Give credit to Dodge. The slings and arrows of the modern car industry have fallen on the brand, robbing it of time, attention, engines, and platforms. It’s been given the castoffs of its various parents and told to make do. Dodge is making do in a big way thanks to the Dakota.
Limitations can sometimes be your greatest strength, and The Morning Dump is no exception. Every morning I’m constrained by the limits of time, the concept of picking just four stories to summarize the vibes, and the lack of energy that comes from a cat jumping on my chest at 2 am and demanding scritchy-scratchies.
The market itself has been constrained by geopolitics, including high fuel prices and high tariffs. The early data from April show that this hasn’t turned the market as negative as you’d have guessed. Toyota is probably the poster child for making the best-of-it, although the company’s March was rough. On the other side of Mount Fuji, a capital-restrained Nissan didn’t actually lose money.
Durango Has Its Best Q1 In Five Years

Technically, the platform that underpins the Durango goes back 20 years to 2006, when Mercedes started work on the W166 ML and, with modifications, various SUVs for DaimlerChrysler and FCA. This current generation debuted in 2011, with a heavy refresh in 2013. This makes the Dodge Durango you can buy today either 20, 15, or 12 years old, depending on how charitable you want to be.
You know who doesn’t seem to care? Consumers. Dodge sold 48% more Durangos (Durangoes?) in Q1 of 2026 than they did last year, and the most since 2021, when they were one of the few vehicles not in short supply post-pandemic. Typically, the Durango lags what GM and Ford produce in the full-size, three-row non luxury space.
Not so far this year. In Q1, the much newer Tahoe was down about 10% to 27k units, Yukon was down 12% to just over 20k units, while Expedition was up 30.2% (the Expedition debuted a new model last year) to 17,544 units. Dodge? The 20,300 Durangos sold put it within striking distance of the Yukon, ahead of the Expedition, and closer to the Tahoe than usual.
What can explain this? Here’s Automotive News with some timely interviews:
“Durango continues to do extremely well for us, as we have positioned that properly in the marketplace, really focused in on the V-8s and offering consumers something they can’t get from any other vehicle in that segment,” Dodge CEO Matt McAlear told Automotive News at the New York auto show this month.
[…]
Dealers were excited to hear at the NADA Show in February that the 6.4-liter Hemi was back in the Durango, said Stellantis National Dealer Council Chairman Sean Hogan.
“We didn’t even talk about the redesign, we just literally talked about a single motor going back into a vehicle,” Hogan said after the company’s make meeting. “Let’s face it, this thing’s long in the tooth. [But if] you stick enough power in there and you price it right, we’re going to sell it.”
Dodge dealers are just like Dodge customers: They need that Hemi V8. As Brian wrote, you can now get that V8 a lot cheaper:
What’s even crazier is that the new R/T 392 is actually … affordable? Sure, $51,990 isn’t objectively affordable for the vast majority of Americans, but you have to admit, for the amount of car you’re getting here, it’s a damn good value.
Think of the new R/T 392 as a middle child between the base 5.7-liter V8-powered Durango, which makes 360 horsepower, and the full-fat, 710-horsepower, supercharged V8-powered Durango Hellcat. While it doesn’t carry the SRT badge, this is effectively a spiritual successor to the Durango SRT 392, which went out of production after the 2024 model year.
It’s a niche! The most powerful Yukon gets the 6.2-liter V8, but it’s 55 horsepower short. Ford doesn’t even offer a V8 anymore. If gas prices stay high for a while, that may not have its appeal, but that doesn’t seem to be tanking the market for these things yet.
April Car Sales Probably Weren’t So Bad

Because everything is wacky all the time, a year ago there was a burst of sales due to people reasonably worried that costs were about to explode because of tariffs. It didn’t quite end up that way, but sales now need to be compared to that sugar rush of sales.
High gas prices. War in Iran. Uncertainty about everything. The A’s are on top of the American League West and the Astros are on the bottom. It’s wild. Still, sales in April, as forecast by Cox Automotive, don’t look that bad. Overall, sales are likely to be down about 5.4% year-over-year to 1.4 million vehicles, or a SAAR of about 16.1 million vehicles.
It’s not great, but it’s not bad either. It’s fine. And fine shows a strong amount of resiliency in the car market:
April is expected to mark the third straight month of annual sales declines, as vehicle demand continues to be shaped by competing headwinds and tailwinds. While fuel prices have risen significantly and signs of inflation have returned, strong tax refunds have added needed stimulus to the economy and the U.S. stock market has also returned to record levels.
Cox Automotive Senior Economist Charlie Chesbrough: “April sales appear to be holding up against a lot of uncertainty in the economy. Surging gas prices and historically low consumer confidence haven’t crashed the vehicle market. Sales in April, as in March, were expected to decline from last year’s temporarily high levels, but they haven’t fallen as much as initially expected, thanks in part to strong tax refunds and healthy equity markets.”
There were a ton of EV sales in the second half of the year that are unlikely to be repeated, meaning that year-over-year sales will probably look awful in October.
Toyota Hits Global Sales Record Even As It Sputters In March

It’s the end of the Japanese automaker fiscal year, and if you take all of the companies that make up Toyota (including Hino trucks and Daihatsu), the company hit a record 11.28 million sales. It is, by far, the largest automaker in the world. The company sells a ton of hybrids around the world, small cars in other places, and even electric cars in China.
March, though, was rough, as the automaker faced the same challenges as every other global automaker, as Bloomberg reports:
Global sales in March — including those of subsidiaries Daihatsu Motor Co. and Hino Motors Ltd. — fell 5.8% from a year earlier to 983,126 units, the company said Monday. So far, the company has been able to keep churning out cars, with worldwide production climbing 3.9% to 1.02 million units.
The numbers show how the world’s biggest carmaker has been able to remain on track despite turmoil in the Middle East, which has raised the price of aluminum and other raw materials and the underlying costs for automobile parts. Production may be due for further declines, with Japanese carmakers depending on the region for roughly 70% of their aluminum.
Toyota is still in a great position relative to other automakers.
Nissan Made About As Much As It Thought It Would Lose

Hand it to the new guy, Nissan originally forecast that it would lose more than $300 million for the fiscal year that ended last month. Instead, Nissan, under a new CEO, made about $314 million. That’s a little like setting up a three-foot putt, telling everyone you’re going to miss it, and then sinking it cleanly.
It’s not nothing!
There’s a bit of a caveat here, as Nikkei Asia points out:
Nissan’s President and CEO Ivan Espinosa has been involved in the company’s restructuring effort since he took the helm in April last year. Under his Re:Nissan restructuring plan, the company decided to cut seven of its 17 factories, reduce its global workforce by 20,000, or about 15% of total staff, and abandon a number of planned investments.
This does sound a bit like cutting your way to a profit, but Nissan’s past leadership acted with a worrying disregard for how much production capacity it had compared to the reality of demand. This was necessary. Cutting is easy, thriving is harder, so we’ll see if a reinvigorated Nissan can keep the numbers positive.
What I’m Listening To While Writing TMD
Weehawken’s own Kate Pierson, of the B-52s, turns 78 today. There are so many good songs to choose, but let’s go this weirdly Mondrian version of “Private Idaho.” Happy Birthday, Kate!
The Big Question
Why not Durango?
Top photo: Dodge









Weehawken, huh? Wouldn’t have thunk it (grew up about 30 blocks north in lovely West New York…..NJ.
I didn’t realize until just now that I need some bright yellow pants. Thank you Matt.
I had a Durango as a rental last week on a business trip. It drove surprisingly well and had good power, reasonable comfort. I wouldn’t buy it, though.
same, it is a very impressive RENTAL that you just abuse for few days and then hand over.
If you want to tow a lot, you can get a V8 Durango with the towing package for 50 grand and they’ll probably leave a few grand in the glove box.
A comparable Tahoe or Expedition start at, what, mid 60s? More?
Honestly, the Durango survives because it has great ride and drive, with an excellent base engine. More powerful engines are available that turn it into a rocket ship. Here in KC the police department has bought several, suggesting that this is the new Diplomat. Crooks have caught on that Hellcats are outpowering police cruisers, this may be the solution.
Durango is so old, nobody at Stellantis know how to ruin it.
OR: Directive #38A-2021 got lost in translation, or rolled under the fax machine so Dodge doesn’t know they were supposed to stop making them!
The A’s are on top of the AL West? Gosh. Disgruntled Oakland fan here, trying to not pay attention…
B-52s put on a great concert! Last saw them at the Mountain Winery in Saratoga.
Why not Durango? Doesn’t happen to be the sort of vehicle I need.
Well that answers why I see so many Durangos (Durangoes? Durangii?) lately in my suburban neighborhood.
They actually look decent for something that’s mostly 20 years old underneath. Nobody knows how to extend the life of a platform like Daimler/FCA/Stellantis.
At lease adds a bit of variety to the endless parade of boring Yukoburbahoes and Wranglers.
The Durango thing shouldn’t be a surprise, the exact same thing happened with the old Caravan/Town & Country, Journey, 300/Charger/Challenger, and is also happening right now with the Pacifica. FCA/Stellantis has a habit of keeping around old as hell models that somehow still sell in respectable numbers years after they should have been due for replacement.
However, they also have a habit of completely fumbling the replacement when they finally get around to it, or just not doing a replacement at all. So, maybe continuing to build the current Durango for as long as possible is the best, safest option for dealers, plant workers, and shareholders
I still find it a mistake to discontinue both the Journey and the Grand Caravan in the same year with no replacement ready for either. But I suppose the Durango and the Pacifica/Voyager seem to have picked up those potential sales.
The last full calendar year they were all sold together was 2019, Grand Caravan, Journey, Durango, and Pacifica combined for almost 363,000 US sales. Last year, the Durango and Pacifica were under 207,000, though 2025 was the first time Pacifica sales ever surpassed the Grand Caravan’s 2019 numbers. Though, again, they had two distinct minivans then, and the Pacifica alone is now doing about what one of them did
Why replace tho?
Why Durango?
Because it’s $20k cheaper than a Yukon, Tahoe, or Expedition.
(GT AWD Hemi version in the low $40k range, vs the base version of the other three models.)
I mean, duh….
The Durango is underrated. It is the Panther body of SUVs.
Blasphemy!
Isn’t that what Dodge is known for? 😀
The Durango has been around long enough that consumers are looking at it with new eyes. I had all but forgotten about it but a gentle reminder shows me it still looks good and has a distinct style. It’s a nice balance of organic and muscular styling. I don’t care how old a platform is. If it works, it works.
“Durango continues to do extremely well for us, as we have positioned that properly in the marketplace…”
“We totally screwed up Dodge but the Durango is kicking butt because we forgot about it. How do we say that in a press release?”
“Just say we positioned it properly in the marketplace.”
“That’s perfect!”
Here is the thing about the Durango. I looked at them a little in Decmember of 2024 because you could get a 392 version that was Rear wheel drive biased, but had awd and could tow 8,700 lbs. Honestly when I actually saw one up close, it smacked me in the face that this actually a minivan in most aspects and that is probably why it sells as well as it does. no more dodge minivans exist outside of Chrysler really, but the Durango can be equipped as a basic kid hauler or somehow all the way up to the jokingly equipped Hellcat Minivan.
If you are going to shell out 60-100K for a single use all arounder, I feel like the midsized Durango with a ton of HP and ability to tow a good sized camper is not the worst decision. I think the 392 is probably a 16-17 MPG average kind of ride, so that is probably the biggest penalty for some. But I think the 3.6 V6 versions are pretty much in the same ballpark as a lot of V6 Sedans in the 20-25 mpg range. so the basic ride can be configured for your paycheck is what I am saying.
Unless you’re exclusively hypermiling on the highway, you’re not going to get anything close to 20mpg out of a Durango V6; I had one as a rental for a week recently.
My parents owned one for several years and averaged about 24ish. It’s definitely doable for the v6.
Maybe true for the older gens? For additional context, I’ve also had a Pacifica hybrid rental recently (also with a Pentastar V6) and averaged 22mpg with mostly highway driving, and that’s a lighter unibody, FWD, hybrid (electric motor & battery) and slightly better aerodynamics than a brick-shaped SUV.
I had to look it up, I had no idea the B-52s formed in the late 70s! They were still popular in the 90s so I just assumed they were more recent when I was growing up. I also thought the music video was retro but no, it’s just of its era.
I saw them first time in 1979 In NYC, and several times again.
Love me some B-52’s. She is KATE, and she is a Taurus!
This seems to be Bandstand or something, just lip-synching and play-synching.
Here’s another one, live and poorly filmed (though several camera angles):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKCGilFFFPk
The gas mileage on them might be reason enough. Some of them only get around 10 mpg. The best you can hope for is maybe low 20s and will probably get high teens. The want at least mid grade but many need premium. So just tack that on as a stupid tax. I’ve encountered a few suburban moms with them that with how they brag about the speed of them. Witnessing them drive I have to wonder if they were an Altima driver in a former life. There was a direct correlation between Altima and Dodge journey so I guess not impossible that Durango has taken its place. That alone is enough. Driving around vehicles that are wildly known to be driven badly can be problematic.
it is because they are a minivan in most aspects, but somehow never get called out on it. also they come with big fun V8 engines.
In many aspects its a journey with a V8. A mussle journey. 2 steps up from an Altima. The hellcat is quick but most hybrids and bev are quicker then the 5.7. Most bev quicker then the 392. They should just buy an ev9 and call it a day.
EV’s don’t elicit smiles like a good old grumbly V8 singing as it delivers it’s feels. Also for towing and basic kid hauling the infrastructure and reduced range are still concerning for many of us.
I suppose so but for many of the suburban moms ev9 is fine. Its basically why the ev9 exists, for them. Instant toque does something between smile and fear. Going digital is always a bit souless I guess. The only bev I would really tow with now is a Silverado maybe an r1t or r1s around town.
I do kind of like the R1’s, the Silverado is coming into it’s own with the youtubers and as a result many more of the masses, but the price is still prohibitive to many.
the R1 price is actually going down it seems, but that is also a concern if it is a result of reduced capabilities due to reduce motor qty and so on.
Silverado has come down alot. They were about $52k new in some markets. I see them used under $40k now. Once they get under $30k more people will be more interested. Has to be soon. I really thought hertz would have a ton for $35k. But they were selling them for basically new retail.
R1t is basically a cowboy lexus taco with the towing capacity of a older 3/4 ton for maybe 150mi. Should be interesting to alot of people. They seem to be in the 40s used now. The Silverado is just alot more truck 9000lbs of almost all battery. They both have a pretty insane warranty on the power train. Rivian is 8 year 175k mi. Silverado is 8 year 100k mi.
I don’t understand a lot of the Durango hate. My company vehicle is a base model with the 5.7. I drive a lot of miles and it has been a good vehicle to put in a lot of highway miles. Would I buy one with my own money? Probably not but I see the appeal to those that want a larger SUV for pretty reasonable money. It’s old tech but it works and is pleasant enough and with current pricing kinda hard to beat.
Seeing the earlier models sneaking into clapped out shitbox status thanks to good ole road salt, I’m morbidly curious how long they keep the Durango going. At least parts availability won’t be a huge concern, especially with the aftermarket surrounding these rides.
Why Durango? For one it’s one of the only, if not only “mid size” 3 rows to be able to tow over 6k. I think the grand Cherokee L is the only other one that comes close.
Most everything in this class is capped at 5k. So if you want to tow more, or don’t want to be pegged at your max tow rating while also not going to full size BoF, it’s kinda your only choice.
Also I think they look reasonably good
Kate Pierson is 78??!! Jesus…
My new son-in-law has an old Dakota. The tin roof rusted.
(Kidding! My daughter would not appreciate that joke.)
TBQ: If the R/T 392 was available this time last year we would have looked at it when we shopped our Pilot. The price is the same as our Pilot Trailsport.
they made the Durango with a 392 back in 2024, I looked at them then at least. The RT 392 must be more of a scat pack type design? Remove a lot of gimmicky fluff, let the owners deal with rougher suspension and what not, the sound of the exhaust drowns out the road noises and is fun enough to overcome the shortcomings?
My wife drove a Durango R/T for six years and would have picked up the R/T 392 without a moment’s hesitation, had it been available last October when we got her a new vehicle.
As it stood at the time, you had go Hellcat to get ventilated seats in a new Durango (ridiculous), and she was NOT going to compromise on those.
Ahem….the Outlander Sport would also like to toss their hat in the ring for old-ass-car-you-forgot-was-still-on-sale-in-essentially-the-same-form-for-nearly-two-decades Awards. Mitsubishi debuted it in 2010(also as a 2011, so same length of time I get it) and since then has changed…..the headlights and taillights.
Now now, they added the 2.4 as an engine choice along the way and now made AWD standard too!
(insert Jeremy Clarkson GIF here) SPEEEEEEEEEED