If you’re one of the glorious motorcycle nuts with an affinity for an iconic sidecar, you’re almost certainly aware of Ural – if you don’t already own one. Since 1941, Ural has been building boxer engine-powered sidecar motorcycles that are capable of conquering some serious terrain. While a new Ural is a surprisingly modern machine with fuel injection and Brembo brakes, the bikes themselves are nods to the past. That’s why Ural’s latest announcement is a shocker. The Ural Neo 500, which is coming to America next year, is something completely new for the world’s favorite rugged sidecar rig builder.
Riding a Ural is a different kind of motorcycling. Plenty of people have slapped sidecars onto the sides of motorcycles that were originally built as two-wheelers. I’ve seen everything from Honda Groms to Triumph Rocket IIIs with sidecars! But there’s something special about a Ural. The firm’s bikes are refreshingly simple, unapologetically metal, and oh yeah, their two-wheel-drive makes them a formidable force when the going gets tough. [Ed Note: 2WD as in the sidecar’s wheel can be powered on demand, joining the bike’s rear wheel, not the front wheel – Pete] A Ural today is a bit like a modern Royal Enfield; it’s just modern enough that you don’t have to fiddle with carbs, but classic enough that you feel like you’ve taken a time machine back to the Cold War era.


Ural’s newest motorcycle is none of that. The new Ural Neo 500 looks like something that could have been created by the futuristic Halo universe’s UNSC rather than something befitting a character from a Tom Clancy novel. A lot of that comes down to the new bike’s origins, as it’s not exactly from Kazakhstan with love like Urals built from August 2022. Instead, what you’re looking at is the Ural-ized Yingang SUV500 II, and when it launches next year in America, it’s supposed to be a new affordable way into a Ural badge.

Thank Germany
Something fascinating about Ural is that there appear to be two origin stories for it. If you go to Ural’s official website today, it directly quotes Wikipedia, which is wild:
Ural’s origins are linked to developments in the Eastern Front during World War II. Mobility was especially stressed after the Soviet Union had witnessed the effect of the blitzkrieg on Poland, and a small, rugged, multi-purpose vehicle that could handle Russia’s underdeveloped road network and pockmarked battlefields was a priority.
A meeting was held at the People’s Commissariat of Defense of the USSR at the end of 30s to devise a motorcycle that would be suitable for the Red Army, and BMW R71 motorcycle was found to closely match the Red Army’s requirements. Five units were covertly purchased through Sweden and handed over to Moscow Motorcycle Plant, recently organized in a retooled bicycle factory. Soviet engineers dismantled the BMWs and reverse engineered the bike’s design in every detail. Molds and dies were made to produce engines, gearboxes and other components. The production of these new military sidecar motorcycles, designated M-72 by the Red Army, started in August 1941.
The opening stages of Operation Barbarossa, the Nazis invasion of the Soviet Union in summer of 1941, were so swift and effective that Soviet strategists worried that Moscow would quickly be in range of Luftwaffe bombers. On October 21, 1941, the decision was made to move the motorcycle plant east, out of bombing range and into the resource-rich Ural mountain region. The site chosen was the town of Irbit, located on the fringes of Siberia in the Ural Mountains.

The competing origin story is that the smuggled BMW motorcycle story didn’t really happen, and instead, Ural was created thanks to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of August 1939. The short version was that the pact called for no hostilities between Germany and the Soviet Union. They also agreed to help each other out on common interests, which meant some technology sharing. The competing story of Ural’s origin states that the Soviet Union didn’t sneakily buy BMW R71s, but Germany had supplied the blueprints and molds to the motorcycles as part of its pact with the Soviet Union.
Whichever version of the story is true, this story changed motorcycle history. The first Urals were built for military use, a trend that continued well into the 1950s. IMZ-Ural, which is an abbreviation for “Irbitskiy Mototsikletniy Zavod,” or “Irbit Motorcycle Factory,” also began exports in the 1950s and eventually opened up to selling its motorcycles to consumers all around the world. Many people bought a Ural as a cheap alternative to a car, while others bought them for their rugged appeal and off-road prowess.

The Irbit facility became an impressive operation. In true Soviet fashion, the factory was run to be self-sufficient, with 10,000 people working in countless shops to create all of the parts for Ural builds. The factory made everything onsite from shocks and rubber. During its peak, IMZ pumped out over 130,000 motorcycles a year.
As RideApart reports, this all came crashing down after the Soviet Union fell, shifting Russia from a centrally planned economy to a market economy. Suddenly, production nosedived, and within a few years, Ural was building only 6,000 motorcycles a year and employed only 4,000 people. In 1998, the factory still employed 4,000 people, but those people produced fewer than 2,000 motorcycles that year. By 2000, RideApart writes, IMZ had been beaten and battered enough to have survived two bankruptcies. Production had to stop because IMZ couldn’t pay its bills.
Now Based In America

As part of reorganization efforts, Irbit Motorworks of America, Inc. was formed in Washington in 2002. Ural itself then moved to Washington in 2006. Now, Urals are designed for its biggest market, America. Since then, the company’s engineering and development efforts have happened right here in America, while the bikes were still built in Russia. Sadly, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the resulting sanctions and embargoes, and anti-Russian sentiment forced IMZ-Ural’s hand. The company moved motorcycle assembly to Petropavlovsk, Kazakhstan, which is roughly 373 miles from Irbit. The factory in Irbit still exists, but now builds frames and other parts.
Urals are also interesting because of their makeup. These machines have a Soviet background, but are engineered in America, built in Kazakhstan, and 80 percent of a Ural’s parts come from global suppliers. Ural’s bread and butter has been the Gear Up since its launch in 2005. Despite the model’s age, Ural has been giving it constant updates. Carbs have gone away for fuel injection, brakes are now meaty Brembo four-pot units, and the bike still has Ural’s iconic selectable two-wheel drive. These bikes do a lot with 41 HP and 42 lb-ft of torque.
But here’s the thing: The cheapest Gear Up is the $19,999 Base, while the fancy model is the $26,999 Expedition. Those prices lock buyers of cheaper bikes out of a new Ural, and as I’ve written about before, inexpensive motorcycles are experiencing a boom right now. Ural’s new motorcycle isn’t necessarily cheap, but it does slap some stacks off the entry price. It’s also just vastly different than the Gear Up and perhaps anything in Ural’s history.
A Completely Different Ural

This new motorcycle is called the Ural 500, also known as the Neo 500, and IMZ-Ural says it’s launching this motorcycle because:
Ural 500 is our bold next step: a modern and approachable sidecar motorcycle designed for a new generation of riders.
As the motorcycle industry faces rising prices and limited options, Ural 500 brings something entirely new to the table – sidecar riding that’s intuitive, practical, and built for everyday life.
Whether you’re a first-time rider, a commuter, or someone who just wants to share the ride, this bike makes it easy to join the adventure.

Customers and a limited number of journalists got to play with the prototype Ural 500 at the company’s headquarters. Ural is placing a bet on its future with this new motorcycle. If all goes well, the Neo 500 will replace the Gear Up as Ural’s base platform.
As reported by Cycle World, Ural partnered up with Chinese firm Yingang, which has a couple of decades of experience in building sidecar rigs. The Neo 500 will be based on the Yingang SUV500 II adventure sidecar rig, but with substantial changes. The prototype that customers and journalists got to play with is based on the latest version of the Yingang SUV500 II.
This platform is a huge departure for Ural. There isn’t a boxer engine here. Instead, the SUV500 II is powered by a Zongshen-built 446cc parallel-twin engine, which is backed by a five-speed manual with low ratios. Ural hasn’t announced final numbers yet, but output is expected to be around 35 HP and a touch over 25 lb-ft of torque. That’s less than what you get in the current Ural Gear Up, but the Neo 500 is also a smaller bike. As our friend Janaki at RideApart has written, the prototype weighs a little under 683.5 pounds, or around 47 pounds lighter than the dry weight of the Ural Gear Up Base.
What’s great to hear is that the platform underpinning the SUV500 II and the Ural Neo 500 was built to be a sidecar rig from the start. That means a three-wheeler chassis and a leading-link front suspension. The SUV500 II also sports a 5.3-gallon fuel tank, a tablet for an instrument cluster, LED lights, and a built-in 1080p camera that can be used as a dash cam.

What’s also very different is how the SUV500 II looks like a futuristic adventure bike. Every other Ural looks like it’s at least 50 years old, but the SUV500 II doesn’t.
Cycle World notes that the production Ural Neo 500 will lose some of the adventure bike bits that the SUV500 II has, and that’s because the Neo 500 will be a street-oriented machine, which is another huge departure from Ural’s past and even present. It’s just a standard one-wheel-drive bike, too, not 2WD like Ural’s iconic machines. Despite all of this, we don’t really know exactly how this bike will look. RideApart notes that once Ural got its hands on the first prototype from Yingang, it made over 127 pages of changes to the bike. In other words, the Neo 500 prototype resembles the SUV500 II right now, but that is very likely to change.

All of this is going to be a big deal because, as I noted earlier, the new motorcycle is intended to eventually replace the Gear Up. According to RideApart, Ural intends to halt production of the Gear Up platform and instead base a whole new line of motorcycles on the Neo 500. So, the Neo 500 is a cheaper entry point into Ural, yes, but it’s also supposed to be so much more.
As for how the prototype rides, I highly recommend reading Janaki’s review over at RideApart. She says that the prototype bike is easier to steer than the Gear Up and is more forgiving to smaller riders. This is a part of Ural’s mission to make its sidecar rigs more accessible, less bulky, and easier to ride. Janaki’s review suggests that the prototype appeared to have been built well, which is also great.
Easier To Ride And Buy?

Ural says it hopes to hit a target price of around $15,000 when the bike launches early next year. The Neo 500 will be built in China, and the company says it’s preparing ahead of time for tariffs, and the projected price accounts for having to pay them.
There’s still a lot of work to be done here. While this motorcycle might have been developed in a partnership with a Chinese brand, Ural wants to be sure it will still feel like a Ural and deliver the experience that Ural fans and newcomers expect.
Honestly, I’m just blown away by the huge departure here. To me, Ural has always been like Royal Enfield. It’s a brand happily sticking to the past, but with just enough modern flair. The Neo 500 tosses that in the trash and goes fully modern. I think it’s too early to say anything definitive, but I’m certainly interested in seeing where this goes. You can bet you’ll read more about this new Ural era as I get more information.
Top graphic image: Yingang/Vision Effect TV/YouTube
I am in the very northern part of Europe, and is a year round MCist. I used to be looking at sidecars (weirdly I do not have a license for that) such as the older Urals; simple mechanicals.
But. Since ~2010 we have not had enough snow to need training wheels, and since 2014 anything russian has been tainted. Yes, Ural moved out of Russia, but really?
Also, if this is just a rebadged CN vehicle, I would rather get the orignial from CN.
I was leaving the local kawasaki shop about a month a go and one (flat twin) complete with dog pulled in. Looking happy I nodded and headed on my way.
Based on my sightings I think they inhabit my area at the rate of about one per hundred thousand of population.
There was a guy who used to live round the corner from me who would re-body his annually last time I saw it, it was some kind of space craft theme it has to be back in the early 1990’s. He committed suicide in a shed at the local railroad yard, I learned from a gas pump jockey and mutual acquaintance. I never saw his machine again.
Sad.
Hey has anybody looked into buying a Ukraine made Dnepr?
They look the same but they don’t pay royalties to Russia anymore.
Engine looks new, but the heavy sidecar is still the same.
Yes I’ve owned a URAL.
I think they should’ve partnered with Royal Enfield. An Interceptor based unit would’ve kept more of the old school look to better line up with Urals heritage. More power from the RE 650 too. If built in India would still have lower production costs. Of course maybe they asked a RE wasn’t interested.
First Ural with a sidecar I saw was for sale at a Detroit-area Costco in the mid 90’s. I think they were about $3k at the time.
Ural just crazy.
A friend bought a Ural brand new about 15 years ago. It was pretty neat, especially when you engaged the sidecar drive wheel, but it was not reliable or well built. He kept it for about two years, 18-20 months of that time with it in the shop, and sold it. The KTM that replaced it was leaps and bounds better, and, shockingly, cheaper too.
One of my favorite motorcycle podcasts was the Wheelnerds. Chuck and Todd both had Urals at one point, I have to admit I want one now because of those two.
I’m still not sure “we have Ural at home,” is a thing I want.
I don’t know how it goes in the US, but in France we have very capable small shops who can turn any good bike into a real side car (leading forks, reinforced chassis, rerouted exhaust and so on) with official titles for the same price. Look at Alternative side car for example. If I had to chose between this Russian Chinese combo or a nice second hand BMW (GS, RT or whatever) I won’t hesitate one second !
And politicaly correct because, well, you know.
The original Ural is a nice bike but still a bit overpriced
Despite a lot of effort from Ural to clean their reputation of bad reliability (out sourced bearings, ECU, etc…) maybe they have no other choice to clean their image ?
But it’s a strange move.
whatever their zig-zag on defining where Ural is based and built, you’re still supporting Russia if you buy one.
Just what I wrote. And Ouighours, and Tibet…
My old motorcycle shop was an authorized service center for the Russian built Urals; I once said that they looked kind of fun and I’d entertain having one the way someone has an old Jeep to roll around in. The owner of the shop said that without question “you don’t want one”. He said there were only about a half dozen or so in his service area and there was always one parked in his shop for repairs. He knew those bikes inside and out and maintained they were junk.
Maybe things have changed since then, but I’m still not sure I trust a Kazakh knock-off of a Chinese knock-off..
Oh, sidecars… Pretty much the only type of vehicle I’ve sworn off forever. Hot take or not, they are really death traps, should be off-road only.
That makes me want to try one even more!
They are lopsided tricycles that will occasionally lift a wheel like a dog against a hydrant and are incredibly engaging to drive. Every turn is a different adventure.
(There’s also an undercurrent of fear of the unknown that adds to the excitement.)
They’re great for jousting, at least according to a documentary I recall…
The bike may be a completely different kind of Ural, but Kazakhstan is still the same old Soviet Union. Totally under Putie’s thumb, can’t be trusted, hard pass.
No 2WD is a no-go for me. As one of our resident Canadians, I want year-round usage.
I don’t see why the necessary hub and CV couldn’t be something they add in the future. But if that was the case, I’m not sure why they wouldn’t announce their intentions for it now.
It’s my understanding that this is only the start of a new platform, and the Neo 500 is street-oriented. Presumably, this means that Ural will have a 2WD version in the future. I can’t see the company completely throwing its history away, but I suppose weirder things have happened. I’m looking at you, Smart!
I dream of whipping shitties in the snow with a 2WD Ural. One dayyyyy
Nobody wants a tablet instead of an instrument cluster on a motorcycle.
For me, it depends on how well it is done and what bike it’s going onto. I liked the tablet screen on the Indian FTR, but I wouldn’t want one on a Royal Enfield.
I’d be suspicious of a tablet’s durability, waterproofness, and visibility in all lighting conditions.
I used to worry about the visibility thing, but most of the new bikes I’ve ridden have that all figured out with matte screens and crazy brightness that overcome even direct sunlight. That said, yeah, I also wonder how many of these screens will be working 20+ years from now.
So this is the prototype Neo 500, based on the SUV500 (but definitely a motorcycle, not an SUV) or just the 500 (but definitely not an old Ford 500), which is a Chinese bike that’s been rebuilt in Kazakstan for an American buyer, and will still be a Ural (but not built in the Ural region), but it won’t look like this, and it won’t be 2WD?
Probably the most straight-forward product I’ve ever read about!
With a dash of sanction and tariff evasion for flavor! Assembled in Kazakstan, from parts made in Russia and China.
Fortnine did a video about what it’s like to ride a sidecar. It would be interesting to try one, but I don’t think I’d want to own one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU1KP8w7HNA
Jesus, that is an ugly bike. It will also likely be as popular as a case of shingles. The Venn Diagram of people who want a motorcycle with a sidecar, 2WD, and off-brand Manga styling is two circles separated by a distance measured in lightyears.
There are a couple of Urals around me, and when I worked in an office downtown, I would see one being ridden all winter long. The guy had a full insulated suit and would putter out of the parking ramp through any amount of snow.
As noted in the article, this new thing does not have 2wd. The old ones did.
That was the only reason I thought a ural was cool. Now they’re just weird.
Thanks, I misread that, which makes it even more of a mystery as to why this hideous thing exists.
I’ll take mine in orange
This is the most likely answer. While the soviets could reverse engineer a lot of things, during WWII they had a massive issue with getting their reverse engineered engines to last anywhere near the hours of the originals. Frankly they were more likely to lose the vehicle before the engine(s) needed replacement for a long time.
Also the Germans already had the R75 which is basically a beefed up R71 with an OHV engine, a ton of the technology sharing that the Nazis did with the Russians were for antiquated designs and or ones they wouldn’t make even if they had the resources to do so (Most of the aircraft designs for one).
The Soviets had tons of land with lots of raw materials and little industry. The Germans had (relatively) low amounts of land with a lack of critical raw materials and a good amount of industry. Them both being against Capitalist Democracies did a lot to foster relations.
Frankly if Hitler didn’t invade the Soviet Union and instead focused his interest on the Western European countries and and North Africa while avoiding an alliance with the Japanese while the Soviets focused on the Slavic states and Finland there’s a decent chance Western Europe would have become the Greater Reich, and the Soviets would have most of what would have become the USSR.
One wheel drive and 25lb/ft torque and a big side car to push in wind AND still $15K. Bummer.
I wasn’t expecting big HP numbers, but I was expecting bigger torque numbers. Maybe the thing will rev a bit to compensate for the lower gearing. It’s a little lighter than its big brother but when you add a rider and passenger the difference is pretty negligible.
So yeah, I’m not sure I’m on board with “it’s still slow and pretty expensive, but now it doesn’t look cool or have 2wd”
The article said only 47 pounds lighter with 40% less torque, yea not cool.
I dig it. The side car could use a bit of work to better match with a modern bike though.
looks like they just slapped the old one.