Home » A Deathtrap, And A Hearse: 1993 Ford Mustang vs 1979 Cadillac Superior

A Deathtrap, And A Hearse: 1993 Ford Mustang vs 1979 Cadillac Superior

Sbsd 7 18
ADVERTISEMENT

Good morning Autopians: This is your wake-up call. It’s Monday morning; time to mainline some coffee and get back to pretending to work. But to make the morning go a little easier, I’ve got some weird cheap old cars for you to check out, as always.

On Friday, we looked at a couple of ’50s sedans that were outside our normal price range. Let’s see what you thought of them:

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Screen Shot 2022 07 17 At 3.43.13 Pm

Well, that’s pretty decisive. Price was probably a factor: I’m not sure that Edsel was more than twice as nice as the DeSoto. And the DeSoto is just way cooler.

Today, we’ve got another one of those odd-couple matchups, because there just aren’t comparable vehicles out there for either of these, at least for our hypothetical budget. But in a way, they do go together: if you’re not careful about how you drive one, you’ll end up as a passenger in the other. Let’s take a look.

ADVERTISEMENT

1993 Ford Mustang LX – $1,300

00e0e 8g9m6frhvrgz 0ci0t2 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 2.3 liter inline 4, 5 speed manual, RWD

Location: Sandy, OR

Odometer reading: unknown

Runs/drives? Like a top, if the seller is to be believed

ADVERTISEMENT

Off-roading cars that were never meant to be off-roaded is officially a Thing these days. But few can afford to safari-ize a vintage Porsche 911. For those of us of more normal means, including our own Mercedes Streeter, the Gambler 500 series is the answer. Take a cheap old car, do whatever you need to do to hang some big off-road tires off the axles, and go beat the snot out of it on logging roads. Sounds like fun, huh?

00k0k Jriskem2gtdz 0ci0t2 1200x900

This late Fox-body Mustang would seem to be a logical choice, and from the sounds of it, has been very successful on a couple of outings. It’s a basic four-cylinder LX, but you don’t need a ton of horsepower to slide a rear-wheel-drive car around on dirt. It’s also a manual, which improves not only control, but also durability – important when you’re in the middle of nowhere in a cheap old car.

00z0z Dpkgieq5em4z 0ci0t2 1200x900

The trouble I have with the whole Gambler 500 phenomenon in general is that it does use up the cars; once you Gambler-ize a car, it’s very difficult to un-Gambler-ize it. In the case of this Mustang, the rear hatch is MIA, the rear fenders and front bumper have been hacked up, and the interior is either trashed or absent. It may run and drive as well as they say, but it’s not really good for anything other than a Gambler event anymore. You could put it back into regular-car service, I suppose, but would you want to?

ADVERTISEMENT

01616 Hk3wfgqwg0bz 0ci0t2 1200x900

A good-running four-cylinder stickshift Mustang for $1300 sounds like a decent deal, but this one? Well, that’s for you to decide.

 

1979 Cadillac Superior Hearse – $1,800

01010 8gcdkj4cl5rz 0ci0lm 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 425 cubic inch V8, 3 speed automatic, RWD

ADVERTISEMENT

Location: Centralia, WA

Odometer reading: 62,000 miles

Runs/drives? Great, according to the ad

And now for something completely different. Everybody loves a hearse, right? I mean, folks are just dying to get a ride in one of these bad boys.

Superior Coaches of Lima, Ohio has been turning Cadillacs into hearses for a long time. In 1981, they bought out the S&S Coach Company, who had been building hearses even longer. They’re not the only game in town, but they’re the only one I’ve ever heard of.

ADVERTISEMENT

00404 Kyxilatbwirz 0ci0lm 1200x900

This 1979 model is based on a Cadillac Fleetwood Limousine, which shrank along with the rest of GM’s full-size cars in 1977. Even with the malaise-era downsizing, it’s still an impressively-sized machine, and in hearse form, it’s even bigger. Good luck parallel parking this monster. 1979 was the last year for the massive 425 cubic inch V8 as well, so expect to spend a lot of time at the gas pump.

00e0e K0j4xxhmziaz 0ci0lm 1200x900

According to the seller, this old Caddy runs and drives well and has had a lot of recent mechanical work done.  Outside, there’s a lot of rust, and not all of it looks benign. It’s probably fixable, but it’s going to take the right kind of buyer to want to try. Although I suppose you could ignore the rust and drive it as-is: Use it in place of a truck or van, maybe? There is an awful lot of room in the back.

00606 Jtfvyxvvpo4z 0ci0lm 1200x900

ADVERTISEMENT

No word on whether this one has an Aiwa stereo in it or not. But it should.

So there they are, our Monday choices. You can Gamble on a badly-abused Mustang, or roll the bones on an old rusty hearse. The choice is yours.

 

Quiz Maker

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
40 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Phantom Pedal Syndrome
Phantom Pedal Syndrome
1 year ago

Well, either one is cheaper than a coffin so… that one!

Vic Vinegar
Vic Vinegar
1 year ago

Next David Tracy piece – “I just bought pretty rust free hearse for $1500!”

notoriousDUG
notoriousDUG
1 year ago

Thar hearse is a rot-box but even if it completely returns to the earth after a year on the road you are left with a bunch of heavy-duty B-body parts and a Caddy V-8 that is begging to be swapped into all kinds of things…
Get a BOP TH400 with a fixed rear yolk and a Chevette… or a Gremlin… or a Vega…

Donald Petersen
Donald Petersen
1 year ago

I’ve always, always wanted a hearse. This one is an ugly year, and the rust is most unfortunate, but what the hell. It’s carried around its share of deadies, I’ll give it a nice retirement. The Mustang I don’t hate nearly as much as I should, but I don’t want to bother with that engine (and upsizing the engine means upgrading the whole drivetrain, and there are much better uses of my time and money out there). so hearse me up.

81Delorean
81Delorean
1 year ago

As a guy who does trauma/crime scene cleaning and has a pretty warped sense of humor, I’m going hearse all day long. Wish I had one for a company vehicle with an awesome vinyl wrap of some sorts.

The Toecutter
The Toecutter
1 year ago

I’d totally get the Hearse. I’d goth the shit out of it. Black with black tinted windows, the gaudiest chrome rims I could find in the shape of pentagrams, Baphomet hood ornamet, give it a nice and plush red velvet interior. And it would be converted to electric. There’s a LOT of battery room in there. It deserves nothing less than a drivetrain from a Model S PLAID and a custom-built 200 kWh pack of 21700s. Given the terrible aerodynamics of it, and all the weight, it would be lucky to get 300 miles range on such a massive pack.

Totally playing Sisters of Mercy, Bauhaus, The Cure, Fields of Nephilim, while rolling around in it. Also a good place to binge on alcohol and controlled substances before passing out.

SLIDTossedPissedinto BleuCHSaladwCroutons
SLIDTossedPissedinto BleuCHSaladwCroutons
1 year ago
Reply to  The Toecutter

Just needs a good large engine and drivetrain… with some nice tall stacks.

AdamVIP
AdamVIP
1 year ago

These are both true shit boxes. I feel like the hearse gains you significant utility and more acceptance of a shit box exterior from the public though so that got my vote. No 5.0 in the Stang is a bummer.

Manwich Sandwich
Manwich Sandwich
1 year ago

Hearse for me even if it’s an insane gas guzzler. Can still be useful as a 2nd vehicle to haul the odd large, heavy or bulky item.

05LGT
05LGT
1 year ago

Does the hearse weigh enough more to have $500 more scrap value? That’s all I’m doing with either of these.

Looked it up, voting MustanGambler.
$500 is the limos full scrap value?

40
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x