Home » Which Spanish Delicacy Would You Try? 1970 SEAT 1430 vs 1978 Chrysler 150

Which Spanish Delicacy Would You Try? 1970 SEAT 1430 vs 1978 Chrysler 150

Sbsd 6 25 2026

It’s day four of our exploration of international shitboxes, and today we’re off to sunnier skies to look at a couple of cars from Spain. And actually, both of these cars were built in Spain, under license from other manufacturers. You could get similar cars in other places, but not quite the same; these versions are uniquely Spanish.

Yesterday’s cars were in Ireland, which is still among my favorite places I’ve ever visited. Tip: If you’re ever in Cork, do yourself a favor and stop by Arthur Mayne’s for lunch. Great food, wonderful atmosphere, and absolutely delightful staff. But how would you get there? Well, though the vote count was lower than usual, the results were clear: the bright blue Peugeot 206 is your choice.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

It’s mine too. I’m not going all the way to Ireland for a damn Toyota. I just put it in there because I know some of you don’t trust French cars. But really, going all the way there to drive something that’s basically the same as a Tercel you could get back home is like asking for a Bud Light at the pub. Don’t be that person. Get the Peugeot.

Screenshot From 2026 06 24 16 21 46

I’ve never been to Spain (though I kinda like the music), but it’s definitely a place I wouldn’t mind visiting. Any place where everybody takes a nap in the afternoon is all right in my book. It’s not a place I typically associate with cars, however, but maybe I should; apparently Spain is the eighth-largest car manufacturing country in the world. These two were both built there, and have spent their lives there. They’re both well over the minimum age for importing into the US now. Is either one worth it? Let’s check them out and see.

1970 SEAT 1430 – €6,900

Seat 1430 16 Fu 22367230 648bb22447dcf
Image: OOYYO seller

Engine/drivetrain: 1.6-liter DOHC inline 4, five-speed manual, RWD

Location: Argamasilla De Calatrava, Spain

Odometer reading: 125,000 kilometers

Operational status: I have no idea, probably runs just fine

Sociedad Española de Automóviles de Turismo, or SEAT for short, is arguably Spain’s best-known automaker. These days, it is a subsidiary of Volkswagen, but it got its start making license-built Fiats for Spanish consumption. It cranked out its own version of the Fiat 600 by the zillions, doing for Spain what cars like the Beetle, 2CV, and Model T did for other places. After a while, SEAT branched out from Fiat’s designs, and this boxy little sports sedan is one of the results. It’s based on the Fiat 124, with elements of the 125 as well.

Seat 1430 16 Fu 22367230 648bb22684779
Image: OOYYO seller

This particular online classified site is maddeningly short on details. There’s no description of the car at all, just a list of some facts and figures. And to make matters worse, this car is mis-listed as a SEAT 1200 Sport, which is a two-door fastback that looks nothing like this at all. I had to do a little digging to uncover this car’s true identity. The 1430 is powered by a twin-cam four-cylinder, which I assume is a license-built version of the Fiat Lampredi engine. It came in three different sizes; I was able to tell which one this car has because the power output is listed in the ad, probably for tax reasons. How does it run? I haven’t the faintest idea. For this price, though, it had better purr like a kitten.

Seat 1430 16 Fu 22367230 648bb230e393b
Image: OOYYO seller

It’s pure ’70s European sports sedan inside, with an upright seating position, nice little chrome accents everywhere, and not much else. It’s in great shape, from what I can tell, but it’s a pretty low-mileage car. It only has the equivalent of about 80,000 miles on it. As far as I’m concerned, it needs more; I’d love to hop in and put this car through its paces.

Seat 1430 16 Fu 22367230 648bb228a71c4
Image: OOYYO seller

Between Fiat, SEAT, and the various VAZ/Lada variants, this car’s profile might be one of the most common car shapes in Europe. Not that there’s much “shape” to it; ask a five-year-old to draw a car, and they’ll either draw a Beetle, or a Fiat 124 sedan. I’ve always liked it, though; it’s no-nonsense and timeless. I like the Rostyle-esque wheels on it, and the driving lights are a nice touch.

1978 Chrysler 150 – €5,600

Chrysler 150 S Gt 17706232 5d81fa9fe6c2c
Image: OOYYO seller

Engine/drivetrain: 1.4-liter OHV inline 4, four- or five-speed manual, FWD

Location: Madrid, Spain

Odometer reading: 44,000 kilometers

Operational status: Your guess is as good as mine

Chrysler’s history is a muddled, jumbled mess of acquisitions, mergers, sales, bankruptcies, and bailouts. But there’s one period of its history that’s not well known to its American fans: Chrysler Europe, which existed from 1967 to 1978. It was made up of Simca in France, the Rootes Group in the UK, and Barreiros in Spain. Chrysler sold the division to PSA Peugeot Citroën in 1978, which is ironic because both companies are now part of Stellantis. This car was built in the Barreiros factory in Spain, in the last year of Chrysler Europe’s existence, and is based on the Simca 1307.

Chrysler 150 S Gt 17706232 5d81fa9e7e8e2
Image: OOYYO seller

Because of the lack of information in the ad, I can’t tell you a whole lot about this car either. I can tell you that the 1307 on which it is based is front-wheel-drive, powered by Simca’s “Poissy” four-cylinder engine. In smaller displacements, this engine was found in the back of the Simca 1000, and in larger displacements, it powered the early versions of the Dodge Omni and Plymouth Horizon. Here it displaces 1.4 liters and drives the front wheels, though I don’t know whether it has a four- or a five-speed transmission.

Chrysler 150 S Gt 17706232 5d81faa135695
Image: OOYYO seller

I wish I could show you the interior of this car, but the ad only shows the exterior. So I guess I’ll use the space where I usually talk about the inside to point out how much this car looks like the first-generation VW Passat, which was sold here as the Dasher. “All cars look the same” is nothing new.

Chrysler 150 S Gt 17706232 5d81faa071e7c
Image: OOYYO seller

It’s in great shape, as far as I can tell, but it’s practically new. There’s something comforting about the idea that low-mileage survivors exist in other places. You know that Cutlass Ciera that somebody’s grandma left behind, that looks like it just rolled out of the showroom? This is the Spanish equivalent of that.

One of my favorite aspects of automotive history is all of the license-built and complete knock-down kit versions of cars that pop up in unusual places. I love finding out that a variant of a car existed in a place I never knew about. These two I vaguely knew about, but not the Spanish versions, and I had a blast doing the legwork to find out their family trees. I hope you had fun reading about them, too. Which one would you rather have?

 

 

Follow us on:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
97 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Clueless_jalop
Clueless_jalop
3 months ago

I wouldn’t be doing my job as an owner of a Chrysler Europe product if I didn’t pick the Chrysler 150. Besides, I think there’s an unwritten law that if you’re going to get a Fiat 124 derivative, it has to have come from behind the Iron Curtain.

Óscar Morales Vivó
Member
Óscar Morales Vivó
3 months ago

Heeeeey blast from the past. One of those Chrysler 150s (in white, natch) was the first car I remember, the one my father drove us around in when he wasn’t out there putting 50k km or more a year on it.

It had a hard speed limiter at 120km/h (75mph for the metric impaired). Like you heard a literal “thunk” and the car stopped accelerating altogether.

Also only had speakers on the front, us kids on the back seats were always arguing about the volume.

Last edited 3 months ago by Óscar Morales Vivó
Mike F.
Member
Mike F.
3 months ago

You can tell that folks here are really into cars because unless I missed it, no one yet has said anything about, “gettin’me some.Poissy”. That said, that SEAT is way cool. Even if it’s slow, it drives the correct wheels with a correct set of gears and is just a neat looking car.. The Chrysler just doesn’t come close.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
3 months ago

Sorry I liked the around the world options but these two cars aren’t desirable in the US OR ANYWHERE. GET STRAIGHT

Nathan Williams
Nathan Williams
3 months ago

Hugely disagree as it’s emotional, subjective and deeply irrational. Live that SEAT

Gene
Gene
3 months ago

I chose the Chrysler that way I can have unlimited visits to the HR department every time I talk about the engine name. (Yeesh!)

RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
Member
RustyJunkyardClassicFanatic
3 months ago

I’d take a SEAT in the 1430! I wonder how comfortable the seats are, ha ha. Yeah, it looks like a rally car so looks like a blast to drive. We already have a lot of Chryslers here, plus they can’t even take pics of the interior?

Lotsofchops
Member
Lotsofchops
3 months ago

Just like I ain’t going to Ireland for a Toyota, I ain’t going to Spain for a Chrysler. I don’t think I’m even going down the street for a Chrysler (300 SRT8 excepted). I dig the SEAT profile, always loved that shape.

Last edited 3 months ago by Lotsofchops
JayJay
JayJay
3 months ago

I’ll take that lovely Roy Axe seventies design: Green one!
Spanish ride height for rough roads is also very cool 🙂
Looks like a nice place to shop. They have a Chrysler 180 in the background!

The “generic car of the sixties” look of the 124 (or 125 – and all of their many clones) have never really been me.

Last edited 3 months ago by JayJay
M. Park Hunter
Member
M. Park Hunter
3 months ago

I know nothing about either car, so I’m voting for the one with color, even if it is reflecting pool green.

A'Aron
A'Aron
3 months ago
Reply to  M. Park Hunter

Does it come with dead duck stickers???

Scott
Member
Scott
3 months ago

I don’t know anything about either car, but it only took the thumbnail to make me lust for the SEAT. That is friggin’ sweet! Like a Datsun 510 sorta. Just cute as effin’ hell and I want it. 🙂

JDE
JDE
3 months ago

Going to Spain to drive a Crappy French car with the Chrysler name slapped onto it makes no sense. Even if the alternative is a spanish copy of a Fiat 124. Honestly, was that Fiat from Italy so great in europe that every country had a go at making one of there own?

John Beef
Member
John Beef
3 months ago

The Simca looks almost identical to my parents’ 1980 VW Dasher hatchback. That thing sucked! My mom drove it 3 years and it kept breaking down. She finally put her foot down and bought an 83 Camry. But then my dad decided to sell his perfectly reliable ’72 super Beetle and continue driving the Dasher for another 4 years, a decision I’ve never understood.

Dodsworth
Member
Dodsworth
3 months ago

The SEAT is a classic shape and the red interior is a must have. Will it make it out to Needles?

Cyko9
Member
Cyko9
3 months ago

That SEAT reminds me of a BMW 2002; I’d like to take it on a tour of the country before importing it. The Chrysler is interesting, but even if it’s nearly a Simca, it’d be hard to sign an import document for a “Chrysler”. Plus, are those tires small or does it ride really high?

Grayvee280
Member
Grayvee280
3 months ago

Had to go SEAT, that thing is adorable! That said, if its not the DOHC version, $7,800ish American plus shipping is crack pipe territory.

Grayvee280
Member
Grayvee280
3 months ago
Reply to  Albert Ferrer

holy smokes! I had no idea they were that valuable.

Albert Ferrer
Member
Albert Ferrer
3 months ago
Reply to  Grayvee280

They “aren’t” as such. Spain is a relatively small market, we were an autarchic dictatorship until the mid-70s and the classic car scene is small.

I also wouldn’t be surprised if a fair share have been exported to other countries.

Urban Runabout
Member
Urban Runabout
3 months ago

I want that red Seat interior.
And if parts are hard to find – There’s always Cuba!

SlowCarFast
Member
SlowCarFast
3 months ago

Both cars have impressively nice interiors! I was all in on the SEAT until Erik shared a link to pictures of the brown leather(?) in his post. Close call, but I’m feeling boxy today!

Rick Cavaretti
Rick Cavaretti
3 months ago

Don’t get excited, this verison only sported the OHV engine, not the brilliant Lampredi twincam.

Bleeder
Member
Bleeder
3 months ago

Thanks for this variation of SBSD this week, Mark!
I’ve been having a lot of fun reading and choosing and I hope you’ve been having fun finding and researching these cars.
I hope this becomes a recurring variant if it is not too much of a PIA for ya!

Manwich Sandwich
Member
Manwich Sandwich
3 months ago

I’ll take the SEAT 1430… I just love how it looks. Hopefully it’s an actual 1600 or 1800cc performance model and not an ‘all show, no go’ example.

Albert Ferrer
Member
Albert Ferrer
3 months ago

It is a 1968-1971 series one car (tail lights give it away) with the 1438cc OHV four cylinder. It was good for 70bhp, 10 more than the 124 with the same engine. The twin cams wouldn’t come until the series three was launched in 1973.

Manwich Sandwich
Member
Manwich Sandwich
3 months ago
Reply to  Albert Ferrer

Oh well… I’ll just have to be a poseur then.

World24
World24
3 months ago

I’d honestly take both, even though it’s not a León, that SEAT is still pretty cool.

Robert M
Member
Robert M
3 months ago

The wheels on that Chrysler are so tiny, even by 70s standards. Could be the massive gap in the wheel arches too.

Fiji ST
Fiji ST
3 months ago
EXP_Scarred
Member
EXP_Scarred
3 months ago

The SEAT looks fun, the Chrysler looks boring. SEAT it is.

97
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x