It’s impossible to talk about modern cars without addressing the elephant in the parking lot: full-size crew-cab pickups. These behemoths have taken the place of family sedans for a lot of people, for better or worse, and they sell so well that they’re going to be part of the used car landscape for a very long time. So I guess I had better get used to writing about them.
Yesterday’s cars were the polar opposite of big pickup trucks when it comes to fuel economy. Hybrids are here to stay in the used car market as well, and I feel like my knowledge of them is lacking. I need to brush up on these things. I had no idea that the third-generation Prius was less reliable than the others. Even so, most of you trusted it more than the upstart Hyundai, and gave it an easy win.
I think that’s the way to go. You don’t buy a car like this because it’s cool, or fun to drive. You buy it to rack up as many miles as possible while stopping for fuel as few times as possible, and absolutely no vehicle on the planet does that better than a Toyota Prius. If I still had to commute, which thankfully I don’t, a good used Prius would be a solid choice.

Love them or hate them, trucks are an inescapable part of the landscape on US roads. And nearly all of them are full-size models with four doors and a shortish bed. Proponents like to say you can “do anything” with such a truck, but parking them is a pain in the ass, most garages are not built for them, and their fuel economy is mediocre at best. So why do so many people choose them over a sedan or a crossover? Honestly, I’m not sure. But let’s take a closer look at these two, and see if we can find the appeal.
2011 Ram 1500 Big Horn Edition – $6,999

Engine/drivetrain: 5.7-liter OHV V8, five-speed automatic, 4WD
Location: Portland, OR
Odometer reading: 146,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
If you look at this and think, “That’s a Dodge truck,” you’re not alone. Chrysler’s decision to split its pickup trucks off into a separate brand called Ram in 2010 was just plain silly. However silly the name is, the trucks are all business. Chrysler cracked the code on the pickup market in 1994 and has been refining that formula ever since. This generation of Ram pickup was so successful that it remained in production as the “Ram 1500 Classic” for five years after it was supposedly replaced by a new generation.

The most important question when it comes to any Ram pickup is, of course, “That thing got a Hemi?” In this case, yes, in fact, it does. The 5.7-liter Hemi V8 is not without its faults, but it does make a healthy amount of power and torque, and it sounds really good. Here, it’s backed by a five-speed automatic (a Chrysler design, not the Mercedes-designed transmission in the LX/LD sedans) and drives all four wheels. This truck runs and drives great, the seller says, though in the interest of full disclosure, it does have a salvage title from a previous accident. It’s probably worth getting it inspected to make sure everything’s in good shape.

There’s a little wear inside, but it’s not bad at all. It’s a pretty fancy truck, with leather seats, and it has an aftermarket stereo with Apple CarPlay and an annoyingly large touch screen. Well, it’s annoyingly large to me, anyway; some people like that sort of thing.

The outside looks good too; I can’t see any evidence of the damage at a glance, except that I think the trim piece between the grille and the front bumper is supposed to be body color. I guess you could paint it if it bothered you. The dent in the rear bumper, though, you’re required to leave. Every pickup truck should have a dent or two somewhere.
2013 Ford F-150 FX4 SuperCrew – $6,999

Engine/drivetrain: Twin-turbocharged 3.5-liter OHC V6, six-speed automatic, 4WD
Location: Portland, OR
Odometer reading: 173,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
Here it is, the best-selling vehicle in the US since the end of the Pleistocene Era: the Ford F-series. Ford sells about 800,000 of these things a year on average, or one every 40 seconds or so. In the time it took you to read about the Ram truck above, Ford sold a dozen more trucks. It’s ridiculous. No wonder you see them everywhere. This is the twelfth generation of F-series trucks, which ran from 2009 to 2014. It’s now two generations old. Gone are the days when a manufacturer could keep the same truck in production for a decade or more – unless you’re talking about the Chevy Express, which may just stay in production forever.

Gone also are the days when a full-size truck needs to have a giant V8 in it. This F-150 is powered by Ford’s 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6. It’s twin-turbocharged and makes an astonishing 365 horsepower and 420 pound-feet of torque. My sister-in-law has an F-150 with this engine in it. I’ve driven it a few times, and it definitely has no shortage of power. It drives a 4WD system through a six-speed automatic transmission. This truck has 173,000 miles on it, and the seller (the same seller as the Dodge, I’m pretty sure) says it runs great.

This one has a little wear inside as well, but hardly anything worth mentioning. These F-150s aren’t particularly luxurious inside; there’s a lot of hard plastic, and the seat fabric feels a bit institutional, but it all does what it’s supposed to do, and the seats are pretty comfortable.

It’s in good condition outside, but it’s a shame it’s white. White trucks are so common among contractor fleets that I don’t know why anyone would choose one as a “civilian” truck. It just disappears into the landscape. Or maybe that’s the idea; a white Ford F-150 is about the most nondescript vehicle there is these days. If, for whatever reason, you don’t want to be noticed, you could do a lot worse.
Actually, I think trucks like these are going to make a lot of sense as cheap beaters in the years to come. They’re sturdy, almost overbuilt in some cases, and they’re plentiful enough that finding parts is never going to be a problem. Sure, you’ll use more gas than you would with a smaller vehicle, but you’ll also have a lot of room and capability to play with. Just please, if you’re going to drive one, learn how to park it properly; that’s all I ask. Which one of these seems like a better deal to you?









My former FIL (divorce, long story, blah, blah, blah) had one of these Fords. I didn’t have a pickup, bjt when I needed one, I used his.
It reeked of the chew tobacco he spat when done, into a cup in the cupholder.
So, for those unpleasant memories, I went with the Dodge. Even though I blame them for making pickups overly expensive and huge lethal vehicles.
Both tempting trucks at decent prices. First the negatives: Dodge : salvage title , 5.7L lifter tick (definitely need to check that) and why do these era Trucks rust in the rear wheel well areas.(thankfully PNW vehicle)
Ford: 3.4L complex engine (better than the 2.7L in reliability but still complex, White (blah), a little wear.
All in all, both decent trucks
Since I have the 1960’s version of the F150 crewcab (a coach-built ’64 F00) and a ’91 F350 longbed dually crewcab, I guess I need one in the middle, an F150? Well, it is much larger than my ’64, so it counts? Right!
My vote goes to the Dodge since it has less mileage and that 5 speed auto with the Hemi is known to be a solidly reliable/durable combo.
I’ll take the Ford. I don’t mind strangers asking me if I can cut their grass.
Need to know a lot more about why the Dodge had a salvage title to even consider it. Sure the bodywork looks good, but a good sheetmetal guy can put some pretty fine looking lipstick on the ugliest of pigs.
I think it was front end damage. As Mark said these should have a body color front lip between the bumper and grille. Only the base trucks had a black trim.
Front end damage bad enough to total out the truck? That would almost certainly be frame/engine mount damage which is a big ol’ nope.
Probably not enough to damage engine mounts but the front end + radiator and support are the most exposed items. Those were what totaled my truck which was the same generation as this one.
I’m torn. I hate the Ram partly for what I believe was this model’s role beginning back in the 90s, the start of an obnoxious tall-front-grill shootout between full sized trucks. This year was no exception.
The F150 at least isn’t quite so deliberately obnoxious.
That said, I do like that the Ram has the possibility to sit three across. There are times when one does use that legal* six-passenger capacity, as I did way back in the day with my old split-bench Taurus GL.
Naw. Still stickin’ with Ford. All those buyers every year can’t be wrong, right?
_______
*as opposed to tossing folks in the truck bed and hoping Officer Friendly doesn’t need to have a word with you.
V-8 in pleather is tempting, but going with the clean title Ford.
Generally if there’s a salvage title, no buy so that tilts the choice to the Ford straight off. Too bad the Ford won’t take E85, my neighbor’s FX2 from similar vintage does seem to take it but must have a different engine. E85 has been a lifesaver over the last month or so in my flex fuel vehicle.
The 5.0 V8s can run on E85.
Hate the interior on those F150s, they’re so damn cheap looking and feeling. But I like the 3.5 Ecoboost. So we’ll do that one.
so true, Ram had the interior dialed in with this generation. But that was only on the Laramies and above with the full stitched dash and extra door padding. My Tradesman was as proletarian inside as an Express Van