Some things in life are expected.
When I get a nudge at a dinner party from my spouse, it’s expected that the ride home will be ripe with harsh words about whatever it was I shouldn’t have said. When I take the ten-year-old remains of what was once a $100,000 German car to my mechanic, I expect that a sixty-dollar oil change has a solid chance of gaining a zero. Possibly two. There’s no way I’m ever going to get the keys back without forking over a bunch of extra dollars for something they “found.” It’s inevitable.


The Expected happened here at the Autopian last week when essentially eighty percent of the staff was working full-throttle on stories devoted to the Slate, that curious little EV pickup-slash-sport-ute backed by the guy who came up with Prime Day.

Each and every writer was going on and on about the pricing, options, online configurator, powertrain, and even suspension details of this new Slate truck, so it wasn’t hard to guess what was coming next. I didn’t have to wait long, as the Slack message appeared not long after the Slate news dropped:
Hey, it’s only natural to Camper All The Things here at this site, and I probably would have camperized the Slate without being prompted anyway. Besides, the designers of this rig (and especially of the accessories and trim) seem to be digging a disco-era vibe, and there’s a compact, space-efficient camper from this time period that hits the spot in terms of the look I know this crew is going for. Let’s summon the spirit of that classic recreation machine to make the perfect little EV camper out of this much-hyped little pickup.
More, More, More … How Do You Like It?
The 1970s’ design aesthetics were often so extreme and absurd that it’s easy for the retina-searing colors and lurid plaid upholsteries to make you miss some of the true innovation of the products that wore those garish looks at the time. Campers are certainly good examples of this.
As RVs go, General Motor’s 1973 GMC Motorhome still stands as possibly the GOAT design for self-propelled campers, even if you don’t like green interiors. What was green? Everything. Everything was green.


I tried to conceptualize updating this thing for the eighties, but it’s impossible to follow a masterpiece.
Want a different example? Well, it might have looked like Uncle Rico would be coming out the back door of this bubble-windowed curiosity, but the 1977 Champion Trans Van was a unique and even partially successful attempt to make a camper that could justify the investment needed to buy it by working as an everyday family vehicle as well.



I tried to update that for today as an EV-van-based daily driver camper:

Another ultra-disco-fantastic RV that just oozed unsurpassed thinking was the Chevy K5 Blazer Chalet and the nearly identical GMC Casa Grande. No, the modern $ 200,000-plus overlanding campers you see today are by no means a “new thing”; General Motors was there fifty years ago, as stated in their literature:
“Did you ever notice that the toughest places to get to usually turn out to be the nicest places to stay? Too bad you couldn’t have a neat little cabin right in the middle of it all. With a new Chevy Blazer Chalet, you’ve got it.”


Our Mercedes Streeter has written about these a few times already:
In the mid-1970s, General Motors decided to capitalize on the rise of off-roading and the boom of camping at the same time. Most motorhomes of the day were built on chassis that weren’t designed to leave the manicured parking spaces of a campground. GM teamed up with Chinook Mobilodge Inc., the maker of now-famous fiberglass Class C campers, to create a camper that a truck owner could take anywhere.

This thing looked like a magnificent Tonka toy come to life. Sounds to me like it had a full GM new-truck warranty on it, too; the only thing that I totally hate about it is the redundant use of taillights. Couldn’t they have just repositioned the original ones and put body-color plugs in the holes instead of wasting another set? There were probably people starving for GM Box Body lights in other parts of the world while these have just stayed dark for the last half century! Anyway, Mercedes continues:
Around 1,800 examples were made in 1976 and 1977 with most examples being the Chevrolet model….The campers started life at GM’s factory, where a stock Blazer or Jimmy would be built. The base truck would then be sent to Chinook, where the back wall of the cab would be removed. From there, Chinook bolted its camper body to what was left. This camper is made out of fiberglass with an inner steel frame for structure.
The was not a typical pickup bed camper; you couldn’t easily remove the thing from the back of the Blazer. However, if you were careful not the crack the fiberglass structure, you could ostensibly move it to another K5 once the base truck succumbed to Midwest winters by the late eighties.

There’s no bathroom, but you get a kitchenette with a sink plus a dinette that could convert to a two-person sleeper. Plus, the pop-top roof allows for six and a half feet of headroom. Fully equipped models had a refrigerator, propane stove, and furnace; they could even sleep two more people in bunks in bunks that fit in the pop-up area.


That’s a lot of camper for something only half a foot longer than a current Tahoe, and I bet it would work as a six-passenger daily driver in a rather convoluted way if need be. Can’t we have something like this today? Well, we’re still wearing out Boogie Shoes, so let’s not take them off just yet.
Draw That Funky Camper, White Boy
The retro-modern style of the Slate is similar enough to the “box” Chevy that something that looks almost exactly the same as the old Chalet camper would work here. I spec’d out a Slate on the configurator in the most seventies-looking graphics offered, including the strange color-stripe wheels. Adding black graphic accents behind the truck’s side windows let them visually follow the leaned-back shape of the camper over the cab and parallelogram-shaped windows of the camper that pay tribute to the old Chalet.

To hide the access doors and exhaust vents on the back of the camper, I just painted the whole area black. You’ll also notice that I do not have redundant taillights as on the original Blazer Chalet; the Bronco-looking stock fixtures from the Slate fit into recesses on BakPak’s tail. There’s also a third brake light above the door with white LEDs as well to act as a “porch light” or supplementary reversing light. Body-colored plugs would fill the rear side markers, which could get repositioned in the BakPak add-on.

Here’s one thing that a lot of people aren’t aware of when they look at pictures of this new Slate pickup: the thing is really small by today’s standards. It’s around two feet shorter than the Ford Maverick four-door unibody truck, but the people that go on forever about how “we need a little pickup the size of a 1980s Toyota or Nissan” will be happy to know that the Slate is exactly the same length of the smallest 1987 versions of those two standards.


What this means is that we have a lot less room to work with than on the K5. It’s around 9 inches narrower, and the “bed” is only five feet versus the Blazer’s six. Still, we can use the same layout as that you see in the pictures above of the Chalet with a few changes.
The BakPak camper would have a sink and stove kitchenette area like the Blazer Chalet, though it would get a bit more compact. The same holds true of the storage area on the other side of the camper, though I think that with today’s products, we could find a way to get an optional slide-out cartridge toilet in there somewhere. By far the biggest change would be with the dinette area. This would have to shrink down to a two-person restaurant-style space instead of the four accommodated by the Blazer, and the narrower width of the Slate means that it would only work as a sleeping area for one or two children.
The upper bunk area will be mandatory, created by folding out the mattress that usually sits on top of the Slate’s cab and letting it rest on built-in supports (which is why there are no windows above the windshield on the camper). You could still partially access the kitchenette and storage areas at the back when the mattress is deployed.
A rear-mounted spare tire is offered as an option on the Slate, but that will obviously block the camper’s door. The Blazer Chalet offered the solution of a front-mounted spare, though I don’t really like the look of that on the Slate, and would likely be sternly frowned upon by the NHTSA. Run flats are probably the way to go here.
Would this thing move under its own power? That’s a good question – but then again, the original Toyota Chinook camper only had around 100 horsepower to work with, and you know that several mini trucks back in the day got by on sub-60 horsepower diesel mills. Performance won’t be part of the game here by any means, but they had plenty of fun in the seventies and eighties going slow.
Is It The Right Clean Slate To Start With?
To make an inexpensive camper, you need to start with a cost-effective vehicle; the Slate just might be that machine to attract van-lifers who want something with a bit more room.
The only issue with our Slate camper is that, unlike the Blazer Chalet, it can only spin its rear wheels; you can forget any ideas you might have of going where the old K5 could. If you want to go off-roading, you’ll need to put the BakPak camper unit into the back of an old Japanese truck with four-wheel drive. Actually, those ancient pickups had six-foot beds instead of the Slate’s five-footer, so the BakPak might fit without even overhanging the back.
Anyone out there got a rust-free Nissan Hardbody or Marty McFly SR5 to spare?
How Our Daydreaming Designer Would Turn A Scion xB Into A Delightful Camper – The Autopian
How I’d Build The Ultimate Compact Motorhome Out Of An Electric Kia – The Autopian
Finally, The Galileo Shuttlecraft Amphibious Camper You’ve Waited Years For – The Autopian
Why not “rest in Slate”? Too grim, or too soon after Pope Francis?
I don’t know about camping, but the termite exterminator’s truck parked next to me looks like this.
I don’t think I’d want to be so range limited for my camping trips, but I feel like there are other use cases for this kind of setup.
In my town a lot of parents take their sprinter vans to their kids’ club sport activities, where they use them more as a mobile command center than a camper. During soccer practice, in between double-header baseball games, during long weekend sports tournaments or ski comps, etc. Any parent of a kid in a club sport will tell you there’s a crap ton of just waiting around. It’s pretty nice to have a comfy place to get some work done on your laptop, wait out a rainstorm, take a power nap, etc. It would be bonkers to spend six figures on a big van for this use case alone, but a 20k or 30k “bakpak” on a vehicle you already own seems more reasonable.
I’d still want the bigger battery and dual motor if they were available tho.
“40-50 miles range is useless”
Not so fast!
A friend annually takes his kids less than 10 miles away to the nearest campsite, where they get to sleep poorly in a pop-up tent trailer, roast mallows, get bitchy over burned food, walk around the site access road, complain and moan, then go back home the third day.
Why they don’t just camp out in their own backyard and walk the beautiful nature trail near their own house, I can’t figure out.
I do like the design of your “BakPak”, and I LOVE small trucks, but that said, I am ever so thankful thankful my non-helicopter parents were not camping inclined.
My brother in law did that same thing. Lived in rather rural Pennsylvania and didn’t want to kill time on driving that the kids hated anyway.
Kitchenette – Use a below-counter single-burner induction cooktop, and you have counterspace plus seamless cooking capability when you need it. Plus a below-counter microwave.
Seats – Use the similar concept for seating as you did for the 1980’s GMC Motorhome redux on a smaller scale: Four captain chairs that unfold and merge into two full-length beds lengthwise.
Front Light – Why can’t you have a forward facing window in the upper section that’s partially blocked when the upper berth is folded, but exposed when in use?
Pop-Top needs Solar panel array to trickle-charge the batteries.
Skip the toilet – Just include a little shovel so you can go out into the woods and bury your shit.
The front window would, unfortunately, be so low as to be mainly blocked by the bedding, and even if not if would mainly be at your feet. It would make the outside look better, though.
Okay – Then a window-shaped solar panel to augment the roof panels
Would’ve been better as a full on van. Make the shape based on the chevy and ford vans of the 80s, but give it the benefits of the Slate truck to make a seemingly nice side companion to the Slate truck, just only with way more cargo…..
That heavy camper means the 150 mile range probably reduces to 100 miles of highway range. You’ll want some margin/power to run accessories if you like camping away from sites with power.
This means you can only camp 40-50 miles away from home. That’s a commute for most Americans, not a camping trip. Totally useless.
Mine is not to question “why”. I was told to make a camper, and make a camper I did; your points are valid.
Fair enough! None of the issues are related to the camper, just the inherent limitations of the Slate platform.
Sorry the proportions look off. It looks like AI combined a Datsun with a land Rover taking the worst parts from each.
Of course it’s “off”. Look at the Blazer Chalet I was copying; it’s got more rear overhang than a platypus. Actually it looks like a snail.
They used to put boxes on the old mini trucks like the uhaul couriers and Toyotas. I’m not sure I ever saw an RV courier but definitely RV Toyota truck. It definitely needs a rex it seems like someone could throw a little diesel engine or a scooter engine with a generator under it.
Like this?
https://dailyturismo.com/u-haul-theme-1978-ford-courier/
Yep but less stupid looking and cheaper
So I’d like to know where, you got the notion
Said I’d like to know where, you got the notion
To rock the boat (don’t rock the boat, baby)
Rock the boat (don’t tip the boat over)
Rock the boat (don’t rock the boat, baby)
Rock the boat
The video is spectacular. I particularly like the side to side by the guy on the left. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKr9wZpjBqE&ab_channel=TopPop
So, a small truck camper. Just without the ability to get you to a campsite.
But with a passthrough from the cab, which is the big downside of truck campers!
So you can easily crawl in the back for a nap while you’re charging 70 miles from home, 30% of the way to your campsite.
Is there a range extending ICE generator somewhere in this thing, or does that get pulled on a trailer?
Now do the Telo!
It’s a more efficient use of the space!
Wow, the configurator website is terrible.
I love this idea. I know something similar has been done for the jeep wrangler. Now for the Slate, Maverick, Bronco. etc.
I was pretty disappointed with the options on the site, considering how much more they could have offered.
The little thumbnails with no information for the trims was not helpful.
Yeah, the website makes the whole thing look unlikely.
150 miles of range…before the camper is installed. Let’s say 100 miles of range. That will not work as a camper.
If the slate had 4wd, a manual, and a turbo-4 engine, sign me the heck up.
Couple thoughts:
Looks great but for the 70’s aesthetic white wheels would be better.
I still don’t get the idea of grafting camper shells onto trucks for “overlanding expeditions” ie camping. Here’s my Slate Camper: Dirtbag Edition:
Then you can drive (but not too far because you’re range-limited) to your desired campsite. Pee on trees. Learn how to poop responsibly in the backcountry. Have fun. Make memories. Spend the $5k to $50k you just saved on more adventures.
Many of my best family memories are from camping trips with my family (mom, dad, two sisters, the best dog ever, and me) out of a ’74 VW bus towing a small trailer filled with dusty, well-used camping gear. You don’t need an expensive “rig” to get out there and enjoy nature. You just need a willingness to put up with the potential for minor discomfort and the understanding that there is no bad weather, just inappropriate gear choices.
this is the way
I’d add a couple of steps, particularly for busy holiday weekends:
7. Park it in a ditch, and walk up a hill to set up camp in a nice spot away from the road
8. Laugh as the clowns with roof top tents, campers, etc struggle to find a level spot to park, and have to pack up and re-setup every day if they go anywhere with their vehicle, spending much of their time just dealing with their overly complicated rigs
Very close to my method. I liked my topper on my last truck, I just had a small screen tent, a couple of folding chairs, a roll-up table, an air mattress, a cooler, and a stove ready to go in the garage. Packing took maybe 30 minutes and I was on the road. For the other 50 weeks a year, I still had a usable truck.
Same deal now, but no topper, so I use my backpacking tent.
One thing you haven’t accounted for is that the bulkhead between the front cabin and the bed is designed to be removed for the SUV versions – so you have a few more inches to play with there. And if the front seats can fully recline you could either sleep on those, or build some sort of sliding mechanism to make beds that extended over the top of them into the front area. That might give some more options?
Not really a camper, but as far as high roofs go, I was thinking (and figure it was highly likely it had been mentioned somewhere already) a high roof shell for the back would give it a very Matra Rancho type of appearance. Especially keeping the standard roof over the front seats with the roof rack over it.
For the front spare – I suppose the frunk could be adapted to carry it, might need a different drop-in well. At first I thought of an old Land Rover-style exposed hood-mount but that definitely wouldn’t be any more NHTSA-friendly.
Yeah, I tried that too but it blocked half the windshield, not to mention you’d never get the frunk open.
I only have one suggestion to make, move the cartridge toilet to the frunk. That way you don’t skunk up your living/sleeping area and it’d probably be a great conversation starter at the campsite.
“Mommy, why is that man shi**ing on his engine?”
I just got a vision of a cut scene from Beyond Thunderdome.
“It must be a BMW, son, we’ve talked about this.”
that gave me a genuine LOL. thanks 🙂
just the seat folded up against the front of the truck and you fold it down and just shit into a bucket, kind of Top Gear style
No 4WD, short range, and an undersized bed make for a poor camper platform.
Thanks Debbie Downer
I hate it when pessimists are right.
I mean… *gestures at everything*
I already said that I read the detailed specs of this thing after making the camper, and I’d rather put it in an old Hilux
You are correct.
Why would 4wd be needed? Unless youre overlanding, most roads will be 2wd capable. And if a lotus can be a camper, why not a Slate? Ill give you range though.
Honestly, there’s way more 2WD RVs than 4WD ones. Pretty much every class A or C motorhomes had only two driven wheels.
Was it not said they were adding longer range batteries and additional motor for AWD later, after launch?
I can’t find it, maybe it was here, but there was definitely a comment that there was space and a potential future plan to power the front wheels
Supposedly there will be two battery packs, a 53 and 86 if I remember right, AWD is a maybe from what I’ve heard. It’s designed to allow it, but they haven’t confirmed they are planning for that.
It is built to accept a front motor in the eventuality that they offer one
A front motor? You mean like a 1981 Toyota 4 cylinder?
One could only hope