The new, second-generation Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport is here, and though my initial thought was that many of you car-nuts probably don’t care, I was surprised to see how many comments there were on Jason’s article about the longer, three-row 2027 VW Atlas. So allow me to present to you that same car, but a bit shorter and equipped with one fewer row of seating. I actually like the way it looks.
When Jason wrote about the 2027 VW Atlas, lots of people had opinions, especially about the interior. Here are a few of those opinions:
VW continues to get shit on about lack of buttons yet continues to stick with touch screen for almost everything (except on the steering wheel, which is like the bare minimum).
[…]
Light-up grill and badge, animated tail lights, and plenty of gaudy interior LED lighting. Great to see that VW has the sense to is work hard on the stuff that makes a car actually good to own and drive.
[…]
No physical buttons, BOOOOO! This is such a bad idea. What happens when that screen dies?
[…]
That interior looks largely the same as the current one, just with more complex lighting. Still has the same crap infotainment system with no buttons as the current one. That buttonless interior is what turned me off from the last one.
[…]
I’d suggest that VW concentrate on providing affordable, quality, reliable vehicles instead of garbage laden gadget containers.
Doing otherwise is going to tighten and accelerate the company’s spiral into the ground.
Wow, some of these are brutal, but three years ago VW’s CEO talked about how confusing some of the company’s user interfaces are, and some interpreted this as: Our touchscreens are confusing, we need to bring some physical buttons back.
Apparently not, because the shortened Atlas Cross Sport (5.4 inches shorter at 195.6, 2.1 inches lower) has the exact same interior (and 12.9-inch touchscreen) that readers ripped on in the comments above:

I’m with everyone on the lack of physical switches, but I think that interior looks gorgeous. The tri-spoke wheel is classy, the lighting is fun, and the two-tone seats, door panels, and dash? Beautiful. (Also, shout-out to the storage under that center tunnel!).
You know what? I think, aesthetics wise, the whole thing looks great.

For comparison, here’s the big-butted three-row: 

Other comments on Jason’s post lamented the Atlas’ lack of a hybrid powertrain:
The inability of VW to produce hybrid powertrains for their snoozy crossover lineup is going to be the final nail in the coffin for the brand in the US.
[…]
The Tiguan is rated at 25 combined and the current Atlas gets a measly 22. Even if you don’t give a shit about the environment I really have no clue how you choose one of these over a Honda or Toyota hybrid and get 10+ better, plus better reliability, PLUS better resale.
Yikes! (The Cross Sport has the same 282 horsepower, 258 lb-ft of torque EA888 turbocharged, direct-injected 2.0-liter four-cylinder TSI motor as the three-row).
For the record, I think people are being hard on Volkswagen because of just how beloved VW was pre-Dieselgate. VW Vortex was a larger-than-life online community, GTIs still had stick shifts, GLIs still had stick shifts, that 2.5-liter five-cylinder made lots of fun noises, the VR6 was a beast, there were great diesels, the Touareg could actually off-road, and on and on. VW was awesome, and as Jason has written before, nowadays its image needs a revamp.
But clearly more important than any of this is the Atlas’ hippo-towing capability, which is good, though there’s a catch. From Jason:
It’ll tow 5,000 pounds, so that means you’ll likely need to opt for a female hippo instead of a male, but most consumers in the Atlas’ target demographic are generally able to find that a female hippo meets most of their day-to-day hippopotamus needs. For Atlas customers that actually do need regular access to a male hippo, there are Atlas owners’ groups that will have a co-owned male hippo available to all members based on a time-sharing plan and housed at a central, shared location.
So far, Volkswagen does not have an official plan to address the fact that the Atlas is generally not capable of towing an adult male hippopotamus, though there are unconfirmed reports that VW has been testing towing adolescent male hippos with Atlases, and this could form the basis of a work-around. We’ll keep looking into this issue.
Per my research, the average male hippo weighs around 3,500 pounds, but if you add a trailer, things could get close to the Atlas Cross Sport’s (admittedly decent) 5,000 pound towing capacity. I think Jason was really saying that, while the Atlas can tow the entire interquartile weight range of female hippos, the upper quartile of male hippo weights is probably over 4,000 pounds; you add a trailer to that and you’re over capacity. This, obviously, is a huge issue for most Americans.
That is to say nothing about America’s many rhino users, as Autopian member Rang made clear in their comment:
I’m sick and tired of carmakers ignoring us rhino users. Sure, hippopotamuseses may be more traditional, but some of us grew up without easy access.
No word on whether there’s a Rhino Over-The-Air update coming.

So there you have it. The chopped-down Atlas is here. It doesn’t fix the complaints many of you voiced five months ago about its big brother, but hey, it looks good. And I’m not the only one saying it; some Autopians say they like the big-butt Atlas Jason wrote about, writing:
This is refreshing. I have a 2018 with 180k on it. I love the VR6 and the turbo 4 stopped me from buying a 2025. This refreshing got me thinking again!
[…]
Looks really decent, and a nice upgrade from the current model.
This shorter model looks even better.
All Images: VW






Wow, another article where I can bash VW Atlases again!
I rented a ’26 Atlas SE with the 2.0 TSI engine for a weekend.
What an absolutely AWFUL vehicle that was! Quite literally 2 seconds of boost lag, and a transmission that refused to ever be in the right gear.
Need to get out of a dangerous situation quickly? Press gas through firewall – 1 Mississippi, 2 Mississippi, transmission triple-downshifts, tires lose traction, vehicle only NOW leaving the dangerous situation, but slower than expected due to the traction control kicking in and neutering the boost you waited so long for…
…with only 11k showing on the dash.
I also couldn’t easily find the menu path to disable any of the e-nannies, so was fighting the steering wheel the entire time. The blind-spot monitors in the mirrors were also inop, or hidden behind a German paywall scheme.
Seriously, I was cursing that POS the entire time I was behind it’s steering wheel… VW deserves every bit of bad press and whatever the market throws at them.
TBF rentals are driven by absolute walnuts and who knows what horrors the drivetrain has been subjected to.
It was still in decent condition with only 11k on the clock.
There was nothing wrong with it other than the engineers who engineered it’s engineering…
…and the badge on the front.
No mention of the price of the one shown in the images?
Here’s why:
“The price as tested for a 2026 Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport typically ranges from about $48,080 for mid-tier trims (like the SE with Technology package) up to roughly $55,095 to $55,950 for the top-of-the-line SEL Premium R-Line 4MOTION trim with added destination fees and packages”
Since it is a 2027 shown with a nicer-looking interior, the one shown most likely goes for well north of $55K
CP today.
55k for a middle of the road VW? GTFO.
I can’t fathom why people call them Sport Utility Vehicles. They aren’t sporty, they aren’t utilitarian. They are station wagons with crappy tall sidewall tires and a 2″ lift kit. And not just the Atlas.
Thats really rude to compare them to station wagons considering you can actually fit things in the back of a wagon.
That’s the interior on our 2021 Rogue Platinum. VW basically copied the entire thing. It is pretty nice for a Nissan.
Seriously, I don’t get this idea, that a car needs buttons.
And yes, I am someone who drove many old cars.
No seriously. What do you need the buttons for?
HVAC is often mentioned. But for me (and as someone who worked in the field of testing & development) there is no need to have dedicated buttons anymore. Ideally, drivers use the auto function and in a perfect world, the FATC works well. I know, this is not valid for all cars out there.
But I personally haven’t touched my AC controls in years. Not in my previous Volvo XC70 P3 that had literally 1000 buttons, not in my current EX30 that has no buttons at all, except for the mandatory ones (defrost, hazard, SOS).
Am I missing anything? No. Works fine.
Even my old BMW 1802 lacks buttons. Yes, it has some switched for the ventilation, but apart from this, there are two buttons: Hazard & rear fog light. Rear fog light is barely ever used, as this is strictly regulated here in Germany (visibility below 50m ahead, max. 50kph speed when light is turned on – so simply don’t use it, if you don’t want to piss us off).
I changed the HVAC setting several times every time I drive. Recirc vs outside air, temperature, fan speed, and fan setting (face vs face and foot well), and of course AC on or off. I’m temperature sensitive and the first thing I want to do with automatic AC is rip it out and get a basic system with 5 controls.
Other buttons and manual controls:
* at least volume and skip/seek for the sound system (1 knob, 2 buttons). I don’t use carplay/android auto (my car is too old)
* window switches (4 buttons)
* mirror adjustment (1 button/joystick and 1 switch)
* phone pick up and hang up (1 or 2 buttons)
Then the obvious:
* turn signal stalks (I don’t drive a BMW)
* headlight stalk
* wiper stalk
* shift paddles
* PRNDL
None of those belong on a screen. I use them while the vehicle is in motion.
Then the “a screen widget and servo are pants-on-head stupid for this” controls:
* glove box
* door handles
* door lock and unlock
I am Sure, that there will Always be a Car available for your taste.
But I have to hate you for disturbing the FATC.
The Cross-Sport is the absolute bare minimum of automotive efforts. They removed the third row, sloped the rear roof slightly, and added “Sport.” Done. It’s a less useful Atlas – just what everyone wants!
I had the VR6 Atlas and sold it as soon as the warranty was expiring, as one does. Then I went full EV because that car soured me on gas…
“Utility” vehicles without utility are rather pointless.
But we live in the worst timeline, so why not?
Also – kids today have a funny idea of what “cool” means. This isn’t it.
VW management’s instructions to the designers for Atlas gen 1: “Here’s a Honda Pilot. Its ugly. Make something competitive, but uglier.”
Instructions for Atlas gen 2: “Same Instructions, but even more uglier. And less competitive than the Pilot/Passport, Kia twins, Grand/regular Highlander, Ford Edge/Explorer and the GM crap buckets.”
That tracks that they didn’t bother talking to the warranty department or the non-existent repairability department.
I honestly think the exterior is kind of ugly. Especially the short model, and front end. The rear of the LWB version is… fine. The interior looks good though, and I like how it feels like the vents on either side of the screens and the side screens look like theyre continue beneath the center screen, which reminds me of the first gen Honda Freed.
Here’s a link to a image of said Freed interior: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Freed#/media/File:2009-2011_Honda_Freed_E_1.5_GB3_(20191020).jpg
Edit: Don’t click the link, copy paste it. With the ‘.jpg’ included
Everything about this, starting with the fact it exists at all and the Cross Sport isn’t just being allowed to lapse at the end of the original one’s run, reeks of decisions made under old management.
And does anyone else see some Corbitt D600 in that high beltline?
Unless that hippo has wheels it’s gonna be hard to even tow a smaller one. They don’t drag well.
It gets easier the further you go though.
Looks cool ??? ummm… ok.
high beltline. yuck