It’s hard not to have a bit of a soft spot for the original BMW i3. Its quirky hatchback design, cutting-edge carbon fiber monocoque, and way-ahead-of-its-time range-extender EV powertrain were so appealing to our own David Tracy that he bought one. And he loved that car so much that he bought another one, which he still owns.
BMW killed off the lovable i3 hatch in 2022, and ever since, we’ve been hoping BMW would offer some kind of replacement. Sadly, nothing from the brand emerged … until now … kinda.
Today, the German luxury carmaker has finally announced the i3’s return. But it’s not a hatchback with funky looks and a space-age chassis construction. And, more importantly, it doesn’t have any kind of available range-extender tech. Instead, it’s a sedan that’ll be sold purely as an EV, adopting the company’s “Neue Klasse” design scheme first seen on the iX3 launched back in September. It uses that car’s underpinnings too, and because of that, it has a whole lot of range.
Going The Distance
BMW’s New Class architecture isn’t just a new design approach—it’s new underneath, too. The underfloor battery powertrain uses an 800-volt architecture, which unlocks more efficient, faster charging. BMW estimates it can DC fast-charge at up to 400 kW, while the company’s “Gen6” cylindrical cells can squeeze out 30 percent more range than before.

Spec-wise, the i3 50 xDrive, the launch trim, is mechanically identical to its iX3 sibling. There are two electric motors, one at the front and another at the rear. Combined, they make the same 463 horsepower and 476 pound-feet of torque. BMW doesn’t list a battery size, but considering output is unchanged, it’s likely that the i3 is getting the same 112.2-kWh battery pack.
Because the i3 is a smaller, lighter car, BMW says it can get an estimated 440 miles of range out of its battery pack, going by EPA cycle testing. That’s 10% more range than the iX3. Should the i3 score that well in official EPA estimates, that range would make it the 5th-highest-range EV on sale in America right now. If you exclude all the heavy electric SUVs and their gigantic battery packs, the i3 would be second only to the Lucid Air Grand Touring, which still leads the segment at 512 miles of range.

A lot of that has to do with the big pack. As far as efficiency goes, the i3 works out to around 3.9 miles per kWh, or a tiny bit less efficient than the new Chevy Bolt. The Lucid Air Pure, the cheapest version of the Air you can buy, still has the industry beat by a long shot, with its 5.0 miles per kWh (it’s able to get 420 miles out of just 84 kWh). Still, 440 miles is damn impressive, and could end up as a big selling point for customers who can’t get rid of their range anxiety.
BMW’s New Face, On A Sedan

When the iX3 dropped in September, Autopian commenters had mixed opinions. Some of you liked it, and some of you didn’t like it. However you felt about that car, you’ll likely feel the same way about this one. The fascias aren’t exactly the same; the i3 is missing the two small vertically shaped grilles found on the iX3, with a more streamlined set that incorporates the headlights on either end. The grille has its own illuminated outline, while the black portions of the panels hide front-facing sensors.

Proportionally, the i3 is classic 3-box sedan-shaped (BMW calls it “a 2.5-box design” on account of its short rear overhang). In the rear, you’ll find a set of thin, long, horizontally positioned taillights that stretch to the center of the trunklid, and flare out as they reach the rear bumper area. Unsurprisingly, the car looks a lot like the Vision Neue Klasse concept shown over two years ago, down to the general greenhouse shape.

I always try to reserve judgment until I see cars in person, but personally, first impressions are good. BMW’s done a good job incorporating the black portions of the side sills to hide the extra height added by the batteries, and the flared fenders do a good job of making the i3 feel at least a little bit sporty. The front end, with its furled eyebrow-like upper bumper and hood section, isn’t exactly beautiful, but it’s certainly interesting. And in a world where designers are constantly restricted by crash safety and aerodynamics, “interesting” is often the most you can hope for.
The Weirdest Parts Are Inside

As jarring as the exterior design can be for some, the interior is an even larger evolution. Gone is the instrument cluster, replaced by a gigantic head-up display that spans the entire lower portion of the windshield. Called “Panoramic Vision,” it’s a full-color screen that shows the things you’d normally see in a gauge cluster, like speed, turn signals, transmission position, and speed limit.
For everything else, there’s the rhombus-shaped infotainment screen in the center of the dash. It measures 17.9 inches and contains most of the controls you care about, including all of the controls for the HVAC system, which are permanent fixtures at the bottom portion of the screen. Thankfully, stuff like the volume scroll knob, parking brake, hazard lights, and defrost buttons are still physical and located forward of the center console.

There are also buttons on the steering wheel, which borrows its fascinating vertical two-spoke design from the iX3. There are some generous moldings for where to put your thumbs, too, and a handful of glossy metal accents embedded throughout. If you like a clean, simple, circular three-spoke design, this is the opposite of that.
If there’s one thing that connects the new i3 to the original, it’s the size of the front trunk. The original i3, infamously, has an absolutely tiny trunk that wasn’t even sealed from the elements. While the new i3’s frunk looks like it does have a weather seal, it doesn’t look like it’s measurably increased in size, despite the car’s length growing by nearly 30 inches.

BMW has yet to release pricing for the iX3 and the i3 sedan, though the crossover is expected to start at around $60,000, so I have to imagine the i3 will be priced similarly because, again, they’re mostly the same car underneath.
Am I totally off-base here? The internet hated how the current M3 and M4 look, yet those cars still fly off the lots as soon as they arrive. Something tells me it might be the same with these cars, especially considering these range numbers. Let me know in the comments.
Top graphic image: BMW









Seriously, that whole front section seems like a Renault 16 reincarnation. Too bad it’s lacking that long hood though…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault_16
well.. I had high hopes from the concept that BMW would return to a somewhat restrained classic Teutonic design,,, but find the front design kinda grotesque with the nostril bulges extending into the hood like in the M3/M4. The appearance is not quite as ‘angry beaver’, but still not great. (I see now that the neue klasse concept had nostril bulges as well, I had forgotten that)
Also.. is BMW stuck in 2021? Did they not hear that everyone hates using touch screens to control HVAC and audio and that governments are starting to regulate this nonsense and fucking recessed door handles? What is this shit?
Mostly though, I’m offended by the FWD proportions of the thing. The people need a long axle-to-dash distance, BMW. That’s why the latest generation BMW 1 and 2 series are so offensive. Stop it with this. Push that axle out to the front end!
I’ve owned three “golden era” BMW sedans and I am truly excited by the side profile of this thing, there’s a really great minimal sleekness that reminds me of their old cars while still feeling quite modern.
But the front and back end feel just kind of busy and overwrought. Especially so the front end which feels busy but somehow underbaked at the same time. Looks like it’s flush and they’re trying to create a feeling of depth with tacky accent lighting in lieu of a grille but to my eyes I’m not really buying it.
Lastly I hate that stupid 4 spoke steering wheel, why does this even exist and why does it have so many little dimensional details on it as well all this pointless decoration?? It’s unpleasant to look at it and looks unpleasant to hold. And lastly the trapezoidal screen-just seems different for the sake of being different, though I’d happily eat my words if it makes sense in person.
That being said I will reserve judgement until I see one in person, it’s too bad this car seems so close to being the kind of out of the park styling hit BMW hasn’t had in years.
I don’t hate it. Not finding anything that thrilling about it either (love the blue though) and I’d probably nope right out of that steering wheel if it’s an option to do so. But it’s at a price point that I’m not interested in or currently capable of (if one is being fiscally responsible) anyway.
I really like it. So in 2028 I will want to replace our 2008 e91 (even though it has only 85k miles and I’ve maintained the hell out of it). Hoping that we get the Estate variant in the US! By then they would like iron out the inevitable bugs.
ORRRRR I could get a used current generation i4 for like $30k and put the other $30k I would have spent into manual swapping my e91!!
Help me decide!
Second one
To my own surprise, I like it a lot. I wish I could afford to be efficient.
Finally BMW returning to form, design wise.
Give us in the US the wagon that I assume they are making anyway for Europe and I will buy one. Even with that ridiculous steering wheel.
It will be interesting to see the pricing and the specs/efficiency. While I love the driving dynamics of our 330e, the efficiency is pretty horrible on electric (but pretty great on ICE). I struggle to get much more than 2.5 miles per kwh. I know it’s somewhat apples and oranges, since the motor on the 330e is coupled at the transmission and still shifts in electric mode, but BMW didn’t really focus on efficiency. Even the old I3 with it’s carbon fiber construction was right around 4 miles per kwh. This new I3 looks to be larger, but more aerodynamic. I also expect it’s quite a bit heavier. I also hope they went with a different pack cooling strategy than the I3 and their PHEV’s. Having the potential for a compressor failure to total the car isn’t great. I hope they incorporated a heat exchanger for battery coolant lines using antifreeze instead.
As for looks. Maybe it will grow on me, but something looks off on the front. It just doesn’t read as a BMW to me. The color is great though. I love the BMW blues like Portimao Blue.
BMW makes the best blues. This is a new one called Le Castellet Blue and it’s fantastic.
It looks fine and I was excited to see a longer range in what looks like a smaller car, but then I saw they get the long range with a huge battery. How much does this weigh?
Sure, 440 miles sounds good, but you can get that kind of range in anything if you stick a big enough battery in it. The challenge is how do you make a small car with a 80Kwh or less battery (or similar size and weight solid state battery with more capacity) get that kind of range?
It looks kind of old school Pontiac. I like it a LOT!
Yeah, I see some G8 in there lol
It looks like a Jetta, in the sense of looking like it was conceived as a hatchback and had a trunk tacked on late in the design process.
It’s gorgeous, and is gonna look even better as a 5 Series.
Exterior kind of looks like an Alfa Romeo 159. I like it.
Love the front, love the side profile, hate the rear end.
I have some issues with the distance between the front axle and the A-pillar. There’s absolutely no room in there to put a longitudinal I6 and not have all it sit ahead of the axle, Audi-like fashion. I know this is an EV-only but I’m concerned about the next ICE 3 Series maybe going FWD? Even in an EV, this short hood seems wrong for a BMW and cheapens the look.
Hate the interior and flush door handles (haven’t we all agreed as a human race that these are dumb?) and also hate the panel gap between the hood and the front clip. The F30 had that and it looked really bad. BMW fixed it in the G generation but it’s back.
I think the ‘next’ ICE 3 Series will just be a facelift of the current one that superficially resembles this EV. Like they did with the Mini.
From the side and back, what exactly differentiates it from a 2024 Corolla or other modern sedan? So the heavy and large battery gives it a longer range. That’s not exactly great when you have to charge it back up. If you sold someone a gas car with a 40gallon tank, they would probably not enjoy filling it up with $5/gal gasoline. I know electricity is less expensive (for now), but with data centers being built all over, I think those days are numbered. Even with solar, how long would you have to charge to get the pack full for a trip?
Heavy EV cars burn through tires instead of gas. Not great when they are so expensive.
Agree on it looking like a Corolla from the side, disagree on the battery size / gas tank size thing. Sure, I’ll pay 3 times as much to gas up my car if I can go 3 times as long without refueling. The imagined downsides of concentrating 3 gas purchases into one are a nonissue for me. Heck, I can’t think of a single car I might own (except perhaps a Miata) where I wouldn’t appreciate a larger fuel tank in it.
As a fellow Miata owner, I find that I don’t enjoy driving heavy cars.
PREACH my friend!!
As a former miata owner, my current Cooper SE still feels heavy at 1.4 tons. Unfortunately, that is on the light side of the EV and even on the new car spectrum.
I have driven a lot of modern BMWs, and they all make you feel like you are captain of a canal barge.
Sure, they handle great if you are going high speed on a dead straight, but all struggle with the required dynamics of even a roundabout.
I think that a lot of folks haven’t driven light vehicles. Heck, my 2wd regular cab 5spd Tacoma from 2002 was 2750lbs. I used it to haul and do real truck stuff and yet it was nimble and good on gas when unloaded. Sadly there are not many opportunities to drive something that is enlightening these days outside of sports cars and some subcompact cars.
You appear to have glossed over the fact that the i3 averages 3.9 miles/kWh. That is very efficient. Weight has essentially no impact on efficiency in EVs – check out Aging Wheel’s videos on the topic.
I’d also like to point out that this is 500 lbs lighter than the M5. Yes, the M5 is bigger, but not by much!
Weight does have an impact on handling, stopping and tire wear. Tires, especially low profile run flat ones, are very expensive to replace. I owned an EV once. I’m all set for a while. We have 5 cars in the driveway and they are all much lighter and more inspiring to drive. But for efficiency I’d take my old MK4 TDI manual wagon. 49mpg all day. 700miles between fill ups.
Even worse is that a lot of home owners will struggle to get it recharged on a regular home installation.
Even worse here in Belgium is that the price for electricity on an entire month is determined by the 15 minutes of highest power during that month.
And your highest power is defenitely going up if you are trying to get 100 kWh out of the system during one night.
Yikes, that is a different way to calculate an electric bill. I wonder if you could trickle charge a giant capacitor and then use that for the energy spikes while keeping your bill low. I’m not an electrician though. All I know is to keep the magic smoke inside the electrical things. Once it gets out the stuff never works again.
Well, kindoff.
Home batteries are popular here for exactly that reason. Charge the battery slowly or with solar and use the energy to lower peak demand.
I have done the math and I don’t understand the financials. But there is always the possibility that I am wrong en everyone else is right.
I wish it had dog mode.
For the first time in a while when looking at a new BMW, I can say that I don’t hate this.
Right. It is interesting, edgy and still conservative in some ways. There are things I like and things I dislike and elements that I am already going back and forth on – those feelings usually end up meaning I ultimately will continue to like this style into the future.
Looks like a weird futuristic Saab/old school BMW in the front, and a lame Tesla/Accord (with a wide single light in the back). Interior is odd, but it’s EV, so I’ve come to grips with it. Inside, the screen is so weird, not square, the corners are missing, driving me nuts. I’m a huge BMW fan, and I can’t get behind this.
Exterior: back end doesn’t look like a BMW, looks pretty nice. Rest of it is otherwise, in both aspects.
Interior: 1. Screen is not a rhombus, it’s a hexagon, or a rectangle with two clipped corners. I dare BWM to be dumb enough put in an actual rhombus screen. 2. Steering wheel is not two-spoke, whatever BMW may be telling you. It is a four-spoke. It has four quadrant voids that are fully disconnected from each other by four solid things spanning from hub to rim. 3. Steering wheel is a travesty and should be sent to VW so it can be set on fire.
Look (much) more closely at the steering wheel – the side pods from the center do not actually touch the rim at all and so there are two voids.
<zooms and enhances> Oh lord, you’re right. I mistook bits of dash to be part of the wheel. But there’s a gap just big enough to get a fingertip stuck in, yet small enough to be hard to clean. Hooray! All while pretty much appearing to be connected.
Here’s hoping they have the new i3 on this summer’s Ultimate Driving Experience tour. Last summer, I had an opportunity to drive like 15 or so different models.
I like the exterior design. It isn’t beautiful, but it’s an improvement over the current petrol 3-series.
I honestly think the interior will work really well in practice, judging by how easy car reviewers have gotten on with the iX3. It’s a bit weird, but maybe it’s weird because it’s functional, instead of the other way round for a change.
FYI I believe the EPA rating is 345 miles. The quoted 440 miles is on the WLTP cycle, which has an average speed of a ridiculous 29 MPH. 345 is more than enough and excellent in this (assumed) price range.
I hope BMW can get the starting price of the base models down low enough to compete with the Model 3. Tesla really needs a competitor in this segment in the US.
I’m thrilled that the platform is 800v and can accept up to 400 kW. In practice, I rarely use DCFC, but it’s nice to have the capability to charge quickly when the need arises!
According to BMW’s press release the i3 gets 440 miles of estimated range “according to preliminary BMW AG tests based on the EPA’s test procedure standards.” They also gave an estimate for this car based on WLPT test procedures and that figure is ~560 miles. So 440 seems reasonable.
US Press Release
UK Press Release
Oops! You are correct. I think I got this confused with another vehicle.
Given that BMW EVs typically beat their EPA range estimates, that’s super impressive!
I dig it.
It looks pretty good to me. And to me, it looks like BMW’s own interpretation of a Tesla Model 3 both inside and out and in a good way.
And on the subject of the interior, I like the interior of this new i3 more than the interior of the regular 3 series.
So I think this is a step in the right direction for BMW.
I like everything about this except fir the weird for the sake of weird interior, unfortunately that’s all you’d see while driving