The Honda Accord is one of the best-selling bread-and-butter cars of all time, as the best-selling Japanese car in the United States from 1982 to 1997. In 1989, it was the best selling car in the U.S, beating the Ford Taurus. It was the model to take Honda beyond small cars, to bring Honda’s manufacturing operations to the U.S, to show what the Japanese carmaker could do when it just wanted to make a really good, durable and dependable daily driver. The Accord deserved to sell well, among all the Camrys and Corollas, and it did.
Over the years, there were even a number of Accords that were interesting from an enthusiast driver standpoint, since in some markets it got hot engines, big engines, all-wheel drive, four-wheel steering – albeit not in the same car, at the same time. Honda could turn the Accord into hatchbacks, coupes, wagons as well as sedans.

If it weren’t for the Accord, Honda would probably still be making tiny kei cars and Civics and little more. The oil crisis had given the then very small Civic the sales boost the company needed: the EPA rated it as the most fuel-efficient car available in the States from 1974 to 1978, and its CVCC engine didn’t need a catalytic converter or unleaded fuel to run clean. It did 40MPG, cost a little over two grand new, and as a result, it sold well. By 1975, Honda sold 100,000 Civics yearly in the U.S, soon tripling that. With its small car selling well, what else could Honda offer for American customers by the mid-‘70s? What kind of Honda would suit the wide open roads of the wide open America?
The Accord Gets Its Start in The Mid-1970s

The first Honda Accord was launched in May 1976. At first, it was still a hatchback like the Civic, but bigger. We’re still not talking about a particularly large car, as it weighed around 2000lbs tops, but it already appealed to buyers who had found the Civic too tiny for their needs. When I think of the first-gen Civic, I think about the scene in the first Police Academy movie, where the stolen Civic’s front seats are ripped off, and the guys sit in the back seat so the driver can fit behind the wheel.
The Accord’s sedan version was introduced in 1977-1978, and it did exactly the same as the Jetta and other hatchback-derived sedans would do throughout history: it looked bigger and more serious, thanks to the added trunk. The first automatic transmissions were still two-speed Hondamatics, and looking at it from 50 years in the future, it’s bewildering that a three-speed automatic would be something to improve things. That was added in 1980.

The second gen arrived in September 1981. It looked almost the same at a glance, and it also retained the hatchback version, but it was ever so slightly bigger. But it would need to be, as Honda, zeroing in on American requirements, started building Accords at its Marysville, Ohio, manufacturing plant. The first car factory in the U.S. from a Japanese automaker, it’s been churning out Accords since November 1982, having started out a couple of years earlier with building motorcycles. By 2023, Honda had built 30 million cars in the United States.
The Accord Was The First Car With A Navigation System

The Japanese-market second-generation Accord also featured an interesting piece of equipment that we’ve grown to take for granted: a navigation screen. Offered as an option, it was the world’s first commercially available automotive navigation system.
Since satellite-based navigation systems in cars were a long ways in the future, it was incredibly complicated in a completely different way. The Electro Gyro-Cator relied on small transparent maps scrolling on a 6-inch CRT display screen, indicating the car’s location using a helium gas gyroscope and a servo gear that would detect the car’s rotation and acceleration, once the driver had set off, tracing their way using dead reckoning and showing where to go. The driver could also highlight locations using a supplied pen. The maps needed to be specially created for the system to be precise enough for the car and driver to rely on, as the development vehicles initially deviated from the routes due to deformations in the cartography.
“Although the vehicle’s trajectory and the map had to be aligned manually on the display, or “map matching”, it was tremendously convenient for the driver to know the location and traveling direction of their own vehicle without using a regular map. The project made progress to the point where the system was ready for a road test, but the team ran into an unexpected problem during this real-world testing. At the road test, (Katsutoshi) Tagami drove the vehicle and Kume and Nobuhiko Kawamoto, then assistant general manager at Honda R&D (and later the fourth president of Honda) also got in the vehicle. They drove along the same test course several times, however, each time, at the exact same place, the vehicle would deviate from the course shown on the map, and nobody could figure out why. Thinking that the onboard instruments were being affected by some kind of electrical interference from a nearby facility, they used a field strength meter to detect any such disturbances, but none could be found.
After exhausting every possibility, Tagami finally hit upon an idea: “Could the map be wrong?”
He contacted the map distributor and learned that in the world of cartography, the use of simplified representations known as “deformations” was a common practice. For example, on a map with a scale of 1:100,000, a 10 meter-wide road would be represented by a 0.1 millimeter-wide fine line. In areas where several roads run close together, these lines would have to be simplified to avoid overlapping, and this inevitably sacrificed a certain degree of precision and accuracy. However, when it comes to route guidance, sacrificing precision was just not a viable option, so the team decided to work with a map maker to create a new set of map sheets dedicated to the system Honda was developing.”
The Electro Gyro-Cator weighed 20 lbs, cost a fourth of the Accord’s price in Japan, and it was only offered for a year until Honda shelved it. It’s unclear how many buyers went for it. Even as a paperweight, it’s cool.

As weird as it was, the Electro Gyro-Cator wasn’t the only fancy thing about the second-gen Accord: it got a perfectly ’80s-looking digital dashboard in Japan. “ALB” stood for Anti-Lock Brakes, before “ABS” was widely accepted as the acronym. I also enjoy that the electronic display says Electronic Display on it.
The ’80s Accords Look Even Sharper

What’s the cool thing about the third-generation Accord? Pop-up headlights! Honda designed the third-gen car to be nearly as good-looking as the Prelude of the time, and that meant a sleek shape and a low nose. It was a transformation after the somewhat ho-hum design of the first cars, and you can’t tell me the black Accord in that above desert shot doesn’t look seriously desirable. The salad shooter wheels help, too.
For the American market Accord, the low nose likely needed pop-up headlights for regulatory reasons; the Japanese ones had them to match the other Hondas sold at the Honda Verno chain of dealers, such as the Prelude.

It has to be said that the Accord coupe was now extremely close to the Prelude in design, especially as you could also get the Prelude without pop-up headlights in Japan.
In the above shot, the American-built coupe poses with a Gold Wing, also built in Marysville. In Japan, the American-manufactured coupes got neat little eagle logos, which you can spot above the exterior door handle.

European versions did without pop-up headlights, but since the engineering was already there, the trick lamps were also used in the fantastically cool Aero Deck three-door wagon sold in Europe and Japan.

While the sedan is one of the few four-door cars with pop-up headlights (do you remember any others?), the Aero Deck was about as fancy and sharp as a hatchback could be. And the hatch was even hinged in a slightly strange way for a larger opening. The available two-tone paint scheme made the Aero Deck look even more ’80s.
The ’90s Start Round Here

For the fourth generation, Honda used the Aero Deck name for its 1991 Accord wagon, the first one of its kind. Those were built in Ohio and exported from there to Europe and Japan, as was the two-door coupe: while the Accord now got a real wagon instead of a shooting brake, the three-door hatchback was dropped from the roster. The addition of a long roof was done very smoothly.

As the ’90s went on, the Accord’s Japanese, European, and American versions also started to deviate visually. While American Accord buyers could choose between a somewhat similar-looking sedan and coupe in 1993 – and select a V6, for the first time ever – the now British-built European Accord was a development of the Honda Ascot Innova (above). It looked otherwise identical, but the Ascot Innova was slightly narrower, had frameless windows, and was available with four-wheel steering, in the style of the Prelude. The UK-market Accord was raced in the British Touring Car Championship between 1995 and 2000.
Honda had been working with Rover since the 1980s, and Rover took the early-‘90s Accord as a basis for its 600 sedan. The 600-series definitely looks like a Honda, and the doors are almost identical to the ones on the European Accord. The cars also shared the windshield and the roof panel.

We’re counting the Rover 620ti as a Cool Accord in this piece, as it offered a 200-horsepower, intercooled, turbocharged four-cylinder Rover engine at a time when Honda didn’t really yet play with turbocharging in its passenger cars (the first-generation Legend and the Honda Jazz/City aside).
The 620ti especially is an interesting blend of Rover’s Olde English viking boat image and straight line speed. It could hit 60 mph in seven seconds and go all the way past 140 mph. In the 1990s, those were some serious numbers from a four-cylinder engine.
The Turn Of The Millennium

The sixth-generation Accord would be three different-looking cars, depending on where you did your business with Honda: the American, European, and Japanese sedans all differed visually from each other. The European car was also smaller than the other two.
As the CR-V and Odyssey took their place, there would be no more Accord Wagon for American buyers, but there was a neat-looking coupe (above) that had the slightest hint of NSX in the taillamp design. It’s great to think about how there was a market for coupes like this in the ’90s and early 2000s, plus you could get it with a three-liter V6.

European customers could choose a Type-R, which produced over 210 horsepower from 2.2 liters of displacement – without turbocharging. The thing screamed to 7200rpm. Some 3800 were built, out of which over 2000 were sold in the UK.
The same engine was also used in the Japanese market Accord Euro-R (pictured above), a model name that isn’t confusing at all.

The car that European Honda drivers knew as the seventh-generation Accord was sold in the U.S. as the Acura TSX. It is one of the best-looking Accords and a great-looking Acura, and you could buy it as AWD in Japan, as well as a 220-horsepower “Euro R” despite there not being a European Type-R anymore. The Japanese and European versions of the Accord were again visually similar, but the American car looked quite different.
As well as again being sold as an Acura TSX, the eighth-generation Accord would be the last one sold in Europe, as Accord sales ended there in 2015.

Importantly, the eighth-generation American Accord was sold as a V6 coupe with a six-speed manual gearbox, as was the ninth-generation coupe. Honda could just have sold them as automatic only, but chose to offer more.
The tenth generation would lose the coupe and the V6, signalling the end for Honda Accords aimed at enthusiast drivers: while there wasn’t a coupe anymore, the sedan at least has a fastback sort of roofline in the two most recent generations.
(Edit: The original version of this article neglected to include that, yes, the tenth-generation Accord was available with a six-speed manual in the Accord Sport. That and the 10-speed automatic are definitely enthusiast choices – maybe some of the coolest Accords I forgot existed)

In the eleventh-generation car, the only available transmissions are a CVT and an e-CVT. But in a market where passenger sedans aren’t even the obvious choice, the fact that there even is a factory-new, Ohio-built Honda Accord for sale among all the SUVs and crossovers feels warming.
Photos: Honda









“The tenth generation would lose the coupe and the V6, signalling the end for Honda Accords aimed at enthusiast drivers.”
And there’s where they lost me. The 8th and 9th generation coupes with a manual sound interesting, though. Too bad only one person in my neighborhood owns a Honda (Element) and I see they also just bought a Tesla. Everybody else in my neighborhood drives GMs, F*rd products, RAMs and Jeeps.
Hooray! A car I owned in the top shot. I loved driving my ’92 Accord EX coupe with the 5-speed.
Ironically, it is also the only car I’ve ever owned that actually stranded me with a breakdown. Igniter module under the distributor cap fails due to heat – poor design, and no way to jury-rig it to get home. When it decided not to work the engine would crank but not start, no spark, the end. I bought a replacement ($80-ish each back when that was a lot of money) and when the replacement also failed I sold the car.
Dude. Just skipping the 7th gen? It was one of the best the US market got IMO. In 2003 it could be had with the J30 V6 with a 6 Speed manual. 2003-2005 it was coupe only. Then in 2006-2007, the grail of Accords for me, you could get the V6, 6 Speed in the sedan!
I remember when Sport Compact Car had a 04 TSX project car they were trying to make faster & handle better than same era M3 – LOL. They did not get close but sure tried. Too much of FWD / AWD fanboys at the time.
For the accord, I’ll have the 1988 coupe please – in red
My second car ever was an old second gen and I loved it until it got totaled by a wreck.
A couple of years back I rented a 10th gen hybrid sport and the handling was very crisp and precise, and it was overally a very nice car.
I recently rented an 11th gen and I could totally feel the decontenting. It’s shame because until this point the Accord was my default recommendation for a non-car person who just needed a good car.
I had a 1989 Accord LXi sedan with the 5-speed back in the day. Basically the same as the black one in the photo above except mine was white with the maroon interior. Even the same wheels. Bought it for $3200 with 105k on the clock when I was back in college, used it for 4 years, put almost a 100k on it and traded it in for $3000 on a Contour SVT a while after I graduated. The SVT was fun but it’s the Accord that I still miss to this day. It was just an all around fantastic car.
Would be nice to see a 50th anniversary special edition. I don’t think Honda has done a commemorative-type special edition in a long time, just the generation-end packages.
Honda shocks everyone and does a V6 6MT 50th Anniversary edition.
I think the 1979 Accord is the best Honda Accord because it’s got an H on the hood. That’s how people know it’s a Honda!
I heard those got stolen a lot
I miss that I never got one of the last manual Accords, but oh well. That wagon was one of the nicest looking wagons ever made, and I miss that as well.
I just love that chrome tube luggage rack on that hatchback.
A Cord:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/49867273687_8245b32fed_b.jpg
Also Aston Lagonda:
https://astonmartins.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/DSC_7016_lagonda-480×360.jpg
I’ve always lusted after that 1981 Accord hatchback. Never managed to get one though.
I did get a 1999 Accord EX Sedan ( stick! ) with Lapis Blue leather interior. Loved that car.
I’m sorry, WHAT? Are you seriously saying that an Accord with a turbocharged 252-HP engine, either a 10-speed auto or a 6-speed manual transmission, and the exact same 0-60 time as a WRX *not* “aimed at enthusiast[s]”?
Yeah, this article misses the a lot of things. The LXi hatch, the 7th Gen V6 6 Speeds, the Accord Crosstour, the 2.0T 6 speed as you said. Some good and some bad, but If we’re gonna do a retrospective, then let’s do it. To skip an entire generation, the 7th gen, is ridiculous.
Yeah, that’s a miss. The manual Sport 2.0T did a 3:18 at VIR
1st Gen is my favorite to see on the road (rarely), but 4th gen is what my brain always goes to when someone mentions Accord.
It’s weird that this article fails to mention the 10th-gen Accord Sport available with a 6-speed manual. I believe you could get a stick with either the 1.5t or the 2.0t. That certainly seems to be aimed at enthusiasts to me.
I thought the same thing. The 9th gen Sport didn’t have a ton of power, but it did have the smooth 6-speed that they carried over to the early 10th gen Sport with a lot more power.
I sorta liked the popup-headlights generation and the next one, and I LOVED the Aero Deck (of course we didn’t get it here, America isn’t cool enough). But they always seemed like flimsy tin boxes to me – and absolute world-champion rotboxes where I came from. I always preferred the equivalent Quantum/Passats in this class.
Everything past that got increasingly bloated, and so, so cheap feeling until the last couple generations. Those don’t feel so cheap, but they sure are boring, if slightly less so than the equivalent Camry. I had a hybrid as a rental a couple years ago, it was “fine”. The V6 was always lovely though. Nice engine, shame what they generally stuck it in – and double shame about the horrific autotragics they usually stuck behind it. When you could get the stick, that fixed that, but at that point I just want a more interesting car to start with.
The 86-89 popup Accord was *everywhere* when I was a kid. My relatives had them, my friends’ parents had them, then eventually my friends had them as hand-me-downs in the late 90s. They sure could rust, though.
Owned an ‘80 beige Hatchback (admittedly a rust bucket) but started a chain of 8 Hondas including a ‘97 Acura CL that was Accord based and an ‘06 V6 6MT sedan. Unfortunately don’t see myself getting another Honda, they just don’t appeal to me anymore. (A Prelude in manual form may bring me back into the fold however)
I wonder why they never tried an Accord convertible? Some of the earlier coupe bodies look like they’d look good topless.
I miss the Accord wagon.
I miss wagons in general.
But I would have totally rocked an Aero Deck. Those were just stupidly cool.
I’ve owned 3 Accords since I started driving (4 if you count the Acura TLX as an Accord derivative). While I resisted the first one since it was Dad’s hand me down, its become the car I buy when I get frustrated with ownership experiences (read quality issues) from other brands. Had my 10th gen 2.0T for a little over a year now and I love it.
The other day I saw a really clean ’93-ish Accord the low beltline, thin pillars, and overall clean design really attracted my attention in comparison to modern cars. That was peak Honda in my opinion.
It was a great driving car too.
They really have aged well