Humans have known that lead is bad for our health for centuries. But in a quest to improve engine performance and alleviate engine knock in the 1920s, during the dawn of the mass-produced automobile, a few scientists at General Motors discovered that lead was pretty helpful. The result was decades of leaded gasoline use globally.
It wasn’t until 1970 that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officially declared that lead from automobile exhaust was a direct threat to human health. In 1973, the agency began to impose regulations on leaded gasoline, which would lead to its eventual phase-out from gas stations in America by 1996.
Amazingly, it was only in 2021 that Algeria, the last country to allow leaded gasoline, stopped selling the stuff at fueling stations. But those toxic fumes aren’t totally gone from our air. There are still nearly a quarter-million airplanes in the world that still use leaded gas.
Thanks to a study released by the University of Utah, we now have proof that the reduction in lead in gasoline mandated by the EPA has led to decreased exposure to people. The evidence, interestingly, was found by analyzing 100 years’ worth of human hair.
Here’s How They Got The Data
The study, published yesterday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal, analyzed strands of hair from Salt Lake City residents, both children and adults, that were up to 100 years old, that the university had in its archives. Unsurprisingly, the amount of lead in hair dropped significantly after the EPA stepped in in the ’70s. From the study:
Concentrations of Pb in human hair from the Salt Lake City region population had very high levels from 1916 to 1969 before the establishment of the EPA, with individual values ranging between 28 and 100 ppm. In the decades of the 1970s through the 1990s, the average values declined from about 50 ppm in the 1970s to 10 ppm in the 1990s. The decline has continued to the present day with average values post-2020 of <1 ppm. Therefore, the lead concentrations in hair have declined by about 2 orders of magnitude since the establishment of EPA and implementation of measures to reduce human exposure to Pb.

Essentially, this means that lead levels in humans were around 100 times higher back in the 1920s than they are now, after the regulations have taken effect. That seems like a pretty good improvement.
It’s worth noting that the study also says some of these lead levels can also be attributed to other sources of lead, such as lead piping, lead-infused paint, and two major lead smelters that were active in the Salt Lake Valley area, where the hair samples were sourced, from the 1910s to the 1960s. But the study makes it clear that leaded gasoline was a “principal source” of environmental lead exposure for humans.
Here’s What It Means
Lead, in case you weren’t aware, can be absolutely devastating to human health. It accumulates in the body in places like living tissue and bone, and even low levels can be toxic, according to the University. This is especially true concerning children, according to the World Health Organization:
Exposure to very high levels of lead can severely damage the brain and central nervous system causing coma, convulsions and even death. Children who survive severe lead poisoning may be left with permanent intellectual disability and behavioural disorders. At lower levels of exposure that may have no obvious symptoms, lead can lead to a spectrum of injury across multiple body systems. In particular, lead can permanently affect children’s brain development, resulting in reduced intelligence quotient (IQ), behavioural changes including reduced attention span and increased antisocial behaviour, and reduced educational attainment. Lead exposure also causes anaemia, hypertension, renal impairment, immunotoxicity and toxicity to the reproductive organs.

The WHO adds that lead exposure could be attributed to more than 1.5 million deaths and a combined 33 million years lost to disability in 2021 alone. So basically: Lead is bad for you, and you should do your best to avoid it whenever possible, especially if you’re a small child.
This data comes to the pretty obvious conclusion that if there is less lead in the environment, humans will be exposed to less of it. But thanks to this hair analysis, we can see exactly how quickly that trend occurred, and how it very clearly coincides with the EPA’s efforts to curb, and eventually eliminate, leaded gasoline use in cars. It also demonstrates exactly how effective the regulations were at solving the problem. And I’d say a 99% reduction in lead from hair samples is pretty effective.
Top graphic images: DepositPhotos.com









Sharing the public health perspective where the lead industry conducted an all-out war against the science. See the first video here:
https://billmoyers.com/story/flint-and-americas-toxic-history-with-lead/
One of the more interesting correlations I’ve seen with lead exposure is the long-term neurological impacts it can cause. Childhood exposure can result in adults who are “more neurotic, less agreeable, and less conscientious”.
Most of the people running our country were exposed to airborne lead for decades before the EPA phase out of leaded gasoline.
So, this entire administration has been huffing lead for their whole lives?
In their early childhood years, when it’s most important to cognitive development, yes.
This seems like as good a place as any to share (since it has to do with gasoline and a type of emission).
This guy’s done some great work in breaking-down the benefits of an electrified transportation infrastructure. While this (long) video is about the benefits of renewable, he uses cars and gasoline consumption as a proxy for all non-renewable energy usage while directly addressing all of the common counterpoints to renewable energy (you just need to have the patience to get to them).
https://youtu.be/Zgxb8I1nk2I?si=5btgoouVXCPA8L_h
I fully expect a follow up story about the so-called, ahem, EPA announcing a collaboration with Big Lead to Make America Leaded Again.
by “executive order”
i.e., unhinged post on Truth Social
Maybe I’m remembering what I read incorrectly, but I thought there actually was a lead lobby at the time that was partially to blame for pushing for the stuff in petrol/gas.
Yes that’s true. And the reason it was tetraethyl lead was not because it was better than all other solutions. Alcohol works about as well as tetraethyl lead to reduce engine knock. You can’t patent alcohol, though, which is why tetraethyl lead was chosen.
Make America Leaded Again.?
I thought that was ICE’s job now.
*I immediately regret posting that for myriad reasons.*
What’s with the strange image? I thought u guys said no AI junk.
The banning lead gas thing but still is in private planes till recently makes me think about the global warming Al Gore types flying around to conferences to spout their piece , but not being accountable for their giant carbon footprint. It’s hypocrisy obviously, forget any political garbage.
Their message obviously means well, but the actions speak louder than words.
Down a few comments they mention that the source images are from depositphotos.com, searched with “no aí” tags. It seems the filter failed.
Weirdly, it looks like this isn’t even AI. Another reader found that this stock photo is pretty old. It’s apparently an amateurish Photoshop job, probably in an attempt to anonymize the vehicle since the original image depicted coal rolling. I suppose that’s why it didn’t get caught by the AI filter. It’s not AI, it’s just a ‘Shop job that’s so screwy it might as well be AI.
We live in a strange world… Today at work someone told me I’m great at vibecoding, for a reporting tool I did in a hurry… in 2022. Not sure if I should feel flattered, insulted, worried or all of the above 🙂
Unless I’m mistaken the leaded gas is avgas used in internal combustion plane engines, while the Al Gore types fly around in jets with turbines powered by fuel that is basically kerosene.
Work is being done on unleaded alternatives for avgas.
It would be interesting to see another study of people’s hair in an area that did not have two lead smelters.
Eliminating variables could really help nail down how much came from each source.
Two fun facts about leaded gas.
1) The guy who invented it was also responsible for CFCs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Midgley_Jr.
2) There is a school of thought that the serial killer epidemic of the 70s and 80s was down to lead poisoning.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046222000667
Not just serial killers but all violent crime from the ’50s to the ’90s. Violent crime rates in the US peaked in 1992, lagging the introduction and then the phase-out of leaded gas by about 15 years.
I’ll add other factors may be involved. The US population has aged over the same period, and there’s an inverse correlation between age and violent crime.
The US also removed lead from house paint, and today all paint products advise painters to wear PPE when scaping and sanding old paint that likely contains lead.
As for serial killers, police agencies cooperate more than they used to and online crime databases make it easier to spot similar crimes. That said, it’s likely today’s serial killers do a better job at covering their tracks and target vulnerable populations in areas with weak law enforcement, such as native American jurisdictions. (I think I just revealed I read too many of Michael Connelly’s books.)
And Midgley died in a Wallace and Gromit contraption of his own design. A down payment on expiating his bad karma.
You state the reduction in PB levels. But never state the ppm levels that cause harm. Basic info yoh.
There is *no safe* level of lead. The usual 15ppb, yes *billion*, in drinking water is a practical limit, not one based on safety.
No level is safe. Just because we evolved on a planet with lead doesn’t mean we’re ok with any level of exposure. We don’t play in a sandbox full of plutonium either.
Speak for yourself
Are you insides liquefying yet?
Dan can’t respond due to the fact that the skin on his hands has melted off. 🙁
Plutonium isn’t found naturally on Earth though except in exceedingly trace amounts so there was none to adapt to.
That’s a contradiction. It is natural and a comparatively rare element. Exposure is exposure.
Not really. All isotopes of plutonium are radioactive and geologically speaking most have relatively short half lives. Humans didn’t even know it existed until the 1940s and even then only because it was made by humans, not found in the environment. Because of this plutonium is considered a synthetic element, not a natural one.
That geologically short half life of plutonium means there is vanishingly little primordial plutonium found anywhere on the Earth. There MIGHT be some plutonium-244 still around but AFAIK it has yet to be discovered in the crust. Good luck finding enough of that to poison anyone.
Naturally occurring lead OTOH is stable and relatively ubiquitous. Humans have been aware of lead’s existence and its toxicity since the dawn of civilization. It’s not going anywhere. You can find it in your tackle box, on your tires, electronics, batteries, ammunition, fancy glassware, fancy plates, dust,…
There are about 1-3 tons of plutonium on the entire Earth depending on who you ask. The overwhelming majority of that is safely locked up in the core of a nuclear reactor, in the demon core of a nuclear warhead, in a waste dump or in a wreck at the bottom of the sea. Its one of the densest elements on the table at 19.84 g/cm³. That works out to a volume of 50-150L yielding a 1 square meter sandbox 5-15cm deep. That’s a nicely sized litterbox for an Ocelot but its hardly enough for a grown human to play in. Lead OTOH is FAR more common. You could have a whole beach of lead sand.
Of course if you were to suddenly dump that much plutonium into a sandbox you’d go critical (assuming its Pu-239) which doesn’t happen with lead. Quite the opposite, lead would protect you from that radiation. Plutonium’s primary danger is it’s radioactivity which varies greatly by isotope and concentration whereas the risks of lead are it’s chemical activity.
So no, not the same at all. Arsenic is a far better benchmark.
In human toxicology, the standard measure for lead exposure is micrograms per deciliter of blood. But since you can’t take blood samples from dead people, these researchers had to use PPM. The EPA characterizes levels more than 3.5 micrograms per deciliter as a “level of concern.” And as we’ve gotten better at observing the effects of lead exposure that level has come down to be barely over the minimum amount tests can detect.
Nice work by those researchers – that’s more of a dramatic correlation than you often see with this sort of work. I hope there are teams in other parts of the US and world working on similar studies. It would be interesting to take the smelters out of the equation (although it doesn’t sound like that would change the results).
Leaded gas just tastes better than unleaded. Big government doesn’t want you to know that!
If they ran that PSA on Fox, our problems would be solved in a short amount of time.
You’d end up with some emissions-deleted Ram 2500 Diesels rolling leaded coal through all of Appalachia.
Some people would call that a form of self-inflicted ethic cleansing. Emphasis on self-inflicted.
Why the AI slop truck/suv in the lead image? It can’t be that hard to find a royalty-free picture of a truck/suv doing a burnout.
Also minus points for the AI slop vehicle being completely the wrong vintage for leaded gas.
Yes; I would like to also voice my disappointment with AI slop graphics.
I will cancel my membership if I keep seeing that garbage. I am paying to support real people; not that horse shit.
Oh my god I scrolled right past it and didn’t even realize. What a shame. If I were subbed, I’d cancel immediately.
I’m not sure Pete noticed the AI-ness of it. That image came from our stock photo provider, and Pete only added the smoke and the lady. I’ll tell him about it.
Thanks!
It’s actually two stock photos kludged together (by me) from DepositPhotos.com. And when I look for stock photos, I always turn on “Exclude AI images.”
https://static6.depositphotos.com/1051698/612/i/600/depositphotos_6124124-stock-photo-beautiful-strawberry-blond-teenage-girl.jpg
https://st3.depositphotos.com/1737959/35379/i/600/depositphotos_353791654-stock-photo-air-pollution-crisis-city-diesel.jpg
https://images-stag.jazelc.com/uploads/theautopian-m2en/Screenshot-2026-02-03-at-7.13.23%E2%80%AFPM.png
What’s the year, make and model of that car
Pretty sure that’s a 2026 [fax noises]
Apparently the “Exclude AI images” flag poorly implemented.
Yeah, I agree. I was entirely focused on credibly getting the young lady into the smoke.
I wonder if someone physically just ‘Shopped an SUV rear end onto what looks like a Chevy Colorado? This thing is going to live rent-free in my head now. lol
I had a bit of a dig based on the original image. Google Image sleuthing and a check of Archive.org reveals this:
https://web.archive.org/web/20210803181641/https://philkotse.com/car-maintenance/what-is-a-nox-sensor-10143
The scrape date is in 2021, comfortably before the release of any tool that might have been able to make something like this with AI.
The photo itself seems to link back to Alamy, and to a rather generic profile in the name of Akhararat Wathanasing. There are quite a few generic photos of cars that look like they’ve been anonymised with photoshop, and also a fair few photos of a diesel pickup truck doing burnouts:
https://www.alamy.com/climate-change-and-air-pollution-crisis-in-city-from-diesel-vehicle-exhaust-pipe-on-road-image470024064.html?imageid=3239270C-9453-4DCA-87F3-85CE3DA37EEA&pn=6&searchId=6994289a2ac4355bbbb9e3957d09d054&searchtype=11
It looks like the image is a slightly iffy photoshop of a picture in this series.
Wow, that is some sleuthing!
I mean it was either that or do my job, which is really no choice at all.
Great work! Yeah, I’ve been staring at the image and noticed some weird blending and such going on. To me, it felt more like an amateurish Photoshop rather than AI. That would explain why it got past the AI filter.
I think these are actually based on pictures of modded Thai-market Isuzu D-Max pickups. There’s a huge aftermarket scene for them and they’re often tuned to roll coal
I guess I should apologize about calling Photoshop slop AI slop. I’m glad the Autopian is actively trying to avoid AI.
I’m probably going to get absolutely torched for saying this, but I’m convinced the severe issues the planet is having with the “older folks” running the show these days stems from childhood exposure to lead.
That’s a pretty common theory so I doubt you’ll get torched. The kids talk a lot about boomers and elder Gen Xers with the “lead poison stare”
I read the headline as “Banning Leaded Gas Wasn’t A Good Thing, Says Century-Old Wad Of Hair” and thought the subject of the line was…you know.
This is actually a fairly common take that’s well within the realm of normal. The negative cognitive effects of lead are well documented by the scientific community, Boomers were exposed to it everywhere, and they’re currently collaborating to burn the entire world to the ground because someone who makes $60,000 a year has they/them in their email signature and that means that despite being paid $1,500,000 a year to be the crusty mad old guy at work who says no and refuses to retire they’re the real victims here…
I (boomer) like to think I have escaped this affliction because a lot of my contemporaries I have grown up with have swung from fairly liberal to bitter old assholes. They’re incapable of having a rational discussion, either.
I’m fighting hard to not be that bitter old asshole as I age. I think a lot of it is simply age itself and not liking the changes that happen naturally in society over time so I work on being accepting of views I don’t necessarily agree with nor have any interest in, but then my “’60’s radical hippie” side wants to go out and mess with some federal agents’ minds. It’s a constant tug-of war.
I like to think the STEM part of me solidified my direction in life, and prevents me from being a closed off, small minded individual.
I read somewhere that the people who got the worst of it was those born between 1972-1974. Which is me. Are we running the world yet? I don’t feel like it. Feels more like leftover boomers and Gen Y are in charge, and we kind of got skipped over. But if so, I’m sorry.
Probably a significant part of it, having an entire generation get lead poisoning certainly doesn’t help- https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2118631119
“Estimated lead-linked deficits in cognitive ability were greatest for the 1966 to 1970 cohort (population size ∼20.8 million), which experienced an average deficit of 5.9 IQ points per person. Adjacent cohorts also experienced considerable IQ loss. The 1961 to 1965 cohort experienced a 4.8 IQ point deficit, while the 1971 to 1975 cohort experienced a similar loss of 5.7 IQ points.”
I see the word estimated and assumption used far to frequently in that study.
I was expecting the “So basically: Lead is bad for you, and you should do your best to avoid it whenever possible” to link to Jason’s https://www.theautopian.com/how-i-used-a-chainsaw-to-remove-batteries-from-the-cheapest-ev-in-the-world/ article.
Glad I don’t have all that lead in me, if it was I’m not sure where I would put all these microplastics.
There’s always room for microplastics!
They’re wafer-thin!
*Mr. Creosote explodes*
The railroad still uses Creosote….they dumped a pile of fresh new railroad ties next to tracks at work.
Mmmmm….very vintage aroma.
The premier Monty Python-oriented automotive site.!
Yup, every time we breathe in.
https://www.plasticpollutioncoalition.org/blog/2024/3/7/humans-inhale-a-credit-cards-worth-of-microplastics-every-week
“I just want to say one word to you; microplastics.”
“There’s a great future in microplastics. Think about it. Will you think about it?“
I would think about it if my brain weren’t clogged with both lead and microplastics. The burden of being Gen X.
Any room for asbestos?
Only in my lungs
There is a convincing arguement that lead played a significant role in the fall of the Roman Empire. As the cities grew and spread so did the plumbing, lots of plumbing. Also lead plates, goblets and spoons. Roman milititay strategy deteriorated the architecture became courser and other signs of reduced intelligence. Bone and hair analysis from tombs shows steadily increasing lead level particularly in Rome. Toward the end those levels were very very high.
It’s so much worse! They were using lead acetate as an artificial sweetener in wine!
They got stupid and made stupid decisions. There is a lot evidence pointing to this.
We’re seeing the same thing today. But it’s ideology and religion causing it.
“The evidence, interestingly, was found by analyzing 100 years’ worth of human hair.”
How did they get to my shower drain without me seeing?
From below. It’s how the watch you shower. And they have trained the alligators to fetch the samples.
I knew it!!!
I highly recommend the book “American Poison” by Daniel Stone, about the development of and the fight against leaded gas. They knew that shit was poison from the jump, but money > all.
“money > all”
Luckily we’ve learned our lesson.
LOL, right!?!?!
Yes, this. It wasn’t necessary, but GM and DuPont saw dollar signs. And that bastard Midgely made it happen.
One of his other contributons was the development of fluorocarbons. These are nearly indestructible molecules that make up the “forever chemicals” scourge we’re dealing with today, and were a main contributor to the destruction of the ozone layer by breaking down in solar radiation while high up in the atmosphere.
And, of course, since the EPA was successful in avoiding TOTAL disaster thanks to regulations, the willfully ignorant will scoff and say it was never a problem, instead of saying “thank you” and realizing there is another way besides extraction and consumption.
These are the same people who thought Y2K was overblown vs. an example of getting ahead of a problem.
I’m with you 100%
Midgley is a great cautionary tale for all engineers and scientist. He did almost kill himself trying to prove TEL was safe when people around the plant were concerned about its dangers by handling it during a meeting.
Practically bathed in it
If I recall he died from it eventually
He’s responsible for more premature deaths than anyone in history. Literally poisoned the entire planet.
Not really. He let his ego and reluctance to be labeled wrong (and greed) overcome him. I can say most STEM people have a burned in level of integrity. He was an also an artifact of his time, looking at his background.
Never, ever think a corporation has the public good in mind. They only exist to make the most money possible. The people who are afflicted with the current brand of corporate idolatry are overdue for a rude awakening.
Absolutely.
Woohoo! Love to see the U of U get highlighted here. That’s my alma mater and a great school. The campus is right at the base of the mountains and is such a great place to spend some time.
Ditto. And I can only imagine that the impact was particularly observable in samples originating in the valley due to the inversions.
Maybe, but the inversion has only been a thing for the last 20 or so years I thought no?
Edit: I forget how old I am. 30ish years
The condition itself is a weather phenomenon…the visible pollution is more recent, and driven by a combination of civilian/commercial traffic and the oil refineries.
That said, I can only assume that the underlying conditions still gave rise to the capture of particulates (and in this case, lead) in the valley since it was originally settled, and as such would include vehicular lead emissions.
That’s fair. Ok I agree.
Leaded gas, a Thomas Midgley Jr greatest hit. He’s pretty inarguably the single most environmentally destructive human being of all time, as he also gave us Freon. We probably don’t talk about him enough actually, he’s a great case study in how much harm a single idiot can do without really trying. I’m sure his actual body count is somewhere in the tens of millions, and we’re still dealing with the harm he did 80 years after his death.
Edit: apparently leaded gas alone is believed to have contributed to over 100 million deaths by itself….
In my comment, I linked a book that he plays a large role in. It’s a shame he didn’t die while developing leaded gas. He almost did, and still insisted it was safe, because he was so obsessed with how much money it would make him.
He DID eventually die from cancer, probably self inflicted, definitely well-deserved
True. He also completely alienated himself from his family. Good riddance.
If I recall, he did die from his intentional exposure. What a capitalististic prick.
Eventually, yes, but the world would be a better place of it happened a lot sooner.
He had polio and was strangled by a device he built to help him get in and out of bed. There is debate if it was intentional.
That was when Dayton Ohio was a tech hub for the world and Detroit was one of, if not the richest cities in the US. I expect there will be plenty of folks who can find fault with the way we lived now that far in the future.
I believe some of the approbation stems from Presentism; I.e. with our current knowledge and morales, we would never do such a thing. Like scorning Washington & Jefferson because they held slaves, when that was the culture of the time.
That lets them off the hook. They knew it was wrong to own humans, but … free labor.
I first read about him a few years back. You can imagine the reaction I had since my mom’s maiden name is Midgley. I’m probably very distantly related to the guy.
Ugh! User name checks out! 😉
When people I know are feeling bad, I always remind them ‘You may feel bad, but you’ll never be as much of a fuckup as Thomas Midgley Jr’. The best part is his final invention killed him!
Yup!
Veritasium has a really good video on him too.
For a digestible overview of the whole situation, beginning to end, highly recommend the segment of the Cosmos: a Spacetime Odyssey series on it. It’s one of the highlights for sure.
I really appreciate these studies and stories because it shows the decisions we make matter, and sometimes on a faster scale than we think. So often there’s defeatist thinking of “well, what we do won’t really matter anyway so let’s just have fun now.”
But we banned DDT and I now get to see California Condors in the wild, and lots of other raptors. We made everyone switch refrigerants and the ozone layer stabilized, and looks to fully recover 20 years from now. And now we see removing automotive leaded fuel results in a couple orders of magnitude less absorption in a generation or two. Choices we make collectively really do matter.
Well said! And of course there is an entire chunk of the population who constantly screams against anything to help and every environmental law.
Not to mention, rivers in Ohio don’t randomly catch on fire like they used to, and the skies of southern California are no longer permanently tinted the color of Pepsi
I actually had a guy (conservative engineer) argue with me that so-cal air is worse now than when he was a kid growing up there.
To be fair to him, it was radical left wingers like Ronald Reagan and Richard Nixon that gave us CARB and the EPA
Nixon only did it because he was so unpopular- it was a ploy to get the youth vote. And he backstopped it with criming, of course.
The EPA commissioned the Documerica project- if you want to see how disgusting it was back then thanks to pollution. The photogs were trained by WPA vets who documented the depression
You know that was like two years before he was up for reelection, which is an eternity in the memory of the average voter, any momentary popularity boost from something done that early in a term is long gone by the time the election happens. But maybe people had longer attention spans back then, I don’t know, but he did win in ’72 with 61% of the popular vote, something unthinkable for the past 34 years or so
Yes – but also the REST of what was going on, beyond the police preserving disorder in Chicago and dirty tricks, was Civil Rights, Black Panthers, social unrest, and the possibility of real gains for the marginalized, and we can’t have that. (Seriously – I mention the Black Panthers because the way the feds cracked down on them was breathtakingly awful and everyone should know about it)
Definitely did a lot of lead lines in his day with that thinking. Coke was too expensive.
It was awful, all of those people giving California Condors DDTs.
https://youtu.be/kxc6RCRpj0A?si=WoFp6C6JZ9Y2GWsV
I was hoping the link would be that…
I’m just glad at least one person appreciated it lol.
I first pictured a montage of Jake the Snake DDT’s (since it was his signature/finisher) but this is more than close enough.
I wish they’d phased out R12 a little less aggressively. I spent my teens and early 20’s driving without air conditioning. Fortunately I didn’t know that propane is a drop-in replacement for R12, or I probably wouldn’t be here today.
Let’s reintroduce wild Grizzly bears to California. Preferably in Orange County.
“Century old Wad of Hair.” Thought you were meant Cadet Bone Spurs for a minute. His mental state is consistent with lead poisoning.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
The “leaded gas is better!” types have evolved into the “I want to delete* my diesel truck” types. We all breathe the same air, people. This is insanity.
*catalytic converter, EGR, diesel particulate filter
and next will be “put lead back in our gas!”
Next week’s “executive order”
Lead-free gas causes autism!
Lead-free gas causes microchips! And will make gravity stop!
I only cook with beef tallow and I only drink leaded milk!
I know too many old conservative men still complaining and belly aching about the damn governmental regulations and how dare the government mess with their use of lead.
The old site (before it went to total hell) Had a great 10 part series on this.
Regulations are just laws for corporations and of course it is “laws for thee but not for me”. Without regulations we would not have clean water and of course with the morons in charge, that is happening again.
Our northern Ohio area for my Star Wars group (501st Legion) named themselves “Burning River Squad”.
The Cuyahoga caught on fire a lot.
Truthfully – the oil/petroleum slicks on the surface (oil floats on water…) was what caught, of course. And think about how difficult that might be to extinguish. You’re going ti splatter burning oil if you spray it with water. Ever have a grease fire on your stive? Gotta smother it. These days, that means a PFAS foam. Real problem before thta existed. More of a “stand back, boys and let it burn itself out”
Hey, ho, way to go Ohio…
Five points for Pretenders lyrics.
I’ll take those points of a certain age.
Well, the Flats don’t exist anymore
Cleveland, city of light, city of magic
Cleveland, city of light, you’re calling me
Cleveland, even now I can remember
‘Cause the Cuyahoga River goes smoking through my dreams
Burn on, big river, burn on
Burn on, big river, burn on
Now the Lord can make you tumble
The Lord can make you turn
The Lord can make you overflow
But the Lord can’t make you burn
-Randy Newman “Burn On”
My entire childhood, I heard complaints from old guys about how gas now isn’t any good. And even in ’50s back issues of Modern Mechanix, Tom Mcahill called it “smelly water”
I literally remember my dad in the late 70s and early 80s saying that the lead lubricated the valve seats and was necessary for older cars. This was true at one time, but improved metallurgy had made this not true … by 1936. It was a classic lie from the big oil crowd at the time.
I heard the same lie at the same time.