Fifty years ago, absolutely no one could have imagined that the traditional Jeep and Ford Bronco would one day be bought by anyone other than park rangers, a few sportsmen or survivalists, and niche fans. Oh, there was also Daisy Duke back then, but that’s about it. How can we forget Daisy? [Ed note: Don’t sleep on David Soul hunting the vampires of Salem’s Lot in his CJ-5 – Pete]
Well, today many stylish ladies of any age group seem to choose a loud, lifted Wrangler over a luxury sedan or sports car, and families by the thousands are buying heavy-duty Broncos as their daily driver. Conspicuously absent from the choices is an offering from General Motors. Not since the old K5 Blazer of the seventies with a lift-off roof has The General even tried to play in this sandbox, so there’s not a lot of precedent for them to do so. However, I recently saw some concepts of theirs that might make cool alternatives to the entries from Ford and Stellantis. Like the current Willys-style Wrangler, the inspiration comes from the last place you’d expect for a suburban street vehicle.
Humvee, You Are One Ugly Mother…
I’m not a big follower of military vehicles, but I get why companies clamor for the opportunity to build one. A contract from the government means millions if not billions in sales that have nothing to do with the hassle of selling through dealerships and competing with umpteen other brands; just make a few thousand of some army green thing and it’s sold before it even leaves the factory. It’s no surprise then that car companies will pitch battle-ready vehicle concepts to defense departments the world over. Few of them actually get produced, and some of the rejected ones are way cooler than the Jeeps and Humvees that actually did get built in large numbers.

One famous example was called the “Cheetah,” developed by an American company called Mobility Technology International (MTI) and supercar-builder Lamborghini in 1977. With a steel chassis and fiberglass body, the Cheetah featured a Chrysler 360 V8 in the back, which supposedly resulted in poor handling. The Cheetah was demonstrated to the U.S. military, but they never tested it, much less purchased any of them.

Lamborghini instead attempted to market the idea as a product for oil exploration companies. The struggling firm’s financial problems put paid to the project, but they later revived it with the engine in the front to create the vaunted Countach V-12-powered LM002. A total of 301 civilian examples were built of this “Rambo Lambo”, the only sport utility ever made by the Sant’Agata firm if you don’t count the gussied-up Volkswagen Touareg they sell now.

The contract that Lamborghini didn’t get for this new style of military Jeep ended up going to a division of the company that made the original Jeep. AM General actually began as the commercial/military products division of the ill-fated American Motors Corporation in 1971, and this always-innovative company started work on what was called the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV or Humvee) in 1979. However, by the time the multi-billion dollar production contract was issued in 1983, AM General was no longer part of AMC. The purchase of a majority stake in the company by a French firm (Renault) meant that American Motors had to dump AM General from their portfolio. I feel the need to mention that any time AMC had a great and potentially profitable product, they got rewarded with a swift kick in the ass. Every. Single. Time.

Now an LLC and goaded on by the man who said “eef eet bleeds, vee can keel eet”, AM General began making civilian versions of the Humvee under the “Hummer” brand name in 1992. By now, SUVs were a fire-hot commodity, so General Motors purchased the rights to the Hummer name in 1999 (but never had anything to do with the military versions). GM sold the original Hummer as the H1; later they expanded the lineup to include the GMC pickup-based H2 in 2002 (built at the AM General factory).

The smaller H3 debuted for 2005, built at the factory that made the Chevy Colorado on which its chassis was based.

Sales of such conspicuously consuming products suffered in the late-2000s Financiapocolypse; with GM’s bankruptcy, Hummer was one of the victims of the great Purge Of Brands and ceased to exist after 2010. A decade on, the Hummer name returned under the GMC brand with the tough look of the earlier H-series, but now as an environmentally friendly luxury EV.

Yeah, I know; it’s not the same thing as the battle-ready examples of the vehicle that it shares its name with. It’s more like an adult-sized Power Wheel interpretation of the original models than anything resembling a “real” Hummer. Still, a bigger regret to me is that no Hummer or Humvee of any kind over the life of the brand came close to matching something like the Jeep Wrangler or new Bronco in terms of being an open-topped, manageable-sized off-road fun machine that made sense for road use. I think I see a way to make that happen.
General Motors For General Infantry
Just because they didn’t build Army Humvees doesn’t mean that General Motors didn’t want government contract business. In fact, GM has an entire division called “GM Defense” that has the sole purpose of creating military products. In recent years, they displayed a number of rather cool-looking products like the “Next Gen” Tactical vehicle.

Here’s what the GM Defense website says about it:
Based on the Chevrolet Silverado 3500HD ZR2 truck, the rugged and durable Next Gen combines GM’s 2.8L Duramax® turbo-diesel engine with a 12-module battery pack, in addition to drive motors for the front and rear axles that enable Silent Drive and Silent Watch, technologies that make the vehicles harder to detect.
It’s very industrial-looking, but the detailing makes it look very much like a designer had a hand in the development.

GM Defense also came up with an electric military vehicle concept, or the EMCV:
The EMCV is presented with the same chassis and powertrain as the Hummer EV, which is powered by the giant 200 kWh battery pack. Planned to have a slightly lower range than the current 329 miles of the Hummer EV at 300 miles, the vehicle is also coming equipped with a diesel range extender if needed. The EMCV has the capability of 800-volt DC fast-charging up to 350kW, enabling up to nearly 100 miles of driving range in about 12 minutes. The military vehicle offers 329 miles of combined driving range, according to GM Defense, with a 0-60 mph acceleration time of 3 seconds.;
It’s essentially a tactical interpretation of the current GMC Hummer EV; the chassis and powertrain are the same.

Range is supposedly less than the street version, so figure around 300 miles, but GM admits that the diesel range extender could be added. The design language works quite well, and it almost comes across as a giant side-by-side more than a luxury truck that spawned it. I don’t know how far either of these proposals got with the Army, though I can say with virtual certainty that a battery-powered war machine sounds like a non-starter in anyone’s book. They claim that “fast charging” could give it 100 miles of range in ten minutes, but exactly how this is going to happen in, say, an Iraqi desert is not known. This idea is likely never going to see the light of day.
Regardless of the feasibility, I love the appearance of these things; any design that starts out as a combat vehicle has some cred as a heavy-duty vehicle. It’d be a shame for either one to end up as a never-was, so let’s use them to make that GM Jeep/Bronco competitor they’ve kept from us.
Declaring War On Stellantis And Ford
First, we need to figure out what mechanicals General Motors even has to make a Bronco/Wrangler competitor. Since Ford’s Jeep fighter Bronco uses a chassis heavily based on the mid-sized Ranger pickup, I have to believe that Chevy Colorado underpinnings would be perfect if chopped down to the wheelbase of a Wrangler. This body-on-frame with a live rear axle and four-wheel drive should at least be the equal of the Bronco; a fact that’s important for credibility if not for real-life use. Let’s face it: about 95 percent of Bronco and/or Jeep owners are as likely to go rock crawling as they are to drive on the surface of Mars itself.

I’ll put a new body onto this chopped-wheelbase pickup chassis for what I’ll call the Kodiak, reviving the name of GM’s long-dead series of heavy-duty trucks. The styling ends up being a mishmash of the two military proposals I’ve shown above, with the EV unit’s center body capped off in front with the Silverado version’s nose. The one shown below in matte green would be the hard-core example, but I would imagine a more mall-parking-lot-friendly version as well. Naturally, to compete with Jeep and Bronco, the doors could be taken off and stashed in back. A drop-down windshield would have to be part of the package as well.

A thick body-colored C pillar that wraps over the top is not unlike the current GMC Hummer EV, but the whole thing is much more industrial and aggressive than that luxury behemoth (it looks more like an old Isuzu Rodeo, which I love). Doors feature roll-down frameless glass windows, and the roll cage body can be covered in fabric or rigid roof panels. Rear quarter windows can also be removed.

What I like about it is that it looks modern, or even retro-futuristic, without trying to recall the appearance of some sixty- or eighty-year-old vehicle as with the Ford and Jeep entries. Here’s an animation to show how the military vehicle concept translates into the consumer version:
In back, the tailgate has simulated “box taillights” as on the original Hummers (and on earlier Jeeps before they went and got all stylistic with them); wraparound smoked-out light units below the tailgate have turn signals, rear fog lamps and repeater lights for when the gate is down.

Inside, the interior of the original Hummer was almost as iconic as the outside, with a massive, almost pyramid-shaped monolith of plastic dominating the design.

I’d like to pick up on that shape with the new GMC Kodiak’s dash. Exposed fasteners abound, with round military-radio-style knobs and buttons including a set of controls for the differentials and drive modes. A row of switches for things like seat heaters is done in tactical style to add some purposeful-looking fun. I’ve even copied the old Hummer’s odd power window switch placement on the sides of the center console, for better or worse (it keeps them off of the removable doors, at least).
Whether you like the idea of Army Jeep-style vehicles is beside the point; a lot of people seem to want them, even though they’re a bit like using a samurai sword to cut celery. A GM entry based on a competent mid-sized truck with the attitude of some real military proposals could assist the Bronco in making things even more difficult for Stellantis.
Top graphic base image: GM Defense











That “Next Gen” Tactical vehicle is barely different from the shit on the road today. They should just add a few matte black US flags and some molle panels and offer it alongside the ZR2 it’s based on.
So much contempt here for the possibility of another off-road vehicle option. What’s not to like about more options? If GM wants to make it because they think it’d sell, then why not. If you don’t like them in green, paint it sarcoline, heliotrope or razzmatazz. Or perhaps don’t buy one at all if you don’t like it. Pretty crazy that people don’t have to like the same thing as you.
I love the Bronco, and I’ve had other enthusiasts berate me for it. I don’t get why, it’s good off-road and looks great, while being more usable daily than the Wrangler. The only reason they seem to dislike it is because “it will never go off-road”. And how is that the truck’s fault? The owner makes that choice, not Ford/Stellantis. And no Bugatti owner is taking their Chiron to the track, and I don’t see many people having a problem with that. But I guess that’s an unfair comparison since that’s a multi-million dollar hypercar being compared to something the average person could afford.
I don’t know what color razzmatazz is but I want it.
I enjoyed this article but I would be happier if you were more clear from the outset that its a flight of the authors fancy as opposed to the clickbait title implying that its something that is actually being planned.
I love that you called it a Kodiak. I’ve been saying since it was announced that the AT4X trim on GMC trucks should have been called Kodiak.
GM (and Ford) have such classic and well-known names it’s strange that they don’t use them
Let’s not forget MacGyver, he always drove a CJ or a Wagoneer.
Given that the VAST minority of people who buy Wranglers and Broncos go off-road, while everyone else owns them for… clout? (idk really, I abused my off-roaders but they SUCK at everything else) I would think looks are just as important as ability, and man that render is UGLY
Clout? Maybe they just enjoy taking the doors off and enjoying the breeze.
Considering that something like 85-90 percent of Wrangler sales are 4doors, I think you have a severe blind spot. Of the dozen or so people I know who own a Wrangler/Bronco, 1 actually takes it on trails. The rest simply claim they do, but are actually just driving on a dirt road to their cabin.
I know my phrasing above was weird, but I am agreeing with you. I said vast minority
I’m friends with one of the engineers that makes the wiring harnesses for the military use ones.
Living in Metro Detroit sure helps make that possible.
Pride of Indiana!
Eh, pretty much every mining road in the West was put in with surplus Jeep Willys. That’s why you have the track-width restrictions to this day, and why products like the 4Runner continue to sell so well.
I’d disagree with this. Lots of stuff is power-intensive: maintenance operations, communications, refueling, so on. All that stuff is driven off of generators or ICE pumps themselves. Being able to do something like drive a utility vehicle to a disabled piece of armor and repair it without having to fire up a genny is actually a big win. Likewise, you get capacity for future energy weapons, drone radios, drone jammers, whatever, that can operate absent ICE.
The Jeep began life as sort of a general-purpose vehicle, not a fighting vehicle, and having lots of power on tap arguably makes it more fit for purpose.
>>How A GM Military Concept Could Become A Serious Jeep And Bronco Fighter
Because it’s been styled to appeal to the sort of emotionally-stunted ammosexuals who can’t buy a coffee without having a silhouette of an AR-15 on the cup, or carry their own child without a harness styled to look like a MOLLE-webbed plate carrier?
Yes. Exactly that.
I could see them naming such a vehicle the GMC Humvee… I would much rather see a cheaper, lighter, smaller vehicle. It could be the size on the Trax and with capability it wouldn’t matter.
Yes, like a new Geo Tracker.
Preach. ????????
They did have a GMC Tracker in Canada already, after all.
Give it the Magna E-Beam electric axles front and back, Cut the battery size in half and let a non-EGR 2.8 diesel run a genny when the 100 or so miles a day is exceeded.
It is GMC, they could still offer the full EV as well.
But please make it look like this. but make the roof fully removable.
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQAGJxOI-xthoOxy_NCpmW1cbPYbol2T8P5X-T78yzweOC9JiLouCj1Xw_N&s=10
Looks like a Bronco with a new house and new nose
I was thinking early Bronco 2, but I still see the 74 Jimmy/K5 in that as well.
I thought the military was going full side by side atvs now.
A few special units got them, but they were never intended to be common despite all the press. Small drone warfare in Ukraine has shown anything with open sides would be a bad idea.
You’d be right about open side vehicles except the US Army is equipping Mobile Brigade Combat Teams with almost exactly the vehicle referenced in the story above. MBCTs will be ISV mounted, over 250 of them per MBCT.
Kodiak Package includes:
Goatee
Peptides
Stolen valor
Add in: stanced wheels with low-profile mud tires, trucknuts, Calvin pssing on something, flags, a few political statement bumper stickers, and you’ve got yourself a deal
I’m gonna need at least one Punisher decal and the logo from a high-end firearm I’ll never take to the range before I sign!
“Made in China clothing that violates the flag code”
https://www.legion.org/advocacy/flag-advocacy/flag-code
Like a red hat? or one on Amazon?
These military cosplay vehicles do not excite me.
Nor me, but I admit they’re probably what the market wants, in general
Fear sells.
Well, if you take Brixton to lacrosse practice in anything less than an MRAP, you’re just telling the world that you’re a neglectful mother
Brixton, ha
Like fear you neighbor if they don’t look or talk like you. I love the Brazilians and Columbians near me. The food is fantastic
When we run out of bombs, just drop EMCV’s on them. 5 tons of LiON batteries baby.
This would sell great once they figure out how to get the diesel range-extender to roll coal.
Would absolutely happen.
Well, the EPA has been de-fanged.
Not so much de-fanged than complicit
Fog machine!
Just need add a “smokescreen” and “oil slick” button ala James Bond (or Spyhunter).
GM is too stupid to give us the international Trailblazer that has been out for years (basically a Colorado wagon)
Therefore, they definitely won’t make anything civilian from the military concept
I’m assuming the diesel range-extender tech doesn’t meet consumer emissions (military vehicles are exempt), otherwise why wouldn’t they be rolling that out?
What consumer emissions?
Cost. The smaller infantry squad vehicle costs $330,000 each. Almost anything is possible with an almost unlimited budget.
That’s because it was all classified until leaked by the G.I. Joe series of documentaries exposing our private war on terrorism in the 1980s.
Beat me to it! Knowing is half the battle.
Yo Joe!
Plot twist, Destro was the one behind the G.I. Joe armaments, and had to fund Cobra to justify the lucrative Joe contracts.
No.
Please stop the military cosplay, the rural police can get only so excited.
Hey, that’s unfair of you! Don’t forget urban police forces as well!
Who would this be for? Pete Hegseth wannabes with extremely low testosterone?
For the size and shape, it doesn’t seem very practical at all for many applications.
Hardcore offroaders likely aren’t buying BEV’s to go rock crawling, and the reduced utility is not a tradeoff I’d make.
Okay, but why are the power window switches on the dash? Leave em on the doors! No doors, no switches. Don’t fall into the silly Wrangler trap.
If it has four doors, and the front two are off but the rear two are on, how is the driver supposed to control the rear windows without controls on the dash?
Ask the rear passengers nicely or reach back and use the controls on the doors, like people did when crank windows were the norm.
Alternately, a manufacturer could put one button on each door and one button on the dash with the latter raising and lowering all four windows, which would also make right-hand-drive conversion easier.
One button, or one switch pod with four switches? I’d rather have the full control of four switches myself. And since the switch pod is mounted in the center of the dash how would changing it make right hand drive conversion easier? I’d say it’s already optimized for that; you don’t have to have make two different door panels for right- or left-hand drive like you would if you put all four on the driver’s door.
Ah, a compliance/safety argument. I had forgotten that rule existed. Well spotted.
They’d sell dozens. Dozens!
It seems to me that a diesel range extended Hummer EV would be selling great right now, and the military version shows it’s technically feasible.
Hello, real-life Warthog, how are you doing?
Seriously, if this were made, I imagine about a year after launch, the “Kodiak Halo Warthog Special Edition” would come out. Bigger wheels, matte green, that weirdly offset spotlight on the “civilian version” from the Forza games…
needs the optional gun mount on top
Of course, though that’s a dealer-installed option and requires registration with the ATF.
Does the ATF still exist under the curent regime? Don’t tell the ATF about this option, and it will never be checked.