If I say “American luxury SUV”, your thoughts will almost certainly turn to something enormous like a Lincoln Navigator or a Cadillac Escalade. The idea of a smaller domestic “luxury ute” really doesn’t cross your mind, other than maybe some existing products that are very much low-ground-clearance crossovers and not true off-roaders. That’s why a rumor we’ve heard recently about Ford developing a Lincoln-badged Bronco-based SUV has the internet all aflutter with activity and car websites covered with rather poorly photoshopped or AI-generated examples of what this thing might be.
I went ahead and did my own badly Photoshopped idea of where I’d like to see Ford take this luxo off-roader, but I’m still a bit confused about exactly which Blue Oval product to base it on. We want comfortable, capable, and affordable, but in the cold, hard reality of the day, I think we might have to pick just two of those three.
Luxury Is A State Of Brand
“Luxury” is such an annoying word. More often than not, the meaning of that word today really relates to the brand of a product more than its actual attributes. For example, our man Stephen Gossin recently just purchased an old Chrysler Aspen SUV, a vehicle that is likely more comfortable and spacious than a similar year Mercedes ML or BMW X5 (and likely more reliable). Despite this, the kind of person who would specifically ask for a “luxury” SUV would never be caught dead in a Chrysler, not in a million years. That’s kind of the case with today’s small “luxury” SUVs – their credibility is determined not by what they do, but by the logo on the grille. Even stranger is that they often get their status from off-road capabilities, which have really nothing to do with “luxury” in any sense of the word.

The biggest players in the small luxury SUV field are likely the cool-looking Land Rover Defender and the Lexus GX550, which doesn’t look quite as cool but stands a better chance of not being in a junkyard twelve years from now (again, ask Mr. Gossin how many British-branded SUVs he saw on his last visit to a pick-and-pull).

Neither the Defender nor the GX550 is a poser. Both are highly capable off-roading machines that still offer relative comfort; both are engineered for severe service in all sorts of off-road conditions. A Mercedes G-Wagen at a higher price point has similar skills. By these accounts, you might say that any Lincoln competitor to these class leaders would need to be similarly over-engineered. The real question I have about this is, why?
The Lexus Jeeps And The Benz Jeeps And The Lincoln Jeeps
There’s a scene in the infamous 1972 movie Deliverance where Burt Reynolds’ character was scripted to go over a waterfall, and the plan to capture this on film was to send a dummy representation of the actor into this perilous situation. Famously, Burt refused this and insisted on doing the stunt himself, an act which shattered his tailbone, knocked him unconscious, ripped off his clothes, and nearly drowned him. Recuperating from his injuries, an aching Burt asked the director how his painful stunt appeared on film. “It looked,” the director said sheepishly, “like a dummy going over a waterfall.”
That’s kind of how I feel about a Bronco-based “luxury” SUV. Ford could do it, but why? Virtually nobody buying a Defender or GX is taking it off-road; the ones you might see in an off-road park are most often a decade old and on their third owners. Worse than that is the cost of a Bronco-based Lincoln SUV would probably be painfully close to the price of those high-end imports, and I get the sense that it might be too agricultural to really meet them head-to-head anyway.

That raises the important question: would it make more sense to base a small Lincoln SUV on an expanded and lifted Bronco Sport / Maverick chassis? Yeah, I can hear all you Moab runners groaning, but Ford probably couldn’t care less what hard-core, cash-poor off-roaders want.

More importantly, the Maverick, even in low-ground-clearance form and without a locking differential or transfer case, is pretty damn capable. Watch the clip below. With a locking diff to kill the wheelspin, that little sumbeech be killing it.
Is there such a rock-covered trail like that which people in Westport or here in the North Shore of Chicagoland use to get to Whole Foods? No, there isn’t; these luxury SUVs will never encounter this kind of use, and even if they did with a bit of tweaks, I could see that Maverick just eating that trail in the video above for breakfast.
Still, it’s how this new luxury little SUV looks and how it functions in upper-middle-class suburbia that’s important. Let’s get to drawing and Photoshopping.
Out-Of-Town Car
If the Defender and GX are indeed the benchmarks of successful small luxury SUVs, we would do well to put them into a blender and get our Lincoln competitor, the Sentinel. I wouldn’t go all Ineos Grenadier with a “tribute”, but we could take some of the best and most recognizable aspects of them to fit the country club parking lot. Oddly enough, the Maverick is within an inch or so of the length of both the Defender and GX, so if we did go that direction, it might be a good place to start.

Plus, we’d have a wheelbase long enough for some kind of third row, which I think would be mandatory to be competitive here. First, I’d add a rather clean and blunt front end with the latest Lincoln styling cues; a lot of body colored surface, not unlike the Lexus GX, but with a bit less fussy detailing. The flanks are sort of slab-sided with a bullnose radius at the top, and the charcoal rocker panels and squared-off wheel arches are naturally a nod to the small Land Rover.

Now we have something that at least looks like it could conquer the trails, which is really the biggest consideration in this market. With those big wheels and tires, extra ground clearance (maybe air suspension), and locking differentials, I think it would be a lot more capable than you’d imagine for a unibody machine.
One thing that our Brian Silvestro mentioned in his recent piece on a Lincoln Bronco is that it would need something trick to set it apart from the lower-level Fords to justify the price. That’s why I’d give the Sentinel an elevated rear roof with extra “Vista Cruiser” style skylights on the sides and just ahead of the second row. A real luxury vehicle gives a “sense of occasion” when riding in it, and despite car makers trending towards removing any and all windows in a car, I intend to go the other direction. Sunlight, people!
You can see that there’s a power sliding sunroof over the rear passenger area and a smaller glass one over the front seats that slides back and over the forward-facing skylight. Such a raised roof would also allow the third row to sit somewhat higher in a “theater seating” manner for visibility and to give those passengers more leg space.
The most obvious design ripoff would be from two different sources. You can see that I’ve added a grey opaque panel just behind the rear doors, similar to the Defender, but what’s with the cut lines I’ve added? Well, here I steal an idea from the latest Hyundai Santa Fe: the hidden handle.
The Lincoln would actually have two handles that are revealed by pushing in the interlinked upper and lower panels. A lower one would be there for kids or very short people, while the one above would be for taller individuals. It’s a cool Hyundai idea, and it keeps the sides aerodynamic and at least part of the handles free of dirt.
In back, I’d like to reintroduce something that Ford invented in the mid-sixties: the “magic door” 3-way tailgate. This innovation (designed by, of all things, the person who designed the “big” Austin Healey sports car) involved a power-lowering tailgate window and could be opened like a normal door or pivoted down like a tailgate once you lowered the glass. This was everywhere in the seventies and then slowly disappeared. Well, we should bring it back.
Take a look at what I also added: the classic Continental “tire hump”! Yes! If this thing bothers you, an actual full-sized spare on a pivoting bracket could fit over the offending lump.

Maybe we need to offer a longer wheelbase version as well to compete with the Defender 130 and to give the second and third row a little more room.

What about a pickup truck version?

Personally, I wonder if the more crossover-like Lincoln “Maverick” I showed some time back makes more sense:

Would offering a more crossover-like wagon be better than a Defender-style pickup? I really don’t know.

Maybe Lincoln could offer both? This is hardly a market segment that’s shrinking.
Ain’t That Tough Enough?
Look, many Autopians with almost-twenty-year-old Lexus SUVs (me!) or fifth-owner Christmas-tree-dashboard Range Rovers would love to see a Bronco full-frame Lincoln SUV, maybe even with a V8. The unfortunate truth of the matter is that such a product might be prohibitively expensive; certainly more than a Maverick-based one. Worse than that, despite generally being more comfortable than a Wrangler, Ford might need to work hard to make the Bronco into an acceptable “luxury” product, and why? Ninety-nine percent of buyers wouldn’t give a sh*t that a Bronco-chassis Lincoln could do some “sick rock crawling”. Actually, make that ninety-nine-point nine percent of buyers. Let’s go back fifty years and take some lessons.
In the late seventies, Matra gave us a vehicle with a front-drive Simca compact drivetrain called the Rancho that offered the look without the capabilities. It sold faster than little car maker Matra could build them. Actually, that’s probably an unfair comparison since if we added a locking differential to go along with the lifted height, a Maverick-based Lincoln SUV would have the ability to silence most critics.

During the same time period as the Rancho, in America, General Motors gave us the first domestic compact “international-sized luxury” car, the Nova-based Cadillac Seville.

The Seville blew up the sales charts despite being the most expensive Cadillac other than the factory-stretched limo. No, you couldn’t hit the Autobahn in it, but few buyers were ever going to do that anyway.
Regardless of which underpinnings are chosen– Maverick, Bronco, or even Ranger – the undeniable fact is that nobody makes a legitimate smaller American luxury SUV today, and they’re leaving money on the table. A lot of money.
Top graphic base image: Ford











First off, Bish, I have to disagree with your assertion that 99.9% of luxury real-off roaders don’t care about the real off-road capability of these vehicles. Part of the image of these SUVs is the real capability to far off the beaten path. That said, 99.9% won’t ever use them this way, but to compete, buyers have to be able to point their friends to the YT videos showing these things in Moab, the Serengeti, the Mongolian steppes, the Darién Gap, etc., and project personal images vicariously via the few who do use the capabilities of these SUVs.
Second, as others have pointed out, Lincoln already has the Corsair on the Escape/Bronco Sport, Maverick platform. Your design would make a great redesign of the Corsair, and I really like the idea of offering a regular/extra-long versions, ala, the Defender.
But a genuine Bronco-based luxury off-roader could go a long way to legitimizing Lincoln as a serious, home-grown competitor to Lexus and Land Rover. “Never going to happen!” is what I hear most of you saying. Of course, you probably said the same thing when Cadillac launched the CTS-V. “No one will ever cross-shop a BMW with a Caddy!” While I know there are still many German luxury car snobs that that stick their noses up at the latest CT4/CT5 Vs, they are doing it while looking at the taillights of these Caddies disappearing in the distance. Sure, CT4/5 sales are a fraction of BMW3/5 sales, but they are selling, and every one that sells helps legitimize Cadillac as a genuine option from the Germans.
Yeah, unfortunately it has to have off road ‘cred’ to be deemed worthy of not using.
Example: BMW i8 – lacked performance to match the looks and price.
Reality is expensive luxury SUVs are bought because they signal you can, not because of any imagined or actual capabilities, with the minor exception of the wealthy skier set. Who would be likely better off in an Outback.
I can assure you as a multiple, serial, BMW owner that is very active with BMWCCA that very few BMW drivers cross-shop Cadillac regardless of how fast they are. They have a stink of tacky that will take another couple of decades to wear off, if it ever does. Also why the truly wealthy buy GMC Denalis, not Escalades, if they want that sort of thing. Shame how GM squandered the brand for so many years. Lincoln has the same problem.
I’m sorry good sir. I cannot support the bringing back of roll down tailgate windows that must be rolled down in order to use the tailgate. Worst invention ever. I built a custom liftgate for my 1971 Travelall to avoid having that “feature”. However, the multifunction tail gates are super awesome. I would be more inclined for a 70/30 split tail gate, like the Volvo XC90 has (used to have?), but that also works as a full swing open to the side tail gate. The tiny tailgate is incredibly useful to keep your load from sliding out when you open the gate.
What if you only had to roll the glass down to lower the tailgate but could open it to the side with the glass up? Seems like a decent compromise to me.
You didn’t have to lower the glass to open the tailgate “door-style” on the station wagons.
I like it.
Slap a Ford badge on it and call it the “Flex”
Maybe that’s the way to get the Flex to be the success that it wasn’t (and should have been): make it more SUV-like.
My thought, exactly.
As sensible a proposal this is, I think Ford has the right idea with the “Bronco-based” Lincoln SUV.
Because it won’t be a Bronco. It will be a Ford Everest. Which is on the same platform as the Bronco so they can technically call it Bronco-based to build up hype and set expectations for the off-road capability wanted by buyers in this segment.
People have been asking for the Everest in the US market for a long time. It has too much overlap with other vehicles in Ford’s lineup but fits perfectly as a Lincoln.
A damn good starting point. I think the grille needs to be wider though, since luxury brands are all about “presence” and the tiny grille doesn’t do that for me. Otherwise I dig on it.
In my opinion, what Lincoln actually needs is a variant of the Mach E as well as a new Mark IX coupe based off the current Mustang.
And if Lincoln wants a luxury off-road vehicle to go against the Mercedes G-Class or the stuff from Land Rover, basing it off a vehicle on the Ford T6.2 platform, wouldn’t be a bad idea. But I would go for something based off the Ford Everest rather than the Bronco.
I also think they should have a plug-in hybrid version or a regular hybrid at the very least so that it will be sellable even if fuel gets expensive or if they want to sell it in places where fuel is more expensive.
And Ford has two good hybrid systems they might be able to use here… a variant of the 4 cyl hybrid used in the Maverick OR a variant of the V6 hybrid system in the F150.
For Lincoln, I’d prefer to see a V6 hybrid. But the one in the F150 is overpowered. Make a version of that hybrid system with the non-turbo V6 tuned for smoothness and efficiency
Take a Ford Puma and put a 400hp powertrain in there. Gussy it up a bit and call it a day.
Lincolns are hideous, and this is scary! The only luxury off-roader that looks cool and does it right is the Lexus GX, IMO. Lincoln should make an S-class competitor and call it a day.
That Aspen really is such a nice truck.
Lockable 4WD, leather, moonroof, heated seats, reverse camera, Alpine sound system, a ton of power from the Hemi, 9,000lb towing capacity and beautiful metallic blue paint.
137K miles, $1K purchase price due to it needing a transmission solenoid.
One of the best values regarding content and capability per dollar on the market at the moment, by far.
Thanks for the shout-out, and another great piece, Mr. Bishop!
No. Turning small cars into luxury cars is also a futile affair. It was never intended to be expensive, so trying to make something not luxurious, luxurious, just takes that much more effort and usually falls short.
I’m getting a strong whiff of Cadillac Cimarron with this.
But Lincoln already has an SUV on the Maverick platform, it’s the Corsair.
The same Corsair that was discontinued along with the Escape.
Looks like a better realized version of the new Outback.
As usual, The Bishop is correct. This is a great case for a Maverick base. However, I think those side skylights are out of place and don’t fit the Ford or Lincoln identity. Leave ’em for the Rover.
As usual, very nice designs, and great well thought out article. Whichever vehicle that becomes a Lincoln, they better make sure you can get a set or tow of Golf clubs in it without folding anything down.
I’m not sure about “as usual” but I appreciate it, thank you!
They don’t need to Lincoln it, they just need to SUV-ify the Maverick
But, then, that might cut into Explorer sales – and that could hurt margins.
Won’t someone think of the shareholders?
OH I forgot not cop version of the Explorer existed. Yes they should just Lincoln Lux up an Explorer and give it a mild lift and they are good to go.
So, a lifted Aviator?
Sure why not just lift one and call it good.
I keep forgetting Lincoln still sells things.
SUV-ify the Maverick? This exists. It’s called the Bronco Sport.
That it’s not; the Bronco Sport is the “rugged” re-skin of the Ford Escape (>$, because rugged = better?
The Ford Everest is the SUV-Maverick.
Not even close.
Bronco Sport, Maverick, and Escape are on the same chassis. Unibody, PTU and RDU, and even share engines (though the 1.5 is Escape and BS only). They’re all essentially the same underneath, though the interiors vary slightly and the Maverick was built to be cheaper and hold 1500 lbs in the bed. A huge amount of parts are shared across all 3.
The Everest is Body on Frame, shares no engines with the 3 above, uses a tranfercase and proper rear diff. It has more in common with the Ford Ranger.
Everest is the Ranger SUV and shared architecture with the Bronco. The Maverick is an Escape/Bronco Sport/ Corsair platform mate
Perception is more important than reality. Luxury SUV owners do not care if they will ever drive on dirt they want the perception that they might and will pay for it.
I hope Lincoln dies not screw up like Jeep did with the grand wagoneer.
Love the looks, love the callback to the Sentinel show car, love the concept. As a current owner of a hybrid Maverick AWD with the top Lariat trim package, I can easily image that with some chassis tuning and materials upgrades this could be a convincing Lincoln.
To make it a bit more special, along with the locking diff, bundle the ecoboost engine with a PHEV and you’d have a screamer of a powertrain with decent economy numbers. For the people questioning the market for a small luxury SUV… let’s see what happens if gas prices stay high.
Not sure why people disdain unibody off-roaders – the XJ Cherokees that lit off the SUV craze were unibody and nobody questions their rock crawling cred.
Oh… and ++1 for bringing back the three-way tailgate. Man do I miss those. Hatchbacks suck for carrying larger cargo or wanting a breeze through the cabin.
I knew I’d find at least one fan.
FoMoCo even has a great trade name for the roll down rear window – the Mercury “Breezeway” sedans of the 1960s.
My 1960 Rambler wagon and 1964 IH Travelall both had the roll down window and drop down tailgate. Our 1996 Buick Roadmonster wagon added the third option of opening sideways. RIP, all three.
Many more than one fan of those 3-way tailgates on here, I’m sure. I can’t help but wonder if Ford felt there wasn’t really a need for the complexity when they got rid of wagons with the rear-facing seats?
Three-way tailgate or no, I’m not sure how I feel about the vestigial half-round Continental hump, but I don’t hate the idea. Honestly, mounting an actual external spare back there would help sell the rugged-luxe image. But as a character line only, what if it mimicked the shape of the squared-off wheel arches instead? In that sense, it would be slightly reminiscent of the trapezoidal hump from the decklid of the ’77 Cougar.
It took a while for the XJ to be taken seriously as off roaders. There had to be a tipping point there there were enough rough used ones that people were off roading for the aftermarket to support them. I remember looking in the mid 90s for lifts/bumpers and off road stuff and it just was not really there yet. I ended up wheeling a ZJ for a number of years, same thing.
A couple of comments from a Maverick owner:
-No, just no. The Maverick platform would be best suited for maybe a Transit Connect revival, but certainly not a Lincoln product.
-Ford annoyingly already has the perfect product to turn into a Bronco alternative and Lincoln version: The Everest.
-Maverick already has a locker (of sorts) in the Tremor model.
-Those hidden hand handles are great… until some wasps build a nest in there
I would love to have an AWD Hybrid Transit Connect based on the Maverick! Would trade my 2022 Mav in a heartbeat. Might even do it if it’s FWD, as I’m not the off-road type.
Not the bees!
It’s better than what Ford will inevitably come out with. Ford should start with the Bronco Raptor and add as much Luxury and capability as possible beyond that. You know they’re going to start with a base model though and make it essentially a gaudy Toyota 4runner and it will be a sales flop.
+1 for the side skylights. Let’s let in some light without the ant under a magnifying glass effect of many current models.
Why would a luxury vehicle need to be affordable?
People will pay $100,000 for a Bronco Raptor, why not a luxurious Bronco?
Cause Luxurious and Bronco don’t exist in the same NVH Venn diagram. $100k Lincoln buyers get a Navi. Which is just an opulent Expedition.
Well I’d buy it.
I would not buy something Maverick based.
I agree. There are certain things that a Lincoln based Bronco (Maybe bring back Mountaineer name from Mercury) is just going to be better suited to. To me the appeal is that it could be a functional tow vehicle that is not the size of a Navigator or full sized pickup truck. Want to go off road? Great, it has the chops and isn’t gargantuan. Want to be a suburbanite? Great, it’s most likely going to be 10 inches narrower and 20 inches shorter than a Navigator.
I know that there is a cross-section of people don’t want to daily a pickup truck but still have the regular need to haul stuff (things a Maverick could do) and tow stuff (things a Maverick can’t really do based on its rated capacity). I fit that cross-section and it’s why I drive a used GX. It’s smaller than a Sequoia, the former LandCruiser, and Highlander. It tows more than a Highlander and has enough space to haul most of the things I’d throw in the bed of a small pickup.
The Bronco has a tow rating of 3500lbs, 4500 on the Braptor. Most crossovers and minivans have the same capacity.
The Bronco is also only 4″ narrower than an F150, and the Braptor is 6″ WIDER.
Lincoln already has a full frame luxury vehicle. Just make a shorter Navi and call it a day.
Lincoln Bronco:
100%, I assume there would be almost NO Lincoln buyers who would remove the roof.
Ford has already said it will be fixed roof.
Have you looked up the fuel economy of the current Bronco?
I have. For the past few weeks I was seriously considering one, abysmal fuel economy and all. Now I’m thinking I should just go buy a used Bolt and try to ride out the impending recession Trump has been cooking up since he returned to office.
Yeah, my Excursion purchase was poorly timed.
But even at higher prices, it’s still less than a payment on a new truck with only marginally better economy.
I like the looks, but I don’t think it’ll sell well.
Small and Luxury do not sell in the United States. You can sell tens of them and lose money or go bigger, sell more, and make money.
The Lincoln Bronco makes sense because you can throw it against the G Wagon and Defender
All this would do is make the Maverick even harder to get, especially the base hybrid version. FoMoCo would probably crank up production of the Lincoln version because of high profit margins.
(Breaks out the spray bottle) NO! Bad Bishop!! No treats!
Corsair pickup looks great. I’m sure it wouldn’t sell but the styling works surprisingly well on a truck.