The average transaction price for a new car in America today is over $49,000, and the number of cars you can still buy in these States that are United is not huge. There are still some decent options out there, like Honda Civics and Toyota Camrys and Mazda3s and a few others, but if the selection were a buffet, it’d be closer to the kind shoved into the corner of a strip club than, say, one at the Sizzler. And yet, during this time of good cheap car options, here comes Dacia announcing a pretty cool-looking new wagon (they say crossover, but this is a wagon) called the Striker, and it’s supposed to start under €25,000, which comes to about $28,000-$29,000 Freedom Dollars.
The Striker is mechanically pretty much the same as the Dacia Bigster, an SUV launched last year, but with less of a tall, SUV-type profile and more of a, as I said, station wagon silhouette. Dacia calls this a “disruptive silhouette,” but those are ridiculous, meaningless marketing words, so I’m not going to use that.
Both vehicles are built on Renault’s CMF-B platform that is used for cars as varied as the Nissans Juke, Kicks, and Note, the Mitsubishi Colts, Renault’s Clio and Captur, and more. An all-wheel-drive version is expected to be available from the beginning, and if the drivetrains actually are shared with the Bigster, we can likely expect a 1.2-liter inline-three engine working in close partnership with a rear-mounted electric motor for a combined 152 horsepower, with some other hybrid variations and an LPG version available.

Full details about the Striker won’t be coming until June, but we can at least get a look at it now, and overall, I’m pretty impressed. This doesn’t read like a bottom-end-of-the-market car at all, I don’t think. It’s not particularly small, and very little about it seems to be built to a budget, at least visually. Dacia’s press release describes it with the usual eye-rolling PR talk frippery, though they at least acknowledge the station wagon-ness of it all:
“Dacia is strengthening its offensive in the C segment with Striker, a new multi‑energy crossover that combines the dynamism of a station wagon, the practicality of a spacious hatchback and the ground clearance of an SUV.
True to Dacia’s DNA, Striker features a robust and confident design. Its dynamic lines, aerodynamic silhouette and assertive vertical front end are complemented by the brand’s new, modern daytime running light signature. Particular attention has been paid to design details, including a distinctive front‑door animation and a glossy black rear link between the lamps, enhanced by a technical grain that reinforces the vehicle’s modern and durable character.”
I’m not exactly clear what they mean by “front door animation,” but I’m sure it’s a pretty good time. Speaking of the front doors, I’m not sure if that black angled strake under the side mirror serves any function, but I like the way it looks. Here’s the video:
It’s pretty handsome, overall, I think. It doesn’t feel too trendy or like it’s trying to hard to be something it isn’t, even with details like that floating roof/broken C-pillar which – you know what – I kinda like here.

The proportions feel pretty good, and, if anything, it seems like it’s downplaying the big wheels/high-ish ride height stance, which I think is part of why it reads more wagon than SUV. Well, that and my own hopes.

There’s a good amount of clever incised details on the body panels to give some visual interest and character, like those two sausage-shaped ones on the rear tailgate that almost read like handles:

The taillights are an interesting T-shaped design, and, since this is European, there must be amber indicators hidden in there somewhere. There’s a strip of black plastic linking the taillights but, notably, no wide full-width light strip like so many new cars feature. Maybe Dacia’s just saving some money, but I can’t say I’m missing it. There’s plenty of cars with this neo-heckblende design on the roads already.

The bumpers at each end feature a lot of black, unpainted areas on the cover, which is a good thing, I think; a fully painted bumper is a liability, and more than a little stupid. The grille has a nice bold graphic look with its six silver colons, and lends itself well to a one-line email signature “=o:::DC:::o=”. Kinda? Maybe that doesn’t work so well. My one-line signature of a VW Beetle, though, works great: (O\_|_/O).
I’ve always liked Dacia; the Romanian company sure has come a long way from its days of building Renaults under license, though in that era they definitely built plenty of wagons I think are pretty cool:

Based on this initial look, I’m pretty impressed with this Striker. And a little maddened, because if Europe can get new under $30,000 station wagons, why can’t we? European emissions and safety standards aren’t that different than ours? Sure, it’s a bit less hp than a lot of US market cars have, but at the same time, it’s absolutely fine.
An option like this in the US market you would think would be very welcome; maybe something like this could be used to help revitalize Nissan? A new Nissan Gloria? Stanza? Bluebird? Maxima? Axxess? There’s so many names to pick from! Sadly, I think we’ll just be watching this one from across the sea.
Top graphic image: Dacia









This is giving me Citroën C5 X vibes, especially the side profile. For me, the C5 X was an interesting car. Quite well priced for what it was, attractive, large, comfy, practical, well-equipped and made in China.
And, following in the footsteps of so many great French large passenger cars (think Renault VelSatis, Safrane, Talisman, Avantime, Citroen C6, DS5…), it flopped hard.
That’s why I hope Dacia finds a good marketing message for the Striker and positions it well. It may not be a normal estate (wagon) but I prefer it to the taller cars anyway.
Plus, it’s Dacia so it should be priced well.
Dacia has been on a roll for soeme time now and they seem well-positioned to actually pull it off.
“Both vehicles are built on Renault’s CMF-B platform that is used for cars as varied as the Nissans Juke, Kicks, and Note…”
What an elegant way to pluralize, taking note of how the name “Kicks” might make such a list read awkwardly, and using it to turn an interesting phrase. Goldangit, Torch, that’s some durn good writin’ rat thar.
And your Beetle emoticon is just *chef kiss*.
And yeah, where are the wagons? I understand why our beloved Large Cars Of Beauty And Grace no longer roam the streets (my all-time favorite Torchism, from Ye Olde German Lighting Site), but it seems that with the price of a new car reaching to the stratosphere, someone could sell a cheap wagon.
I like it, but I’m sure there’s some corporate tax reason we can’t have Dacia here in the US, as asinine and disapointing as that is.
Dacia can’t sell it in the USA… But Nissan could.
I came here to argue about whether it’s a wagon, but I don’t think I care. It’s not, btw.
It’s as much a wagon as the last three generations of Subaru Outback are. Which is indeed to say that it isn’t, but it wants to be.
Jason, knowing your graphic sensitivities, I’m surprised you didn’t pick up on the all-caps STRIKER logo not having a slightly extended downstroke on the T, so it looks like it’s jumping up off the baseline.
Strange not to mention how very much this looks like the Kia K4 wagon (which we’re also not getting…yet). The K4 is maybe a little lower, which would make it even better than this Dacia IMO. We did get the K4 hatchback, which is really just a shorter K4 wagon, so that’s nice.
Exactly my first thought. Especially the front depending on the angle…
In general I think it’s a good looking car and of course it will sell great. Most cars on the European Market are simply overpriced. Dacia has done well in the recent years. Fair prices, reasonable cars. Cars, that have gotten better and better.
For me there are just 2 downsides:
Bad News we aren’t getting this Dacia. I go to Romania for work and I learned that it’s not Dacia (dayseeia) should be pronounced like saying Datcha. Dacias are all over Romania and lots of Eastern Europe. Weirdly tho none of the Romanians I know actually own Dacias…
I’d really like to put the blame at the mispronunciation of Dacia in the anglosphere with Top Gear.
James May’s Dacia Sandero trope would have worked just as well if he pronounced it correctly, and we’d be better off.
This, yes!
The Brits love to anglicize words, it’s just what they do. ‘Lan-see-uh [Lancia], day-see-uh [Dacia], hi-un-die [Hyundai], gu-wack-a-moe-lee [guacamole], se-mi-noh-lee [Seminole]’
It’s common across many, and even non-English.
I work with a guy whose name is Jeff (hard J), who grew up in a Spanish speaking country. He said his name was an eternal struggle.
And then there are the word-atrocities committed by Noah Webster.
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but in modern linguistics, I think the “soft c” / “c = s” is unique to French (which passed it on to English).
Is that €25,000 before VAT? Could bump the price up significantly.
Now I want Sizzler, thank you.
Most, if not all, European prices are quoted as OTD. Or close enough, VAT is definitely included
Problem is that each country have different VAT levels and *other* taxes on vehicles. So when a (often US) writer quotes a price, and not explicitly telling it is pre-VAT and pre-tax, the price might as well have been pulled from a body orifice.
French car magazines are reporting a €25k starting price, so that’s including a 19.6% VAT. It would be about €21k/$24k before taxes.
Jason, I wish Nissan would listen to you. A bunch of Dacias would be a great way to rejuvenate the lower end of their product line.
I think they’re terrified of opening the door to Renault. Nissan can ill afford more competition.
Was Dacia peeking at Kia’s K4 homework?
The only wagon I see here is the green one.
This appears to be, basically, a Trax? Which is a good thing. And while this and the Trax aren’t quite 100 percent wagons like we would all like them to be, they’re close. And in 2026, close is better than nothing.
Exactly what I thought first…
That black panel on the door (and it’s associated divot in the sheet metal) seems like a good place to house the blind-spot camera to me, and might also help with panel gap tolerance on the door opening. I like it.
that qualifies as a wagon and our generic jellybean “crossovers” don’t?
I, personally, wouldn’t count that as a “wagon” but you do you.
Body-wise, this Dacia’s not all that different from the 2nd-gen Trax, other than that panoramic roof.
The Trax even has similar (more F than T-shaped) taillights.
And the Trax is also under $29K
Torch should drive a Trax at least once. Maybe twice. A base-model LS and a more sporty 2RS. I’d love to read his opinion of one or both of them.
I’ve heard people yelling they can’t have the $20ish k dacia spring electric, the $25ish k duster pickup. $30k dacia cuv nope. Bring the super cheap weird stuff in sure. If the regular stuff comes too maybe someone will buy it.
Sorry Torch, but that is a CUV that looks like 20 other crossovers we already have on sale here.
But it’s slightly lower and stole it’s silly floating roof from a Datsun.
Hmm as a person with eyes I disagree. The proportion of glass-to-sheet metal at the doors is def more car than tall CUV. It’s pretty clearly a lifted wagon and more so than the 5th gen Outback.
The 3rd gen was the last outback I would call a wagon definitively, even if it was wagonish until the current monstrosity.
What is and isn’t a wagon is certainly subjective, but if you told me this was the new Kia Sorento I would believe you.
Arguing about what’s a wagon and what isn’t seems purely semantic and for the sake of being a contrarian. Regardless of what it is, this longroof looks better to my eyes than most of the stubby CUVs we get.
This is a enthusiast site, I thought discussing minutiae was what we do here? Torch has written long form articles about what is and isn’t a wagon. The stance that discussing what constitutes a wagon or a CUV is semantics and/or contrarian, particularly on the Autopian, seems ironic and somewhat facile to me.
The entire point of my original comment was that this vehicle isn’t very different from the dozens of CUVs we already have available. If Torch had written about the Seat Leon estate, I think the differences would’ve been more apparent. The Seat is an actual traditional wagon that is also fairly inexpensive and not available in the US. I can see why he didn’t use the Leon, since the it has been out for a few years and the Dacia is new, but the “look at the cheap wagon” headline for what appear to be a CUV to my eyes (and, for what is worth, the manufacturer’s eyes) seems a bit click-baity. So I may have been a bit dismissive in tone with my comment, but I was aiming for humor. I’ve been know to miss.
Love Torch, I just disagree with him here.
I mean, I also am a fan of the guy but his criteria are pretty fast and loose. Based on: 1. Cargo Area Window ✓, 2. Over 50% of Trunk Directly Below Roof ✓, 3. Little to no off-road intent ✓ this is a wagon. That last one is definitely subjective, but in terms of proportioning I see no reason to not call this a wagon. I don’t really see much difference between the Striker and an Ibiza besides a bit of cladding. The difference in ride height is trivial at best.
https://cdn.imgchest.com/files/67136b5b7430.png
Is it because the Dacia has shorter overhangs? It always seems to come back to the overhangs. It does beg the question of whether lifted-cladded wagons like the allroad or Cross Country are ‘real’ wagons. After all, cladding didn’t come around as a new thing suddenly just because CUVs became fashionable.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ab/Fiat_Regata_Weekend.JPG/1280px-Fiat_Regata_Weekend.JPG?_=20131022105524
I guess my bone to pick with the ‘wagon deniers’ is what does it matter in the long run if the resulting ‘not a wagon’ is still more wagon-like than the alternative blobby SUV? I’d take a Toyota Crown
EstateSignia any day over a Highlander or a Ford Flex over an Explorer. If anything I think we need more ‘not a wagon’ wagons.Anyway, the Striker is both new and notable. It poses a significant threat to the C-segment by offering more space at a lower price and could become a real contender for the best-selling spot in beating the Octavia Estate at its own game. After all, the Sandero is already Europe’s best-selling B-segmenter.
I think I see where you are coming from. Sometimes I let myself get so annoyed by trends that I fail to see small improvements. Just write things off as more of the same.
I agree that flex >> Explorer. I always liked the wagon-meets-minivan thing the flex has going on and was sad when they were discontinued. The Crown signia is a step in the right direction and I like it better than a highlander but it still would like it better if toyota just embraced it’s wagon-ness.
I would love if brands like Skoda and Dacia were available in the US. Less complicated, less expensive cars that do not require selling a kidney to purchase would be great. It’s insane to me that the average new car in the US costs almost $50k.
Even though I don’t like this particular car, I suppose if Dacia offered it here, it could inspire competition and more inexpensive offerings. More competition and variety is nearly always good for the consumer. The US market has gotten stagnant and boring over the last 20 years and it makes optimism difficult.
I appreciate you sharing your perspective.
I agree, and I do have to disclose my defensiveness as bias in being an XC70 owner. But I suppose my point stands in that I’m all for wagons being marketed as CUVs and vice versa if it means longroof proportions start making a comeback. There’s definitely merit in splitting hairs, but then we’d also have to revisit various ‘near-wagons’ throughout history too, like the Tercel ‘wagon’ or Toyota Crown ‘van’. Besides, Toyota does market the Crown Signia as an ‘estate’ for the JDM.
The thing is that affordable, basic cars still totally exist in the U.S. but people just don’t buy them. I rented a 2025 RAV4 this year that had a physical ignition key, no power seats or climate control, steel wheels, and a torque-converter auto mated to a naturally aspirated 2.5 I4, all for around $3k more than this Dacia (for a much bigger car). The deals are out there if you’re willing to shop on the low end, and in most cases at the base level cars are cheaper than ever before when controlled for inflation; it’s just that wages haven’t kept up and trim level creep is real.
Also I have no idea why I called the Leon above an ‘Ibiza’. Just for the record, it’s not an Ibiza.
Is there any chance the “front door animation” is some sort of LED light show built into those black plastic panels?
No, it’s just the black plastic panel itself. “Animation” in French is just used for ‘point of interest’ or ‘activation’
I wish we got more cars like this. It would make me think I could one day afford to buy a real new car off the lot. I don’t see that happening with the current state of affairs in the US.
I mean, the Buick Envista & Encore; Chevrolet Bolt, Trax, Trailblazer, and Equinox; Ford Maverick; Hyundai Venue, Kona, Santa Cruz, Tucson, Elantra, and Sonata; Kia Soul, Seltos, Sportage, Niro, K4, and K5; Honda Civic, Accord, and HR-V; Toyota Corolla Cross, Corolla, Prius, and Camry; Mazda CX-30, CX-50, CX-5, and 3; Subaru Crosstrek, Forester, and Impreza; Nissan Sentra, Altima, Leaf, Kicks, and Rogue; Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, Outlander, and Outlander Sport; Volkswagen Taos and Jetta; MINI Cooper 2-Door, and Jeep Compass are all either priced about the same as this Dacia or lower, in many cases, significantly lower
I want the Bigster. That is a Good Name.
To be fair, America can’t have most things.
This is the hybrid Nissan should be selling here instead of that lazy rebadge of a Mitsubishi we can already buy from Mitsubishi.
Also, the Renault 12/ur-Dacia always makes me think it was designed as a wagon first and the sedan “styled” by way of a couple flourishing sword hits to a 1/4-scale clay model.
“Lifted Wagon” aka. CUV. Nice.
If I’m not mistaken, these are built on a platform shared with VW. If I’m not mistaken twice, VW engine swaps are pretty straightforward. I have to believe that VW has a powertrain that’s already US emissions compliant (something from a Taos, maybe?) that would allow them to ship these to the US. And they should.
Some articles mentioned it was coming out on the CMF-B platform. That’d be the same as underpinning everything from the Renault Clio, Nissan Juke, to the Dacia Bigster.
If it’s underpinning a VW as well, I wouldn’t be surprised. If there’s anything VW needs is more CUVs under its wing.
Dacia is owned by Renault, so i doubt any VW platform is underneath. Since its inception it used to build Renaults under license, then after the fall of the iron curtain it was completely acquired by Renault.
You’re right. I was confusing Dacia with Skoda. I do that sometimes.