Home » Can You Guess What The Chevrolet S-10, Volvo XC40, And Mk7 Ford Transit All Have In Common?

Can You Guess What The Chevrolet S-10, Volvo XC40, And Mk7 Ford Transit All Have In Common?

Imb Durur1
ADVERTISEMENT

Have you ever played TriBond before? That board game where you’re given three words and you have to figure out what they all share. For legal reasons, this isn’t that game, but I’m dying to pick your brains — What’s one distinctive thing that the Chevrolet S-10, Volvo XC40, and Mk7 Ford Transit have in common?

On the face of it, we’re looking at a pickup truck, a subcompact luxury crossover, and a cargo van. Sure, they might all have four wheels and fairly standard controls, but I’m talking about something specific. Something unusual. Something that will forever make these vehicles pub trivia material.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Jason’s previously written about the longitudinal front-wheel-drive powertrain layout, and while none of these cars fit that bill, the commonality we’re looking for runs along the same lines. See, all three of these vehicles were available with drive to the front wheels, the rear wheels, or all four wheels, an incredibly unusual move for an automaker to pull, much less three different automakers.

Volvo Xc40 Recharge 2023

Let’s start with the easiest one — the Volvo XC40. In combustion-powered trim, it’s either a front-wheel-drive or all-wheel-drive crossover, but the electric models all currently feature a motor at the back, meaning you have a choice of rear-wheel-drive or all-wheel-drive. Considering how compact electric motors are and how they don’t require driveshafts running from the engine bay to the rear axle, it’s not terribly difficult to make a rear-wheel-drive electric XC40, so that’s exactly what Volvo did in 2023.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chevrolet S 10 Electric

Electrification is also how the world got a front-wheel-drive Chevrolet S-10. See, this pickup truck featured rear-wheel-drive or four-wheel-drive in its standard form, because that was, and still largely is, the standard for trucks in North America. However, in 1997, General Motors wanted to offer an electric fleet vehicle, so it crammed the motor and electronics from an EV1 in an S-10 pickup. This motor drove the front wheels on the EV1, and so it ended up driving the front wheels on the Chevrolet S-10 Electric.

Ford Transit Mk7

However, the Mk7 Ford Transit was a much stranger case. It was an evolution of the Mk6 model, and Ford decided to offer it in both front-wheel-drive and rear-wheel-drive layouts, all with internal combustion engines. This meant that Ford had to design two different floors, two different rear axles, two different engine carriers, and make essentially the same van in longitudinal and transverse layouts. As you can imagine, this is a bewilderingly expensive endeavor, yet Ford made it happen.

Screenshot X 2024 09 06 At 3.45.15 pm

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s incredibly unusual that automakers take the Burger King approach to drivetrains and let you have it your way, but thanks to the extensive history of the automobile with virtually no niche left unexplored, it’s happened at least thrice. Weird, right?

(Photo credits: Volvo, Chevrolet, Ford)

Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.

Relatedbar

Got a hot tip? Send it to us here. Or check out the stories on our homepage.

ADVERTISEMENT
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
30 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Manwich Sandwich
Manwich Sandwich
24 days ago

I bet they could have done a longitudal FWD setup like the Chrysler LH cars and cut down the cost and complication… IF they designed it to accomodate it to FWD and RWD from the start.

Vc-10
Vc-10
24 days ago

One of the other more weird switches was the MG ZT (a rebadged Rover 75).

The standard car was a totally normal FWD transverse engined car. But the MG was supposed to be more sporty, so they decided to put in something more powerful for the top trim cars. Specifically, a Ford V8.
Which of course doesn’t work well in a FWD transverse engined car.

So they completely re-engineered the car in 2003 to have a longitudinally mounted engine driving the rear wheels.

Because spending all that money on a car with limited appeal was obviously such a great idea, when the rest of the range was extremely dated and uncompetitive.

MG Rover folded in 2005.

Shop-Teacher
Shop-Teacher
24 days ago

Those electric S-10s are really interesting. A few of them survive, because they weren’t all leased like the EV-1. The Questionable Garage on YouTube has been bringing one back to life.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUK0LPn0iHC_u94qx_nxD-2Q_KZhNHXxG&si=FYyT-Du_5ny9vgWi

Max Finkel
Max Finkel
25 days ago

are there any other hybrids like the Volvo system? I realized that my dads v60 is all configurations in one vehicle a while ago and wanted to know if it was really the only one

Jakob K's Garage
Jakob K's Garage
25 days ago

Oh, if only the Triumph 1500 had been available with 4WD 😉
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triumph_1500

GENERIC_NAME
GENERIC_NAME
25 days ago

Triumph did develop an AWD variant of the FWD gearbox, but it was only ever used in the Autocars Dragoon, a small military pickup truck built in Israel.

Darek Stelmaszewski
Darek Stelmaszewski
24 days ago
Reply to  Mark Hughes

Why?! Wikipedia says all the engines were I4, so I really can’t understand why would they do it.

Mark Hughes
Mark Hughes
24 days ago

I have absolutely no idea… I guess at the time they had good reasons for it, But it’s not something we could easily work out I think.

Neil Hall
Neil Hall
24 days ago

Renault’s previous generation of cars had all had longitudinal engines. At the time of the 21’s introduction they had relatively recently introduced the second-generation of the 5, with a transverse engine, and the lower-medium 9 & 11 also had transverse engines, so the 1.7-litre engine in lower-powered versions of the 21 were already available in a transverse installation, with matching transmissions. However, they had never installed any of their larger engines transversely, so they didn’t have a suitable transverse transmission for the 2.0 petrol or 2.1 diesel. Therefore, they used the same longitudinal installation of these engines as in the larger Renault 25.
You can tell the two versions apart externally, as the front wheel is closer to the cabin on the longitudinally-engined versions, so the part of the front wing (fender in US-English) between the wheel opening and the door is much smaller on the longitudinal versions than the transverse versions.
Additionally, the “21 Nevada” (or “21 Savanna” in the UK), wagon versions had the rear wheels further back to increase cabin space and allow a 3rd row of seats. Combine this with the different front ends, and the 21 range had 4 different wheelbases.

Darek Stelmaszewski
Darek Stelmaszewski
21 days ago
Reply to  Neil Hall

Mind blown. Thank you!

Janek PL
Janek PL
26 days ago

It, is not that uncommon for european vans to be either FWD, RWD or 4X4 depending on variant of same model. I know of these examples:

Renault Master
Mercedes Sprinter
Volkswagen Crafter
MAN TGE

There is also electric Ford Transit that has rear mounted engine and independent rear supension instead of standard solid axle and leaf springs

Kyree
Kyree
26 days ago

That’s wild, on the Transit. I was aware it was available in all three layouts, but I always thought they all had a longitude/engine-forward layout and a longitude transaxle, a la Audi or Subaru, with the driveshafts removed from one end or the other for the RWD and FWD versions.

I didn’t realize that, while the RWD and AWD ones did have the engine-forward layout and transaxle, the FWD one was traditionally transverse, with the engine sitting beside the transmission. That’s a wild amount of variance in one vehicle.

Sam Gross
Sam Gross
26 days ago

The Chevy Blazer EV is also available (well, purportedly going to be available) in all three. Only the RWD and AWD are currently available.

Huja Shaw
Huja Shaw
26 days ago

Can You Guess What The Chevrolet S-10, Volvo XC40, And Mk7 Ford Transit All Have In Common?

What is, “None of them have been in Cliff Claven’s kitchen.”

Idle Sentiments
Idle Sentiments
26 days ago
Reply to  Huja Shaw

Nice!

Dodsworth
Dodsworth
25 days ago
Reply to  Huja Shaw

As God is my witness, that’s the first thing I thought!

Mechjaz
Mechjaz
26 days ago

I had no idea, but I like this game!

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
26 days ago

Amazing how Ford could build and sell a van with completely different innards – as if anyone on the lot really cared – but can’t be bothered to build and sell a semi-affordable car in the US that isn’t a Mustang.

Scoutdude
Scoutdude
26 days ago

The LH Cars were intended to be available in AWD and RWD versions as well. Unfortunately Chrysler was Chrysler, ie poor and didn’t want to spend the money on tooling up the needed parts. That is what they dusted off for the LX and they were ready to send to tooling when Mercedes take over occurred and told them to redesign to accept the Mercedes components.

When the LH cars were being designed Chrysler did a lot of low bidding on police fleets and didn’t want to loose those sales. That is why they did a RWD design and of course that is in the first era of AWD car popularity.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
26 days ago
Reply to  Scoutdude

Chrysler may have been thrifty, but they were hardly poor.

The day after the takeover “merger of equals”, $13Bn was wired out of the Chrysler accounts to the Daimler-Benz account at Deutsche Bank.

Scoutdude
Scoutdude
26 days ago
Reply to  Urban Runabout

Which was after the Last Hope cars were sent to tooling and years of the new Grand Cherokee and Ram printing money. Those vehicles were also vying for development funding at the time the LH cars were going to tooling.

Shooting Brake
Shooting Brake
26 days ago

Fascinating, I never would’ve guessed it

Bucko
Bucko
26 days ago

Mercedes Sprinter

Rust Buckets
Rust Buckets
26 days ago
Reply to  Bucko

That’s what I can here to say. Not just the Transit, the current Sprinter lets you spec it as fwd, AWD, or rwd.

Kyree
Kyree
26 days ago
Reply to  Rust Buckets

Well, yes, but all Sprinters have the engine in the same place and orientation. Daimler didn’t do what Ford did, and give the FWD version a whole different engine bay and floor pan, with the powertrain rotated 90 degrees.

As far as I can tell, the closest thing to this is when—after the brand was sold BMW—MG Rover went through the trouble of reengineering its transverse-FWD 75 to longitude-RWD…and stuffing a Ford Mod V8 in there while they did it.

Alexander Moore
Alexander Moore
25 days ago
Reply to  Kyree

The Renault Master also has transverse FF and F-AWD with optional longitudinal FR.

Clupea Hangoverus
Clupea Hangoverus
25 days ago
Reply to  Bucko

And Vito

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
26 days ago

Cool stuff. And you can call your game Treyffiliates.

30
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x