Home » How The New Slate Pickup Could Make An Affordable EV Camper

How The New Slate Pickup Could Make An Affordable EV Camper

Slate Camper Ts2
ADVERTISEMENT

Some things in life are expected.

When I get a nudge at a dinner party from my spouse, it’s expected that the ride home will be ripe with harsh words about whatever it was I shouldn’t have said. When I take the ten-year-old remains of what was once a $100,000 German car to my mechanic, I expect that a sixty-dollar oil change has a solid chance of gaining a zero. Possibly two. There’s no way I’m ever going to get the keys back without forking over a bunch of extra dollars for something they “found.” It’s  inevitable.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

The Expected happened here at the Autopian last week when essentially eighty percent of the staff was working full-throttle on stories devoted to the Slate, that curious little EV pickup-slash-sport-ute backed by the guy who came up with Prime Day.

Blank Slate Profile

 Hero Blank Slate And Suv
Slate

Each and every writer was going on and on about the pricing, options, online configurator, powertrain, and even suspension details of this new Slate truck, so it wasn’t hard to guess what was coming next. I didn’t have to wait long, as the Slack message appeared not long after the Slate news dropped:

ADVERTISEMENT

Bishop Signal

 

Hey, it’s only natural to Camper All The Things here at this site, and I probably would have camperized the Slate without being prompted anyway. Besides, the designers of this rig (and especially of the accessories and trim) seem to be digging a disco-era vibe, and there’s a compact, space-efficient camper from this time period that hits the spot in terms of the look I know this crew is going for. Let’s summon the spirit of that classic recreation machine to make the perfect little EV camper out of this much-hyped little pickup.

More, More, More … How Do You Like It?

The 1970s’ design aesthetics were often so extreme and absurd that it’s easy for the retina-searing colors and lurid plaid upholsteries to make you miss some of the true innovation of the products that wore those garish looks at the time. Campers are certainly good examples of this.

As RVs go, General Motor’s 1973 GMC Motorhome still stands as possibly the GOAT design for self-propelled campers, even if you don’t like green interiors. What was green? Everything. Everything was green.

ADVERTISEMENT
Gmc Motorhome 1973 Images 1 29
GM
Gmc6
GM

I tried to conceptualize updating this thing for the eighties, but it’s impossible to follow a masterpiece.

87gmcmotorhome

Want a different example? Well, it might have looked like Uncle Rico would be coming out the back door of this bubble-windowed curiosity, but the 1977 Champion Trans Van was a unique and even partially successful attempt to make a camper that could justify the investment needed to buy it by working as an everyday family vehicle as well.

Sportstransvan
Champion Home Builders
Trans Van Rear
ebay via Barn Finds
Trans Van Interior
ebay via Barn Finds

I tried to update that for today as an EV-van-based daily driver camper:

Pv Concept
KIA

Another ultra-disco-fantastic RV that just oozed unsurpassed thinking was the Chevy K5 Blazer Chalet and the nearly identical GMC Casa Grande. No, the modern $ 200,000-plus overlanding campers you see today are by no means a “new thing”; General Motors was there fifty years ago, as stated in their literature:

ADVERTISEMENT

“Did you ever notice that the toughest places to get to usually turn out to be the nicest places to stay? Too bad you couldn’t have a neat little cabin right in the middle of it all. With a new Chevy Blazer Chalet, you’ve got it.”

Chevrolet Blazer Chalet Brochure 1 4 26 2
GM
Kg Chalet 1 4 26
Bring A Trailer

Our Mercedes Streeter has written about these a few times already:

In the mid-1970s, General Motors decided to capitalize on the rise of off-roading and the boom of camping at the same time. Most motorhomes of the day were built on chassis that weren’t designed to leave the manicured parking spaces of a campground. GM teamed up with Chinook Mobilodge Inc., the maker of now-famous fiberglass Class C campers, to create a camper that a truck owner could take anywhere.

K5 Chalet 2 4 26
Bring A Trailer

This thing looked like a magnificent Tonka toy come to life. Sounds to me like it had a full GM new-truck warranty on it, too; the only thing that I totally hate about it is the redundant use of taillights. Couldn’t they have just repositioned the original ones and put body-color plugs in the holes instead of wasting another set? There were probably people starving for GM Box Body lights in other parts of the world while these have just stayed dark for the last half century! Anyway, Mercedes continues:

Around 1,800 examples were made in 1976 and 1977 with most examples being the Chevrolet model….The campers started life at GM’s factory, where a stock Blazer or Jimmy would be built. The base truck would then be sent to Chinook, where the back wall of the cab would be removed. From there, Chinook bolted its camper body to what was left. This camper is made out of fiberglass with an inner steel frame for structure.

The was not a typical pickup bed camper; you couldn’t easily remove the thing from the back of the Blazer. However, if you were careful not the crack the fiberglass structure, you could ostensibly move it to another K5 once the base truck succumbed to Midwest winters by the late eighties.

Chevrolet Blazer Chalet Construction 4
GM

There’s no bathroom, but you get a kitchenette with a sink plus a dinette that could convert to a two-person sleeper. Plus, the pop-top roof allows for six and a half feet of headroom. Fully equipped models had a refrigerator, propane stove, and furnace; they could even sleep two more people in bunks in bunks that fit in the pop-up area.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chevrolet Blazer Chalet Brochure 2 4 26 2

Chevrolet Blazer Chalet Brochure 3 4 26 2
GM
K5 Interior 4 4 28
Bring A Trailer

That’s a lot of camper for something only half a foot longer than a current Tahoe, and I bet it would work as a six-passenger daily driver in a rather convoluted way if need be. Can’t we have something like this today? Well, we’re still wearing out Boogie Shoes, so let’s not take them off just yet.

Draw That Funky Camper, White Boy

The retro-modern style of the Slate is similar enough to the “box” Chevy that something that looks almost exactly the same as the old Chalet camper would work here. I spec’d out a Slate on the configurator in the most seventies-looking graphics offered, including the strange color-stripe wheels. Adding black graphic accents behind the truck’s side windows let them visually follow the leaned-back shape of the camper over the cab and parallelogram-shaped windows of the camper that pay tribute to the old Chalet.

Front Camper View 4 27
Slate

To hide the access doors and exhaust vents on the back of the camper, I just painted the whole area black. You’ll also notice that I do not have redundant taillights as on the original Blazer Chalet; the Bronco-looking stock fixtures from the Slate fit into recesses on BakPak’s tail. There’s also a third brake light above the door with white LEDs as well to act as a “porch light” or supplementary reversing light. Body-colored plugs would fill the rear side markers, which could get repositioned in the BakPak add-on.

Rear Camper View 4 28
Slate

Here’s one thing that a lot of people aren’t aware of when they look at pictures of this new Slate pickup: the thing is really small by today’s standards. It’s around two feet shorter than the Ford Maverick four-door unibody truck, but the people that go on forever about how “we need a little pickup the size of a 1980s Toyota or Nissan” will be happy to know that the Slate is exactly the same length of the smallest 1987 versions of those two standards.

ADVERTISEMENT
74d6e4555f0c53b56afcb46dc5097b01
Toyota
Nissan Brochure Image 1987 Scaled
Nissan

What this means is that we have a lot less room to work with than on the K5. It’s around 9 inches narrower, and the “bed” is only five feet versus the Blazer’s six. Still, we can use the same layout as that you see in the pictures above of the Chalet with a few changes.

The BakPak camper would have a sink and stove kitchenette area like the Blazer Chalet, though it would get a bit more compact. The same holds true of the storage area on the other side of the camper, though I think that with today’s products, we could find a way to get an optional slide-out cartridge toilet in there somewhere. By far the biggest change would be with the dinette area. This would have to shrink down to a two-person restaurant-style space instead of the four accommodated by the Blazer, and the narrower width of the Slate means that it would only work as a sleeping area for one or two children.

Scan 20250427

The upper bunk area will be mandatory, created by folding out the mattress that usually sits on top of the Slate’s cab and letting it rest on built-in supports (which is why there are no windows above the windshield on the camper). You could still partially access the kitchenette and storage areas at the back when the mattress is deployed.

A rear-mounted spare tire is offered as an option on the Slate, but that will obviously block the camper’s door. The Blazer Chalet offered the solution of a front-mounted spare, though I don’t really like the look of that on the Slate, and would likely be sternly frowned upon by the NHTSA. Run flats are probably the way to go here.

ADVERTISEMENT

Front Tire 4 27

Would this thing move under its own power? That’s a good question – but then again, the original Toyota Chinook camper only had around 100 horsepower to work with, and you know that several mini trucks back in the day got by on sub-60 horsepower diesel mills. Performance won’t be part of the game here by any means, but they had plenty of fun in the seventies and eighties going slow.

Is It The Right Clean Slate To Start With?

To make an inexpensive camper, you need to start with a cost-effective vehicle; the Slate just might be that machine to attract van-lifers who want something with a bit more room.

The only issue with our Slate camper is that, unlike the Blazer Chalet, it can only spin its rear wheels; you can forget any ideas you might have of going where the old K5 could. If you want to go off-roading, you’ll need to put the BakPak camper unit into the back of an old Japanese truck with four-wheel drive. Actually, those ancient pickups had six-foot beds instead of the Slate’s five-footer, so the BakPak might fit without even overhanging the back.

Anyone out there got a rust-free Nissan Hardbody or Marty McFly SR5 to spare?

ADVERTISEMENT

Relatedbar

How Our Daydreaming Designer Would Turn A Scion xB Into A Delightful Camper – The Autopian

How I’d Build The Ultimate Compact Motorhome Out Of An Electric Kia – The Autopian

Our Daydreaming Auto Designer Reimagines A More Modern Version Of The Legendary GMC Motorhome That Died In 1978 – The Autopian

Finally, The Galileo Shuttlecraft Amphibious Camper You’ve Waited Years For – The Autopian

ADVERTISEMENT
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
57 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Michael Ballezza
Michael Ballezza
20 days ago

Why not “rest in Slate”? Too grim, or too soon after Pope Francis?

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
21 days ago

I don’t know about camping, but the termite exterminator’s truck parked next to me looks like this.

First Last
First Last
22 days ago

I don’t think I’d want to be so range limited for my camping trips, but I feel like there are other use cases for this kind of setup.

In my town a lot of parents take their sprinter vans to their kids’ club sport activities, where they use them more as a mobile command center than a camper. During soccer practice, in between double-header baseball games, during long weekend sports tournaments or ski comps, etc. Any parent of a kid in a club sport will tell you there’s a crap ton of just waiting around. It’s pretty nice to have a comfy place to get some work done on your laptop, wait out a rainstorm, take a power nap, etc. It would be bonkers to spend six figures on a big van for this use case alone, but a 20k or 30k “bakpak” on a vehicle you already own seems more reasonable.

I’d still want the bigger battery and dual motor if they were available tho.

Brau Beaton
Brau Beaton
22 days ago

“40-50 miles range is useless”
Not so fast!
A friend annually takes his kids less than 10 miles away to the nearest campsite, where they get to sleep poorly in a pop-up tent trailer, roast mallows, get bitchy over burned food, walk around the site access road, complain and moan, then go back home the third day.

Why they don’t just camp out in their own backyard and walk the beautiful nature trail near their own house, I can’t figure out.

I do like the design of your “BakPak”, and I LOVE small trucks, but that said, I am ever so thankful thankful my non-helicopter parents were not camping inclined.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
22 days ago

Kitchenette – Use a below-counter single-burner induction cooktop, and you have counterspace plus seamless cooking capability when you need it. Plus a below-counter microwave.

Seats – Use the similar concept for seating as you did for the 1980’s GMC Motorhome redux on a smaller scale: Four captain chairs that unfold and merge into two full-length beds lengthwise.

Front Light – Why can’t you have a forward facing window in the upper section that’s partially blocked when the upper berth is folded, but exposed when in use?

Pop-Top needs Solar panel array to trickle-charge the batteries.

Skip the toilet – Just include a little shovel so you can go out into the woods and bury your shit.

Urban Runabout
Urban Runabout
22 days ago
Reply to  The Bishop

Okay – Then a window-shaped solar panel to augment the roof panels

Nis Sanny
Nis Sanny
22 days ago

Would’ve been better as a full on van. Make the shape based on the chevy and ford vans of the 80s, but give it the benefits of the Slate truck to make a seemingly nice side companion to the Slate truck, just only with way more cargo…..

Ppnw
Ppnw
22 days ago

That heavy camper means the 150 mile range probably reduces to 100 miles of highway range. You’ll want some margin/power to run accessories if you like camping away from sites with power.

This means you can only camp 40-50 miles away from home. That’s a commute for most Americans, not a camping trip. Totally useless.

Ppnw
Ppnw
22 days ago
Reply to  The Bishop

Fair enough! None of the issues are related to the camper, just the inherent limitations of the Slate platform.

1978fiatspyderfan
1978fiatspyderfan
23 days ago

Sorry the proportions look off. It looks like AI combined a Datsun with a land Rover taking the worst parts from each.

M SV
M SV
23 days ago

They used to put boxes on the old mini trucks like the uhaul couriers and Toyotas. I’m not sure I ever saw an RV courier but definitely RV Toyota truck. It definitely needs a rex it seems like someone could throw a little diesel engine or a scooter engine with a generator under it.

Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
22 days ago
Reply to  M SV
M SV
M SV
22 days ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

Yep but less stupid looking and cheaper

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
23 days ago

So I’d like to know where, you got the notion
Said I’d like to know where, you got the notion
To rock the boat (don’t rock the boat, baby)
Rock the boat (don’t tip the boat over)
Rock the boat (don’t rock the boat, baby)
Rock the boat

Christocyclist
Christocyclist
22 days ago
Reply to  Canopysaurus

The video is spectacular. I particularly like the side to side by the guy on the left. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKr9wZpjBqE&ab_channel=TopPop

Ignatius J. Reilly
Ignatius J. Reilly
23 days ago

So, a small truck camper. Just without the ability to get you to a campsite.

Bags
Bags
23 days ago

But with a passthrough from the cab, which is the big downside of truck campers!
So you can easily crawl in the back for a nap while you’re charging 70 miles from home, 30% of the way to your campsite.

Racer Esq.
Racer Esq.
23 days ago

Is there a range extending ICE generator somewhere in this thing, or does that get pulled on a trailer?

SoMuchBetterThanJalopnic
SoMuchBetterThanJalopnic
23 days ago

Now do the Telo!

It’s a more efficient use of the space!

4jim
4jim
23 days ago

Wow, the configurator website is terrible.

I love this idea. I know something similar has been done for the jeep wrangler. Now for the Slate, Maverick, Bronco. etc.

4jim
4jim
23 days ago
Reply to  The Bishop

The little thumbnails with no information for the trims was not helpful.

Ignatius J. Reilly
Ignatius J. Reilly
23 days ago
Reply to  4jim

Yeah, the website makes the whole thing look unlikely.

Rippstik
Rippstik
23 days ago

150 miles of range…before the camper is installed. Let’s say 100 miles of range. That will not work as a camper.

If the slate had 4wd, a manual, and a turbo-4 engine, sign me the heck up.

FormerTXJeepGuy
FormerTXJeepGuy
23 days ago

Couple thoughts:

  1. Keep the tire on the rear but make it fold down and turn into stairs up to the door
  2. Ditch the stove inside to regain some space. Instead have a slide out grill or table for a camping stove on the exterior. Keeps you from stinking up the sleeping area.
Ottomottopean
Ottomottopean
23 days ago

Looks great but for the 70’s aesthetic white wheels would be better.

JDS
JDS
23 days ago

I still don’t get the idea of grafting camper shells onto trucks for “overlanding expeditions” ie camping. Here’s my Slate Camper: Dirtbag Edition:

  1. Buy a truck from Slate
  2. Put a Coleman cooler in the bed, fill with ice, food, and drinks
  3. Put a few cheap tarps in the bed along with rope and poles, or bring a pop-up sunshade
  4. Put a ground cover, cot (or paco pad, hammock, whatever you sleep in) and sleeping bag in the bed of the truck
  5. Put whatever else you think you’ll need in the bed of the truck. Throw in a tent if you need shelter from weather.
  6. Tie it all down, cover with a tarp if it looks rainy, and hit the road

Then you can drive (but not too far because you’re range-limited) to your desired campsite. Pee on trees. Learn how to poop responsibly in the backcountry. Have fun. Make memories. Spend the $5k to $50k you just saved on more adventures.

Many of my best family memories are from camping trips with my family (mom, dad, two sisters, the best dog ever, and me) out of a ’74 VW bus towing a small trailer filled with dusty, well-used camping gear. You don’t need an expensive “rig” to get out there and enjoy nature. You just need a willingness to put up with the potential for minor discomfort and the understanding that there is no bad weather, just inappropriate gear choices.

Utherjorge, who has grown cautiously optimistic
Utherjorge, who has grown cautiously optimistic
23 days ago
Reply to  JDS

this is the way

Who Knows
Who Knows
23 days ago
Reply to  JDS

I’d add a couple of steps, particularly for busy holiday weekends:

7. Park it in a ditch, and walk up a hill to set up camp in a nice spot away from the road
8. Laugh as the clowns with roof top tents, campers, etc struggle to find a level spot to park, and have to pack up and re-setup every day if they go anywhere with their vehicle, spending much of their time just dealing with their overly complicated rigs

Ignatius J. Reilly
Ignatius J. Reilly
23 days ago
Reply to  JDS

Very close to my method. I liked my topper on my last truck, I just had a small screen tent, a couple of folding chairs, a roll-up table, an air mattress, a cooler, and a stove ready to go in the garage. Packing took maybe 30 minutes and I was on the road. For the other 50 weeks a year, I still had a usable truck.

Same deal now, but no topper, so I use my backpacking tent.

GENERIC_NAME
GENERIC_NAME
23 days ago

One thing you haven’t accounted for is that the bulkhead between the front cabin and the bed is designed to be removed for the SUV versions – so you have a few more inches to play with there. And if the front seats can fully recline you could either sleep on those, or build some sort of sliding mechanism to make beds that extended over the top of them into the front area. That might give some more options?

GreatFallsGreen
GreatFallsGreen
23 days ago

Not really a camper, but as far as high roofs go, I was thinking (and figure it was highly likely it had been mentioned somewhere already) a high roof shell for the back would give it a very Matra Rancho type of appearance. Especially keeping the standard roof over the front seats with the roof rack over it.

For the front spare – I suppose the frunk could be adapted to carry it, might need a different drop-in well. At first I thought of an old Land Rover-style exposed hood-mount but that definitely wouldn’t be any more NHTSA-friendly.

10001010
10001010
23 days ago

I only have one suggestion to make, move the cartridge toilet to the frunk. That way you don’t skunk up your living/sleeping area and it’d probably be a great conversation starter at the campsite.

Yzguy
Yzguy
23 days ago
Reply to  10001010

“Mommy, why is that man shi**ing on his engine?”

Ignatius J. Reilly
Ignatius J. Reilly
23 days ago
Reply to  Yzguy

I just got a vision of a cut scene from Beyond Thunderdome.

Rollin Hand
Rollin Hand
23 days ago
Reply to  Yzguy

“It must be a BMW, son, we’ve talked about this.”

Sammy B
Sammy B
23 days ago
Reply to  Yzguy

that gave me a genuine LOL. thanks 🙂

Nick Fortes
Nick Fortes
23 days ago
Reply to  10001010

just the seat folded up against the front of the truck and you fold it down and just shit into a bucket, kind of Top Gear style

D-dub
D-dub
23 days ago

No 4WD, short range, and an undersized bed make for a poor camper platform.

Icouldntfindaclevername
Icouldntfindaclevername
23 days ago
Reply to  D-dub

Thanks Debbie Downer

General_Idiocy27
General_Idiocy27
23 days ago

I hate it when pessimists are right.

D-dub
D-dub
23 days ago

I mean… *gestures at everything*

Bizness Comma Nunya
Bizness Comma Nunya
23 days ago
Reply to  D-dub

You are correct.

JurassicComanche25
JurassicComanche25
23 days ago
Reply to  D-dub

Why would 4wd be needed? Unless youre overlanding, most roads will be 2wd capable. And if a lotus can be a camper, why not a Slate? Ill give you range though.

Last edited 23 days ago by JurassicComanche25
Marc Fuhrman
Marc Fuhrman
23 days ago

Honestly, there’s way more 2WD RVs than 4WD ones. Pretty much every class A or C motorhomes had only two driven wheels.

Ottomottopean
Ottomottopean
23 days ago
Reply to  D-dub

Was it not said they were adding longer range batteries and additional motor for AWD later, after launch?

Utherjorge, who has grown cautiously optimistic
Utherjorge, who has grown cautiously optimistic
23 days ago
Reply to  Ottomottopean

I can’t find it, maybe it was here, but there was definitely a comment that there was space and a potential future plan to power the front wheels

Brandon Forbes
Brandon Forbes
23 days ago
Reply to  Ottomottopean

Supposedly there will be two battery packs, a 53 and 86 if I remember right, AWD is a maybe from what I’ve heard. It’s designed to allow it, but they haven’t confirmed they are planning for that.

Nick Fortes
Nick Fortes
23 days ago
Reply to  Ottomottopean

It is built to accept a front motor in the eventuality that they offer one

Nick Fortes
Nick Fortes
22 days ago
Reply to  The Bishop

One could only hope

57
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x