Home » This 124 MPH Jet-Powered Hover Bike Doesn’t Solve The Worst Problem With Flying Cars, But It Is Wicked Cool

This 124 MPH Jet-Powered Hover Bike Doesn’t Solve The Worst Problem With Flying Cars, But It Is Wicked Cool

Jet Hover Bike
ADVERTISEMENT

Every year, some startup company sprouts out of the ground, making a huge promise to revolutionize personal transportation with some sort of flying vehicle. The “future of mobility” often gets used in marketing, too. But here’s the thing, none of these flying vehicles can live up to their big promises, and that includes the newest flying thing everyone’s talking about. The Volonaut Airbike promises to be the jet-powered superbike of the future, and while it’s cool, it’s not going to be the future of how you get to work.

I’m a huge fan of all things aviation. I’m the kind of person who gets equally excited about the cheap plane bought from a department store as I do about the Boeing 747. Every year, I spend a whole week in aviation Mecca at EAA AirVenture Oshkosh, and despite some road bumps, I’m still working on my private pilot certificate so I can live my flying dreams.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

It’s exciting to see that a flurry of startups want to make flying a bit weirder, a bit more fun, and maybe even a bit more accessible. Flying isn’t cheap, but I’m a firm believer that anyone who wants to be a pilot should have access to learning how they can do it. The Volonaut Airbike sounds like the stuff of dreams. It’s a jet-powered motorcycle-shaped thing that zooms at 124 mph and hovers like a helicopter. I just wish its marketing didn’t try writing checks that the jet-moto physically and legally may not be able to cash.

Volonaut Airbike 2 00002 1536x11
Volonaut

Science Fiction Dreams

The Volonaut Airbike comes from a familiar face in the aviation startup world. It’s the brainchild of Polish aerospace engineer Tomasz Patan, who is known most for creating the Jetson One, a vehicle that I can only describe as a quad-motor flying ATV.

In late 2017, Patan developed a working concept for an electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft (eVTOL). Early marketing labeled the project a flying “flying car” and said that the Jetson aircraft carries the mission of “making everyone a pilot.” Now, I have always been a fan of the Jetson One and am happy that it’s actually in production. But the marketing has always been a bit ambitious.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Jetson One is an ultralight, which means that it doesn’t require a pilot’s license. But more importantly, this distinction also means that it legally cannot fly over a congested area like a city, cannot fly at night, and cannot fly into controlled airspace without prior authorization. That means calling the control tower before you depart, and don’t be surprised when they tell you no.

Jetsononeformation
Jetson Aero

Then, once you go through all of those restrictions, you’ll realize that the Jetson One flies no faster than 63 mph, can’t carry more than 200 pounds, can carry only a single occupant, and has an endurance of 20 minutes. Oh yeah, and I forgot about the current price, a whopping $128,000, an increase from its original price of $92,000.

The fact is that the Jetson One does not make “everyone a pilot.” Maybe I’ve spent too much time in the cheap seats, but not everyone is sitting on six figures. In fact, you can get a real pilot certificate for under $20,000 if you’re a decent enough aviator. Then you can fly a real plane. Let’s say you spend $20,000 on flight training. My local flight club charges $170 per hour to rent a Cessna 172, which includes fuel and everything. That’s 638 hours of flying (on top of the hours you flew to get your license) before the Jetson One becomes the better deal. You can also buy an ultralight helicopter for less than the price of a Jetson One.

Again, I like the Jetson One and want to fly one someday, but it’s not really a flying car. You’re not beating traffic in it or going to work. It’s not reinventing transportation. It’s more like a trick flying side-by-side, which is fine! That’s still awesome.

But the problem with flying cars remains unsolved. Every single company that’s building an ultralight eVTOL is making a product that, in my opinion, physically and legally will not live up to the sci-fi dream.

ADVERTISEMENT
Kleinaircar
Klein Vision

That said, there are companies working on making real flying cars, like the $1 million Klein Vision Aircar above, that you can drive on the road and fly long distances, but you need to temper your expectations there, too. All of the real flying cars will require a pilot certificate, cost ridiculous sums of money, and the flying portion of your commute will involve flying between two airports. The dream of getting stuck in traffic, deploying your wings, and flying away is unrealistic. Think of it as a plane that can drive rather than a car that can fly. That’s why flying cars are more accurately called “roadable aircraft,” but that doesn’t have the same ring as “flying car.”

Sadly, this means that the idea of a flying people’s car will continue to be a pipe dream, just as it has been since the flying car prototypes of the 1940s.

The Volonaut Airbike

Screenshot (302)
Volonaut

So, what’s the latest hot and new flying thing that everyone is talking about? It’s the Volonaut Airbike. After Patan successfully launched the Jetson One, he decided to work on a different project in secret. Now, after years of silence, he has unveiled his latest idea, the Airbike.

Patan’s Volonaut company announced the Airbike on April 30 and continued marketing the machine on May 3 with Star Wars speeder-themed posts (nobody tell the Mouse). Thus far, Volonaut has announced only a couple of specs and a couple of videos that show some neat flying with the real working prototype, but nothing else of use:

ADVERTISEMENT

Patan says that the video shown here is real. No AI was used, just a neat POV camera and some slick drone operators to catch the action. That’s impressive! It’s wild that this exists, and it actually works.

So, here’s what we know. Volonaut says that the Airbike is jet-powered, can hover, and speeds up to 124 mph. Patan has been working on the concept for years, but the Airbike didn’t make its first flight until 2023. As for the marketing? Well, here we go:

Welcome to the Future of Mobility. Evolving Human flight. Airbike flying motorbike is a breakthrough in personal air mobility. The futuristic single occupant vehicle is a realization of a bold concept often portrayed in science-fiction movies.

Screenshot (311)
Volonaut

No other details have been mentioned yet. However, the imagery displayed in the launch videos suggests that the Airbike could utilize either thrust vectoring nozzles, like a Hawker Siddeley Harrier, or multiple turbines. That would make sense as either would help the machine be as nimble as Volonaut suggests it could be.

Patan also says that the Airbike utilizes carbon fiber, 3D printing, and other weight-shaving tactics to help the machine achieve a weight that’s “seven times lighter than a typical motorcycle.” That’s not very clear, but I suspect it means that the Airbike weighs less than 254 pounds empty, which would allow it to fall under the legal requirement for an ultralight.

Screenshot (308)
Volonaut

But that would present an issue. It cannot be classified as an ultralight in the United States since ultralights cannot legally exceed 63 mph. So, we’re back to needing a pilot certificate again, unless the U.S. version is slowed to 63 mph. Then, it still remains weird because in the U.S., ultralights are limited to carrying no more than five gallons of fuel, which means limited endurance. Likewise, if it’s an ultralight, then it’s subject to the same downsides as the Jetson One, in addition to however much you’ll have to pay for it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Being in a class higher than an ultralight would mean licensing requirements, thus more costs, and competing with real planes and helicopters. You’re still not flying it to your office, either.

Screenshot (299)
Volonaut

So, I’m not sure how this is supposed to reinvent mobility.

I’m also interested in hearing more details about the vehicle’s redundancies. Engine failures do happen in general aviation, but thankfully, most aircraft are designed to get to the ground relatively safely. Airplanes can glide while helicopters have autorotation. Even eVTOLs tend to have four or more motors, and in the worst-case scenario, can deploy an airframe parachute. In theory, a flying motorcycle would fall like a rock the moment it loses thrust. A parachute can be a lifesaver, but it is ineffective at the low altitudes shown in the promo videos. That motorcycle helmet might also not help as much as you’d hope.

Img 5317 Copy
Volonaut

But we’ll have to wait for more information as Volonaut doesn’t have any further details at this time. Patan has told Robb Report that the Airbike is “highly probable” to go into production, but he can’t give an estimate on launch date or price.

To be fair to Patan and Volonaut, the Airbike is seriously cool. It’s so awesome that it exists as a real, working vehicle. A flying motorcycle is easily one of the craziest vehicles I’ve heard of this year, and I’d be happy to don my cat ear helmet and take one for a flight ride. I even love how it looks like a Ducati from 100 years in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

But, if I could provide Volonaut a suggestion, I would shift from calling this the future of mobility and just lean on how awesome it is. You have a wicked cool product, double down on that! You don’t need to make almost impossible promises when you already have something that could sell itself on looks alone.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
118 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Scott
Scott
1 day ago

Yes it is cool, and I really like how small it is… the driver sits on it like a bike, not in it like a car (or the Jetson One). I’d hate to fall off of it though, or have it land on top of me… unless you’re a kid (I’m not) you’d be lucky to get away with just a torn rotator cuff and broken ribs (perhaps another few grand for a full-body airbag suit)? Of course, I’m also curious about range, and where/how it could legally be flown (you couldn’t just land it on the sidewalk or in an open parking spot outside Trader Joe’s for a quick shop I assume). Thus, it’s probably just a recreation/sports toy thingy, like an ATV or dirt bike, which is fine of course albeit a lot more finite in use case(s) than anything you could commute with, no matter how much you enjoyed The Empire Strikes Back. 😉 You’d heft in into the back of your pickup truck or toy hauler (or, I suppose, a commodious enough SUV or crossover) and drive out to the desert or someplace where it’s legal for you to ride around on it. Some folks will be happy with that, I’m sure, assuming it’s not a six-figure plaything.

I’m hanging on to my helmet and jacket after I sell my Suzuki VanVan 200, but not because I’m planning to get one of these. 😉

Last edited 1 day ago by Scott
Hugh Crawford
Hugh Crawford
1 day ago

Even if all of the technical problems of flying cars or flying mopeds or whatever are solved, letting people fly machines that can move in any direction in space limited only by inertia and gravity seems like really bad idea. Especially over my house.

I lived in park slope for 30 years, a few blocks from an airliner crash site,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_New_York_mid-air_collision

When I was a six month old baby a B52 blew up over our farm, my father thought that the caterpillar tractor he was driving had thrown a rod, and was underneath it when debris started falling around him.

https://www.ttownmedia.com/tracy_press/our_town/1956-bomber-crash-showered-wreckage-over-tracy/article_ca15be54-5f26-11ea-aa21-a35953ea8f67.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_the_Boeing_B-52_Stratofortress

And those weren’t operated by random idiots.

My grandmother would always tell the story about having the first car in her town in western Pennsylvania, and the second family to buy a car promptly crashed into her family’s car.

So no thanks, not over my back yard.

Almost forgot the crop dusters that ran head on pulling up over a neighbor’s barn. Oh, and that WTC crash. Burnt papers from that were all over Park Slope.

I don’t know why people insist on taking a trope from fiction, designed to show you that the world is very different in the future, and turning it into an actual product.

Red Devil GT 5.0
Red Devil GT 5.0
1 day ago

I don’t think anyone said it yet, so allow me.

We got a real life Oppressor before we got GTA 6.

Anoos
Anoos
1 day ago

A child born when GTA V came out will be able to babysit by the time GTA VI arrives.

Jonah
Jonah
2 days ago

Here’s a technical question: Is it a ground effect craft? It’s never higher than it’s jet wash in the video.

Twobox Designgineer
Twobox Designgineer
2 days ago

124 mph? I wonder how much power it takes for a bike and rider to reach that speed, without a windscreen, figthing just air resistance and rolling restistance — not having to produce lift (fight gravity) at the same time. It seems like it would be a lot, for a package that small.

Maybe 124 is its terminal velocity?

Last edited 2 days ago by Twobox Designgineer
Anoos
Anoos
2 days ago

If you find the operator of one of these dead by the side of the road, can you keep the meat as long as you didn’t kill it with your car?

Anoos
Anoos
2 days ago

Leave the Kernnedies out of this.

Canopysaurus
Canopysaurus
2 days ago

This is more of an Atmoped than a skycycle or bike. Sadly, the only redundant system is the rider/pilot. Plenty more of those around.

Last edited 2 days ago by Canopysaurus
Lotsofchops
Lotsofchops
2 days ago

The fact is that the Jetson One does not make “everyone a pilot.”

And this is GOOD. I don’t trust the average asshole with a car, I don’t need them trying to kill me from above as well.

Anoos
Anoos
2 days ago
Reply to  Lotsofchops

I’ve played GTA Online.

I shouldn’t have to rage quit real life.

Black Peter
Black Peter
2 days ago

So I’m old, as such I have lived with the promise of flying cars longer than most. This is the closed we have really come, so I’m giving it to him. Up until these projects we have had cars that can be made to fly, and cars that are really just planes with four wheels. The Jetson, I could commute in/on/with. Well if it wasn’t for the pesky restrictions, and if it can recharge in ~10 hours. The jet thingie I’m less convinced by, I live near Mesa Gateway airport and can say that the Harrier is the loudest thing that flies. So if it’s loud people are gonna say NIMBY

Last edited 2 days ago by Black Peter
Anoos
Anoos
2 days ago
Reply to  Black Peter

Do they run commercial Harrier flights now?

Anoos
Anoos
2 days ago

Me too.

Landing a Harrier in a customer’s parking lot?

Hell yeah (only because I could bill it to the company).

Black Peter
Black Peter
1 day ago
Reply to  Anoos

lol
F18s, Harriers, C130s (of multiple configurations) some loud Gulfstream like planes, a B-25 Mitchell, the B-17 “Sentimental Journey” have all flown over my house regularly. Mesa Gateway still has a few mil-spec planes that fly out of it. Falcon Field is nearby too (a destination for you someday Mercedes) I had a Guppy fly over one day, that was surreal. I’m a frequent user of the ADS-B Exchange site..

The reason the Harriers are the worst is partly because they perform really slow (for a military jet) circles over the neighborhood, and those engines are screaming..

Anoos
Anoos
1 day ago
Reply to  Black Peter

I never want to see any version of the Guppy in the air. It would break my brain.

118
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x