Someone Help Me Identify This Chunk Of A Van Submerged In The LA River Before I Go Nuts

Pasted

There’s something about the challenge of identifying cars by tiny pieces that clamps onto my attention and holds, ferociously, like a Pomeranian on a dropped hot dog. Yesterday I was feeling pretty smug because I just identified four really obscure cars procured by our partner Beau (more on those soon!) from just taillight pictures, so I was pretty cocky when I encountered this challenge: identifying part of a van in a river. And it kicked my ass brutally, and I think with some glee. So now I want your help, Autopians. We can’t let river van win.

The van came to my attention via the Twitter account of my friend Emily (who is an absurdly talented tinkerer and builder of things, just so you know) who noticed the van-chunk as it was revealed in an unusually low LA river:

We don’t get to see much of the van at all; in fact, what’s not hidden by water appears to have been partially bisected by either human hands wielding a Sawzall or the bite of a terrifyingly large kaiju of some kind. So, we’re really only dealing with, like, 1/8th of a van here, at best. [Editor’s note: Looks like more than 1/8. Also “bisect” means split in half. I’m going with 1/3 of a van, here. -DT]

Still, that should be enough to identify this. As I said, I just identified several obscure cars based on about six square inches of area [Editor’s note: Enough with the bragging! How many days of this will I have to endure?! -DT]. This should be possible! And yet, it’s proving very difficult, mostly because of one key detail.

The detail is this stamping right there, as indicated by the arrow. It’s the place where a window would be punched out in passenger versions of this van, but as this seems to have been a cargo version, it wasn’t. It’s a common thing to see on panel vans. Here’s a similar one on a GMC Savana/Chevy Express:

Same idea, but not the same van, as you can see that one in the river there is a much smaller window-area stamping with a much larger corner radius. The sorta B-pillar area (well, where the pillar would be if the window was actually stamped out) is much thicker. So, it’s not one of these.

Could it be a low-roof Ford Transit Connect?

No, those don’t even have any window stamping area on the windowless versions.

It’s not the newer version, either.

RAM Promaster City? Nissan NV200?

Nope and nope. Wrong shape for that stamping. Maybe the bigger Nissan van, the one with the stupidly-long hood? The Nissan NV?

Hm. That’s a bit closer?

That’s close, but now I’m not sure about the slope of that A-pillar, which seems to have a steeper rake than the NV. That, and there seems to be a much more prominent rain gutter between the roof panel and the side, which the NV lacks. So I don’t think this is our answer.

What the hell else could this be? LA sometimes gets Mexican-market cars sneaking over. Could it maybe be a VW Caddy?

Eeeeh, close but still not it. Am I thinking too exotic? Could it be a ubiquitous Ford Econoline/E-Series?

Hm. Let’s enhance the window-stamp area and compare:

We’ve got the rain gutter, but that A-pillar isn’t right, and the shape of the window stamping isn’t either. Crap. Maybe that window stamping on the flooded van was hidden under an outer panel? But I don’t see any obvious mounting methods?

What other panel vans are out there? Why do none of these fit? Why is this so hard? What is that miserable, sunken half-van? What is its story, and what dark secrets did it take with it into the deep?

Someone help me out here. This is making me bonkers, and I know if anyone can help, it’s one of you crazy-ass Autopians, of which I bet there’s at least a few who fetishize panel vans and will recognize this as quickly as a photo of their own mom.

So, please, solve this and get it out of my head!

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit

69 Responses

  1. https://www.kbb.com/chevrolet/express-2500-cargo/2018/

    Jason, image 5 of the gallery here suggests you were right with the Express/Savana. Something of a rain gutter directly above the door jamb with no gap; indents in the door jamb exactly matching where the rubber is on KBB’s picture; gently-sloping A-pillar.

    I’m less keen on relying on the B-pillar thickness visual difference, only because the angle/lighting/scale etc. in the Twitter pic might be obfuscating or distorting it to some degree.

  2. Torch,
    Have Emily return to the same spot in 4 months. After this hot summer in Southern California, the LA river will be completely dry. Then we could see the whole (front half at least) van and probably the bones of the bodies with concrete blocks shackled to the floor (or something like this).

  3. I enjoy how a question of ‘what US market van is this’, which could be anywhere between 5 and 45 years old, is basically boils down to only a choice between 6 vehicles, with body styles seemingly unchanged for decades.

    Based on images provided I’d say it’s a Chevy Express, not that I knew what one of those was until 15mins ago! It’s certainly not the VW Transporter one poster is very insistent on.

  4. “the dismembered remains of a car have appeared, much like the body in a barrel recently revealed by the drought in Lake Mead, though less gruesome.”

    If you ever needed a reason to filter your water….

  5. It’s absolutely the Chev/GMC you posted first. The lack of reference points for the size of the van has thrown you off. The relief is the same shame and the cabin size and windscreen angle also match. You nailed it straight away and then spent the rest of the article doubting it.

Leave a Reply