Is it a story when a vehicle isn’t changed at all? With the Chevy Express, it is. At this point, the exciting thing is to watch it go from model year to model year without a single thing being updated, like a woolly mammoth would refuse to go extinct. We’re talking about a full-size van that was launched in 1996 and whose last significant update was done in 2003. Remember 2003? I barely had my driving license back then.
The Express is sold to fleets and customers who clearly know what they want: one or a dozen more of the same. There’s nothing to stop it, any tentative electrified successors seem to whimper out of its way, and it keeps selling. In fact, 2025 was even the best sales year for the Express in the 2020s, with 58,578 units shifted. The lowest point was in 2020, with 40,659 Expresses sold. The 2025 figure even matches sales in the late ‘00s, with the Express selling 60-80,000 units per year in the 2010s. In the first quarter of 2026, some 12,500 have been sold. Sales figures of the Express’s GMC sibling, the GMC Savana seem more volatile, with some 42,500 sold in 2024, half that in 2025, and 2233 vans so far in 2026.

For 2027, the powertrain options continue to be the 4.3-liter LV1 V6 with 276 horsepower and 298 lb-ft of torque. The 6.6-litre optional L8T V8 produces 401 horsepower and 464 lb-ft of torque. Both units are paired with the heavy-duty 8-speed autobox.
The cheapest 2026 Express Cargo Van starts at $41,800 without destination charges; the V8 upgrade is two grand well spent. While the 2003 Express was priced at $22,550 at its cheapest, looking at inflation calculators tells us today’s prices are almost exactly the same with inflation taken into account, as $22,550 in 2003 is $41k today. 2027 pricing is yet to be announced, but don’t expect it to change too much.

Like Brian wrote last October, the Express and Savana don’t even have that much competition when it comes to getting something comparable. Ford hasn’t sold passenger or cargo versions of the E-series aka Econoline for over a decade, as they were discontinued for 2015 and only cutaway chassis versions remain in production. The E-Series is even more of a dinosaur than the Express, as the basics date back to 1992, with a lot of the earlier third generation carried over then.
The Ram ProMaster and the Ford Transit are unibody vans, so there are use cases where the Express towers over them – towing, for example. Of course, sometimes you also want a unibody van for the way it drives. Today’s fuel prices are also a valid reason to seek out a van that’s more frugal than the Express.
GM Authority notes there’s ongoing speculation about a possible Express refresh or modernization, but one of the things GM can do is keep building the vans the way they’ve been for a long time. The last revision the Express and Savana have received have been transmission updates for 2024. Given the third-generation Chevy vans they actually replaced in 1996 had been in production since 1971, it just makes sense that these things are built for decades.

The Express and Savana were also the last vehicles to feature sealed beam headlights, because of course they were. They lost the sealed beam units for the 2018 model year in favour of more modern lighting. The last time the nose changed was the 2003 facelift, which was in fact substantial with a higher hoodline, giving a sort of “raised eyebrow” look to the front.
Earlier this decade, the electric GM BrightDrop delivery van was touted as a possible successor for the Express, but as its sales were counted in singular thousands, it was canceled due to lack of demand. As GM stated back in October:
The commercial electric delivery van market developed much slower than expected with the plant operating below capacity and production suspended since May 2025. A changing regulatory environment and the elimination of tax credits in the United States have made the business even more challenging. The decision is part of broader adjustments the company is making to North America EV capacity.

In a way, the Express gives you a steel enclosure where it’s always 1996 (as long as you don’t look at the dash too closely, as that has been updated once, in 2003).
You can go back to a mindset where there only had been one Tom Cruise Mission Impossible movie, and the Batman Forever soundtrack sounds fresh and inventive (let me be real here, it still does. I think Hold Me Thrill Me Kiss Me Kill Me is U2’s best song, There Is A Light is some of Nick Cave’s best work, and I still don’t understand what the hell Kiss From A Rose is about).
But you have to use Bluetooth to play the soundtrack, because CD players were discontinued for these vans for 2022. Why can’t things just stay the same?
(Images: GM)









I just rented one of these from Home Depot yesterday. I got in and thought “damn this thing is ancient.” And then I looked at the odometer and saw it only had 20,000 miles on it. Broke my brain.
FWIW, it looks like they’re currently sitting on an oversupply of cutaway chassis (saw a bunch parked in a fenced lot not far from the plant). I’m guessing that it’s directly related to an economically-driven falloff in RV sales.
A nice upgrade would be to update the steering column to something that feels a little more attached to the front wheels. It doesn’t have to be a sports car, just a little more of an al dente noodle would be fine. Otherwise, why change what works. It’s a box. It transports your other boxes. Perfect.
It’s a rare case of GM 1: getting something exactly right, and 2: not fucking it up.
What I like best about this continuity is that my Horrible Van Remote (TM) will continue to allow me to hijack shipments of Wonderflonium from poorly guarded Chevy Express courier vans. One of these days I WILL get my freeze ray right.
Buuuaahhhaaa!!!
-Dr Horrible. Ph.D.
Neither here nor there for me, buy having rented vans a couple times back in the early 00’s or maybe late 90’s, I thought these were more pleasant and easy to drive than Econolines. Also kudos to GM for making a long passenger version, with an actual long-wheelbase instead of the hacked up unsafe job Ford (and Dodge) did with their ridiculous rear overhangs. These were downright modern for the time.
I seem to recall a manufacturer must make a decision to replace stamping dies, and at that point the cost of redesigning the vehicle for more efficient, modern manufacturing processes is similar to the cost of replacing worn out dies. How long can a manufacturer produce a vehicle without change (aside from drivetrain)?
Someone with assembly line manufacturing experience enlighten us.
I mean part of what makes dies wear out is the intricacies of the design wearing where you can’t reasonably press the shapes out where they fit spec anymore.
The Express isn’t exactly a complicated design, and it wasn’t even in the 90s
Damn! The Russians must be beaming some weird-ass mind control signals into Finland.
Is that the same 8 speed everyone hated in their trucks and was quickly replaced by the 10 speed?
I suppose that would be a good way to get rid of their leftover transmission stock. It’s not like buyers of the Express have a lot of other options.
I have the 8-speed. Assuming this is the 8L80 that the 1500 trucks got. It’s Okay. Assuming you got the original fluid changed before it grenaded the transmission, they are more reliable than the 6-speed and more efficient. You just have to live with it always giving a hard 1-2 shift.
I’m just shocked they haven’t put the “Babymax” LM2 Diesel in it yet
If that’s the 2.8L, they did have that option for a few years. Everything got consolidated a couple of years ago when they dropped the 1500.
The LM2 is the 3.0L straight six. The 2.8L was the LWN, which for some reason got an 8 speed in the van and 6 speed in the truck.
I see, I see. Thanks for clarifying!
The sole example where GM ‘finally got it right’ and DIDN’T cancel the entire line.
Am I losing my mind or is Jalopnik posting a very similar article to this? For a second I checked the authors names, both are different, but it seems odd to cover the same thing.
Let me assure the Andy guy there is likely a completely separate person!
Why can’t we get brand new, 30 year old pickup trucks yhen? They’d sell dozens!
I’d be at a Chevrolet tomorrow if I could buy a brand new gmt400.
Heh, I see this sentiment quite a lot. To be honest, I don’t think the modern buying public would really go for a GMT400. I LOVE mine, but there are a lot of niceties that folks would need to be willing to give up. That and you can spec a modern pickup with 1000 ft/lbs of torque, where as my top of the range 454 doesn’t even fart out 400.
It’s worth noting that part of what has enabled the Express to go this long is they abandoned the 1500 version. The 2500 and 3500 have a high enough GVWR to not go through the standards passenger vehicles have to use.
For a similar case, look at the Ford Super Duty line, which despite its minor changes you can largely swap parts from recent trucks to trucks from 20+ years ago
So you’re telling me there’s a chance.
I have a 2011 Express 4500 Chassis Cab. The great thing about keeping things the same is that when that 2011 chassis wears out I can drop the aluminum ambulance body on a brand new Express 4500 chassis and be good for another 20 – 30 years.
Commercial customers do not like change. You have to give them a really good reason to start over again with their upfitting.
Makes me wonder what percentage of the annual sales are chassis-cabs and cutaways. Maybe those sales numbers don’t include those, because I’m actually surprised the numbers aren’t higher. They’ve gotta be doing 10,000 a year just in mini-busses, right? Add in cube vans, shuttles, ambulances…
pretty sure the chassis cabs and cutaways are separate numbers because they’re technically separate models
Edit: maybe not, https://investor.gm.com/static-files/23adce96-ea26-4a6e-82dd-68a0042df51c
I think the Express Chassis Cabs and Cutaways are included in the Express total.
With Ford they are separate because the only E-Series they sell are the Chassis Cab and Cutaways. Ford sold 41,000 E-Series last year.
GM keeping the Express/Savana twins fairly unchanged for so long is the reason why I can still walk into the parts department of my local GM dealer and get several electrical parts brand new for my 20 year old Buick Lucerne; things like the Body Control Module, the Theft Deterrent Module, the Ambient light sensor, and the ultrasonic parking sensors. (Unfortunately that last one is on national back order)
Perfect example of if it isn’t broken, it does’t need fixing.
I would have thought that, given the age of the thing, it would also be the hold out for malaise-era-style engines. Like having a 150bhp 8.8-litre big block V8 or something.
But actually they are hovering around 60bhp/litre, which isn’t bad at all.
Also. From an European perspective I am also quite flabergasted that you can order a Ford Transit-like vehicle with a 400bhp V8. An empty Express in the smallest configuration possible with the V8 must haul ass…
I mean it’s a similar discussion to the design continuation but the mounting points for powertrains have not changed in about 5 iterations of GM V8s. It allows for refreshing powertrains in the trucks without refreshing platforms, and why an Express can have an 8 speed today when it debuted as a 4 speed.
But part of the beauty of the Express is you can largely find any powertrain you want from the last 30 years of GM trucks if you’re willing to scour the modern classifieds.
Can confirm, empty American vans are very fast. They are like old-school muscle cars, but practical. I know people who have won drag races against Mustangs and such in empty cargo vans, to mutual astonishment, and ridden in V8 passenger vans with exuberant drivers… SUVs are a joke, if you want something more fun than a minivan just get a full-size van with a V8! It’s like a Camaro, but with room for all your friends 🙂
I have owned one. They are fantastic highway long distance cruisers and a bit annoying in tight parking lots. They need to make AWD versions again if they stopped.
They don’t produce the 1/2 ton version anymore, which was the only one they ever offered with AWD. I think the modified GMT400 platform makes it difficult to fit proper 4wd to these vans without a substantial lift.
Nah you don’t need a lift to do it. There’s plenty converted to 4wd using GMT800/900 factory parts if you look around
I dont know if i would go as far as to say its fantastic. I drove one for 2 years for work and was so dang excited when i got my Ford Transit 150. It was way better and much quieter. The express van is great for Fleets, but it sounds like your driving a 1970s truck all the time. It was so loud. The dash was carved from some of the hardest plastic known to man.
Fair, when compared to old kia minivan or a jeep wrangler the 1 ton express with dogs in it goes down the highway way better.
GM painted itself into a corner in the van market. Sales figures aren’t really high enough to warrant a complete redesign, and unlike Ford or Stellantis, GM no longer has European operations from which to crib a Euro-style van.
Thanks for this perspective…I’d never thought of it that way, because it had crossed my mind, why only Chevy keeping an old-ass van around?
I don’t think Ford necessarily regrets stopping selling the standard E-Series, but I do think if they knew they’d still be selling cab & and chassis models in 2026 they’d still be selling the van alongside the Transit
I still say they should do a limited run of SS versions. The ExpreSS, if you will.
Bring back AWD, bolt a supercharger onto the LS, slam it, stiffen the suspension, and paint SS stripes down the middle.
C’mon, GM. You know you wanna…
I am not sure the world needs a high performance version of this van, but the name alone makes it worth the effort
I find your ideas intriguing and would like to subscribe to your newsletter
Sorry to be that guy, but you can’t actually listen to Bluetooth audio in your new Express. They removed the Bluetooth and MP3 function of the radio in 2025, so now your options are AM/FM or Aux input. (edit… looks like they added that back in for 2026 as a $200 option)
And that’s the problem with these vans. I know they sell as many as can make, but they could at least throw an updated radio in there. In the 80’s, the full size conversion van was the ultimate family hauler. Keeping these at least competitive with comfort options and safety could really break into that segment again. Something like this that is comfortable for a family and can tow would be so much better and cheaper than a full size truck or a full size SUV for family vacations.
Cassettes are making a comeback. Bring back tape players!
I mean…conversion vans based on Expresses are still being made…they’re just pricey. But then, I guess new conversion vans always have been.
One upsetting bit is that even since the 2003 refresh, their dashboard design is still stuck in ’90s antitheft mode, so it’s reportedly a really tedious job to replace the radio. You have to take the entire dashboard trim piece (one huge piece of plastic all the way across) off to do it properly.
(a) yes it sucks, (b) but if your van is over a decade old the dash has probably just enough cracks to make it easier without the whole dash falling to pieces
I think of this like a Craftsman screwdriver. Why redesign the tool for the job?
I winced at the $41K base price until you included the comparison including inflation. Man, my brain is really stuck in the mid ’00s when it comes to perceived value of things.
I remember when a Golf GTI was €30,000. Now you can’t even get a base Golf for that…
One of the signs that I’m getting old is that I have a hard time wrapping my head around how expensive things are these days, even if I know objectively they cost the same or even less when adjusted for inflation.
Just remember that inflation alone doesn’t tell the whole story, because average wages haven’t gone up nearly as much.
Median household income hasn’t gone up as much as inflation – It has exceeded inflation for 40 years.
I guess we’re doing something really wrong at my house…
Someone has to be below average.
Inflation adjusted median household income can be found here:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N
I always thought it was weird that they discontinued the sealed beam version and not the other one. Since it’s 100% fleet sales now you’d think fleet managers would have wanted the opposite.
The composite headlight versions had been available in parallel for a while – you can see them on the passenger vans more than 10 years back. At this point, replacing the bulbs on those is cheaper than the sealed beams and despite being pretty basic halogen units they are much better at, you know, being headlights.
They also offer much better aero, which some engineer probably fought really hard for because you know GM isn’t giving up a single cent per van in cost even if it makes it much better.
Hey now. The conversion van companies still making these into luxurious living rooms on wheels surely prefer the aesthetics of the not-sealies type.
I prefer the original nose, but other than the “cateye” look (I assume to match the look the Chevy pickups got in 2003), the lines are still pretty clean on this thing.
4.3, 350, 4.8, 305, 454, 8.1, 6.6, 2.8, 6.5, 6.0. Just SOME of the displacements and engines that have been available in the worlds greatest van. LONG LIVE THE EXPRESS. GOD SAVE THE KING (of vans)
On a related note, that modern aluminum block 4.3 (without DOD in the Express) is seriously intriguing for swap projects that are a little too small for an LS.
While Ford/Chevy/Ram have been battling out in the open on v8s and turbo 4-bangers, the v6 options have been quietly getting better and better.
That 4.3 may not be the best engine option today, but it beats the base v8s from not that long ago. I think the 5.3 was the sweet spot in the truck/van lineup for a long time, but I bet the 4.3 does a great job as the base engine. (my minibus has the 6.0, and it’s the only one I can really attest to, but it has no trouble getting that 8,000 lbs up to highway speeds without drama)
It (rather shamefully) beats the TBI 454 on horsepower that was available in the same van. Ah well, my 454 in my K2500 runs sweet as a nut. Just thirsty.
It’s always interesting to see the v6s being produced practically only for fleet service. I always forget about Ford’s 3.3 as well, although those are in the cop-spec Explorer and Hybrid as well as the F-150.
The fleet option now with the F150 is the 400hp 5.0 v8, thats what comes standard in the xl work truck package. Makes for a great hotrod in lighter rcsb spec. Especially when you bolt a whipple blower on it. Even stock you are running 14 second quarter mile times while banging into the stock 98mph speed limiter down the back half of the track