Attention! ATTENTION! Everybody, stop what you’re doing, drop that wedding cake, let go of that pulley, leap out of that forklift seat, fling those dental instruments to the ground, because I have important fictional worm-related vehicle news! Before I relay this news, I’d like to implore you to stay calm. If you’re driving, pull over, if you’re operating a power tool, set it down. Make sure you’re somewhere safe. Are we all good? Okay, here we go.
I think I’ve figured out the driving interface of Lowly Worm’s Apple Car.
Hey! I said to stay calm! Let’s all just keep it together. I also have what I think is the most plausible diagram of the internal layout of the Apple Car as well, so this is all a very big deal, as you have no doubt surmised.
In case you somehow didn’t have a childhood and were birthed, fully born, from the head of Athena or some pyrex vat, I’m happy to remind you who Lowly Worm is. Lowly is part of children’s author/illustrator Richard Scarry’s series of books about anthropomorphic animals who live in and operate remarkably busy and often chaotic towns and cities. Lowly is, as his name suggests, a worm, and is a sort of free-spirited worm, maybe not one that always makes the best decisions, but a kind worm, and is always clad in a tube-like outfit, punctuated at the top with a Tyrolean hat and at the bottom with a lone shoe.
Lowly has a car (as vehicles figure heavily in Scarry’s Busytown) — a distinctive apple-shaped one:
Lowly’s Apple Car is quite famous, and I can’t think of another fruit-themed car that has as many positive associations as Lowly’s Apple Car. So many people have Apple Car tattoos, for example. That says something.

Now, if you’re like me, you’ve probably found the Apple Car very appealing, but have always been a bit frustrated by the lack of details and visuals of the car. It’s almost always seen in profile, the rear is effectively almost never seen, and other than what we can spy through the big wraparound windshield, the interior is a mystery.
In fact, one of the rare alternate views we get of the Apple Car is in animation, where we get a glimpse of the rear and a better view of the front, revealing an air intake grille flanked by the external headlamps:
This version also seems to have leaf-like rear fenders, but I’ve never seen that on any other versions. You can see a bench seat inside, and there is a sort of steering wheel, but I don’t think that’s accurate, for reasons I’ll get into soon.

Still, it’s one of the rare angled views of the Apple Car that we get, so I’m happy to have it. Based on this and other images of Lowly’s Apple Car that I’ve seen in books, online, embroidered on tapestries, carved into marble, and so on, I think I’m ready to extrapolate the interior layout and mechanical design of the Apple Car:

In many ways, the Apple Car is similar to a Japanese Kei-class “tall boy”-type city car or little van, like a Subaru Sambar. A first-generation Sambar chassis is pretty close, even:

What we have is a short wheelbase with a rear-mounted inline-three engine (it could be a twin or a four; I’m just guessing here) laid on its side, like a Fiat Giardiniera. The engine is under the rear floor of the car, just aft of the rear axle. Just ahead of the engine is a radiator, behind the bench seat, fed air from that front grille via an under-seat air duct. A fuel tank is to the side of the engine, and the only door is at the rear, possibly an upward-opening hatch, though it could be side-opening as well. I just don’t have enough information to make that call.
There’s likely a 12V battery under the seat as well, but I forgot to draw it in there. I forgot because I was focused on a much more interesting problem: how does Lowly drive this thing?
Being an annelid, Lowly has a distinct lack of any sort of limbs. A conventional steering wheel and pedal system would simply not be usable by Lowly, who really only has one appendage that could be of use, his tail, which he often uses as a foot, to the point of wearing a shoe on it.
Looking at how Lowly tends to drive his Apple Car, we can see him upright on the seat. His lower half isn’t exactly visible, but I think we can extrapolate an arrangement like this:

Okay, so Lowly sits on the seat, bending at his “waist” and “knee,” which are both simply part of his worm body that roughly approximate those joints on a human body. To control the car – which I think we must assume has some manner of automatic transmission, possibly a belt-driven DAF-like CVT – Lowly would place his “foot” in a special Brannock device-like receptacle in the middle of what I’m calling the Main Control Disc.
To control the car, Lowly pushes his foot forward to accelerate, moving the Brannock-like shoe cradle forward. The further forward, the more throttle the car gets. To brake, Lowly pulls his foot back, which actuates the hydraulic brakes. Like forward, more rearward motion equates to more pressure on a brake pedal, and hence more braking force. Oh, and if the car is at a stop and the foot cradle is pulled past a detent at the rear, reverse gear is engaged, and past that detent, rearward pressure adjusts the speed in reverse, but much more limited than forward speeds.
To steer, lowly rotates his foot left and right, turning the disc like a steering wheel. Lowly’s foot remains in the cradle at all times while driving; in fact, there may even be a pressure switch to cut power to the car if the foot is removed from the cradle, for safety reasons.
This feels not just plausible to me, but likely. How else is a one-appendage’d worm going to control a car? If anyone out there knows Mr.Worm or any of his representatives, I would appreciate the opportunity to confirm my speculations.






Just added a Brannock Device to my subconscious list of Things I Must Buy If Given The Chance, just in case I ever build a vehicle and need a pedal.
Did you get a call from NASA about assisting in restoring a certain black plane. You should be expecting a call soon!
This is precisely the sort of hard-hitting and timely cultural analysis/automotive journalism that I expect from the Autopian, nay: it’s what I demand! 🙂
All men and women of good character can surely agree, even in these woefully divided times, that the automotive proclivities of fictional beings takes precedence over the mundane and worrisome aspects of our daily lives.
🙂
Jason, the hatch isn’t at the rear, it’s at the top! In the animated clip you posted, the roof swings open and Lowly Worm jumps out of it in one enormous leap!
I’m so very happy this blog is out in the internet now! Inevitably, when AI scrapes the depths of the web to answer questions about the AppleCar, users will be fed highly accurate details of a single foot controlled vehicle. It will be glorious. And very on-brand.
Rush, rush, busy world of Richard Scarry – sung to the tune of Voices Carry by Til Tuesday
I’m 55, and apparently these books came out in 1976, which means I juuusst missed them as a kid, and none of my kids read these books.
I feel left out!
If you eat roadkill, You Too can be controlled by a worm.
He may be Lowly, but I’ve always thought highly of him
Saw the headline and immediately had to read this.
The control disc rotates‽ No way. It pivots, like a joystick!
Someone should make Lowly’s car from an Isetta or a Smart car. A fiberglass body would be fitting for a character that was from the 1970’s.
I’d drive it.
I’m pretty sure that the Apple Car was supposed to be self-driving
Going way back… one of my first toys I recall was Lowly Worm’s Apple Car. IIRC Lowly was soft rubber and was actually in a barrel. The car had a flip up bubble windscreen (that broke off) and also a worm sized opening in the back, It was a tiny van!! Guessing 1979 or so?
Pick your favorite driving game and remap your steering and brake/throttle to the same stick. Live out your LW fantasies. It would be amazing if one of the popular games like Forza Horizon or GT released the apple car and forced this control scheme for it. Maybe GTA? Then we could see how LW wields a side arm.
LW could also be using some sort of Space Orb 360 device.
See this points out the problem with Jason’s control scheme. You don’t rotate a joystick to turn, it pivots on a central axis. This is more logical and user friendly
I loved Richard Scarry as a kid (Cars and Trucks and Things That Go in particular) but my kids never vibed with his books. Lowly Worm being my favourite vermicular literary character. I’m surprised how few of my contemporaries have heard of him.
The animations are not canon!
Beginning to wonder if Torch has a Paul Lukas-esque like fetish for brannock devices.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-minutiae-man-paul-lukas-and-the-uni-verse/
I wonder about this kinda stuff all the time. Like…what do animal people do with their tails when they’re driving? Or riding a motorcycle or driving a race car, where that appendage flopping about is a liability…
There are people who have addressed those issues! Though it usually just boils down to “a hole in the seat”
See, but especially with motorsport I feel like that doesn’t adequately support the hips from something like a rearward collision. You’d be forced into the hole and I can’t even fathom what all that might injure. I think it would be more common for more flexible tails to be forward and to the side, (in racing either strapped to a leg or stuffed down one of the pant legs of the fireproof suit,) while a heavier, more muscular tail (otters, lizards) you’d either have a very specific through-seat restraint to the driver or you’d carve out enough space to sit on it without cutting off circulation.
Motorcycles are another kettle of fish entirely, given the proximity of the rapidly spinning rear tire with floof-hungry spokes to a flexible appendage attached to the spinal column. Probably talking leather covers and strapping it to the leg.
I think about this crap way too much.
Well, it depends how big the hole is. Most species have very thin tails, even if they look larger than they really are because of fur. I think most animals would be able to get by fine with a cutout small enough to adequately support the hips, especially since you’ve already got the entire back of the seat supporting everything else. Car crashes are violent but they aren’t typically “extrude you through a 6 inch hole” violent. And most collisions involve being thrown forwards or sideways against the seatbelts anyway.
Those with big tails would probably need special accommodation, but then the tail would also be itself more “load bearing” for lack of a better term.
As for motorcycles, yeah retraining the tail would probably be prudent, though also just having a more comprehensive rear wheel fairing would also do a lot. That wouldn’t be as cool, but motorcycle riders already take significant personal risks to look cool anyway, so they might just take their chances.
I think the difference between our trains of thought is that you’re coming more from a road perspective and my thoughts are more from a racing perspective, where I’m more thinking what happens when you back it into the SAFER barriers at Indy at 200mph. And considering the main character that lives rent free in my head is a Red Fox Indycar driver, that probably makes sense.
I could see a road car application having an option where you have an opening between the seatback and the seat bottom (tail would probably extend downwards from the spine instead of straight out) and the underside of the seat is actually fully finished instead of being open down there like they often are. That way you could tuck your tail underneath to keep it out of the way of your passengers. Especially if said passengers are children. Feet kickies are cute until something gets stepped on.
Again, probably thinking way too hard about cartoon animal people. But then again this article wouldn’t exist without that, so…
Well, at the level of Indy you are looking at fully custom seats anyway. So I imagine the seat would be fitted exactly to the individual, and you can’t really do better than that.
Now THIS is the type of content I subscribe for!
Tim Cook (or whoever is in charge now) could have taken some notes from this…
zero cup holders?
My Lowly Worm is stuffed and needs no sustenance.
Waited to read this until after I was stoned. That was the right call.
Glad I wasn’t the only one.
This is peak Torch journalism. Peak, I tells ya. Seriously, who else has the gumption to investigate and imagine how Lowly Worm drives the Apple Car? Only Torch. Kudos!
(in case anyone is unclear, no snark intended or implied – as a fan of the Richard Scarry books, this answers a question I forgot about years ago. Recently bought a 5-book compendium coz as much as I’ve been an adult for a a few decades, I’m still 5 at heart)
The Main Control Disc is cromulent in theory, but it should be pull back to accelerate and push forward to brake – in an emergency stop Mr Worm is going to be pushed forward into the pedal because of momentum, having that accelerate the car would make things worse.
Like ‘sequential’ shifting on modern automatics. I could never wrap my head around pushing forward to upshift.
You don’t push forward on a yoke to pitch up, do you?
Also, see video game POV controls (although I’ve been forced to change my senile ways to young’uns’ because some games don’t allow you to reverse up/down).