The only certainty in life is change. Ketchup is no longer purple, Skype is no longer online, and the Outback is no longer a wagon. Subaru has gone all-in on making the new seventh-generation model a crossover, and it’s safe to say that the internet wasn’t happy with this new styling direction.
However, if we look past the blockier, bulkier exterior, we can see that the new Outback rides on the same platform as the old one and uses the same engines, so does it really just keep what we already liked and add some quality of life improvements? I spent a week in one of the most affordable examples to find out.
[Full disclosure: Subaru Canada let me borrow this Outback for a week so long as I kept the shiny side up, returned it reasonably clean with a full tank of fuel, and reviewed it.]
The Basics
Engine: 2.5-liter naturally aspirated flat-four.
Transmission: Continuously variable transmission.
Drive: Full-time all-wheel-drive.
Output: 180 horsepower at 5,800 RPM, 178 lb.-ft. of torque at 3,700 RPM.
Fuel Economy: 25 MPG city, 31 MPG highway, 27 MPG combined (9.3 L/100km city, 7.5 L/100km highway, 8.5 L/100km combined).
Base Price: $36,445 including freight ($43,190 in Canada).
Price As-Tested: $38,715 including freight ($43,190 in Canada).
Why Does It Exist?
In the beginning, there was the Subaru Legacy, a midsize sedan and wagon competing against the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord. As a relatively cheap way of going after SUVs, Subaru lifted the Legacy wagon, threw on some cladding, and the Legacy Outback was born. Over the years, the Legacy Wagon faded away, but the Outback stayed, creating an implied missing-link scenario. Now there’s no more Legacy, and with the two-row crossover segment still going strong, this latest Outback basically sheds the last of its wagon roots in a gamble for greater appeal.
How Does It Look?
Look, aesthetics have rarely been the reason why people buy Subarus. There’s only ever been one pretty Subaru, and it was styled by Giugiaro. However, while the old Outback was proudly not like other two-row crossovers, the new one seems like it’s trying to sneak into the party. It’s more upright, blockier, and full of unusual elements. The weirdly jagged window line, those giant blisters atop the arches, the industrial roof rack that sadly does away with clever swivel-out crossbars. The end result looks a bit like a Ford Taurus X that’s been covered in glue and run through a plastic cladding factory. It definitely seems less SUV-like in person than it did in press photos, but you simply can’t call it a wagon anymore.
What About The Interior?
While the outside of the new Outback looks best in the dark, the cockpit is a different story altogether. Sure, the material consistency still isn’t quite perfect—the leatherette on the dashboard and the leatherette on the door cards have slightly different graining, for instance—but I can forgive all that because Subaru’s gone all-in on buttons. There’s a real bank of switches and knobs for the climate control, and a separate little climate control screen. The heated seats are controlled by buttons, the auto-hold and stability control are managed via buttons, and while there’s no more tuning knob, that’s a tradeoff I’m happy to make.
Beyond the dashboard, the new Outback’s as comfortable as your granddad’s armchair. Think a plush, yielding top layer of seat foam you sink into, accompanied by loads of space. The only thing to be careful with is the lumbar support, because it adjusts at a speed of Mach chicken. Cargo space is also abundant, although the cargo cover is a bit of a bother. It’s basically a sheet of fabric that zips up to become a hammock for small items. Handy if you need it, but I suspect it’ll mostly just be folded up and tucked into the cargo area’s side storage compartment. Oh, and while we’re on the subject of mild gripes, the armrests on the old Outback were plusher.
How Does It Drive?
It’s not often that a new generation of vehicle loses power compared to its predecessor, but the new Subaru Outback’s base 2.5-liter naturally aspirated flat-four comes in two ponies short of the old model’s standard motor, cranking out an underwhelming 180 horsepower. The tradeoff is two more lb.-ft. of torque at a peak some 700 RPM sooner. Hitched to a CVT, it’s remarkably quiet around town, but runs out of puff in a relative hurry. You often have to cane it to make real forward progress, and doing so tanks the fuel economy. The EPA combined rating is already an underwhelming 27 MPG, but I only saw 23 MPG. Sure, my tester was equipped with winter tires, but the rubber change alone doesn’t explain such a discrepancy.
Granted, there is a turbocharged option available for those who want to splash the cash, and the base car still gets a rock-solid structure and reasonably nice suspension tuning. Between the ground clearance and the sheer sidewall, there’s plenty of space and squish to bound over potholes and speed bumps without feeling jostled. It’s just a shame the steering on the old model was better. It weighted up beautifully with load in a way that the new car’s steering doesn’t. Still, outward visibility’s excellent, and the light steering calibration makes it a cinch to thread through underground parking garages.
Does It Have The Electronic Crap I Want?
Remember when a base model meant something? Well, this is pretty much the base Subaru Outback, and it genuinely has everything you need. Heated seats, a heated steering wheel, a power liftgate, smart key entry, a digital cluster, and a big infotainment screen, automatic climate control, auto up/down on every window switch, paddle shifters, a power leatherette driver’s seat, LED lamps, the works. Even the standard audio system is perfectly fine for the price. What isn’t so fine is how the Apple CarPlay experience in my tester was marred by periods of horrific unreliability. Sometimes it would work normally, sometimes it would crash and reboot every handful of minutes. It’s something that should’ve been figured out by now, and a blight on what is generally a slick infotainment system.
Compared to the old portrait-style screen, which took donkey’s years to boot and was completely illegible when the sun hit it, the new 12.1-inch touchscreen fires up quickly, works smoothly, and doesn’t wash out in direct sunlight. Even the menu structure makes a great deal of sense, with large tiles so you don’t fat-finger things. If Subaru were to bring the CarPlay connectivity up to an acceptable standard, this new infotainment system would be perfectly competitive against the systems in the Hyundai Santa Fe and Kia Sorento.
Three Things To Know About The 2026 Subaru Outback
- The cargo cover doubles as a hammock for small items.
- Buttons are back.
- The price of entry is much higher than on the old one.
Does The 2026 Subaru Outback Fulfil Its Purpose?
For the most part, the new Outback is still an Outback. It’s a reasonably sized, long two-row thing with all-wheel drive and enough ground clearance to make it to the hiking trailhead, even if there are some notable changes. As the level of standard equipment has risen, so has the base price. The big shock is that there’s no more true base model, which is why the new Outback looks thousands of dollars more expensive than the old one. Trim-to-trim, the most comparable outgoing equivalent to my $38,715 test car was last year’s $37,475 Outback Premium with the optional sunroof package. Adjusted for inflation, that’s only a $278 price delta, and that sort of money for loads more buttons doesn’t seem like a bad deal.
It’s worth noting that embracing the midsize crossover form factor does bring risk. The walk-in freezer-shaped Hyundai Santa Fe is more spacious, the Toyota Crown Signia is a compelling hybrid that’s priced close to a loaded Outback, and there’s even about to be some internal competition in the form of the electric Subaru Wilderness. The Outback used to be cool because it was a bit of an anachronism, the last mainstream station wagon alive in America. Now that it’s visually forgotten its roots, some things like a sub-190-horsepower base engine are a little bit harder to excuse in the name of character, even if it’s more refined overall than the old car.
What’s The Punctum Of The 2026 Subaru Outback?
While the fundamentals are essentially unchanged, this latest Outback is no longer the left-field option the model used to be.
Top graphic image: Thomas Hundal
I take it Canada’s version starts at a higher trim level?
Such a shame. These are starting to show up more frequently at Whole Foods out here in CO. They are very ugly. Even though I have a personal vendetta against every Subaru manufactured (personal reasons) and foam at the mouth in anger when I see a Subaru driving badly, I test drove the last gen, an XT variant, and it was pretty good. It was a wagon still, had tons of room and was comfy. This generation spits in the face of why I test drove one when I was looking for a new car.
Subaru Outback Sedan, my beloved, forgotten to the perils of time.
I doubt chasing Toyota, Ford, Honda and Hyundai/Kia into the market for these raised boxes will play out well. They’ve essentially abandoned their differentiators wishing they were a different company. Of course, I haven’t bought a Subaru since ’05 and they have taken share most of the times I’ve disapproved.
Faithful followers will keep buying Subaru just to prove they aren’t wrong.Subaru doesn’t make great vehicles but the marketing department is absolutely amazing.
Those mileage figures are embarassing in 2026, especially for a new model.
A couple comments:
-I am a reformed Subaru Fanboi, having owned a couple of WRX’s in the past. Subaru people can and do often forgive the sheer aesthetic hideousness of their cars, however, every once in a while, Subaru lays a turd that is far too stinky to convince their fans otherwise. This is one of those rare turds.
-I found myself sitting at my dining room table last weekend, helping coach my 7 year old nephew through a Lego vehicle build. About 3/4 way through the build of his “sports car”, it had an uncanny resemblance to the new Outback. A few more bricks relocated here and there and it would have been a spitting image, cladding and all.
I see both the new Forester and outback pretty regularly as I’m normally deep into Subaru cult territory. If I see them by a restaurant that is often busy and attracts people from all around there are normally people looking at one or the other maybe both in the parking lot trying to make heads or tails of it. So I guess it’s getting attention now.
Everytime I’ve asked what they think they are Subaru people first time seeing it and dislike it a lot. So as far as I can tell the only people buying it are people so deep into Subaru cult they don’t even look at it just go buy the new one and say good enough.
The Subaru dealer keeps calling me asking me if I want a new Forester or outback because I took my daughters in for warranty repair a few years ago. They are getting desperate. Lots full of these things only the deepest in Subaru cult members will buy.
On the other hand tons I see tons of the bzs around people seem interested in them. The Subaru version could be sort of win for features for money but you never see them. The dealers have a few, I think I’ve seen one or two in the wild , in both a high Subaru cult and high bev market. The first gen was all around as rentals. But I’m not so sure what happened to them after.
If it’s got a cvt I’m not buying it. Which pretty much takes out all subaru’s now.
The XT would like to take you ’round back and kick you in the nards.
He’s also pretending the Brat doesn’t exist. Let’s get him!
I hate the styling more than I have a problem with it being taller.
I guess wagon-ness is in the eye of the beholder – I haven’t seen the Outback as a wagon for a while now.
Anyhow, I think there are cars that become broadly popular with a specific gender for image reasons, including styling. When I was in high school the Jetta was referred to as a “chick car”, and eventually the Scion tC seemed to take that role. Toyota salesmen seem to think RAV4s are for moms and 4Runners are for dads, except the 5th gen RAV4 design seemed to butch up a bit and become more popular with men.
There are the tired (but not entirely inaccurate) stereotypes about lesbians driving Subarus, and most of the Outback drivers I know are indeed female (but not all gay). But I look at this new Outback and wonder if it’ll appeal to the Outback owners I know. The no-nonsense elder lesbian who doesn’t go anywhere without her hiking poles and binoculars. The outdoorsy suburban mom who dresses like an REI catalog model. The heavily tattooed, gen-Z Wicca practitioner. I have a hard time imagining any of them opting for this new Outback.
Maybe Subaru will make up for it elsewhere – maybe more men will buy Outbacks? Not this guy though.
I finally saw one in the wild a couple of weeks ago. Calling it a crossover is being nice. I thought it was a APC in disguise. Big and Fugly.
I wanted to like this thing so I waited until I saw one in person. It was brand new and already looked like it was in an accident. Just a horribly ugly vehicle and I’m really irritated it’s not a wagon any longer. I’m usually less negative on new vehicle looks than most folks on the Autopian but my god what a disaster of a redesign to me.
Subarewww
Outblech?
Subaru take it outback?
It look like one of those illustrations that publications use for an anonymous non-branded vehicle. A little Toyota-like, but not really anyone’s trademarked look.
I don’t like how either the Forester or Outback look now, and I don’t care about the category but it doesn’t read “wagon” to me. I test drove a ‘25 and that flat 4 was working so hard I thought I was in a Vanagon.
Still looks like a wagon!
https://www.theautopian.com/the-rules-of-what-makes-a-car-a-station-wagon-need-to-be-restated-and-updated/
The distinction between lifted station wagon and crossover means a lot less than you say it does.
I just couldn’t disagree more. I saw my first one the other day, and I literally swore in shock. It’s huge, it’s ugly, and it’s completely indistinguishable from its competitors.
I test drove the Outback in ’19, gave it serious consideration. I wouldn’t take one of these things for free, except to trade it for something that isn’t another goddamn Explorer wannabe.
A RAV4 Hybrid starts at $31,900. $34,750 if you gotta have AWD. 42mpg combined.
You’d have to have a hell of a lot of brand loyalty to spend $35,445 on symmetrical AWD, an extra 0.4″ of ground clearance, and 25mpg.
Assuming there’s no mark-ups and you can actually find a base model, and ignoring styling and whether or not it’s a wagon, I’m confused what the value proposition is?
It’s what makes a Subaru, a Subaru.
I thought it was blown head gaskets and rust that make a Subaru, a Subaru. And excessive NVH as a bonus? Subaru never got the memo that boxer motors are supposed to be smoother…
Look, when a journalist starts a sentence with “Look“, they know they are trying to pass a bullshit sandwich. The above is pure bullshit.
Generations 1 to 3 where beautiful for their time. Especially Gen 3. The interiors were always ugly, but the exteriors were absolutely great. They had that old style “I’m Japanese” je ne sais quoi but without being obnoxious or weird.
Gen 4 was atrocious with the ugly bubbly headlights, sort of an Olivier Boulay-like last gen Mitsubishi Diamante.
Then the Gen 5 was beautiful again, especially the 3.6R. My neihbor has one, and it’s one of the best looking wagons ever made.
So puh-lease. Don’t go there.
I used to be a big Subaru fan (had a 2003 WRX and a 2007 Outback 3.0R) back when they were considered quirky and reliable enough to outcharm their other drawbacks, but Subaru is flat out uncompetitive at this point.
My H6 Outback averaged about 22mpg, but that had a flat-six with a whopping 65 more ponies and had a fairly pedestrian, but still responsive and reliable 5-speed automatic. The butter-smooth and extremely reliable H6 engine was Subaru’s hidden gem, and I was sad when they put it to pasture. With a little muffler work, they made an Outback sound far better than any family wagon had any right to.
I get that they’re small, but they really should have given up on the boxers for their volume sellers and just licensed Toyota hybrid engines years ago.
“It definitely seems less SUV-like in person than it did in press photos, but you simply can’t call it a wagon anymore”
Well, that sure settles it. You don’t like the styling so that means it is suddenly a different vehicle class. The last one also sat on its tip-toes 9 inches above the ground and had a bunch of cladding, but I guess that slightly sloping back glass magically made it a wagon while this one “seems SUV-like” so it isn’t.
Enthusiasts don’t want to admit it, but they’ve got their own irritating groupthink. So let’s have the full package of Autopian pseudo-facts that won’t die. Someone please post again about how cars aren’t affordable anymore because the average transaction price is 50K, but don’t mention the all the 30K models available and don’t include inflation adjustment. For the 1,000th time.
It looks way too similar to the Forester.
I quite like the Forester. Very functional shape, fits many Ikea boxes.
I own a 2018 Outback, and I came out to my car from the store the other day to see one of these new ones parked right next to it. To my surprise, they were way closer in shape than I thought from pictures. Like, virtually unnoticeable. It’s clearly just as wagony-as my 5th generation (which is about as wagony as the 4th, which is noticeably less than the 3rd…).
I disagree with this whole notion that this 7th is the breaking point. It’s was either the 4th generation that it ceased to be a wagon, or it is currently still a wagon.
All that being said, it was even uglier than the pictures made it out to be.
This is my issue. I don’t care if it’s a wagon or an SUV/CUV. My God, it’s hideous either way.
This is much more of a Forester +10%, than a continuation of the current Outback shape.
But this site will continue to waffle between whether a Volvo’s XC60 is a valid wagon or an SUV. Entertainment.
Disagree. Some measurements:
2018 Outback
Length: 189.6″
Height: 66.5″
Wheelbase: 108.1″
Ground Clear: 8.7″
2026 Outback
Length: 191.7″
Height: 67.5″
Wheelbase: 108.1″
Ground Clear: 8.7″
You’re really going to say 1″ in height is what pushed it over the edge here?
I didn’t; I said shape (not size).
Point to the shape that gets you…
https://www.carsized.com/en-us/cars/compare/subaru-outback-2014-suv-vs-subaru-outback-2025-suv/
Yeah, that is way closer than I would have thought. It’s almost like an offset of the old gen it’s so close.
The old gen used for this comparison is also a Touring, which has the sleeker roof rails that shave like 1.5″ off the height.
Swap it with a 6th Gen (vs the 7th Gen) and it’s literally the same shape, moved up 1″.
https://www.carsized.com/en-us/cars/compare/subaru-outback-2019-suv-vs-subaru-outback-2025-suv/
Looks even closer when you select the 2019-2025.
Your link below shows a 3.6″ increase on the height over the ’18 and 1.5″ on the height to the ’19.
63.9″ and 65.9″ respectively to the current 67.5″
I’m an owner of a ’18 and ’19 and had a similar parking experience as you, but came to a totally different conclusion. I felt like the newer one seemed inflated in all aspects compared to mine (de-laminating touchscreen aside). It just seemed like a larger vehicle overall, and I didn’t know how to feel about it. I will agree that it was also ugly as sin.
Not trying to argue, but just providing my viewpoint.
I just had my de-laminating touchscreen replaced by Kinetic Vehicles. Shortly after I mailed it off, I found I could have purchased (what appears to be) the very same touchscreen off AliExpress for like $70. Should I have gone that way? Maybe. The Kinetic one works fine, but my suspicion is that he’s just buying what I found, marking it up, and installing it. I have zero issues with that business model, but as a DIY’er, I should have been smart enough to look into more options first.
Agreed.
What really gives me “not a wagon anymore” vibes is that it looks more like a 4Runner or an Xterra due to the C Pillar. I think if the C Pillar was more of a standard continuation of the glass instead of the colored panel it wouldn’t look as SUV/CUV-like.
Well, that and the hood height and 3.5″ overall height on the 2018 vs 1.5″ extra on the 2019.
Thank you for posting this
I owned a 2011 Premium and a 2015 Limited (all with the base engine) and purchased them because they were cheaper, but still useful alternatives to cars like the XC70 and Allroad. I enjoy the utility and looks of wagons, even if they are butched up. This thing, though, I don’t know what Subaru was thinking. It was a major over-correction to the other side….
And can we please stop with the slinty-eyed driving lights and darkened main lights trend already? I’m so sick of this look.