Any discussion of iconic American automotive performance brands has to include Hurst alongside all-time all-timers like STP and Champion. The famous provider of aftermarket gear selectors made a name for itself by partnering with various muscle car brands to supply shifters, wheels, and other products for their option lists. Hurst also made numerous limited-edition cars, customized in their signature colors and with their latest goodies. Over the years, Hurst has collaborated with Pontiac on some exciting and gloriously flashy special versions of their performance coupes.
Oddly enough, at one point Hurst even made at least one bespoke Pontiac station wagon and, decades later, they even made a “station wagon” out of a car that was never, ever intended for such duty. Let’s explore some Pontiac Hurst products and the elusive Hurst Haulers.
As Inconspicuous As A Parade Float
Hurst’s association with General Motors is usually thought to be an Oldsmobile thing. Hearing the words “Hurst Edition” almost always makes you think of stripes and two-tone paint jobs on Cutlass 442 models from the sixties all the way up through the early eighties. All of them featured whatever the latest shifter technology that the transmission selector firm wanted to showcase, like the misogynistically-named “His and Hers” Dual Gate shifter.

Later, it was the bizarre “Lightning Rods” selector with three separate handles. Jason has written about these before, but the sticks were shifted sequentially to engage second, third, and fourth gear.

Still, Pontiac products were offered with some of these unique shifters as well, even though the gilded “special editions” were not as well know. One of the most famous might have been the 1965 GeeTO, made for a contest created by Pontiac, advertising agent Jim Wangers, Royal Pontiac of Royal Oak, Michigan and Hurst.

Of course, the car featured a Hurst shifter for the four-speed and was painted Hurst Gold with gold-finish Hurst wheels that, unfortunately, kind of set your teeth on edge since they don’t match the bodywork color (but maybe that’s just me).

Another Hurst Pontiac was based on the 1967 Grand Prix when that name was still placed on full-sized coupes. This year featured the awesome covered lights and slotted-pattern turn signals in the tops of the fenders. This looks like an early-run Hot Wheels car come to life.

Under the hood is a Pontiac 428 V8 pumping out 367 horsepower.

Three of these Grand Prix convertibles were built, all loaded to the gills with options including factory 8-track player and six window buttons on the driver’s door to even operate the vent wings. Check out the rear legroom on this aircraft carrier- I think an Accord or even a Civic is better.

Hurst used this and earlier examples of full-sized convertibles to showcase their shifters at race events; they mounted a platform on the trunk lid and installed a ten-foot-tall shift lever that famous Hurst spokesmodel Linda Vaughn grabbed on to for dear life as they drove around the track. I’m just making that up, right? Actually, no, I’m not:

A higher production run was done with the smaller 1970 to 1972 personal luxury coupe version of the Grand Prix. “Higher production” still meant rare, though: only 272 were made for 1970, with 157 for the next year and an unknown quantity for the final outing (estimated to be between 50 and 150).

This white-and-gold edition came with a power sunroof that Linda Vaughn is peering out of.

Yeah, it’s tacky, but that’s part of the appeal. I could do without that landau vinyl roof, but that’s a minor quibble. A Pontaic 400 V8 was standard; the top performance choice was the 455 cubic-inch HO V8 with 370 horsepower.

What? No Hurst shifter inside? Looks like a “Hurst” button on top, but probably the console shape wouldn’t accommodate one.

These were certainly cool cars to rival the best Oldsmobile Hurst products, but there’s nothing here so far that’s particularly unique compared to a Cutlass 442. You want something completely different? Here you go.
Hauling In More Ways Than One
You would never equate the concept of Hurst customization with station wagons, but in a very few cases, the firm did just that. The Cutlass 442 bits were put onto a small number of Cutlass Vista Cruisers in 1972, but a full-sized station wagon? There’s no record of that happening to any Oldsmobiles, but there is such a Pontiac: the large “Hurst Hauler”.
Exactly how the first “Hurst Hauler” came into existence is not entirely clear, but most accounts say that the company needed to transport its display items and other paraphernalia to various car shows and race events. Vans or pickups were considered workaday items with zero glamour back then, so Hurst decided to trick out a full-sized 1966 Bonneville station wagon with custom paint and a lot of the components that they offered for very similar Grand Prix and Catalina models. Those wheels look so much better without the gold finish.
Like the Grand Prix convertibles, Hurst started with a fully loaded power-everything A/C equipped car, also purchased from the famous Royal Pontiac. A bench seat, but there’s still a genuine Hurst floor shifter on the tunnel. The 389 GTO V8 under the hood sounds nice, but it would have been a whole lot nicer with a tri-power 421.

There’s even a Pontiac tachometer, which I doubt any other wagons were specified with. Looks like the speedometer got stuck at 85mph on a run years ago.

This one has seen better days; there was apparently plenty of floor rust, but that’s to be expected for a sixty-year-old car that did hard work in the northeast. It appeared on eBay in 2011 for $12,750 and was last listed for sale in 2017 at Hemmings with an asking price of $22,500. I hope it got a new coat of gold paint and the vinyl roof it deserves.

Surprisingly, that wasn’t the end of Hurst Pontiac wagons; another one-off appeared at the SEMA show in 2001. It seems rather unfathomable that Pontiac would do such a thing then, particularly since they weren’t building any station wagons then and hadn’t since around a decade before. That didn’t stop them from taking a WS6 Firebird Trans Am and doing the “shooting brake” treatment to it.
Design-wise, I’d like to resolve the rear window a little better to get rid of the pickup-truck-cab vibes, but as a concept, it’s quite inspired. The motor received some massaging and reportedly produced around 370 horsepower, meaning that, unlike the 1966 car, this thing could legitimately “haul.”

There’s a now-pushing-60 Linda Vaughn posing with this odd “wagon.” Unlike the earlier Pontiac Trans Am wagon done in the late seventies that Mercedes Streeter reported on, this one does not have “gullwing” side glass; the entire shooting brake back opens like a hatch.

There are more pictures of this thing that show stickers indicating that it participated in a muscle car Power Tour. Some accounts say it was listed on eBay for $35,000 in 2012, but I can’t find its whereabouts today, or if there’s a fiberglass mold for that thing. If not, we need to make one – like right now.
Sadly, No Hurst Aztek
I saw one commenter in the listing for the first Hurst Hauler quip that it was “just a wagon painted by Hurst with a bunch of their parts stuck onto it.” This is exactly what it was, and what’s wrong with that? Somehow, silly as these Hurst editions can seem, they end up being more than a sum of their parts and transport you back to a time when the flourishing aftermarket could give you the cars of your dreams that the OEMs refused to build.
If your own dreams don’t include long-roofed Pontiacs with floor shifters and big V8s, maybe these Hurst specials will make you reconsider.
Pontiac Points (for either the 1966 or 2001 Hurst Haulers): 89/100
Verdict: Pontiac excitement isn’t reserved for sedans, as these odd but magnificent creations prove.
Top graphic image: Hurst/Pontiac










Not a Pontiac’ but the “Rescue System 1” Gremlin showed their reach.
Jaws of Life FTW
Patty Hearst had a thirst for a Poncho Hurst and bought it.
Sorry about the drool puddle everyone….
Hurst special editions are usually delicious. That last wagon is .. ugly.
Why no mention of Pontiac and Mopar relevant Ed Hamburger though? I’m obligated to bring him up because my Challenger has his oil pan and crank shaft.
https://specialtyvehicleengineering.com/about-sve/
The SLP Firebird was … better?
I like the gold wheels but you are right they don’t match the paint color. But painting the car the same colour would be too much. Needed a different color that would work with the gold rims that would be complimentary to them
This is the perfect response to dumdums who see a longroof version of a car and ask “Is this a hurst?” because they apparently can’t spell “hearse.”
Oh man a Hurst hearse would be fantastic. The “Hearst”, they could call it. Someone should sponsor this build. A newspaper company, perhaps?
I like the cut of your jib, old chap.
His and Hers Hurst Hearses?
I have never wanted a last-gen Firebird more than this one.
Ugly? Sure.
But it is weird and cool, and surprisingly powerful. Sounds like fun!
> You would never equate the concept of Hurst customization with station wagons, but in a very few cases, the firm did just that. The Cutlass 442 bits were put onto a small number of Cutlass Vista Cruisers in 1972, but a full-sized station wagon? There’s no record of that happening to any Oldsmobiles…
Akshwally, there is! But only as a special one-off (technically two-off) support car for the 1972 Indianapolis 500 – one for medical staff, another for press. Behold, possibly my favorite Hurst edition of anything, ever: a 1972 Hurst/Olds Vista Cruiser “Pace Car.”
https://www.hemmings.com/stories/primary-rocket-1972-hurst-olds/
Also, on reflection, I suppose a Vista Cruiser was technically a “midsize” wagon at the time, no matter how huge it was.
Yup, was about to correct you didn’t since you were able to post the picture of the wagon I was too lazy to do! Yes, the A body was a mid-size. They never did a Custom Cruiser Hurst from what I saw, or a Vista Cruiser from the earlier large body style.
An H/O 455 Vista Cruiser gives me the feels.
This is really cool as others said it just needed a little more work and be a bit more rounded to fit the 4th gen body styling.
Good thing they didn’t even try to get the rear hatch to match the Trans Am’s styling! Woof.
“ GeeTO”
NO! Not at all close and just plain silly. If you cannot type “GTO”, you have no freaking right to call yourself an automotive journalist. You’re a typist.
I think you’ll find that was the stylized name for the Hurst/GTO that kind of thing was popular in the late 60s early 70s.
Lots of results in the interwebs
I question that and I don’t think GM ever used the term. Perhaps some marketing schlubb did. Regardless, it’s still incorrect and shouldn’t be used.
OK read the article and the links then maybe relax
Bruh.
Stop.
Just stop.
https://live.staticflickr.com/3834/20098737795_90cf2568ba_b.jpg
If you need something legit-ish to get worked up about, I would say that calling Champion and STP “performance brands” was a bit of a stretch.
It was named “GeeTO” for a contest organized by Jim Wangers and George Hurst in 1965, not by the author of this article. Entrants were required to answer why they’d like to win the original GeeTo Tiger and answer correctly how many times the word “Tiger” was used in the promotional GeeTo Tiger song.
Can’t recall where I ran across this story – likely in drag racing circles, it was a while ago, but supposedly it can be argued that Linda Vaughn’s boobs killed Carroll Shelby. As I recall hearing it, he ran into Ms. Vaughn, who had a cold, at some sort of industry function (my mind wants to say something like California Hot Rod Reunion). Some…uh…”motorboating” was engaged in, and shortly after that Shelby came down with a cold which progressed to pneumonia for which he was then hospitalized and didn’t survive. Could be complete BS, but for that story has stuck with me ever since I heard it.
If it’s not true, it should be. Other than a fiery crash on a test track, I can’t think of a more Carroll Shelby way to go than “fatally motorboated Miss Hurst Golden Shifter.”
As Jack Nicholson’s Joker said, “If you gotta go, go with a smile!”
Except maybe a chili explosion.
She would have been in her 70s, but maybe? Dude was married a half a dozen times or so.
Misogynisticly named…try straight up misogynistic. Take a read of the text of that advert…a special key to keep the “little lady” from slamming through the gears? Heavens be…why would a woman want to drive fast???
Because it’s 1966. QED.
Getting pretty tired of people with recency bias born on third base and thinking they hit a triple, morally speaking.
This existed in the same time and place as The Little Old Lady From Pasadena which makes it a little baffling. I suppose it was also valet mode before its time
I know some people might have a hard time believing this, but most of life was a sausage fest where no one knew or cared that girls could do stuff until not so long ago at all.
Thanks for your comment.
First, I’ll say that I was commenting on the authors point that it was “named” something, with the ad copy was more blatantly misogynistic.
Secondly…I would call into question your idea of “recency” bias…the Equal Rights Amendment has been floating around since the 1920’s, and for certainty the idea of equal rights for women was a thing in the 1960’s…
I’d respectfully ask that you consider your own biases. There was no need in the 1960’s to have this kind of advert just as there is no need for it today. Calling out something that happened 60 years ago, during a time that these types of misogyny were also being called out isn’t “hitting a triple, morally speaking”.
No, but I’m sure calling out sixty-year-old sins that have already been discussed to death, even here in this very forum, shoots a deep and useless thrill straight through your justice boner.
As recently as this morning, there are many WOMEN who don’t get why women would be into cars. Please feel free to judge them for their internalized misogyny.
But congratulations for correctly stating that some things about the past used to be worse than they are now. Brilliant. You are officially a Good Person™.
I have always had a different interpretation of car ads that appear misogynistic. Like a lot of features marketed to men, the “his” side of the shifter is kinda stupid. I wasn’t around when this car was new, but I am a little insulted they think I would be fooled by a stupid slushbox with a few metal notches by the shift lever.
I have always interpreted these kinds of ads as a statements that manufacturers believe women are less gullible and unlikely to be tricked into paying a premium for useless, gimmicky features. It isn’t uncommon even today to see ads where the man is portrayed as dimwitted or frivolous and the woman is portrayed as practical and intelligent. If we want to talk about gender roles portrayed in car advertising, pandering/insulting isn’t limited to women.
(Also, I agree with Joe the Drummer. This was 60 years ago…)
That’s an interesting take that is worthy of consideration…although I doubt the ad agencies of the time were so subversively minded…
No, I doubt they had that mindset in the 1960s. Although again, the feature they were marketing was stupid and they were clearly trying to sell a dumb gimmick by playing off men’s insecurities. It was a different time, though. I presume who ever created the ad is dead, as are most of the target market who read it.
I have mostly observed that ads in in my lifetime have often portrayed men negatively, or at least easily amused by trivial “cool” stuff that isn’t useful. It appears socially acceptable to stereotype men in a way that it isn’t for women. Although, I do think ads in the last decade or so have done a better job of being neutral and not insulting anyone or making unfair assumptions.
They should’ve made that a factory option, so it could be the new Pulsar 😛
As it is, the NX2000 and NX1600 were basically the F-Body Done Right! Half the size on the outside, twice as much space inside LOL
My dad had a ’66 GTO new in high-school (traded in his ’66 Mustang GT Fastback 2+2 for it). It had a factory Hurst shifter and he always said it came with a warning sticker that said “Shift as hard as you want but be careful not to break your arm.”
I chalked that up to boomer talk waxing nostalgically about the good ol’ days, but I guess this was actually a thing! They really did put those stickers on the cars.
Oh, and that Firebird shooting brake is super cool.
Had to look it up to remind myself, but per this Hagerty article, GM made one as a concept for the third gen.
I love an F-Body shooting brake.
Thanks for posting this!
I’ve never seen one, but it’s going on my ‘bucket list’ for cool vehicles to look for.
Linda Vaughn posing with this odd “wagon.”
I thought it was Victoria Jackson at first glance.
As an F-Body enthusiast from way, back, I’ve always loved this. I think it is pretty close to working, it just nees to be a little more rounded to match the body lines.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the rear window was an existing piece from another GM vehicle from the time. Something using the more curved glass from the 2-door S10 Blazer of the time probably would have looked a bit better.
I have never seen that Hurst Fake Lenco setup before and it does seem quite silly.
The Firebird though. Almost would. It’s just a bit awkwardly integrated with the square rear lines on a very round car. Probably should be narrower at the back with maybe 10 degrees more rear window slope.
I’ve only ever seen a couple of them, but word in the day was that the shifters had issues working properly. Back then, I thought it was stupid for a ~165 hp 307, but now I think it’s ridiculous in a fun way.
It kind of makes it look better lol
and I love that Linda was still in the pics!
I wonder if the Hurst Hauler inspired the marketing people and engineers in Auburn Hills to produce the Dodge Magnum in 2005.
It’s hard not to look back and shake my head at the casual misogyny of not only labeling a shifter “his and hers” but including a lockout so the “little lady” couldn’t get to the “his” side.
A buddy in high school had a 78 (I think) g-body Hurst olds with the cream and gold stripes paint job. I remember it made an amazing sound, even though it was probably far more bark than bite.
If I were to mention that marketing for that shifter, I will inevitably hear my uncle say “ah…those were simpler times” as if that makes everything back then better. It’s hard for him to understand that it’s okay to realize that those times weren’t all good.
Hey, they were good for him!
Pontiac Vibe, Hurst Edition!
That needed to happen.
Oh hell yeah that would’ve been awesome as fuck 😀
The supercharged 2ZZ from the Exige yo
Autopian project car!