One of the most pervasive fears among all of us is fear of the unknown. Not knowing what’s going on or what could happen can be terrifying, especially when you must make a decision based on what little information you have. And since that’s how our game is played, you’re going to have to make a decision. I won’t give you much information about our competitors, though, because there’s not much to give.
Yesterday we had a lot more information to go on, and I think that worked against the Audi. Its seller’s claims of boosted horsepower and a booming stereo might attract a certain type of buyer, but it wasn’t you lot. The shiny red BMW 540i absolutely crushed it in the poll.
As much as I like the idea of a stickshift Audi Quattro, I’m inclined to agree. That one has been messed with too much. And even if it were stock, the S4 is just overkill. I’d rather have a nice old 4000 Quattro. I’m not terribly enamored with the 540i either; I’d prefer a six-cylinder E39 with a manual, but between these two, it feels like the safer bet.

Shopping for used cars used to be a much more nerve-wracking process. You had to find cars either by spotting something parked in a driveway with a “for sale” sign on it, or reading the classified ads in the newspaper, or a paper like the Tradin’ Times, available at most gas stations and grocery stores for a dollar. The ads had brief descriptions, usually no more than 10-15 words, and if you were lucky, one postage-stamp-sized photo. After that, there was a phone number. You had to call the seller if you wanted to go see the car. I may complain about Craigslist and Facebook Marketplace, but honestly, they’re a dream come true compared to all that. Some sellers seem to think they’re still charged by the word, though, and don’t realize you’re allowed a whole mess of photos, and so their ads still leave you guessing. Today we’re going to look at two cars for the same price, for sale from the same dealership in Lincoln, Nebraska, a dealership that still clings to the old ways.
2006 Buick Rendezvous CXL – $1,900

Engine/drivetrain: 3.5-liter OHV V6, four-speed automatic, FWD
Location: Lincoln, NE
Odometer reading: 185,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives
I’m sure everyone reading this is familiar with the Pontiac Aztek, that gawky, strangely lovable crossover that was the hero car in the short-lived TV series Dark Angel as well as becoming the darling of Pebble Beach years later. But what’s not as well-remembered is that the Aztek had a sister model, the Buick Rendezvous, which had much more conservative styling but somehow managed to look even gawkier. Both the Aztek and the Rendezvous were harbingers of today’s locust-like plague of crossover SUVs, but you don’t see them much anymore. Thankfully.

The Rendezvous uses the same platform as GM’s minivans at the time, and so shares their drivetrains. This being a 2006 model, it’s powered by a 3.5-liter “High Value” V6 engine, which is basically just an evolution of the same 60-degree V6 that had been stuffed in the front of mid-level GM cars since the Chevy Citation. That’s not a bad thing, though; generally speaking, if you’re looking at cheap GM cars, you want the most prehistoric drivetrain you can find, not the latest and greatest engineering triumph that has been cost-cut into unreliability. The only info we get about this car’s mechanical status is that it runs and drives. Anything beyond that, you’ll have to find out in person.

The Rendezvous had another feature that is everywhere in crossovers now: a third-row seat, allowing for seven passengers. I’ve been crammed into the third row of some other mid-sized crossovers before, and I can tell you that if you’re planning on carrying seven adults, just buy a damn minivan instead. They’ll hate you less. In a car like this, calling “shotgun” is an act of self-preservation. I wish I could show you what the interior of this one looks like, but the seller has neglected to take any photos of it.

There are four photos of the outside, though, and they all show minor damage to the bumpers and trim. There’s a hole in the rear plastic bumper cover, and one corner of the front one is held in place by zip ties. Whatever works, right? I don’t see any obvious rust, but there’s an awful lot of plastic cladding on this car. Things could be pretty nasty underneath.
2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GT2 – $1,900

Engine/drivetrain: 3.8-liter OHV V6, four-speed automatic, FWD
Location: Lincoln, NE
Odometer reading: 212,000 miles
Operational status: Runs and drives, but says “NO TEST DRIVES”
Ah, the W-body. That long-time resident of cheap used car lots that is finally starting to fade away. Oh, there will be Grand Prixes (Grands Prix? How the hell do you pluralize that?) and Buick Centurys and Chevy Impalas around for a long time to come, but they’re finally starting to succumb to rust and massively high mileage. They’re still a pretty good deal as far as cheap used cars go, though: reasonably comfortable, surprisingly efficient, and able to be fixed with nothing more than duct tape and swear words.

This is the first year of the final generation Grand Prix, when the two-door model was dropped, and the standard engine became the legendary 3800 V6, in its Series III form. It’s a big, lazy engine for a car this size, and that’s part of its success: it doesn’t scream, or sing, it drawls, and moseys. This one has well over 200,000 miles on it, and the seller says it runs and drives – but for some reason, the ad says “NO TEST DRIVES.” Yes, in all caps like that. What the hell? Who would drop two grand on a car without taking it around the block first? It’s not like it’s a Corvette or something that someone is going to abuse on the test drive. It’s a damn Pontiac sedan. I really wonder what the story is there, but not quite enough to call the dealership and find out.

There aren’t any photos of the inside of this one, either, but we know what mid-2000s Pontiacs look like inside: lots of gray plastic, buttons galore, and probably pretty comfy seats. It looks like this one has black leather seats in it. What condition are they in? Who knows? If they won’t let you drive it, maybe they’ll at least let you sit in it.

It’s starting to get pretty crusty around the wheel wells, but from what I’ve seen since moving to Michigan, these cars can get really spectacularly rusty and still hold together somehow. It’s probably got at least a couple years left in it before it becomes a problem.
I know why small dealerships like this write such terse ads. They don’t want you basing your decision on a description and photos. They want you to come down and look at the car, get you into that portable construction trailer they use as an office, and apply the hard-sell. But since we’re only looking at them for fun anyway, we have to go by what’s in front of us, and in the case of these two, that ain’t much. What do you think? Which one seems like a more safe bet for the price?






Easy vote, whatever isn’t the Rendezvous. I find it far uglier than its Aztec counterpart, and in general one of the most unattractive cars of all time. I wouldn’t be able to look at one sitting in my driveway without being overcome by a wave of depression. I’ll take the Grand Prix, hell I’d take just about anything else over a Rendezvous. High mileage German luxury cars included.
Pontiac, but the Buick is probably safer, I just want the 3800 and despite having owned 3 of them, I still like Pontiac, even with their terrible interiors.
I’d have that Pontiac owner drive it right to a mechanic.
Buick easily wins with basic shitbox rules. It is newer and has less miles for the same price. This class of vehicle is about A to B transport for cheap.
I’d also say the Buick is the safer bet. Light damage to basically all sides and the fact that it is an old Buick gives grandma’s last car vibes to me.
Condition is everything in this price bracket. The Buick seems to be in better condition even with a worse engine. No test drives plus obvious rust seems sus. Like the front subframe is held on by thoughts and prayers and the brake lines are corroded to oblivion. GM did not bother rustproofing brake lines in this era.
I hated voting for the Buick, but that Grand Prix has just too many red flags.
I’ve hated the Rendezvous since I first saw it. It has homunculus vibes. It looks like a test mule, none of the proportions are right, nothing makes any sense. It looks like they made the body fit a chassis never meant for it, which is kinda what they did. It’s an abhorrent machine.
I have no idea what CXL means, but judging by the painted mirrors and fancy wheels, I’m guessing this one is fairly loaded. Combine that with the shady Grand Prix dealer, and I have no choice but to vote for the vile abomination.
“Combine that with the shady Grand Prix dealer…”
Both cars are for sale from the same dealer.
Rusty as shit and unable to test drive it? Hell no.
As much as I hate to do it, the ‘parked by braille reader’ Rendezvous is the choice.
WE KNOW WHAT WE’VE GOT, NO TEST DRIVES, THIS BABY’LL SELL TODAY SO HURRY BEFORE YOU MISS IT!!!!
I’d roll the dice on the unknown rust situation with the Rendezvous. FWD is one less thing to go wrong. But really, plan on either of these being a pile for which $1900 is the down payment.
Well, I think the best thing to do is buy the bigger one because it has more mass for when you drive it through the dealer’s office. You got the scary down pat today.
I wonder what’s wrong with the GP that they say no test drives. Are they afraid it’ll break down a mile from the dealership and they’ll have to have it towed back?
Correct. The Grand Prix is low and lighter and might get stopped by the first desk after the curb and plate glass has slowed its momentum. I’ll bet that Buick can get right through to the back office where the little predatory weasels are hiding.
Does it matter which one we vote for? These are both solid cases of “Here you go, my ADHD son/daughter. Have fun learning to drive and please buy me a new mailbox every time you run mine over. When the car breaks it’s gone.”
We did that with the daughter! Liability-only insurance on the old car that wasn’t really worth trading in on my new one. “Here are the keys – wreck it = lose it.”
I got my kids a Cobalt. Would you believe Cobalts are expensive to insure because everyone gets them for their kids and they keep getting wrecked?
Also would you believe it’s been in the shop for three weeks and I’m not sure it’s gonna make it?
Can we half-vote for the Pontiac to get the opportunity to contact the dealership to inquire exactly why the test drive ban? There could be a good reason, or maybe some flexibility…
What would be a good reason? It’s not safe to drive?
Right? It screams that something is seriously wrong and they don’t want you to know about it. They first want you to buy the $1900 car with $50 down and weekly payments at 27% APR.
Possessed by the devil? Parts fall of when it’s moving? Rustflake-nado?
The wood chips in the transmission can only quiet the noise for so long…
Nope on both 4/4 days this week. Used car shopping is more luck than overconfident people will admit.
Used car shopping is luck? Not really,
Mark just picks poor examples to keep things “interesting”. He has flat out said this series isn’t about getting a good deal on basic reliable transport.
No matter how much homework you do, you still need a little luck on your side to ensure a hidden, unpredictable breakdown doesn’t happen right after the keys change hands or even finding the right car at the right time in the right condition.
I’d rather have my legs removed with a belt sander than drive a Rendezvous. I’ve hated these things since day 1, and Mark is absolutely on the money that these hideous turds were a harbinger of the loathsome, egg-shaped Encore and other blobmobiles that followed. Give me the Grand Prix. Give me shoes made of mousetraps. Give me the sweet release of death. Anything over the Rendezvous.
I’m also fairly confident I could get a test drive if I left $1000 on the sales guy’s desk and showed the other half, promising a sale on the condition that the GP could at least make it to 60mph. If it can’t, I’ll waddle home on my bloody stumps and mousetrap shoes and still be happy I’m not in a godforsaken Rendezvous.
lol this is the answer, I’ll deal with the rust, and W bodies are super easy to work on
I posted a similar criticism of the Rendezvous, but I like yours better.
Buick under these conditions, but plenty of reviews for this dealership say don’t buy any car from them.
Damnit, I wanted to vote for the Grand Prix because I might feel somewhat alive while driving it but NO TEST DRIVES is an automatic disqualification. That shitty little dealership can eff all the way off.
At $1,900 you’ll get your money’s worth out of that Rendezvous if it lasts over a year. At this end of the market you can’t ask much more than that in 2026.
That looks way too much like my GF’s old Grand Prix and I was so happy when it finally died. No test drives? No worries, I’ll buy the crap Buick.
who died ?
It.
Well, the “NO TEST DRIVES” guy just settled it. I’m not dropping twenty bucks on a vehicle without taking it for a spin (if it runs), let alone two grand. So screw you buddy.
As for the Rendezvous, I wonder how hard it would be to reskin it with all Aztek sheet metal? I always thought the Rendezvous was the far less weird-looking of the pair, but if you’re going to drive something weird looking, lean in. Go for the big splash in the deep end. Weird is not something you do halfway, you’re either in it to win it or you’re doing it wrong. Ask Weird Al, he’ll tell you. So rebuilding an ostensibly more-normal Rendezvous back into its oddly-hot cousin the Aztek is the way forward.
Just think, if the Rendezvoustek needs an engine swap, I think a 2.8 would drop right in. That’d be hilarious. Slow…but hilarious.
Would you prefer Measles or Mumps today? Both are about as desirable as these choices. The gawky, beat up, SUV-ish thing or the something is certainly very wrong with it, Sketchy Buy Here Pay Here Dealer Edition Pontiac.
I’d rather walk but Buick today based on the obviously dirtbag dealer Pontiac ad.
Normally I’d go for the GP in a heartbeat.
NO TEST DRIVES though? Deal breaker.
Buick it is today.
No test drive? No way. I’ll take the fugly Rendezvous.
GP for me.
We had a Rendezvous for a while. It was… fine.
Until the head gaskets had to be replaced because of the Dexcool disaster. Got that fixed juuuuust in time for the AWD to crap out on it.
I’ll take my chances. I bet if I flashed a stack of hundreds they’d toss me the keys.
The 3.5 fixed pretty much all of the gasket issues that the 3.4 had, and this one is FWD, so no AWD to worry about.
No test drive, no buy.
No test drives? Like how does that work? They obviously don’t want to sell the car.
I was leaning Buick anyway. Then I saw the Pontiac’s rust and read “NO TEST DRIVES!!!1!”
Now 100% Buick.