Home » This Seemingly AI-Generated Car Article On Yahoo Is A Good Reminder That AI Is An Idiot

This Seemingly AI-Generated Car Article On Yahoo Is A Good Reminder That AI Is An Idiot

Bmwbrz Ai Top
ADVERTISEMENT

Here at The Autopian, we have some very stern rules when it comes to the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the content we produce. While our crack design team may occasionally employ AI as a tool in generating images, we’ll never just use AI on its own to do anything – not just for ethical reasons, but because we often want images of specific cars, and AI fundamentally doesn’t understand anything. When an AI generates an image of a car, it has no idea if that car ever actually existed or not. An AI doesn’t have ideas at all, in fact – it’s just scraped data being assembled with a glorified assembly of if-then-else commands.

This is an even bigger factor in AI-generated copy. We’ll never use it because AI has no idea what the hell it’s writing about, and so has no clue if anything is actually true, and since ChatGPT has never driven a car, I don’t really trust its “insights” into anything automotive.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

These sort of rules are hardly universal in our industry, though, so if we ever wanted confirmation that our no-AI-copy rule was the right way, we’re lucky enough to be able to get such reassurance pretty easily. For example, all we have to do is read this dazzlingly shitty article re-published over on Yahoo Finance about the worst cars people have owned.

Maybe it’s not AI? Maybe this “Kellan Jansen” is an actual writer who actually wrote this, and in that case, I feel bad both for this coming excoriation and about whatever happened to them to cause them to be in the state they seem to be in. The article is shallow and terrible and gleefully, hilariously wrong in several places.

I guess I should also note that we don’t use AI because the 48K Sinclair Spectrum workstations we use here don’t quite have the power to run any AI. Well, we do have one AI that we use on them, our Artificial Ignorance system that we employ to get just that special je ne sais quoi in every post we write. Oh, and our AI (Artificial Indignation) tools help with our hot takes, too. So, two.

ADVERTISEMENT

Okay, but let’s get back to the Yahoo Finance article, titled “The Worst Car I Ever Owned: 9 People Share Which Vehicles Aren’t Worth Your Money,” which is a conceptually lazy article that is just taking the responses to a Reddit post called “What’s the worst car you have personally owned?” which makes this story basically just a re-write of a Reddit post. It seems like the Reddit post was fed into whatever AI half-assed its way through generating the article, based on these results.

The results are, predictably, shitty, but also still worthy of pointing out because come on. There’s this, for example:

2023 BMW BRZ

BMWs are a frequent source of frustration for car owners on Reddit. Just ask user “Hurr1canE_.”

They bought a 2023 BMW BRZ and almost immediately started experiencing problems. Their turbo started blowing white smoke within two weeks of buying the car, and the engine blew up within 5,000 miles.

The Reddit user also had these issues with the car:

  • Air valve
  • Computer software and control module
  • Transmission

Other users mention poor experiences with BMW X3s and 540i Sport Wagons. It’s enough to suggest you think carefully before making one of these your next vehicle.

The fuck? What is a BMW BRZ? This is such a perfect example of why AI-generated articles are garbage: they make shit up. Maybe that’s anthropomorphizing the un-sentient algorithm too much, but the point is that it’s writing, with all the confidence of a drunk uncle about to belly-flop into a pool, about a car that simply does not exist.

And, if you look at the Reddit post, it’s easy to see what happened:

Bmwbrz 1

ADVERTISEMENT

The Redditor had their current car, a 2023 [Subaru] BRZ in their little under-name caption (their flair), and the dumb AI processed that into the mix, and, being a dumb computer algorithm that doesn’t know from cars or clams, conflated the car being talked about with the one the poster actually owns. You know, like how a drooling simpleton might.

There’s more of this, too. Like this one:

F105501

Ah, yes, the F10 550i. So many of us have been burned by that F10 brand, have we not? Or, at least, we would have, if such a brand existed, which it doesn’t. What seems to have happened here is the AI found a user complaining about a “2011 F10 550i” but didn’t know enough to realize this was a user talking about their BMW 5 series, and yes, F10 refers to the 5-series cars made between 2010 to 2016, but nobody would refer to this car out of context in a general-interest article on a financial site without mentioning BMW, would they? I mean, no human would, but we don’t seem to be dealing with a human, just a dumb machine.

Even if we ignore the made-up car makes and models, the vague and useless issues listed, and the fact that the article is nothing more than a re-tread of a random Reddit post, there’s no escaping that this entire thing is useless garbage, an unmitigated waste of time. What is learned by reading this article? What is gained? Nothing, absolutely nothing.

ADVERTISEMENT

And it’s not like this is on some no-name site; it was published on Yahoo! Finance, well, after first appearing on GOBankingRates.com, that mainstay of automotive journalism. It all just makes me angry because there are innocent normies out there, reading Yahoo! Finance, maybe with some mild interest in cars, and now their heads are getting filled with information that is simply wrong.

People deserve better than this garbage. And this was just something innocuous; what if some overpaid seat-dampener at Yahoo decides that they’ll have AI write articles about actually driving or something that involves actual safety, and there’s no attempt made to confirm that the text AI poops out has any basis in fact at all?

We don’t need this. AI-generated crapticles like these are just going to clog Google searches and load the web up full of insipid, inaccurate garbage, and that’s my job, dammit.

Seriously, though, we’re at an interesting transition point right now; these kinds of articles are still new, and while I don’t know if there’s any way we can stop the internet from becoming polluted with this sort of crap, maybe we can at least complain about it, loudly. Then we can say we Did Something.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

(Thanks, Isaac!)

Relatedbar

Let’s See What Artificial ‘Intelligence’ Thinks Good Valentine’s Day Car Images Look Like

VW Will Be The First Carmaker To Offer Integrated ChatGPT After All None Of You Demanded It

The New Photoshop Beta’s AI Image Generator Does Some Weird Things To Cars

I Tried Using AI To Help Me Understand This Deeply Confusing Old Gas Station Ad And It Didn’t Work

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
128 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dogisbadob
Dogisbadob
7 months ago

better than most non-AI Yahoo “journalism” tho LOL

The best part of Yahoo News is the comments section, filling in the blanks of Yahoo’s middle school journalism quality articles

Marteau
Marteau
7 months ago

Torch, are we fully honest here ?
I remember some weeks ago, i think during aweekend, several unsigned or signed by an unknown unintroduce writer, that were utter shit. Clearly could have been AI generated, and people said so in the comments.

Space
Space
7 months ago
Reply to  Marteau

Who was it? so I can go look at them too.

Cars? I've owned a few
Cars? I've owned a few
7 months ago

I saw this article this morning in an app that aggregates items from a wide variety of internet sources and had the same AI thoughts.

Sadly, a Google search reveals there may be a real-life Kellan Jansen, complete with a LinkedIn profile and an author bio at GOBankingRates.com. Of course, that may just be another layer of AI subterfuge.

Cal67
Cal67
7 months ago

He’s a content creator. If you check his profile on https://muckrack.com/kellan-jansen/articles, he has numerous repeats of every single content piece he creates listed on different sites.

Argentine Utop
Argentine Utop
7 months ago

Maybe it’s just journalist being, you know, journalists. They get paid to write about shit they don’t know about, supervised by some moron counting words or clicks, just to make “content” that nobody reads. But it must help fill some business metric, I guess.
AI will only exacerbate mediocrity at all levels.
Wait until judges and lawyers start to use it with the same moronic abandon as some Tesla-stans that take a nap, watch porn or play tetris (or all the avobe together) while doing 130 km/h on the highway. What, they already did?

JC Miller
JC Miller
7 months ago
Reply to  Argentine Utop

Wait until judges and lawyers start to use it

They did my friend!
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2023/06/08/lawyer-used-chatgpt-in-court-and-cited-fake-cases-a-judge-is-considering-sanctions/
Also that makes me think of all the “experts” and “scientists” of late

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
7 months ago
Reply to  JC Miller

There are rats in every industry, sadly, and some are particularly well-hung (and built with a computer algorithm trained on stolen art). https://defector.com/the-brief-and-wondrous-life-of-the-ai-giant-penised-rat-explained

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
7 months ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

> “These figures are clearly not scientifically correct, but if such botched illustrations can pass peer review so easily, more realistic-looking AI-generated figures have likely already infiltrated the scientific literature”

I’m less worried about illustrations than about fake data, fake statistics, and imaginary findings, TBH. Peer review has been the gold standard to weed out the frauds, but if Mr Rat Thundercock over here can get through when a 7 year old could see it has issues, then you have to wonder how much plausible-looking fake science is being published.

Last edited 7 months ago by Double Wide Harvey Park
Argentine Utop
Argentine Utop
7 months ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

I’m laughing like a madman with that article. Thanks Stef, you made my day!

JC Miller
JC Miller
7 months ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

God damn there are not enough stars for that link!
Also not AI but just as bad scientists(your link reminded me of it):
https://www.wral.com/story/with-canine-sex-and-hooters-hoaxes-point-at-weakness-in-journals/17894156/

Michael Beranek
Michael Beranek
7 months ago

Many reporting user comments generated by AI. Close examination of meta reports collaborate user ID AI, with sentient waffles corralling constable forecast metamorphosis. Clamor idle situation at convergence dichotomy.

AssMatt
AssMatt
7 months ago

Beautifum!

Vanillasludge
Vanillasludge
7 months ago

”You can buy this BMW BRZ for the price of a Mitsubishi Mustang”

JC Miller
JC Miller
7 months ago
Reply to  Vanillasludge

I prefer the Maybatsu Monstrocity okay? I guess rockstar was way ahead of everyone in using AI 🙂

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
7 months ago

The lovely part of filling the internet with AI generated nonsense is that this becomes a self powered cyclone from hell. The next article AI writes will reference those AI articles, creating whirling cess pool of constantly degrading nonsense.

Der Foo
Der Foo
7 months ago
Reply to  Lockleaf

Interesting experiment. How long will the result is only a word salad? How long till that word salad is only a letter salad? How long till the intelligence curve swings back up and the results become a new AI language? How long till AI figures we are too stupid to understand the new language and it ends us all?

Vanillasludge
Vanillasludge
7 months ago
Reply to  Der Foo

Most Americans don’t eat enough salads so it’s a good thing.

Ranwhenparked
Ranwhenparked
7 months ago
Reply to  Vanillasludge

A taco salad is still a salad

Amberturnsignalsarebetter
Amberturnsignalsarebetter
7 months ago
Reply to  Ranwhenparked
AlterId
AlterId
7 months ago
Reply to  Der Foo

How long till AI figures we are too stupid to understand the new language and it ends us all?

Not soon enough.

Marteau
Marteau
7 months ago
Reply to  AlterId

Username checks out

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
7 months ago
Reply to  Der Foo

Skynet is coming for us all!

DialMforMiata
DialMforMiata
7 months ago

I can’t wait until this article shows up on Livelively.com or some other assorted twaddle generator after being retitled “Random Meat Puppet Needs to Learn His Place, Also Bad Cars are Bad”.

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
7 months ago
Reply to  DialMforMiata

I full on laughed out loud at your article name. Good on ya!

Argentine Utop
Argentine Utop
7 months ago
Reply to  DialMforMiata

As a meat puppet I feel offended.

Mr Sarcastic
Mr Sarcastic
7 months ago

Another funny enjoyable article. But Jason weren’t you a little tough o. The AI? I mean who among us human types hasn’t been a victim of Autocorrect?
But no worries this is why I get all my car information from the Autopian and all my sports News from the Pittsburgh sports teams websites.

Last edited 7 months ago by Mr Sarcastic
Der Foo
Der Foo
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr Sarcastic

Every ducking time I try to text when I’m angry.

Col Lingus
Col Lingus
7 months ago
Reply to  Der Foo

I think the text editor on my iPhone is controlled by the Church Lady.

It refuses to remember many of my most favored offensive words and phrases.

Lizardman in a human suit
Lizardman in a human suit
7 months ago
Reply to  Col Lingus

My samsung is learning well. It’s auto fill knows all my favorite bad words. I can’t even let my daughter use my phone at this point

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr Sarcastic

> who among us human types hasn’t been a victim of Autocorrect

No risk of that happening on this site as spell check is chronically MIA :p

LTDScott
LTDScott
7 months ago

It’s somewhat comical now but I genuinely fear for the future. Propegating misinformation has already been a problem on the internet, but now people are reading stupid shit like this, thinking it’s real, and presenting it as fact. And if you try to argue against it using data and facts, someone can just as easily come along and point to some website that spouts some nonsense that supports their point, because they genuinely believe it’s real.

I already shake my head at every stupid Facebook post suggested to me with a *CLEARLY* AI generated image but hundreds of comments below from smooth brains thinking it’s real. Like this image of a “Corvette meet” in a parking lot which made the rounds a few months ago. Anyone with half a brain can see that the cars in the background are all distorted and the proportions couldn’t exist in real life, but sadly I’ve found lots of people out there, especially in this hobby, do not possess half a brain.

https://www.corvetteblogger.com/images/content/2023-2/110323_3.jpg

DialMforMiata
DialMforMiata
7 months ago
Reply to  LTDScott

Plus none of the shoes are actually New Balance.

Amberturnsignalsarebetter
Amberturnsignalsarebetter
7 months ago
Reply to  DialMforMiata

COTD ????

TopFuel1771
TopFuel1771
7 months ago
Reply to  LTDScott

I fear for the future too. The amount of people I know who have had their brains broken by the level of misinformation on the internet today is shocking, and that’s mostly just with blurry pictures, bad Photoshop, and conspiracy loons. Adding AI videos, pictures, and articles to it? It will be like a never-ending, self-perpetuating tornado of bullshit.

LTDScott
LTDScott
7 months ago
Reply to  TopFuel1771

Right, at least conspiracy loons are usually *intentionally* presenting misinformation and it’s often easy to tell this based on the source where you’re seeing said misinformation.

This AI garbage doesn’t know it’s garbage and there’s no way to easily tell it’s false unless you happen to spot something egregiously wrong like the things that Torch pointed out in this article. If not for the BMW BRZ and F10 550i truck mentioned in the article, I would think that the article was just written by some low level clickbait article writer.

Lizardman in a human suit
Lizardman in a human suit
7 months ago
Reply to  LTDScott

Hey, sometimes the conspiracy loons get things right! Hang on, the Overlizards are calling…

Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
7 months ago
Reply to  LTDScott

You know it’s fake because Mason Verger in the brown shoes never leaves the house.

Ben
Ben
7 months ago
Reply to  LTDScott

I’ve been doing some AI training for work, and one of the things they discussed in a class was that current AI isn’t going to end the world in a Terminator-esque apocalypse. What’s scary about it is the ability to almost-instantly generate an entire ecosystem of misinformation. You can publish ebooks, astroturf social media, and create so many web sites claiming the sky is green that by normal standards it will seem like you have a strong argument. And given how many people fall for one poorly-written Facebook post, society is not ready for that level of sophistication in misinformation.

LTDScott
LTDScott
7 months ago
Reply to  Ben

Yep, that’s exactly my concern.

Daniel MacDonald
Daniel MacDonald
7 months ago

Even a well crafted word salad is…still word salad.

The Mark
The Mark
7 months ago

Even if the content was accurate, what’s the point? Why do I need to know to avoid the PT Cruiser? If it had stuck to new cars, mmmmmaybe it might be interesting.

Shooting Brake
Shooting Brake
7 months ago

I find myself confused by the current definition we are using for AI, as you point out, it’s just a scrapping tool, there is 0 actual intelligence going on, artificial or otherwise. Doesn’t mean it isn’t impressive technology, just that per usual the tech companies are overestimating it’s capabilities.

Rad Barchetta
Rad Barchetta
7 months ago
Reply to  Shooting Brake

If you ask me, the only thing impressive about the technology is how much useless crap it generates.

DialMforMiata
DialMforMiata
7 months ago
Reply to  Shooting Brake

I had a friend in college who trained her parakeet to whistle the first few bars of the “Andy Griffith Show” theme. She then tried to teach it the “Flintstones” theme. It wound up getting a bit lost and coming up with something in between the two. To me, AI is that poor confused budgie.

JunkerDave
JunkerDave
7 months ago
Reply to  Shooting Brake

No stock options for Shooting Brake, who is clearly not an MBA!

Shooting Brake
Shooting Brake
7 months ago
Reply to  JunkerDave

Haha, you couldn’t be more right about that!

Stef Schrader
Stef Schrader
7 months ago
Reply to  Shooting Brake

Yeah, I hate the use of “AI” for what’s essentially a predictive-text chatbot. There’s an algorithm involved, sure, but it’s not frickin’ intelligent. Stop calling it intelligent! It’s no more intelligent than pond scum or Jim Spanfeller.

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
7 months ago
Reply to  Stef Schrader

Yeah, I call it Artificial Stupidity (I’ll never get sick of saying that)
Also, that Skynet is coming for us all!

Last edited 7 months ago by Freelivin2713
Ben
Ben
7 months ago
Reply to  Shooting Brake

It’s more properly called machine learning, but that doesn’t have the cultural cachet of artificial intelligence so the marketing department won’t go near it.

Tim Connors
Tim Connors
7 months ago

Kinda fun (in the not so fun way) as a high school English teacher in the age of Chat GPT. Frequent conversations that look like this, “Either you used Chat GPT, which is academic dishonesty OR you write like an uninformed robot–neither of these is good.”

I honestly think the best way to teach students not to lazily use AI is to make them heavily revise the shitty work AI produces for them. I’m also not 100% against AI as a product, so I ‘ve walked students through what it would take to guide an AI towards actually writing something that is quality–inputing the evidence and the points to be made, uploading your own writing so that it can match your style, repeatedly generating work and then asking for specific revisions, etc. Usually, the student’s response is just, “It sound easier to just writte it.”

Mr Sarcastic
Mr Sarcastic
7 months ago
Reply to  Tim Connors

Writte it? You almost had me AI?

Lockleaf
Lockleaf
7 months ago
Reply to  Mr Sarcastic

You know, Connors is a name that can reasonably be associated with AI. Usually combatting it, but that only makes it a better cover…

Is this T1000?

Mr Sarcastic
Mr Sarcastic
7 months ago
Reply to  Lockleaf

You raise A very good point. It also makes me think were either the reddit post or this article published on March 32nd?

Col Lingus
Col Lingus
7 months ago
Reply to  Lockleaf

The name is Connor. As in “The Connor Family” minus Roseanne.
This AI “mistake” resulted in the deaths of several thousand people.

And it’s not a tumor. Neighbah.

Last edited 7 months ago by Col Lingus
Double Wide Harvey Park
Double Wide Harvey Park
7 months ago
Reply to  Lockleaf

Trivia I only found out recently. In James Cameron’s T2, John Connor’s step mom is played by the same woman who played the epic badass marine Vasquez in James Cameron’s Aliens.

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001280/

“Hey Vasquez, ever been mistaken for a man?”
“No, have you?”

Cal67
Cal67
7 months ago
Reply to  Tim Connors

Had a co-worker use AI to write a control plan for manufacturing quality. She asked me to review it – and it meant nothing and would have accomplished nothing. Just a collection of buzz words, although in honesty, if someone had no concept of what a control plan is supposed to be they probably would have thought it was OK. At least the grammar and sentence structure was reasonably readable.

Do You Have a Moment To Talk About Renaults?
Do You Have a Moment To Talk About Renaults?
7 months ago

Amazing how even the most sterile of content still needs both emotion AND human reasoning put into it to not seem like a simulation of itself, as it happens when AI tries to write longer pieces. There’s other areas where AI still feels super weird no matter how much better it’s gotten, like speech generation; it’s gotten to a point where I can spot it – and become off-put by it – within seconds of the start of a video, way before the AI voice model first struggles with numbers, dates or acronyms (which I actually chalk up more to user error, you can get around those errors with better textual input – writing “twenty twenty” if you don’t want the AI to say “two-zero-two-zero”, for instance). Much like with image generation, here’s a distinct artificial feel to it that we’ll evolve to spot along with the evolution of the models themselves. Maybe AI will get there eventually, but I think it’ll be way harder and take longer than people currently believe.

Even when AI is deployed in a more bare-bones way, such as an AI algorithm sorting data, you still have fundamental challenges to overcome – I know this because I actually work fixing the mistakes made by an “AI” data extraction algorithm. Me and my colleagues see AI malfunctioning on a daily basis and it’s super funny, because we’re basically operators of a Mechanical Turk, marvelling our clients with the wonders of some shitty software.

Last edited 7 months ago by Do You Have a Moment To Talk About Renaults?
Tim Connors
Tim Connors
7 months ago

Hear this statement a while ago: AI is just three labor violantions wearing a trenchcoat.

Do You Have a Moment To Talk About Renaults?
Do You Have a Moment To Talk About Renaults?
7 months ago
Reply to  Tim Connors

I genuinely burst out laughing, that is an excellent one-liner 😀

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
7 months ago

This is a GOOD thing: I should be able to pick up a BMW BRZ super-cheap now!

Chronometric
Chronometric
7 months ago
Reply to  TOSSABL

Since you can get a BMW Supra, the BRZ was only a matter of time.

Adam Rice
Adam Rice
7 months ago

Artificial Ignorance system that we employ to get just that special je ne sais quoi in every post we write”

I’d say it gives your posts more of a je ne sais rien quality..

Black Peter
Black Peter
7 months ago

While we can all have a laugh at the “current state” of AI, I heard a frightening interview on the “offline” podcast that this is consumer AI, “golf cart” AI in car terms. The AI in the development labs, the “Lucid Air” AI, that one is scary and should not be released.

Crank Shaft
Crank Shaft
7 months ago

Shhhhh. Don’t tell Elon.

Flyingstitch
Flyingstitch
7 months ago

I was waiting to see DANGER TO MANIFOLD, but it didn’t quite get there. Disappointing.

Drew
Drew
7 months ago

Utopian sci-fi: Artificial intelligence and automation will take over the jobs people don’t really want to do and free them to engage in philosophy and art. We’ll live in a post-scarcity society where no one needs to worry about their basic needs.

Current reality: Hey, we’re going to have these algorithms create art and write informative opinion pieces. They’re not going to be good at it, but we’ll put them everywhere we can to reduce the writing and illustrating jobs and pay people less. Also, basic necessities are going to get more expensive.

Mr Sarcastic
Mr Sarcastic
7 months ago
Reply to  Drew

Have you checked what jobs in Philosophy and Arts pay? Can’t get cheaper than self publishing right?

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
7 months ago

Darn! I was sure the ignorance on The Autopian was real.

Drew
Drew
7 months ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

I’m pretty sure the ignorance we readers bring to the comment section is both authentic and organic, so just jump into the comments for the real thing.

Last edited 7 months ago by Drew
Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
7 months ago
Reply to  Drew

Already wet.

V10omous
V10omous
7 months ago

If AI can’t even figure out all the BMW chassis codes, what hope do the rest of us have?

There was a slim chance when they were all Exx. but once other letters became involved, there was no hope.

MikeInTheWoods
MikeInTheWoods
7 months ago

I might be mistaken, but I have found the web to have always been full of insipid, inaccurate garbage. TV is also bad with pandering to whomever gives them ratings. The shocking thing for me is that there are so many people who don’t exercise critical thinking when absorbing the garbage. AI is the noob who posts stuff in a car forum and gets flamed for not utilizing the search tool first.

Mr Sarcastic
Mr Sarcastic
7 months ago
Reply to  MikeInTheWoods

Was that a shot at me? LOL

Maxzillian
Maxzillian
7 months ago

I hate this timeline.

Brian Ash
Brian Ash
7 months ago
Reply to  Maxzillian

Or this version of the Matrix

TOSSABL
TOSSABL
7 months ago
Reply to  Maxzillian

I used to—then I read more history.
It could be worse. Way worse

Tim Connors
Tim Connors
7 months ago
Reply to  Maxzillian

This is The Bad Place!

LTDScott
LTDScott
7 months ago
Reply to  Tim Connors

Great reference to a great show.

Mr Sarcastic
Mr Sarcastic
7 months ago
Reply to  Tim Connors

Where did that bad AI touch you? Show me on this Atari keyboard.

1 2 3
128
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x