Google Streetview is, in some ways, one of the true marvels of the modern era. It gives regular lazy slobs like myself the opportunity to explore the world, all from the comfort of our sleeping litters and nests of old cardboard and burlap. Streetview is a great way to see cars from halfway around the world, like this dusty Bolivian street, for example. It’s also a fantastic way to catch furtive glimpses of cars that may not actually exist outside the fevery integrated circuits of the Google Streetview cars. That’s what we’re going to look at right now.
Sometimes when the Streetview cars go trundling around, with their mast-mounted 360° cameras snapping pictures, they capture glimpses of cars in ways that maybe don’t necessarily mesh with actual reality. In many cases, this manifests as images of cars with strangely elongated wheelbases or extra axles or both.


The resulting images shows us some novel cars that, while they may only actually exist in Google Streetview images, perhaps should be considered for actual production here in our mundane, clammy reality. So let’s go through some of these now and then vote on which of these extended wheelbase/axle monstrosities should be pulled, screeching, into our reality.
Sound fun? Too bad, we’re doing it anyway!
You know what the Ford Explorer always needed? More dramatic proportions! Like, Jaguar E-Type proportions. And what better way to get there than by adding a whole extra axle up front, Tyrell P34-style! It’s certainly got a more aggressive look this way, and I suspect the handling is improved? Or at least grip?
I think this works, in a certain made-in-an-evil-lair sort of way.
The Mark 4 Jetta I always thought was the most attractive of the Jettas, and I’m a bit embarrassed to say I never considered how it may look with a second rear axle. It’s not bad! Especially on this one, with the bold gold wheels, which if they were cool on four wheels, must be even more cool on six.
Also, it’s worth noting those two rear axles are likely unpowered, if this is a FWD Jetta.
It’s not all about adding axles; what about just a good old wheelbase extention? I think the long-wheelbase treatment is really transformative for this Porsche Boxster, which gains a whole second row of seats as a result! A four-seat mid-engined roadster sounds like a fantastic package to me, and I think this could be a really valuable addition to the Porsche lineup. A Boxster people carrier! They’d have this whole four-seat-mid-engine-roadster segment tied up!
This one just seems practical; a cargo version of a Mistubishi Pajero maybe should have a dual rear axle option, so it can haul some really big, heavy loads. It looks pretty right, too, somehow.
UPDATE: Crap. This seems to be a Toyota. That’s what I get for rushing.
The boxy 700-series Volvo wagons seem like they could lend themselves quite well to being extended, not just with extra axles, but extra cargo areas and windows and pillars. This one has an E-pillar, even, and kind of reminds me of those Checker Aerobuses:
It still has some growing to do to get to Aerobus-level, but it’s a pretty good start.
Range Rovers are already pretty showy, so you’d think an extra pair of wheels would just kind of work, and, looking at it, I think they do. It’s got kind of a bullet train vibe with the extra axle here, and I bet that plays well for Range Rover buyers.
This feels like the most rational one of the set; just a wheelbase extension for a Camry, making a nice, reliable, economical limo. If you’re rich but want to convey to the world that you have terribly mixed feelings about your good fortune, I think this is a fantastic way to do just that.
UPDATE: Of course, this is a Corollllla. Sorry.
Finally, why should Zagato get all the good double-bubbleizing in the car world? And who said all double-bubble roofs have to be side-by-side? Why not a tandem style double-bubble roof? And why not on an Elantra? And why not throw in an extra axle? Why why why?
Okay, so, these eight stretched-and-distorted Streetview cars are what you have to pick from; which would you want to bring into actual reality? Choose wisely, because these results are binding!
There are probably car designers that shake their heads and say, “why didn’t I think of that?”
I really like the Volvo. The Tyrell Explorer is fun too. The
CaMMMryCorrolla looks like the roof couldn’t handle the stress. And the blue on that Range Roverer is gorgeous.And I totally agree that Mark IV Jettas were the best-looking. The instruments were beautiful… bright red needles contrasting against soothing blue backlighting. I kinda miss that car but I kinda don’t. I sold my ’01 TDI 55M eight years ago with 165 K miles and I can’t imagine what problems I might have had over that period of time.
Only reason I never considered the Boxster, is the missing rear “seats” almost all other Porsches have. So I voted for that one.
Too few vehicles have several front axles! I always enjoy it when I see a mobile crane or something that has them. Or when I think of a Neoplan Megaliner I get all happy inside. So in order of coolness and “what the world needs more of” ‘ness it will have to be the Ford. Nice shooting, Google 🙂
-The Volvo is not bad either, it looks like a competitor to the very small market of delivering newspapers and EU documents very fast in the middle of the night in Belgium, Holland and such places, which Citroën CX totally dominated back then. Please write a fun piece for this site about them (fingers crossed hopefully emoji)
That Megaliner has some serious front overhang.
The Jetttta must be hard to source replacement rear tires for. Those figure-8/Moebius-strip things have to be pricey and hard to find.
Does OmegaMart have a tire department?
I assumed it was a half-track.
May I humbly submit The Dodge Grand Grand Caravan: https://maps.app.goo.gl/kVWL8V2QSMyjww6P9?g_st=ac
(Shhh…I know it’s a Chrysler)
And the Toyota 4Runnnner: https://maps.app.goo.gl/RnbXTPG8xoVgBXs16?g_st=ac
Wouldn’t that just be a 4.5Runner? A dual axel version would be a 6Runner.
So it’s a Town Suburb and Country?
https://www.google.com/maps/place/Elkhart,+IN/@41.7435042,-85.9743933,3a,15y,54.93h,87.99t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1svAqRbPK1ChJUBBSQ4S7LNg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D2.012248631785795%26panoid%3DvAqRbPK1ChJUBBSQ4S7LNg%26yaw%3D54.93140136882985!7i16384!8i8192!4m6!3m5!1s0x8816c2c35be3ae13:0x7aedefd9028388cb!8m2!3d41.6873832!4d-85.973517!16zL20vMHNsNjk?authuser=0&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDcyMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Since I can’t insert a link or a photo, the above is a Google Maps Street View of a unique Silverado in Elkfart, IN.
That one gets my vote. It almost looks real!
That is magnificent, I’m still not entirely sure it isn’t a real vehicle. They must have been backing out of the space at the perfect speed as the camera car cruised by.
If it weren’t for the glitched mirror, I’d almost guess it was a six-door conversion. Though I have seen those more frequently on Fords, if you’re a die-hard bowtie fan, you can’t have that.
There’s a 6 door Excursion for sale near me: https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/1048127144125135/
It looks too well-done to have been stretched, at least in Elkhart.
If (like me) your Maps app doesn’t automatically pan to the vehicle in question:
https://imgur.com/a/D9CzJa7
Dunno looks like a normal American truck to me.
That Explorer used to come with a V8. Does that mean the extended version comes with a V16? If so, I’m all in
Well, the 4.6 was “modular”, right?
Going by the traditional Volvo model naming convention, that’s clearly a 747, or maybe a 767.
Also, is this going to become a regular feature that will take user submissions? Because I use Street View for my work and I frequently admire these beautiful monstrosities.
Although there’s not enough space in the Boxster’s new back seat – I’d prefer a Porsche-daulet for those times when I want to be driven by someone who’s better at it than I am – I voted for it anyway. If nothing else, those seatlets should help reduce the insurance premiums.
Never before have I ever thought about the glitched vehicles on Google Street view. Now I have thought about the “magic buildings” and climate before. What are magic buildings or magic climate or weather, you might ask? They are areas where the buildings or weather changes dramatically, when crossing an intersection, for example. There was or is a near full-line GM car dealership in Pecos, Texas that has a dead end side street on its eastern lot line. The other side of that side street has a former Dairy Queen that later became a tire store. The old drive-through window disappears (or reappears…I forgot which) when a Google user enters the side street from the frontage road. Weather changes are found in some cities and towns. One intersection in Southlake, Texas changes from spring to winter when crossing an intersection. Oh, and following a right turn lane at one intersction in Brownwood, Texas, sees the Street view leave the street, and actually go into the Taco Bell parking lot, until the Street view returns to the street several feet later.
The Cammmry is a Corollolla and the Mitsubishibishi is actually a Toyota Pradoado
Crap! I was rushing. I always flip Corolla and Camry, too.
Here’s a tip: if there’s a dent, it’s a Camry, otherwise it’s a corolla.
Sweet Baby J yes the Volvo. Also, have seen photos of Volvo wagons pulling trailers made from same model Volvo wagons cut aft of the b-pillar, with matching paint and wheels. Drool.
I believe that Cammmry is actually a Corohlà là .
I want to see Elf livery on that Explorer.
The VVVolvo, I realy looked twice, it looked a bit familiar, a sort of uncanny valley Tissier loadrunner. Then a realized, the Loadrunner looks like a camera error anyway. I have just sort of got used to it.
Volvo! It just looks…right. I also like the tie-in to the Aerobus. At first I was gonna go Boxster, but that hardly counts w/ no added axle
Jason ,
fantastic names.
Volvovo 74040 for the win .
Or we could use old Volvo naming (series-cylinders-doors), and just call it a 747 😀
There’s only so much space on the internet, and those lengthened vehicles have come at the cost of my Crossfire, which has lost three feet in length and 30% of its volume according to Street View. Also, I have not owned this car for 9 years, so maybe the electrons have just shrunk in the heat, because global warming.
https://www.google.com/maps/@38.8067228,-77.0508129,3a,75y,194.51h,74.81t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sHG8206K6gVCpzD8dhjLg6g!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D15.191540720418075%26panoid%3DHG8206K6gVCpzD8dhjLg6g%26yaw%3D194.50744123990194!7i13312!8i6656?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDcyMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
Where did you get the Crossfire body kit for a SMART?
Daimler catalogue, natürlich. 🙂
That’s hilarious.
Well at least it’s easy to park.
What about that Eclipse opposite your Crossfire?
In this case, I think it would be called an Ecse.
I kinda like it
I may be just a weirdo who can’t get enough wagons, but that Volvo is just *chef’s kiss*. 11/10 smokeshow of a battlewagon.
The Explorerer and Cororola come across as the best photochop jobs for sure, because they do look like they could exist and function.
I had to go with the Explorerer especially since it is the 2dr version, it really channels the long hood short deck PLC vibe. The window covered in plastic really adds to the BHPH 4th or 5th owner vibe.
the camry looks like an actual limo. The volvo looks pretty awesome tho!
Interesting but
1. Just doing a good extension plenty of room to work but no other benefits. I prefer 2 red axles
2. Losing trunk space but as a wagon ?
3. Those rear seats wouldn’t fit a toddler.
4. Possible
5. Love it but doors may need adjustment to fit passengers in the back 2 rows
6. Love it but the third door won’t work.
7. Middle section is that another door or just a panel? I am see limo with the 2nd row seats being rear facing
8. Maybe but it has worse panel gaps than a first year model Teslas
That Mitsubishi is a Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 90.
That Camry is a Corolla.
Totally taking the Tyrellexplorer.
“four-seat mid-engined roadster”
Porsche would never be so crazy as to attempt this.
Only Enzo, and he’s dead.
the pajero and camry are a J90 toyota prado and e120 toyota corolla respectively
#7 is a Corrorrola but the Volvo does it for me. I love that the extended Explorer is a two door though
I hope Corrorrola is pronounced with lusty rolled R’s like ferrero rocher.