I feel like if there’s been a theme for this year so far, it’s that I’m learning new and fascinating things about inline-four engines that are laid flat on their sides. Engines which I’ve known about for years, but never really scrutinized before. For example, I found out all sorts of interesting things about the Wright Flyer engine, and now I find myself amazed by details about another inline-four engine laid on its side: the engine proposed for use in the Volkswagen prototype known as EA266, my favorite of the many never-realized VW prototype cars.
For those of you not familiar with the EA266, I have written about it a couple of times before, mostly over at The Old Site. But if you want a quick summary, EA266 was a Beetle-replacement project developed with assistance from a Porsche team led by Ferdinand Piëch, and was really quite a revolutionary design, or would have been, had it made production.
The core of what made this car so fascinating I think has to do with its incredible packaging design, one that got the absolute maximum amount of usable interior volume possible via some really bold approaches to packaging design. The engine, a liquid-cooled 1588cc inline-four design, was transverse and laid flat under the rear seat, driving the rear wheels via a transaxle; the fuel tank was in front of the dashboard, the spare wheel under the driver’s seat, and there were two good-sized cargo areas, front and rear. It’s an absolute packaging masterpiece:

It’s incredible, isn’t it? I think so. Of course, part of why I think so is that I’ve never had to try and access that engine to do any sort of repair or maintenance, but conceptually, I really admire this design.
I think they were pretty cool looking on the outside, too; the top image here is an early body design, the middle picture and the bottom one (it’s next to the Beetle, second from left) shows its sleeker final look.

These were essentially pre-production cars by the point the lower pictures were taken, but things changed dramatically for VW when Rudolph Leiding, formerly head of VW Brazil, took over the company in 1972. Oneof Leiding’s first actions was to cancel the EA266 project, and moved the future technical direction of VW to abandon their old rear-engined, air-cooled ways and adopt the liquid-cooled, front engine/FWD tech from recently VW-acquired companies NSU and Auto Union, which gave birth to the Passat, Golf, and the whole path of modern VW.
It was kind of a shocking move, as the EA266 project was expensive and very close to production, and VW had a whole plan for an EA266-based lineup of cars, including sports cars and microbuses:

It’s all a fascinating sort of what-if to think about. And I was thinking about it recently because I happened upon a site that showed some interesting styling proposals for the EA266 that I’d never seen before, including this one from Pininfarina:

I don’t think it looks as good as the one that was eventually settled upon, but it is interesting, especially with those huge rectangular headlamps. But what I found even more fascinating was this picture of the EA266’s engine that I’d never seen before:

Previously, I’ve only seen this engine in schematic drawings or already installed in the car, where it was very hard to see. It’s quite wide, perhaps the result of making it so flat, and I think that ribbed unit at the far left was the fan/air duct assembly for what would have been a side-mounted radiator. The fuel injection and intake manifold I think is off to the far right, like some kind of quadrapus grappling at the engine, which is also interesting to see.
But what really caught my attention is the belt and pulley setup used to drive the accessories like the alternator and water pump, etc. It’s interesting because it looks like they contracted the design out to MC Escher. Look at this thing:

Look at these bends and twists in that belt! This is beyond a serpentine belt, which usually just serpents on a single plane; this is making all kinds of three-dimensional (possibly more, haven’t checked) twists and turns. And we’re just seeing one bit of it! Where does the other end of that loop go? Each of the three pulleys I can see here are on a completely different plane, and that belt is going to have to make some more crazy bends to form a workable loop. It’s astounding!
The closest I analogue I can think of on a production car is the Chevy Corvair’s right-angle-ish bend that its belt makes coming from the vertical crank pulley, then up and over the generator, turning to then drive the horizontal fan atop the engine:
Still, that looks downright tame compared to whatever is going on with the EA266’s multi-dimensional-serpentine belt!
There’s only one or two EA266s left in the world; if I ever get back to Wolfsburg, I’d love to roll under that EA266 and try to see just what the hell is going on there. I bet it’s sort of a mind-bending experience.









The engine looks like they combined 2 flat-4 engines to become a flat-8, and then sawed it down the middle.
I await the deep dive on the Hilman Imp
I like to imagine that the entire rear cradle could be easily dropped from the vehicle by removing 4 bolts for maintenance. Or snap on like a lego brick.
That’s how it was for their air-cooled engines, four bolts, disconnect a few things and it’s out. You’d hope they incorporated that idea because oof, servicing that looks like a nightmaee.
Certainly brings new meaning to the term “firewall”
The same as aircooled VWs and Porsches of the time. Seems much better than the pickups of that time that had the fuel tank behind the seat.
Two fun facts…
Wow, those Minis are heinous. The two door can almost pull it off, but the round lights are pulling a lot of weight here, so to speak.
I have a somewhat technical question. Apologies if it has already been asked and answered. Wouldn’t all of those twists and turns be absolute hell on a belt? Or are there special belts designed for that sort of thing? It just seems to me like you’d be replacing them with damn near every oil change. Just trying to learn.
I have no expertise, but I would have to agree with you. Growing up, we had a few Subaru EA82 engines (no relation to VW EA266) and their timing belts had a crazy tight Z bend in them. Not one of them ever made it to their 60,000 mile change interval. Luckily, it was not an interference engine. After the second went at 55,000 or so, we stated replacing them every 50k.
Only experience I have with this belt arrangement is the ones that were/are used on PTO driven underbelly and rearmount mowers for tractors. The PTO shaft is longitudinally oriented at the back of the tractor with a big pulley mounted, then the belt routes via a ‘mule drive’ which imparts a 1/4 twist and a 90º path change, sending the belt forward to the three pulleys on the mower deck which are vertically oriented. The mule drive also allows raising and lowering the mower deck without appreciably changing belt tension. The return path for the belt between the mower deck and the mule drive incorporates a 1/2 twist of the belt to equal out the double 1/4 turns. Many early riding lawn mowers used this arrangement as well if they had a horizontal shaft engine. The belts hold up very well as long as the pulleys are well-aligned.
That’s the key right there. Same is true for single-plane belt drives, but the twists in multi-plane belts are sort of a stress riser (not sure that’s the right term here, but it gets the point across), and they also tend to be the areas most likely to be rubbing on an out of place pulley.
They were a known failure point in Corvairs. Most drivers drove around with a spare one since it didn’t take up much space.
“My name is Doctor Quadrapus, I have four arms and I intend to kill you.” Scott Musgrove’s comics had a weird sense of humor.
Isn’t this pretty much what Toyota did with every HiAce and Previa in the 80’s/90s – except it was under the front row with a drive-shaft to the rear?
After seeing the picture of the engine I immediately thought of the Previa.
Me too! My brothers and I have an inside joke where we can say “you must never speak of the Previa spark plugs” at any time for any reason. We’ve never tried to change them but after examining them at pull-a-part it provoked a debate.
That little hatchback looks like a Renault Le Car.
Strong Renault 4 vibes
That engine packaging makes me wonder if inline pushrod engines might be useful for REX applications since they would only need to operate within a narrow RPM range.
The Porsche design “new” VW logo is giving me art deco vibes.
I love how the Pininfarina design includes a non-stylized version of the side intakes on the ten-years-hence Mondial.
The schematic seems to be violating the laws of physics with the rear passenger’s feet and spare tire occupying the same space.
Maybe they’re implying the person would stick their feet on either side of the tire which sounds unpleasant.
Also that spare looks significantly smaller than the already small original wheels and tires. It looks to be a total diameter about the same as the full size wheels without the tire, which according to that drawing would have the engine dragging on the road.
3 outta 4 chance no, that’s decent
I was briefly a Corvair owner. Mine never slung its belt but the fear was a constant. There were definitely belt fragments in the engine bay from previous slingings. I’ve heard stories from hardened Corvair owners that properly tensioning the belt ensures it will never fly off, but even those guys had extra belts stashed in their engine bays along with the two wrenches needed to install them.
So, yeah, that belt will never just fly off. Trust me.
Heated rear massage seats at no additional cost!
Ahead of their time.
I’m being silly, but this is the VW I miss, where they pushed innovation rather than chase it the way that have for years now
Does that mean if you didn’t keep up with your subscription payment the car wouldn’t run?
“Oh we would never dream of trying to keep you from driving your car! This charge is just for the heated massage seats! It’s just such an unfortunate coincidence that the engine powers those, totally out of our control, $19.95 please!”
Also interesting how the distributor sticks out of what would be the oil pan on a more common engine.
I know! But that’s where the oil pump is so I guess it makes sense right?
It looks like the belt just loops around the fan pulley and comes back around to the front. Except for that weird angled lower pulley (power steering pump?) it’s a very similar route to the Corvair.
They would have to use belts designed for this purpose. I have a snowblower with belt routing like this. If I buy a cheap replacement belt based only on width / length, it will shred the belt in a day. I need to buy the specific one that can also handle the twisting.
I was just noticing the same thing, it looks like the belt runs that fan on the side
I think that angled unit below the alternator is the water pump. It wouldn’t really need power steering.
That makes more sense.
That engine diagram answers my question from the first picture – where the heck is the cooling? Not sure how that would have worked. Interesting packaging to retain a frunk while going watercooled.
Packaging miracles are often serviceability nightmares. I’m not sure if there’s ever been a car that had truly excellent packaging and was also easy to work on. The closest might be the original VW bus
Ferdinand Piëch assisted the project, so serviceability should not had been a priority.
Just check the engineering “marvelous” that he authorized while in charge of VAG (W blocks, V10 TDI, VW Phaeton et. al.)
I love that front end styling.
Hey this is a really neat des..
*Rear ends car in front and gets a face full of mid grade*
Yeah. You’d for sure want to splurge for premium.
Gotta keep your octane levels up!
As the owner of a Velorex 435 I’ll have to say that the presence of a firewall isolating the fuel tank from the passenger compartment in the VW design is nothing more than decadent Western bourgeoise infantile nannyism:
https://smallcarsclub.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Velorex-453-0-08.jpg
Fascinating indeed. I’m sure they could have made it fairly easy to work on with properly designed access ports, etc., but being Germans, they probably wouldn’t have (evidence: the VW “service position” nightmare).
Side note: Seriously, can we consider retiring “stillborn” when referring to prototypes, or never-realized cars, or non-production models, etc.? “Stillborn” is a bit graphic and disturbing for several reasons, even if you or your wife has never miscarried a child (as mine has). I mean, afaik, we’ve stopped using “abortion” to describe a horrible mistake, as was common when I was younger (back in the 70’s), and I think it’s time to give “stillborn” the old heave-ho as well.
Agreed.
Think of all the special tools they could have sold which were the only way to access that one f$%king bolt needed to complete a repair.
Update: Thanks Jason (or whomever changed the title) for replacing that term with “Never-made”.
Serpents on a plane was the working title of that movie, wasn’t it?
If you had a way to use quick disconnects on the linkages and hoses, and then had bolts that would allow the entire engine/transaxle/rear suspension assembly to just “drop out” and roll out backwards, it would actually be easy to work on. Without that, it’d be a straight-up nightmare.
The one change I’d have made to the basic EA266 is make it a 4-door, and a 4-door only regardless of previous German home-market preference for 2-door cars.
Because presumably there was an access cover for that engine under the back seat cushion (looking at that belt it would hopefully include most of the riser from the footwell to the cushion, at least on the right side), and being able to pull the cushion and access cover out directly and lean straight over the engine would have a significant impact on serviceability.