If you look at as many automotive classified ads as I do, you start to get a feeling for when something is too good to be true. Outright scams are usually easy to spot, but cars that are good deals except for that one little thing require you to click on the ad and read it. If you’re actually looking for a car to buy, those catches are usually enough to make you look elsewhere, but this week, I’m seeking out those ads intentionally, trying to find cars that are still worth it despite that one little thing.
On Friday, I asked you to choose one of our ridiculous project vehicles from the week and assign it to an Autopian writer to fix up. It was no contest: the old REO Speed Wagon ran away with this one. I had a feeling you all were gonna keep on lovin’ that one. (Last REO lyrics joke, I promise.) And most of you wanted to give it to either David or Stephen to fix up. I did lke the idea that a few of you had of shipping the T-bucket over to Adrian, too.
Regular commenter Shop-Teacher wanted to give me the T1000, and I guess I’d take it – but that dumb V6 has to go. I like that engine in my old Chevy pickup, but it doesn’t belong in a flimsy little hatchback. I bet a 2200 OHV four-cylinder and five-speed stick from an S-10 would work pretty well, though. And that would still just about double the output of the stock engine.

There’s always a certain amount of – I won’t say dishonesty – but emphasizing the good points and downplaying the problems when writing a classified ad for a car. You choose the photo of the good side as your lead image. You don’t mention that the power windows don’t work until after you point out how well it runs. Everybody does it. And it means that you have to read ads carefully to make sure you aren’t wasting your time going to look at something that ends up being junk. Both of these cars seem like great deals at first glance, but like always, you have to read the fine print. Let’s check them out.
1987 Honda Civic CRX HF – $1,500

Engine/drivetrain: 1.5-liter OHC inline 4, five-speed manual, FWD
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Odometer reading: 231,000 miles
Operational status: Starts, but won’t idle
The Honda CRX, like the Pontiac Fiero introduced the same year, was billed as a stripped-down two-seater commuter car, but one look at either of them and you knew they weren’t fooling anyone. The CRX may have gotten excellent fuel economy, especially in this ultra-lightweight HF form, but it has the soul of a sports car. The sportier Si version may have gotten all the attention from enthusiasts, but the HF handles almost as well and will still put a smile on your face.

This one, unfortunately, needs a little help; its 1.5-liter carbureted engine will start, but it won’t stay running at idle. The seller makes no mention of how it runs if you keep your foot on the gas, so it’s hard to diagnose what the problem might be. My first guess, however, would be a vacuum leak. Carburetors in the last days before fuel injection took over were a nightmare of sensors and actuators, many of which were vacuum-controlled, and all it takes is one little pinhole in a rubber hose or a little crack in a gasket to cause all sorts of weirdness. The first thing I’d do to this one is replace all the vacuum lines, as well as the gasket at the base of the carburetor, and see if it starts behaving properly. If that’s not it, the next thing to check would be the choke, or something else on the carb itself.

Whether they were bought for economy or for fun, CRXs were not expensive cars, and as such, they got used hard. I’m not surprised that the interior of this one needs a little love. The driver’s seat needs at least a cover, or maybe reupholstering or replacement. And the Honda logo is missing from the steering wheel, if you care about such things. The rest of the interior looks pretty good, and it does appear to have air conditioning, though there’s no telling if it works.

The photos in the ad aren’t great, but it looks like it’s in good condition outside. This is a rare car these days in a lot of parts of the country, due to Honda’s propensity towards rust; you almost have to come to a climate like California to find a clean one anymore. It’s registered as non-operational, and the seller doesn’t say how long it has been sitting. It also has a salvage title, but it really doesn’t matter; if you want a good first-generation CRX, grab a U-Haul trailer and head west.
1997 Infiniti Q45 – $1,450

Engine/drivetrain: 4.1-liter DOHC V8, four-speed automatic, RWD
Location: San Jose, CA
Odometer reading: 117,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
I mentioned that the CRX is on non-operational registration. That’s a quirk of California law that a lot of people outside the state aren’t aware of. If you let the registration on a car lapse, and don’t tell the state it’s not being driven, you (or whoever buys it from you) still owe the DMV all the registration fees for that period of time. Let a car sit long enough, and those fees can add up. In the case of this Infiniti Q45, they add up to $1,200, which you will need to pay before you can register it in the state of California. I think that’s the reason why it is priced so low.

It’s a damn nice car, though; the Q45 was designed to compete with the Lexus LS, as well as the big German sedans. It has a V8 engine displacing 4.1 liters (earlier versions had a 4.5-liter engine, hence the name, but I guess they thought Q41 didn’t sound as good) and a four-speed automatic. This is a one-owner car, with only 117,000 miles on it, and according to the seller, there’s nothing wrong with it. Low mileage plus long-term lapsed registration points to an elderly owner who passed away, and the car was probably bought from an estate auction for next to nothing.

It’s as loaded inside as you would expect, with leather, wood, and power everything. There’s a little wear on the driver’s seat, but otherwise it looks really nice. The seller says that everything works in there, too, including the air conditioning.

The original Q45 was a wild design for its time; a little too wild, as it turns out. For this second generation, Infiniti toned down the styling and made it more Lexus-like, or rather, more Mercedes-like, which is what Lexus was aiming for. The result is nowhere near as cool-looking as the original, but it’s a handsome enough car. This one looks good, except for some scuffs on the bumpers here and there.
Fifteen hundred bucks isn’t a lot for a car these days, and you have to expect to spend some more to whip a car that cheap into shape. For one of these, that means towing it home and turning some wrenches, and for the other, it means giving the bureaucrats almost as much as you paid for the car. Still, even with all that, they could both end up being good deals. Which one are you willing to spend the extra money on?






Once owned a 2000 I-30 inherited from my Father-in-law after he passed. It was 15 years old at that point, but absolutely everything still worked on that car, and it stayed that way for the next 6 years of ownership. Sometimes we forget exactly how good Nissans of that era were. Obviously going with the Q here.
Q-45. Bring it home to WI. Title it here no CA fees. (Feces?). Blue tag special $150. Garage it do our salt stays off. Nice 8 month per year ride.
I was ready to vote CRX and take it home as the basis for an EV swap (my orthodontist growing up had purchased a wonderful CRV HF for this exact thing, but 20 years ago). Like the always insightful Shop-Teacher pointed out here in the comments, this one is rough enough you wouldn’t feel bad putting it to fun use. For me, that would mean acknowledging it will never be a collector’s piece and it is a great base for something interesting.
That said…
I voted Q45. I love these cars! I think the styling is fantastic, the V8 is lovely, and I love the crazy shit that came out when everyone decided to try to beat Mercedes at their own game. No one did, but we got some fine used cars out of the pursuit. Plus, I’m not registering in California. Road trip that baby home after doing an oil change, transmission flush, and checking out the soft bits under the hood. Could be fun?
CRX Si’s had a much better suspension, but easy enough to swap in. Biggest problem for these years are the lower panels are now very brittle plastic and replacement parts are scarce.
We once had a loaded 20 year old Maxima and everything still worked, so the Nissan seems like the better option here.
The HF is a starting point. Not the end result. So many egnine swaps available from efficient to downright insane. I’d go in between to DD it. Doesn’t look like the dash is cracked so interior is ripped out, dynamatted, carpetted, set of decent seats, then paint and wheels and you have a car worth driving every day.
This is a tough one. My initial gut reaction is the Q45, particularly since I don’t live in Cali, but I also don’t really want a big luxury sedan. The CRX has issues, but is more inline with my desire for a small, manual, hatchback. Screw it, I’m voting for the CRX.
The Q45 is certainly the better choice. Especially for those of us who would be taking it out of California and don’t have to worry about such nonsense. But I don’t want it.
I’d love a rust free CRX though, and this one is rough enough that I wouldn’t feel bad rallycrossing it. If vacuum lines and a carb base gasket don’t sort it, a swap to a Weber carb and getting rid of all that nonsense would.
And once it’s running, a rust free CRX is easily worth double/triple that here in the rust belt.
CRXs are never worth all that much, and they’re ridiculous fun to drive. Very much like a classic Mini with less effort. I’ve got an ’85 Si and I’m never letting it go.
Sporty hatch for me all day long.
I miss the 85 Si I had as a youth SO much.
Smart.
They are exceedingly rare in the rust belt. I honestly cannot remember the last time I saw one. But your point stands. 2-3 times more than the asking price in California is $3000-4500, so still not a lot.
I once owned a Jensen Healey, I wanted to do the Weber swap for the Dual Strombergs but I could never find a set. Are they still impossible to source or did someone start making them again?
They’re making them again.
Tavarish of all people sold an early CRX to Derek of Vice Grip Garage, and he swapped a new Weber onto it to revive it and drive it back to Tennessee.
https://youtu.be/SujeCZcMpGU?si=WOHRYiQnx83CuLMl
The HF variant didn’t have AC as an option, but maybe I’m thinking of the civic HF and not the CRX.
Anyway, I’m officially old now since I picked the sedan.
I kinda wanted the Q45, but I’d be concerned about anything cosmetic on it. They weren’t terribly popular when new, so finding new or even used parts could be tough. Someone already looked and mechanical bits are available, but what if you crumple a fender?
Plus, stick and AC in the Honda? I’ll take my chances in that lil’ deathtrap!
I’ve been wanting a Q for a while. If I register it here in VA, will I still owe the $1200 to CA? Hell, I would ship it for close-ish to that and be in it for 3k?
ahhhh… The idles of online car shopping and fantasy…..
I don’t think you do but I also know next to nothing about all this CA nonsense.
Edit: a quick google search seems to confirm that the CA fees are wiped if registered in a new state.
I wonder if you can register it out of state for a year then bring it back free and clear? Arizona is a wonderful place to register a car.
Based on some of the posts it seems that’s a common tactic. It wipes the slate clean
I’m a sucker for a CRX.
The Infiniti is the better buy, but I’ve fallen out of love with big sedans lately, so I’ll take the hatch and tinker.
The CRX is undoubtedly a complete basket case but I would still take it and love it.
And pet it and feed it and I would call it George.
Somebody stole the H? But that’s how people know it’s a Honda!
Try removing the H from someone else’s Hyundai and using that instead.
I have a know-everything neighbor down the street who insists that Hyundai and Honda are the same company, and they’re just trying to rip people off.
Ask him if he is sure because Honda came first maybe they are trying to get people a deal.
As past owner of an CRX 1.6i-16 (AS), there is only one correct answer here. So much FUN!
The allure of the CRX and what it could be is tempting, but I have enough on my hands keeping my current projects running; give me the big, comfy cruiser.
I live in a state where the fees are responsibility of who owned it at time. I would own it outright and pay only my fees.
The parts for the Q41….er Q45 might be unobtainium, but at one point when I was much younger, I spotted one for sale. Oh, it tempted me with its luxury and its attractive pricing, but thankfully it was out of reach for my young, naive self.
I resisted the siren song of a luxury cruiser once. I want to make the dumb choice as an adult. Q45!
I just did a quick scan on Rockauto and it looks like most anything you need is still there.
Impressive, considering that this is a car that sold in the low 5-digits and ended its run 25 years ago. I would have expected to be scouring eBay for new old stock parts.
Alas, California is across the continent from me.
Rock Auto lists everything, even parts that never existed. Put in a rare part and it’s usually just them sending out feelers to their associates asking if they have one. If you doubt me request a rear door or seat for that CRX they will tell you they can get you one.
I’m assuming you don’t have to pay the fees if you don’t register it in CA, so I’ll take that Q45, drive it cross-country to the other coast, and resell it. đŸ™‚
This is the answer if you don’t live in CA. If you do live in CA, the answer is to still pick the Q and part if out for at least double the purchase price.
I have no desire to own the Infiniti at any price.
Even if the price is Infinity of dollars?
Both of these are why the hell not type money? I voted for the Honda even though it won’t stay running I am sure can get it running and it could be a fun stick shift car to teach the fiance better in.
If the Q45 really runs and drives, it’s the obvious choice at ~$2500 all in.
The CRuX of the matter is which car I would most enjoy driving. Hmm, let me think …
My second car (way back in ye olden times) was a 1986 CRX Si which I absolutely adored despite is being black on black with no AC. So nostalgia demands I vote Honda today with an optimistic plan on a swap out of the old carbureted mill with something more modern. I know the cars were light but 58hp is holy-shit scarry slow on modern highways.
That being said, today is really a both day, that Infinity is a steal, especially since I don’t live in CA so don’t have to worry about the back fees. Of course it would cost me three grand to get it shipped to Massachusetts but we’ll ignore that detail for now.
The Infinity is a perfect road trip car.Take a weeks vacation , cruise back east and you’d have a rust free car that would last about five years in Mass.before it looks like Swiss cheese
Hah! That’s exactly what I suggested above. Great minds. đŸ™‚
I don’t know if I’m brave enough (or foolish enough) anymore to attempt to drive a $1400 car 3000 miles in a week. I’m getting a little old for that kind of adventure.
But it’s only 47 cents of car per mile!
500 miles a day enough time to take it easy and see the sites get to know some of the tow truck drivers and mechanics along the way, what could be better? FYI, leave on a Monday that way everyday the shops and parts stores are open except maybe mechanics on Saturday but you are close to home. Start with 600 miles a day and then Saturday if no serious problems really close to home
Get both rent a car dolly use the Q45 to tow the CRX home as well.
I personally won’t bother with the CRX’s carbs, that thing getting a k / h / b swap ASAP.
What’s rare about this CRX is that it’s not halfway through an engine swap. That’s the typical condition when they go up for sale.