In the 1970s, American automakers sold small trucks built in Japan. Twenty years later, the tables turned, and the Japanese nameplates were relying on their American partners for their small trucks. Today, we’re going to look at two examples of these reverse-captive-imports: a Mazda that’s really a Ford, and an Isuzu that’s actually a Chevy.
The theme yesterday was green paint and a tan interior, and we looked at a couple of rare cars with that color combination. And color me unsurprised that, all these years later, still not very many people want a Daewoo. The super-clean Nubira wagon fell mightily to its competitor, a Mitsubishi Galant sedan.
I don’t think I agree. Since neither one would be a daily driver for me, I think I’d have more fun with the Daewoo, just for the novelty factor of it. It would be amusing to take it to Cars & Coffee-type events and watch people’s reactions. Yes, it’s really a Daewoo Nubira wagon. Yes, I know the badge looks like underwear. Yes, it made it here under its own power.

Now then: What say we look at some beat-up little pickup trucks? It’s basically a Ford versus Chevy matchup, with slightly different styling. But it’s also 4WD versus 2WD, six-cylinder versus four-cylinder, and topper versus headache rack. I guess it’s all about what you need from a truck. Let’s check them out, and you can decide.
1994 Mazda B4000 – $2,900

Engine/drivetrain: 4.0-liter OHV V6, five-speed manual, 4WD
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Odometer reading: 198,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well, I think
Ford and Mazda traded truck designs back and forth for years. In the ’70s, Ford sold a version of the Mazda B-series truck with its own engine called the Courier. In 1983, when Ford brought out its own Ranger compact pickup, the two lines went their separate ways for ten years. But starting with the 1994 model year, Mazda’s B-series became a badge-engineered Ranger – which is not a bad thing. The Ranger is a hell of a truck.

The number after the B on the fender denotes which engine is under the hood, at least usually. This is a B4000, with a 4.0-liter Cologne V6, though if you look closely, the left fender badge says B2300. Of course, the left door doesn’t match at all, so obviously there has been some junkyard diving going on here. The seller doesn’t say how well it runs or give any indication of maintenance history, though they do say it passed a smog test.

In typical work truck fashion, the driver’s seat is badly worn, but the passenger’s seat looks fine. The seller says it has air conditioning, but they don’t say whether or not it works. It does, however, have manual crank windows, which every pickup truck should have. Disagree if you want, but know that you’re wrong.

Outside, apart from the aforementioned mismatched door and replacement fender, it doesn’t look too bad. It’s just beat up enough to be a good honest truck. The ladder rack gives it some work-truck cred, but if you don’t need it, you could probably sell it.
2000 Isuzu Hombre XS – $2,650

Engine/drivetrain: 2.2-liter OHV inline 4, five-speed manual, RWD
Location: Earlysville, VA
Odometer reading: 236,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives well
Isuzu and Chevrolet’s small truck relationship mirrors Ford and Mazda’s pretty closely, actually. The Chevy LUV was made by Isuzu, and stuck around until the S-10 came out. Isuzu then sold its own truck until 1996, when it was replaced by this truck, the Hombre, which is just an S-10 with a different front clip.

If you’re familiar with the second-generation S-10, you can tell at a glance that this is the same truck. Under the hood is the same 2.2-liter pushrod four-cylinder found in a Chevy Cavalier, just turned the other way and driving the rear wheels. The seller lists a whole bunch of new parts and recent service, and they say it runs and drives great, except for an occasional hard-starting issue when warm. It could be vapor lock – yes, it can happen to fuel-injected cars too – or more likely an ignition coil that gets weak when it gets hot.

It’s in really good condition inside, especially for the mileage. Standard-issue GM gray interiors may be drab and flimsy-feeling, but they do seem oddly durable. This truck has air conditioning as well, and it got a new condenser a while back and works fine. The seller does say the fuel gauge doesn’t work, so don’t forget to reset the trip odometer at every fill-up.

It does have some rust, most notably on the rear wheel arches, and the seller says the door hinges droop a little, despite having new hinge pins. It’s a common GM truck problem, and usually it just means you have to give the doors a little more “oomph” when you open or close them. It has a nice matching topper with roof racks on it, which you may or may not like, but again, if you don’t want it, someone else probably will.
As I stated at the beginning, a lot of this choice rests on what you need out of a truck. If four-wheel drive is a necessity and you don’t mind the gas mileage hit of the big engine, then the Mazda is a better choice. If you prefer something simpler and more efficient, with lots of maintenance history behind it, then it has to be the Isuzu. So what say you, Autopians?









B2300 was my first vehicle. Sure, it was slow, but at least it was manual. Cherry bomb exhaust, burnouts when the tires were bald, and donuts in the dirt.
I recall a few issue with the cologne 4.0, but not enough of them to sway me to the S10 side. Though it would be objectively easier to LS swap the S10. If I had a youtube channel, maybe that would be the thing to do here. neither are vehicles I would otherwise actively look to purchase. It might be fun to have a competition between a couple youtubers though. Buy these, Junkyard dive for a V8 Swap option. coyote or perhaps a first gen Hemi 5.7 for the Mazda? Oooh or maybe the japanese LS, the Nissan 5.6. Goal to build them complete for under 5K and then road trip them to Duct Tape Drags for a winner takes all Drag race.
Absolute no brainer today. The Forzda objectively has all the right stuff and subjectively you would have to pay me to endure that gawd awful GM interior of that Chezuzu.
This is a “both” day for me. Compact pickups are cool. Regular cab manual transmission compact pickups are awesome. I want both.
For voting purposes, I went with the Mazda. It is legitimately a good deal. I don’t see a lot of major flaws aside from the driver’s seat upholstery and the mismatched door. 4wd and 6 cylinders are also both positives. This could be a very nice truck with minimal expense and effort.
While I like the Isuzu, it is probably best used as a cheap work truck given its condition.
I’m going to have to go Mazda here. I love a Ranger and have a long history with this general area of FoMoCo. In high school, my buddy Josh had the “Danger Ranger” which was just a shitty 4-cyl Ranger with the exhaust cut off. We’d still ramp the ever-loving shit out of it over Fort Drive. Got fantastic air and I am shocked that we did not die. Right after high school when I was a security guard, our “patrol vehicle” was a 1998-ish? Ranger with 200,000 miles on the clock. I spent three years piloting that thing around the same industrial park night after night and it never gave me an issue. My Uncle and my Grandfather both had Mazda B-Series trucks (one a B-2300 and the other a B-4000). They never died. Just kept going.
Easy choice today. Chevy is lovely (and those seats are so much more comfortable), I know it would hold up well, but I want to stick with the truck I know and go Mazda.
I voted for the “Isuzu” truck with the I4 and the door that’s actually the same color LOL
And yeah, time to get rid of the stupid chicken tax
I have an irrational love for 2WD pickups, even though I live in snowland. Never had a 4WD. Maybe because they demand a premium around here while 2WDs are relatively cheap (but somewhat rare.)
That said the Mazda is the much better deal all around. Rust eventually kills everything here and that Isuzu looks to be well on its way…
California truck or rust bucket truck. Are you really asking this question? No doubt David would call the Isuzu “Rust Free” but we know the reality.
On the merits: The Mazda is a V6, 4WD, with less miles. Clear win there. The ladder rack is cool to and at this price point expensive accessories matter. You could likely buy the truck, take of the rack, and then resell the truck for the same price.
The Isuzu’s rust makes me want to go with the Mazda Ranger today. The Isuzu’s sagging doors could just be weak hinges, or as Anonymous Person notes below the structure of the pillar could be failing. I wouldn’t need to drive the Mazda often enough to make its poorer fuel economy a problem for me.
A Ranger by any other name would smell as stinky as this thing looks in the pictures. But I’d take it anyway. 4WD and 5M? Sold.
I have absolutely zero use for a 2wd truck, so the Ford was already winning, but the rust on the Chevy made it an absolute slam dunk.
Ford F*n Mazda.
Just say no to rust.
That is one Bad Hombre.
I’ll take the Forzda.
Hombre for me. The 4.0 ain’t thirsty but she’s a high maintenance girl.
Huh? I had a 94 Mazda Navajo (Explorer Sport) and a friend had a 90 Explorer, both with this engine. Both made it well over 200k miles without out-of-the-ordinary maintenance. Yours is the first comment I’ve seen complaining about this.
Maybe refering to the timing chain and head gasket issues of the newer SOHC version of the 4.0. But this one should be the old OHV version and doesn’t suffer from the same issues to my knowledge.
I might have it confused with the 4.0 SOHC version.
MFR by a long shot. It’s the more work truck work truck. Guzzler or not.
I’m a GM guy, but I had to vote Mazda today.
The door-hinge-droop detail is telling. My S-10 did the same thing. When replacing the pins didn’t change anything, I lifted up on the end of the door while it was open and watched the pillar that the hinges were attached to move with the door… Huh???
So I ripped out the rubber floor and insulation to discover there was nothing left where that pillar was supposed to be connected to the floor.
So I would run, not walk, away from that Isuzu.
I’ll take the Mazda Fucking Ranger. MFR for those in the know….
I’ll take the Fazda today. In PA, winters (like this year) can still get a little gnarly at times.
Either one would probably be fine, but the
FordMazda seems like it’s in a little better shape and will continue trucking longer than theChevyIsuzu, even with mismatched panels.Heck, if any other panels or exterior parts are dinged up on that one, replace them with more colors and go full Harlequin mode.
When I do truck things for example transport wood in the winter I generally need to drive in snowy yards, and I have never had a case were I did not need 4WD. I drive a 5 speed 2.7 Tacoma.
Since I’m not super thrilled with the condition of either truck (never trust mismatched panels,) both have manuals, and both should be easy to find parts for, for me it comes down to personal preference of what they are. And the Mazda too tall for my tastes. I don’t want a 4×4 or its associated ride height, so Isuzu it is.
Zoom zoom, baby!!
It’s a Mazda F^ckin’ Ranger!
No rust > Rust
Simple math today.
A rust free Mazda of that era is a rare bird indeed. Even if it is a Ferd.