW2 in the time it takes a kid to go through high school.

Collegiate Autodidact
Collegiate Autodidact
26 minutes ago
Reply to  4jim

Yeah, some archeologists have noted that the most impressive aspect of the ancient Egyptian pyramids was not the actual edifices themselves but the sheer scale of logistics involved in managing and running the construction especially since the workers were actually not slaves as was so long thought but citizens working during the off season (that is, during the lull in seasonal agriculture) as a form of tithing to their pharaoh. These workers were actually reasonably well-fed (with bread & beer, back when beer actually had substantial nutritional content, lol) & provided with reasonably decent housing, all of which indeed took a lot of logistics in addition to the actual construction of the pyramids. What’s also impressive is how the Great Pyramid of Giza, the largest of the Egyptian pyramids, was built in *just* 26 years, a good testament to the logistics of running the construction thereof, especially since they had to work around the agricultural work of the people involved.

But youve seen it run
But youve seen it run
15 hours ago

The answer is always Miata!

Nic Periton
Nic Periton
17 hours ago

As far as having runned a military unit, I leave that to my father, a story involving Jacque Loussier and dried eggs.

The Liberty Truck was initially a Thornycroft J Type, standardised by AEC (Associated Equipment Company) as the AEC Y type, more than 8000 were built before the American version was built under license.

It always annoys me when some knowitall chimes in, I am now annoyed.

JKcycletramp
JKcycletramp
17 hours ago

“Even in 1914, when Gavrilo Princip decided to add some speed holes to Archduke Ferdinand and thereby set off what would come to be known as World War I.” [Snortlaugh]

I named the first bicycle I designed and built Gavrilo Princip, because wanted it to be the start of something big.

Nathan Gibbs
Nathan Gibbs
17 hours ago

And then in the 2000s, Jeep brought the name back with the *equally* iconic and capable Liberty!

Blazing_Cyclone
Blazing_Cyclone
17 hours ago

I have nor ever will run a military unit, but i have played hearts of iron 4 since release so i am very much not qualified to answer your opening question.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
17 hours ago

Okay I am not an English major nor a journalist. But I am pretty sure you can say I run a military unit, present tense, or I ran a military unit, past tense but can you ask if anyone ever ran a military or is it has anyone ever run a military? It do sound right.
In addition, this was not the first time any military ever realized a equal transportation vehicle was the better choice. In fact Hannibal transversed the Alps with all similar equipment Elephants. Think about it food for one animal type or all animal types, medical equipment, vets, and drugs for one animal type or many, garb and storage for equipment transport for arms, ammo, and equipment fit for one animal instead of many. You make an excellent point but about 2000 years after it was figured out. Unless Genghis Khan did it too.
There are no new ideas only modified ideas

Twobox Designgineer
Twobox Designgineer
2 hours ago

Hannibal had horses, too.

Mike Harrell
Mike Harrell
17 hours ago

…the logistical complexity of operating and maintaining a fleet of different kinds of vehicles would be an absolute nightmare.

I don’t need to run a military to know this; I have instead foolishly embraced it as a hobby.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
17 hours ago
Reply to  Mike Harrell

Do you need to ran a military?

13
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x