As much of the auto industry has been converting to practical all-electric power, the RV industry has been lagging behind. All-electric camper vans and motorhomes have been around for a while, but going all-electric usually meant sacrificing range, which doesn’t make much sense for a vehicle designed for road trips. RV startup Grounded has announced its newest all-electric motorhome, the G3, and with a range knocking on the door of 300 miles, this is an electric camper you can actually take on a trip.
Let me paint you a picture of what all-electric camper vans and motorhomes looked like until recently. Back in January 2023, I got to drive what was supposed to be Winnebago’s future electric camper, the eRV2. This van was a prototype to test the waters for a future production vehicle. It was great, from the silent drivetrain to the snap of instant electric torque. But Winnebago learned that pretty much nobody wanted a camper van that had only 108 miles of range.


We’ve seen camper vans built out of the Ford E-Transit and the Mercedes-Benz eSprinter before. There are also companies that will convert a gasoline-powered van into an electric camper van. Many of those vans go under 200 miles on a charge, while a rare few companies advertise an estimated range of around 250 miles. There are also developments from Harbinger and Thor Industries. Thor’s new prototype hybrid Class A motorhome goes 500 miles on a charge!

Sadly, you still can’t buy a coach like that yet, but there’s a new coach on the block with a claimed 286 miles of range. This is the Grounded G3, and it’s a big step up from Grounded’s last van.
Based On GM’s Work Van
If the Grounded G3 looks familiar, don’t worry, you’re not crazy. This camper van looks almost exactly like Grounded’s previous generation van, the G2. However, despite the visuals, Grounded says that this new camper has important updates.
One of the biggest limiting factors in the advancement of electric motorhomes is that RV manufacturers are largely limited to whatever range their donor vehicles have. It doesn’t matter if Winnebago wants to make a van with 300 miles of range if it’s hamstrung by a platform with far less range than that.

Grounded knows this, too, so its strategy has been to base its campers on the van with the best range that it could find. At the end of 2023, Grounded announced that it moved away from its 108-mile range Ford E-Transit-based G1, and what was its then-new camper van, rode on the General Motors BrightDrop platform. Grounded said that moving to this platform cranked the range up to 250 miles, a significant improvement from the old E-Transit. Now, Grounded’s latest camper van has even better range.
Grounded’s newest RV, the G3, rides on the current Chevrolet BrightDrop Zevo 400 or 600 chassis, which measures 20 feet long and 24 feet long, respectively. Grounded’s press materials note “270+ Miles Of Range” and 286 miles of combined range. This is the range that GM quotes for these funky work vans. The G3 also has fast charging. The native plug is CCS, but Grounded tosses in a CCS-to-NACS adaptor so you could use the Tesla Supercharger network.

The platform is a cool one, too. Grounded’s version of the Zevo 400 and 600 vans sport dual-motor AWD with 300 HP and 390 lb-ft of torque. These camper vans come with Chevy’s Max Range 172 kWh 20-module battery, which kicks range up to 286 miles combined. Now, you may wonder why Grounded is boasting about the inclusion of AWD when the vans have a low ground clearance of 7.51 inches and a poor breakover angle of around 9 degrees. Clearly, nobody is going to be using this for off-roading.
The addition of AWD is a function of how the BrightDrop vans are configured. Currently, equipping the Max Range battery option requires having AWD. Besides, as far as Grounded is concerned, AWD helps enable all-season driving, anyway.
The Grounded G3 Camper Van

The G3’s interior is also vastly different than the G2 and G1, and Grounded founder Sam Shapiro says that’s due to customer feedback, from Grounded:
“The G3 is a next-gen offering for travelers who want to live, work, and roam in comfort, grounded in what matters. The G3 builds on everything we learned from our customers and from the G2. It’s a ground-up reimagining of our smart, fully-electric RV that’s based on real-world use. We replaced wood cabinetry with durable aluminum frames and 100% recycled tree-free materials, refined every wall panel and furniture module to deliver designer-grade aesthetics with pro-functionality, added a motorized lift bed that transforms into a California King, and designed a new insulated rear door that improves energy efficiency without sacrificing the view.”
“We also reengineered the electrical system for 1,400W vehicle-to-house charging and added self-heating batteries to enable four-season travel. Every improvement from materials to layout was shaped by feedback from G2 owners. The G3 is smarter, stronger, and more adaptable than any other offering on the market today.”

This is good news! Back in 2023, Grounded marketed its interior concept as being modular. The twist was that if you wanted to change your interior layout, you had to send the van to Grounded so the company could make your desired changes. The original van did not work like other modular RVs, where you could change the interior yourself on the fly.
The G2 updated the concept to allow the end user to change the interior. But, in my observations checking units parked at auto shows, the G2’s fit and finish weren’t quite where I would have expected them to be. I also wasn’t a huge fan of all of the exposed furniture tracks everywhere. It looks like I wasn’t alone in thinking that Grounded could do better. As a result, the Grounded team went back to the drawing board and produced this:

The most obvious change is that there are no longer obvious tracks lining the walls to attach the furniture to. What’s awesome is that Grounded says that you can still swap out modular interior modules, but the setup now looks much cleaner. A lot of the other changes have been noted above, where the thin plywood is gone, replaced with recycled materials backed by aluminum frames.
Other bits of equipment include 1kW of roof solar, a Starlink dish, and up to a 20 kWh LiFePO house battery. The G3 is also better for cold weather, with Grounded saying that it layered the van in 2-inch-thick EPS foam in addition to beefing up the insulation on the rear door and the self-heating batteries. As a result, Grounded says, the camper should keep working just fine even in 0-degree weather.
Not As Expensive As I Expected

All of this is great! What also sounds reasonable-ish is the price. The Grounded G3 starts at $165,000 for the G3 Form. This sounds pretty awesome, right? It’s cheaper than a Wingamm and much cheaper than many of Airstream’s camper vans. One of Grounded’s original goals was to put a camper van on the market that’s cheaper than a comparable one with an ICE. The G1 sort of met that goal, but the G2 did not. Now, Grounded is returning to its roots.
However, there is a catch. Going for the G3 Form highly limits your options. You get only a fixed queen bed, a kitchen without a dishwasher, and no bathroom facilities. You also can’t get it with a television or a computer monitor. If you want a shower, you’ll have to upgrade to the $180,000 G3 Function, but that also adds options like a dinette, a toilet, and a dishwasher.
If you want the headline feature of a raisable bed, that’s available only with the $200,000 G3 Freedom. This model has every single option unlocked for you to pick. Among the additional options you can get are an awning, a bike rack, and more. In terms of other equipment, there’s a 16-gallon fresh water tank, a 22-gallon gray water tank, a Bosch electric water heater, and an app to control the van’s systems.

There are also a couple of quirks here. One of them is that since this camper is based on a vehicle primarily for commercial use, there isn’t really any integration between the cab and the camper. A Ram ProMaster camper or a Ford Transit camper will feature seats that swivel to add to living room space, but that can’t happen here because the BrightDrop is more of a delivery van with a divider wall.
The commercial van bones are also apparent in the fact that there are no side doors to enter the camper portion. You either enter only through the rear door, or filter your way through the front end first. Oh, and despite how large this camper van is, there are seatbelts only for the driver and the front passenger. Grounded hopes to solve that sometime this fall.

There are several upgrades across the board here. Grounded has improved the interior materials, doubled the house battery capacity, and finally, now there’s an option for a shower inside of the camper. A combined range of 286 miles is also pretty decent. While it’s not very impressive in a world full of Lucids and Teslas, this van should be able to hurtle down the highway for at least a few hours at a time before needing to charge again. Even better is that, as charging infrastructure improves for large vehicles, it should get even easier to charge this thing.
If you’re interested, you can start your ordering process by playing around in Grounded’s 3D configurator tool. Once you submit your design, Grounded will contact you with next steps. The company says that Grounded G3 production begins this month.
I won’t lie, this camper van is still very expensive. But we have seen so much worse lately, including camper vans that cost over $500,000. It’s sad that $160,000 is “cheap” in comparison to what some companies try to sell. At the very least, it does look like Grounded is committed to improving, which is pretty neat. Maybe one day I’ll get to take one of these for a spin.
I do not understand ERVs. Apparently this cheap ERV allows you to pay $160,000 to drive to a campground within 300 miles and then camp in it with dead batteries. Why are we looking at range when it is short and you end up with no power while camping? I’m thinking I want power available while I am camping. Please explain why this $160,000 ERV that gets you close to the campground but leaves you in a blackout while camping?
A. Per the article it has: up to a 20 kWh LiFePO house battery.” So even if you completely discharged the propulsion battery you would still have juice at your destination. Of course the logical thing to do would be to charge on the way using a CCS or NACS DC charger and arrive without a dead battery.
B. If you are going to a campground most of them have 30 amp or 50 amp service.
At $160K it is pricey but then almost all B-Class RVs are. The Winnebago Ekko starts at $215K, is about the same size and is based on a Transit.
https://www.winnebago.com/models/product/motorhomes/class-c/ekko
So the perfect EV camper van if you want to camp out in your backyard?
My backyard doesn’t cover a 300 mile radius.
Nice attempted deflection though for not understanding that this camper has a separate house battery.
They should put solar panels on the roof. That way if you run out of charge you could just abandon it and come back the following spring. It would be all charged up and ready to go. So convenient.
“Other bits of equipment include 1kW of roof solar”
The rest of your comment is accurate LOL
Funny. Spending $15k more gets you more Function than Form.
I’m smitten with the non-greyscale minimalist interior – Other than the “let’s shower over the poop receptacle” water closet…
…and that exterior – it’s better than any traditional RV graphics or camo.
Range: When my parents were full-timing in their DutchStar – 300 miles/5-6 hours drive was about their max range for a day, even when doing cross-continent travel. Because there’s an entire process of getting up & dressing, having breakfast, disconnecting land connections, pulling in the slides, putting things away securely, hitching up the car and hitting the road – with refueling somewhere in the midst of all that – generally around lunchtime. Then doing all that in reverse order at the other end, but dinner instead. It makes for quite a full day.
A lot of full time RVers say they’ll never drive more than 4 hours in a day, and they strive for no more than 2. The point is the journey, not the destination.
That said – I’m still concerned about ending the day somewhere without a plug. The big draw of an EV is ending the day at home 99% of the time and hunting for a charger is the exception. Going to a known campground that you frequent is one thing, but the open road adds unknowns.
Most RV parks have 30 and 50 amp electrical connection so folks won’t need to run their APUs.
Its easy to determine if the park you’re interested in has that when you make your reservation.
A lot of the NY state park campgrounds don’t have RV sites with hookups. The one I’m most familiar with added a couple EV chargers at least. I’ve heard mixed reviews from people on sites that do have hookups – sometimes they don’t work or sometimes they don’t have enough juice if every site is full (not sure how prevalent that is). I suspect the added fees some campgrounds are charging for EVs (someone else noted it in the comments but I’ve heard of it before as well) is less about electricity usage and more about actually providing properly working sites that can all handle that much draw constantly (and not just a spike from an AC unit starting up, for example).
I’m not saying electric RVs can’t be a thing, I’m just saying I’m a little concerned about full timing it in one.
Michigan state parks are the same. Most were powered in the 50s & 60s, so the grid can barely handle the 30A/50A connections of traditional RVs with single and dual AC units running throughout the night. If you add EVs to it I think it’ll crash pretty regularly. They are upgrading but it’s going to take a decade to do every park, and as is typical for government the upgrades will just make it efficient for traditional campers and not EV charging.
Very nice for people who don’t drive far to their favorite campground. The interior is sharp and I am intrigued by this “modular” idea although I wonder how often do people really wish to move their RV settings around.
Agree with others that hybrid would really be the ideal solution for RVs.
With it having the ability to fast charge, you can really take it just about anywhere honestly since you can go to regular CCS fast chargers
You know, you’re right, and since it’s an RV, you can just hop in the back and make a sandwich or take a nap while you charge up.
If there was one vehicle category that is extremely appropriate for EV + ICE range extenders, it’s RVs. 300 miles just is not nearly far enough for a road trip vehicle. What is that…. 4 hours of driving? Then what, sit for hours and hours?
The point of an RV is to drive long distance, and stay in comfort, no? I get that with today’s tech we can make an EV RV. ERV? But the sheer amount of batteries seems counter productive. I’d rather have 60 miles of electric range with a nice range extending ICE engine or something. But then you need an ICE engine powerful to maintain highway speeds… and then you’re kind of negating the EV aspect.
Idk. This just seems like an answer to a question nobody asked.
I totally agree with that! I hope Thor’s hybrid motorhome becomes a reality because that seems to be the ticket.
Weirdly, some people are asking for all-electric motorhomes. It’s part of why the RV industry keeps trying out these concepts. That’s not too surprising as there are now lots of people swearing off internal combustion entirely. But yeah, the current method to get range is lots of huge, heavy, and expensive batteries.
The first thing that strikes me is the exterior graphics. This is so much better than the lame uninspired graphics on other RVs and trailers. I could do with out the branding, but I assume this being a demonstrator model it makes sense for their marketing.
Now, questions. Many public charging stations are under awnings of some kind. Often solar. Can this fit under them? Would you need an app to tell you what charging stations you could get near enough to use?
Being based on a delivery van, which is primarily designed for urban/suburban delivery, I would imaging the range to be completely different in highway use. I don’t foresee most users just diving across town to camp. They would be out on rural roads and highways. I think this would need to be properly rated for those use cases.
Also, every step in van I have ever been in has had a very noisy cabin. Especially wind noise due to the sliding doors. This would be even more obvious with the near silent drive train. A couple of hours on the highway would be pretty fatiguing.
I’m a huge fan of this RV, just wish I could afford it. Maybe in 10 years on the used market.
The one issue I wish they would address is the lack of a rear toilet. It’s just a cartridge toilet.
I have noticed now campgrounds charging you extra if you have an electric vehicle, a few locally have a $75 per day add on. Friends had grandparents visit with their Prius and they got charged $150.00 sadly the fee is solely at the discression of management so they had to pay.
That is egregious. It is impossible to use that much electricity in a day with an EV.
I think it’s ideological for them
You are probably right…
Shouldn’t they have kept a door in the bulkhead? Lots of vans have a way to get from cab to cargo area, and this is basically a gussied up FedEx truck. It’s also way too expensive, but that’s typical of low volume RVs. Lol at what a Cricket costs for what you get
The range is laughable but at least it’s really overpriced… wait…
The range is likely quoted for the van platform itself. Now, load it up with stuff, and possibly fresh water in the holding tank, and watch the range decline further. At least you have a camper to relax in while you stop to charge…
Have you ever driven more than 250 miles in a camper? That range is more than enough for my tastes quite frankly.
Yes, plenty of times, actually.
I don’t know about you, but if I want to stay so close to home, I’ll just stay home.
In 250 Miles I can get from my home in Chicago to the woods of Northern Wisconsin. So, yeah… totally worth it.
It is even closer to camping near Road America or the Indianapolis Motor Speedway….
And in the woods of northern wisonsin, you can charge your camper easily from any of the countless trees with charge leads.
They have campgrounds there. Virtually all with NEMA 14-50 hookups.
And you can charge along the way.
Like I said, “Stop to charge, yes, and waste lots of time.
If there are any charges that actually work. Back to the crumbling infrastructure…”
Cruise America doesn’t even recommend you drive more than 300 miles a day. https://www.cruiseamerica.com/trip-inspiration/what-is-the-3-3-3-rv-travel-rule-why-it-s-importan
Not that you could with this thing anyway xD
From your link: “At 75mph, it only takes four hours to cover that distance. Rarely is RV travel so simple, though — crowded highways, road construction, not to mention bathroom and meal breaks.”
So, “cruise america” factors in that americans have the bladders of sparrows and stomachs of… I don’t know, what eats more than americans? Brachiosaurus?
That’s aside from the crumbling infrastructure.
So grateful I don’t live there.
Well, you do know you can stop to charge, right?
Cruise America literally knows more about American use of RVs than probably any other company in the country.
Stop to charge, yes, and waste lots of time.
If there are any charges that actually work. Back to the crumbling infrastructure…
Yes, because camping trips are all about speed.
Other than you just now, who said a word about speed?
“Waste lots of time”.
Has nothing to do with speed.
Fill a diesel, 10 minutes or so.
Charge this contraption, exponentially longer and more frequent.
Time not spent enjoying the destination, hence time wasted.
A bit surprising something so simple needed to be explained.
“Has nothing to do with speed”…
… Then proceeds to explain how something occurs faster than something else.
When it comes to not spending time “enjoying your destination”, we *are* talking about an incredibly small percentage difference. But I guess for some people every second counts and you must be one of them. Luckily you have found a solution that works better for you.
Speed is how fast something is going.
Time is how long something takes.
Life is a finite resource. If you’re okay wasting some of it, you’re doing it wrong.
Is it Grounded to the ground?
Probably not. I don’t see a wire.
Who thought “Grounded” was a good name for an ERV? Any parent can tell you grounded means you ain’t going anywhere.
You get grounded for 90 minutes at a time charging.
Assuming the charger is working and available when you pull in
The biggest problem I see with this one is the price. $200,000 would buy you a very nice used Marathon, and people with 200 grand to splurge on a vehicle you rarely drive and that just sits there depreciating unlike the property you could buy with that money, probably aren’t overly concerned about saving money on diesel. Are they really going to be willing to settle for a composting toilet and a fairly barebones and plain interior when the same money could buy them a rolling mansion, especially since the mansion is a bus conversion with the inherent reliability that brings?
You just described all RVs. Rarely driven, huge depreciating brick on wheels. Conversely, the thought of a ‘rolling mansion’ like some of these monstrous RVs is simply distasteful. If you need to bring your whole damn house with you, stay home, and spare us the highway blockade. Or do what other civilized people do; stay at a hotel.
I don’t like to judge as everyone has their own priorities. Personally, I spend close to 200 days per year in hotels on business. The last thing I want to do on vacation is go to a hotel.
That said, an electric RV does not make sense for me. When I go camping, I have never been anywhere with electricity, let alone a charging station. I also have rarely traveled less than 300 miles in a day. Maybe someday when I retire, an RV with a lower range will make sense.
You’re not wrong. My point is that if you’re willing to spend enough to buy a small house on a motorhome, you’re probably going to want something more suited to your likes than this. 200 grand and it’s got a composting toilet? I mean, really? I’d convert my entire fleet to EV tomorrow if I could afford it and I wouldn’t buy this.
I’ve seen a bit of a trend among some high-end folks to do this intentionally. Permanently parking a high-end trailer like Airstream and you get an instant guesthouse without any pesky building permits.
Sure. That’s a trend. Hell, I’m getting ready to do that myself. But not with this. I could spend less than half as much for something just as nice. I don’t object to motorhomes or EV campers, I just don’t see that there’s much Venn diagram overlap between people with 200 grand to burn and people who want a composting toilet instead of a real one.
The big advantage this has over the ‘rolling mansion’ as well as those bus conversions is the fuel and maintenance costs will be much lower.
And while the range is less than a diesel RV, it shouldn’t be an issue if you camp at places with electrical hookups or do some planning ahead of time.
Yeah, but again, if you’re cool dropping almost 1/4 mil on an RV, you’re probably not too worried about fueling it up.
I’m all in on the concept of EV motorhomes, but right now, they’re spending Ferrari money for a Chevy Cavalier. Even if you don’t want the rolling mansion, there are lots of options that are more comfortable whatever level you like for camping.
This is probably a great motorhome for half the price, but at the price point it currently sits there’s just too much competition in all categories.
$200K won’t buy a bare lot in many parts of the USA let alone a house.
There is a reason that used Marathon that cost $1.5 to $2 million new is $200K with only 160K miles on the clock. The same reason that you can buy an old luxury car that cost $200K for the price of a new Corolla. A coach based RV comes with commercial vehicle size maintenance and a 20 year old one is likely to need a lot of upkeep. So you buy it “cheap” and then put the original purchase price back into it every few years to keep it on the road. And in many parts of the country you will be paying $200 – $400 a month just to park it. The costs to owning a Class A RV is far more than just the cost of diesel. (Similar to how many large sailboats that must be kept in a slip or dry storage are cheaper than a midsize trailerable boat)
Class B RVs cost more to buy than a new Class C and used Class As even though they are much smaller. Part of the reason is that they are smaller and more practical. A Class B can be parked in the driveway and driven to work. (There are about 5 people at my work that daily drive Transit and Sprinter Class B campervans.).
You aren’t getting into a new Class B for less than $100K and many are much, much more. You can easily spend $200K on a gas or diesel Class B campervan – that is just what they go for.
The very cheapest Winnebago Class B is $144K and that is for a short wheelbase FWD Promaster. An AWD Sprinter is $255K.
BTW – I’ll take a “composting” toilet over a “real” toilet in an RV any day. With a separating toilet (nobody is actually composting poop in an RV) solids and liquids are separate. Pour out the pee bottle and the solids side just has a plastic trash bag. Tie it up and toss it out – simple. Way easier than finding a dump station, hooking up your drain pipe, and then dumping nasty stinky poop slurry into a hole in the ground and then cleaning out all your poop pipes.
There is a reason that many RV’ers with “real” toilets have a hard and fast rule that says under no circumstances is the RV toilet ever to be used for “#2”.
Yeah, I live where $450k is considered a starter home, and I’m not in the most expensive part of the country either. But there are still places where you can get a house for 200 grand.
I don’t disagree with you about the maintenance expenses, but would point out again that if we’re talking about people who are dropping 6 figures just on the purchase price of a steeply depreciating asset, they’re probably more worried about how comfortable that asset is and how good it looks vs. how much it costs to run and maintain.
If this thing were 80k or less, I think you’d have a stronger argument, but people who have hundreds of thousands to drop on something that loses value at the speed of light (as you noted) and that gets used only occasionally are going to be looking for something they want. Is this RV really something they want? A bread van with plain-jane furniture inside and a toilet that looks like it came out of a cheap popup?
I tend to doubt it.
As far as “real” vs bag/compost/whatever toilets, the tank dumping thing is overblown. I never got dirty dumping a black tank, and cleaning out all the “poop pipes” just requires that you dump the grey tank after you dump the black tank. It all goes through the same hose, and the grey water cleans out all the nasty stuff.
Yes, a lot of RVers don’t want “#2” in their toilets, but a lot of other RVers aren’t too worried because they know how to deal with their tanks.