You know how a page is a sort of a window? Think about it: an illustration on a page has boundaries, contained by the physical borders of the page itself. In that sense, a physical page with an illustration is like a window into the artists’s vision, and whatever is beyond the boundaries of that page may be suggested by the art contained within the borders, but we don’t truly know.
We can speculate, though! No one can stop us from doing that, even though they’d love to, oh you know they would just love to keep us from seeing what’s beyond the thin fragile edges of those pages, but they can’t, you see, they can’t because they didn’t count on our tenacity and determination when it comes to looking at old car brochures and imagining what is going on just out of frame.
I’m not going to lie; there are a lot of people out there who would love to see me cower from, say, looking at this 1956 Opel Olympia brochure and just pretending like I’m not wondering what is happening just beyond the edges. They would love it if I never cast my eyes to the edges of these pages, never tried to process and infer the hidden goings-on in the no-space outside of the pages. But they’ll just have to be disappointed, because that is not what I’m going to do.
Let’s start with the image that got me thinking about all this:

Okay, that’s a page from the brochure, showing, as so many brochures love to do, just how much you can cram in the car’s trunk. But what feels weird is the position of the arms placing that last suitcase in as that fancy lady wearing a yellow dog bowl on her head looks on. The car isn’t that high off the ground; those arms at about knee-level for her? Really, the only way I can make sense of the position of those arms is if this is what was happening:

Someone is either leaping headlong to cram that suitcase in there rapidly, or floating about 14 inches above the ground to leisurely place the suitcase in there. Either way, those arms have to be attached to someone who is currently quite horizontal.
Let’s look at another one of these:

Here we see another view of the handsome Olympia, this time with the trunk closed, but likely soon to be open, as we see luggage approaching from two fronts: one a dapper fella in a suit, and then, mostly cut off, a kid, holding at least one suitcase. The Olympia’s lovely ribbed amber-and-red taillamps are on full display here, looking either like colorful gnocchi or a pair of caterpillars, maybe cocoons. Anyway, let’s extrapolate the rest of this image:

I knew it! There are some violations of child labor laws happening here! That kid can’t be more than, what, six, and look at all the crap they’re piling on them! I bet that kid hardly gets any breaks, too! This is atrocious; I’m reporting this to the Automotive Brochure Illustrated Child Welfare Bureau! This will not stand!
There’s another one, too:

Finally, we get to see the front of the damn car! Look at that smug Opel-pilot tooling through that exciting downtown, wet roads reflecting the city’s lights! But what is that business he seems to be driving away from?

Oh, right, it’s the famous European institution, FUCKN R! It’s basically like central Germany’s Dave & Buster’s, where you can go to get lit on schnapps and play unsettlingly realistic versions of Whack-a-Mole that use real, taxidermied moles. Sometimes the machines pump red-food-coloring-doped Karo syrup to act as blood, making the games a genuinely terrifying spectacle.

I don’t have a beyond-the-borders expansion of this lovely page of engine/suspension diagrams and inside looks at brake drums and transmissions. I just really like these illustrations. That drivetrain looks so oddly skeletal, though?









Well, the 1st one that lady is actually the gas station attendant who has already cut off the car owner’s arms since gas costs “an arm and a leg”…and apparently a suitcase full of cocaine.
The second one that dude and kid are secretly screaming in their mind: “Come on lady, open the trunk! We’re holding/dragging all this shit…OPEN THE FUCKING TRUNK RIGHT NOW!”
The 3rd one that smug dude just did a smoky burnout in front of that crowd and they are thinking “Damn, that was fucking badass, I want a car like that “FUCKN R”ight now!
OH! Also, that first photo I’m surprised you didn’t mention that it could have been a midget! Err…I mean little people.
Made me think of this, ha ha
KRAMER: (to Mickey) I told you, you should offer him some cigarettes.
MICKEY: I offered him cigarettes, (to Jerry and George) but his stupid mother is hanging around. She won’t let him have any.
KRAMER: (to Mickey) What about lifts?
MICKEY: (to Kramer) Out of the question.
GEORGE: (to Mickey) Can’t you just switch with another Midget?
(Mickey grabs the counter with rage on his face, Jerry does a form of gulp)
MICKEY: (turns and moves up to George, points his finger at him) It’s little people, you got that?
KRAMER: Easy Mickey, easy.
FUCKN A was a copyrighted establishment so they had to change one letter
Definitely a Duck Amuck homage.
That’s actually a pretty attractive car for that era. I was in grade school when they started selling Kadett Bs and the very cool Opel GT in the States.
The Wikipedia article on Opel is fascinating. Starting out as a manufacturer of sewing machines, they became the first German car company to build vehicles on a mass-production assembly line. They even had the world’s first rocket program back in the 1920s! Now that we are in the 2020s, I guess we can no longer assume that “the 20s” are from the last century.
I immediately saw the first one as the person attached to the arms having catastrophically tripped and the ‘56 Olympia having the generous trunk opening to save the day
I’m disappointed you didn’t flesh out the last page. I’m pretty sure that driveshaft connects to a rusty old thresher on David’s LA urban farm.
He is pulling it out, previously had his feet on the bumper as the suitcase was full of lead and hard to remove.
Jason: Sometimes you scare me with your, umm, unusual perspective. Other times I just chalk it up as too much LSD at Berkeley. Either way aways entertaining.
Counterpoint: it scares me that it only sometimes scares you.
Ha, that brochure image of the kid loading the Olympia’s trunk predates Harvey Comics (best known for their Richie Rich and Casper the Friendly Ghost comic books) publishing a comic book about a bellhop named…Billy Bellhops. (Only *one* issue was ever published; arguably that was one too many even though that issue had “…THE WILDEST STORY YOU’LL EVER READ.”)
https://misterkitty.net/extras/stupidcovers/stupidcomics125.html
I got a kick out of that. Thanks!
I like the corded seat upholstery in that 2nd pic!
I imagine an “E” behind the stoplight, and assume the establishment is named “Fuckner”.
Jason there is another explanation for the first picture it called a suitcase deep knee bend. I am surprised you aren’t familiar with these things as they were taught years ago in grade school gym class. Indeed performing 20 of these without getting a slipped disk would qualify you for the President’s All-America Team. Sadly they are no longer taught as they are contraindicated. Pansies.
Still bitter about missing out on that presidents award…
Germans were once pretty good at hiding what went on beyond borders.
Maybe they still are? We wouldn’t know…
While in the first illustration it’s fun to think of the arms-guy floating, the situation is a bit uglier than that. The bumper is at least a foot high, so the horizontal arms are at least two feet off the ground, which if the arms are bent puts the shoulder around three feet. The guy is kneeling. Her Ladyship Of The Canine Comestible Accessory is making him kneel while overstuffing that trunk. Disgusting. Unless it’s consensual of course, in which case carry on!
Was this the first of the Carry On movie series?
That third illustration contains one of the enduring conceits of automotive advertising, where the blandest vehicular wallpaper has pedestrians gawking in wonder. Look at the people almost leaning off the curb to stare, and the guy in the background whipping his head around for a look before the fabulous Olympia disappears from view.
This was fairly early in the Wirtschaftwunder, so a snazzy new car with slab-sided style that looked like a three-quarter scale Yank tank would catch more eyes than one might think in these jaded times.
Well dressed orang pendek.
How to raise a bellhop.
The wave sent from the puddle has settled.
Shear pottery.
Proper ventilation is required.
In the last picture, I assume Opel Engine Blue is a thing but all of the components in green or beige in the illustration are painted black or left in bare metal (maybe the fan blades are plastic, but probably not yet in ’56) on the real car?
The CAD system I mostly used to design car parts, CATIA, used to colour everything in a similar assortment of pastel and primary colours, rather than a more realistic set of greys.
I assume this brochure is the inspiration behind the software.
A friend of a friend worked for Dassault Systèmes on their SOLIDWORKS 3D CAD software. That software is fun to play with.
Solidworks is a buggy, crashy mess. But it is easy to learn.
I just wish it didn’t do things like crash because you pressed save just in case it crashes again.
It’s not any better than CATIA’s “click OK to terminate” button, but it happens all the time. And what’s with it randomly changing my view settings when I open assemblies? Urgh.
2D in SW is just awful too. It encourages new users to get first angle and third angle projection mixed up on the same drawing. And would it really be so hard for dimension leader lines to recognise text leaders and break for them?
Genuine question: do the Dassault SW team know about the Dassault CATIA team? Why do they both have great features that the other lacks? And terrible bugs that the other lacks?
It seems so French. Like PSA making weirdly flawed Citroens and differently weirdly flawed Peugeots.
There is a perfect CAD system in there somewhere.
My friend’s friend has moved on to a different (non-CAD) software company, so I don’t know.
I knew a guy (long-retired now) who worked for Boeing and he was griping about how they had so many different platforms that weren’t really compatible with each other. It sounded messy.
I never had a job using CAD of any sort. I’ve just seen demos and we all know how true-to-life those are.
I’ve used loads of CAD systems, enough to become expert in at least five of them, and sometimes, on the right system, modelling the right geometry almost feels like flying, it’s amazing.
And the the next minute you’re screaming at the screen because it won’t do a feature that you could create in seconds on a real block of steel using a file.
Fuckn R, man.
They phased out the real, taxidermied moles as they wore out in the early ’90s. Their source of cheap East German mole taxidermists dried up.
Good for the moles!
But then the out-of-work mole taxidemists took up taxidermying…never mind.
Fuckn R Us
… Where a perv can be a perv?