If there’s one three-letter combination that’s seared into the brain of every American car enthusiast of a certain age, it’s SBC, which stands for Small-Block Chevy. Ever since it appeared on the scene in 1955, this compact cast-iron marvel has found its way under the hood of just about every RWD car you can think of, whether Chevrolet put it there, or someone else did. And the most common displacement is also a well-known number: 350 cubic inches. One of the cars we’re going to look at today has had a 350 small-block since day one, and the other recently acquired one.
I got a little silly for most of you yesterday, it seems. But in fairness, I did warn you that we’d be venturing out into left field a bit this week. The gigantic diesel-powered extra-wide Studebaker was polarizing, but even with its absurd looks and even more absurd price tag, it managed to pull off a win.
Thanks to those of you who identified the engine in the other choice as a Studebaker V8. I should have known that. Several of you had ideas on how to finish its front end in a more attractive fashion, and I have some ideas of my own too. As it sits, it looks like one of my old attempts at customizing model cars by cutting two kits up and gluing them together, but I can see a way to make it work. Is it worth doing? Absolutely not, but it’s fun to think about.
Today’s choices are downright tame by comparison, but they’re both rarities. One is quite possibly the least attractive vehicle ever to carry the Jeep name, and the other is also pretty ugly, but iconic. And both have Chevy 350 V8s under their hoods. Let’s check them out.
1972 Jeep Commando – $5,000
Engine/drivetrain: 350 cubic inch OHV V8, three-speed automatic, 4WD
Location: Muskegon, MI
Odometer reading: unknown
Operational status: Runs and drives well
The original Jeepster, way back in the Willys-Overland days, was an attempt to bring a more car-like vehicle to the starkly utilitarian Jeep lineup, and it turned out to be a really cool car. It only lasted about three years, though, before Willys shelved it. In 1966, new Jeep owner Kaiser brought the Jeepster back, this time on a 4WD chassis and carrying the name Jeepster Commando. When AMC acquired Jeep in 1970, it took the Jeepster concept and basically ruined it. Now called simply the Jeep Commando, the new version had an elongated nose to fit AMC’s inline six engines, and a new and hideous grille that looked like a Tonka toy of a Ford Bronco. This ’72 Commando somehow makes the botched nose job look even worse, with its gigantic tube bumper that sticks out a foot from the front.
This Commando would have come from the factory with either an inline six or an AMC 304 cubic inch V8, but for the last five thousand miles it has been powered by a new Chevy 350 crate engine, probably with a four-barrel carb and probably making somewhere around 200 horsepower. It’s a big step up in ease of maintenance and parts availability from the old AMC engines, but I understand if purists are upset. I don’t know for sure what transmission is in it, but I think Jeep was using the GM Turbo 400 at the time. It all runs and drives just fine, according to the seller, who says it’s “dune or trail ready.”
The four photos of this car you see here are the only four photos in the ad, and they’re not much to go on. This is the only view we have of the interior. If that rip in the driver’s seat is the worst of it, then I’d say it looks pretty good, but more photos in the ad can never hurt. You get something like 24 spaces for photos; why not give us a better look?
The outside, apart from the AMC grille and the terrible front bumper, looks pretty good. It has a little rust here and there, but for this part of the country, it’s nothing. The paint is even still shiny in most places. It has nice slotted mag wheels with 35-inch tires on them that give it a good stance, and it comes with both the hard top and a soft top. And of course, you can drive around with no top at all, which is a feature more modern SUVs should bring back.
1977 Checker A11 Taxi – $4,850
Engine/drivetrain: 350 cubic inch OHV V8, three-speed automatic, RWD
Location: Caledonia, MI
Odometer reading: 99,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
Checker is unique among defunct car brands in that most of its production was never sold to the public. The bulk of Checker cars were built to be used as taxicabs, starting way back in 1922. It wasn’t until 1960 that Checker offered a model for sale to consumers: the Superba, shortly thereafter renamed the Marathon. You might think that this is a Marathon, but it is in fact an A11 taxicab model, special-ordered by a Checker dealer for his own use in 1977. The A11’s design is based on the earlier A9 taxi, which dates all the way back to 1956, and barely changed at all until the last one rolled out of the factory in Kalamazoo, Michigan in 1982.
Earlier Checker taxis used flathead inline sixes built by Continental, but the firm switched to GM engines in the mid 1960s. In 1977, three Chevy engines were available: a 250 cubic inch inline six, a 305 small-block V8 with a two-barrel carburetor, and a 350 with a four-barrel that put out 170 horsepower, not bad for the malaise era. This one has the 350, and a beefy Turbo 400 transmission. It runs and drives very well, the seller says, and it has had a lot of recent work done to the cooling system and brakes, among other things.
A11s, and Marathons for that matter, are anachronistic and utilitarian inside, but it gives them a sort of timeless charm. This car could be any age, really, except for the obviously ’70s Chevy steering column and wheel. Basically the whole interior is black vinyl, which isn’t the most comfortable material around, especially in the summer. But the ad also mentions a new air conditioning condenser, which gives me hope that the AC actually works.
You’d expect a Checker cab to be yellow, as most of them were, but this one is painted in almost-but-not-quite Forest Service Green. Could it be that Smokey the Bear was moonlighting as a cabbie at one point? Only you can prevent forest fares, after all. The seller suggests painting it yellow and renting it out as a movie prop, but I think that would be a shame. I like it exactly as it is, rust, dents, and all.
Hopefully today’s tamer offerings are a little more to your liking. We have only one more Showdown this week, as I believe we are off on Friday for the Juneteenth holiday, and I’m trying to decide how crazy to get tomorrow. I have some ideas. Until then, pick the 350-powered ’70s machine you’d rather drive off into the sunset in.
I actually love both of these! The Checker is always cool, but the Jeepster wins for me. When my Dad sold his Jeepster for a 1985 Chevy Celebrity, the era of fun dad ended, and responsible dad started. I will always hate Celebrities for the same reason.
I think the Checker is great, just about perfect as is. Both almost rust-free Michigan cars.
Wow this is actually a tough choice. I got a good feeling about the Checker.
For some reason I’ve always liked the earlier Kaiser-version Jeepster Commandos so ’72 Commando it is, despite it’s having been beat with the AMC ugly stick. Ditch the tube bumper/terminal underbite front end, a little clean up, and it could be a handy toy for cruising around on some desert back roads.
I’ll take the ugly Jeep. I think with the top off, these are actually kinda cool looking, and it’s already a great color. I think Jeeps should be “happy” colors, and Smurf blue definitely is.
Clicked Commando before reading the article. Now I will find out why it is not beating the Checker cab.
Not a bad pair of vehicles to choose from today. The Jeep looks pretty nice, although I don’t understand why they ruined the perfectly nice bench/serving table hanging off the front grill by welding tubes on it.
But as I sometimes scan Craigslist and FB Marketplace to see if I can find a Checker, I’m voting for the cab. I love the idea of bombing around town in one of those big old monsters, and the fact that the A/C might actually work just seals the deal.
I’ll take the Commando. I especially love that it has the hate-bait later style front clip.
I actually like the looks of these Jeeps, though I’d shuck that atrocious bumper off first thing. Lots of fun to be had with this Commando, too on or off, cruising the street or forest roads.
Read the line about being rhe least attractive vehicle/Jeep. Didn’t think much of it then scrolled down a bit and
“What the fuck is that thing!?”
It’s not even so ugly it’s loveable, it just looks like an abomination that needs to be stored in the same warehouse as the Ark of the Covenant. Left to be never seen again.
I already have a 4×4 I need to get rid off, so I don’t want another one.
But I would LOVE to have a Checker for those times I have to go to my office outside Boston. Fuck with a scruffy Checker at your peril, Massholes! <evil villain laugh>
I wonder if the Checker is one of the 26 that was restored and given away in a contest for “Surge” soft drinks in the late-90s: https://www.reddit.com/r/WeirdWheels/comments/1hvzj4z/in_1998_craftsmen_industries_of_saint_charles/
I actually really like the weird Bronco/Jeep mashup of the Commando, and don’t feel anything toward the Checker. I’ll take the Jeep and use it for fun days out with the family.
Although, as another commenter pointed out, the “off-road” crowd in my area isn’t my speed, and I don’t live in the west anymore where there are plenty of places to get off pavement without engaging in the off-road community.
Both are showing evidence of rust. Until I can see their frames, I’m not sure that I’d want either one.
I’ve been fascinated by the Checker Taxi’s retro charms since I was a little kid (and you still saw them plying their trade). You bet I’m voting for it.
I find the Checker interesting, particularly because it isn’t a taxi clone, but in near-seafoam it makes me wish it were a Bel Air instead. And the Jeep would make me pine for a ’67 Commando worse, but between these two, I voted for the ugly Jeep. It’d get more use.
Using my Autopian internet dollaridoos I pick the Checker.
Oddly enough, there is a genuine Checker taxi in the nearby town – pop 12000. I think it has a six due to the asthmatic wheezing noise it makes when under power. It’s also painted in a delightful shade of what looks like roller applied purple with a shiny black roof. I’ve never had the need to use the taxi service so I cannot report on the ride experience. The firm also has a model Y and a couple of vans. The model Y was an underwhelming experience IMO.
Checker all day! Old jeeps are fun, but the fact that this model lost the “jeep fender” front end makes it look like its trying to pull off some type of 1/2 way mk1 bronco cosplay.
Waiting for next week’s DT article “I bought a rust-free Jeep Commando in Michigan and I’m driving it to California!”
Ugly Jeep for me. At least the top comes off and it’s a tad more useful than the ugly old car.
I can smell the vinyl in both of these cars just looking at the photos.
Checker A11 for me.
I would drive it as-is and the only things I’d change is to remove the paint from the headlight surrounds to make it look more original, get the pre-1974 bumpers and then touch up the paint where needed.
No rear-seat pics for the Checker is disappointing.
That Checker is a creampuff, looks very well kept and I’ll bet the odometer hasn’t rolled over. For under $5k it’s a steal. Also, I always kinda wanted one. I’ll bet it gets barely double-digit MPG though.
To be honest, I’ll vote for anything with slot mags and BFG’s on it…..it’s a problem, I know.
I have a soft spot for Jeepsters since I had one years ago. Being Michigan, the rust is worse than it looks, but at least you can take a short drive north to Silver Lake sand dunes. The Checker is rusty too, you could do retro Uber other than that don’t know I’d do with it.