One of the first challenges from the latest season of The Great British Bake Off was having these British amateur bakers make “American-style” cookies. Unexpectedly, it was a gastronomical disaster just this side of the Midland Counties Beer Poisoning of 1900, though with thankfully fewer fatalities. Many of the cookies were more like candy bars, or featured meringue toppings and sour fruit. It was very odd.
Even the phrasing of the challenge was bizarre, with a request to produce 30 American-style identical cookies with… decorations? The classic American cookies (chocolate chip, oatmeal raisin, snickerdoodle, peanut butter, etc) are not decorated. They’re sweet, sure, but not overwhelmingly or cloyingly so, and a bit of salt often provides a counter to the sugar.
What the bakers created, primarily, are more like something you’d get at a novelty cookie bakery. Think Crumbl or Insomnia Cookies. Not that they’re necessarily bad, if that’s what you want, but they aren’t really American-style, nor are they in any way sufficient when what you’re thinking of is a Tollhouse-style chocolate chip cookie.
This is how I feel about most electric cars, and why I think it’s so hard for fans of EVs and fans of traditional internal combustion cars to even speak the same language. A focus on pure statistics might make one assume that a cookie with more sugar is the better cookie if you like sweets, when, to me, a saltier cookie with less sugar is what I’m really craving.
An example.
In a long conversation about the future of the Volkswagen Group and combustion cars, someone on BlueSky said the following:
Who is still going to buy a Porsche ICE car, when a dual motor EV can eat any one of them for lunch easily at the hypothetical race off the stop light?
This poster is not wrong to say that if what you want in a performance car is to accelerate faster than anyone else, you ultimately are better off buying an electric car. In terms of performance-per-dollar, it’s nearly impossible to beat a Tesla Model 3 Performance, which costs under $60,000, can hit 60 mph in under 3 seconds, and produces over 500 horsepower. If you wanted the same level of objective, numerical performance from a gas-powered car you’re in the realm of, say, a Ford Mustang Dark Horse SC, which costs basically twice as much.
Porsche has found it so hard to find customers for performance EVs that it’s shifted its strategy back towards making more expensive 911s, which are inefficient and illogical cars. They’re also fun as hell. So is the Mustang. If a rational person would rather have a Model 3, I am definitely not a rational person.
High performance electric cars, going back to the culinary metaphor, sometimes feel to me more like that Gushers candy, which supposes that if you want something really sweet, there’s nothing better than a chewy bit of sugar confection that blasts a lukewarm splurt of corn syrup straight into your mouth while you eat it. It’s an appealing notion to children, maybe, but try arguing to an adult that a Gusher is better than, like, a Twix, or a Kit-Kat, or any other candy you can think of. [Ed note: I prefer Toffifay, which is “too good for kids.” – Pete]
This isn’t to say that it’s impossible. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 N pulls it off by mimicking a gas-powered hot hatch, and the new i3 is apparently very good. A Porsche Taycan Turbo comes close, although it’s still not as fun as the basest base Cayman or Boxster.
All of this was on my mind when I decided to borrow a purple Rivian R2 Performance AWD.
An R2 Has The Performance, If Not The Feel

To clarify, this is not going to be a full review, because David did like 6,000+ words on the R2 after its launch this summer and I agree with his take. The R2 is an excellent electric SUV, and the fact that it looks very much like a smaller R1S isn’t a detriment to me, as I think the R1 is an extremely handsome design.
I own a Honda CR-V Hybrid that is just an car to me. I don’t really care that much about how it looks, I just like that it’s efficient, safe, and was affordable. If you were only thinking about a car as something that’s efficient, safe, and affordable (relative to an R1S, at least), then a Rivian R2 is a sensible choice.
Many people, I suspect, aren’t into the R2 because it makes rational sense. My friends who are interested in buying one look at it like something fun. And, in a way, it was. Driving the Rivian R2 for a week, I found it to be both sensible and even enjoyable.
Was the actual point-to-point of driving it fun? Not exactly. I appreciate that even the dual-motor performance version only trots to 60 mph in the mid-3-second range, because anything faster than that makes me feel like I want to barf, and barfing is not usually fun to me. Still, the novelty of an electric car accelerating at non-nauseating speeds doesn’t do much for me, and after a while the trick loses its appeal. I have more fun in my E39, which is slower, but makes a bunch of loud noises and allows me to shift. Maybe that’s juvenile, but it’s my truth.

I feel the same when I attempt to hustle it around a corner. Absolute credit to Rivian for taking something that’s roughly 5,000 pounds and overpowered and also making it easy to drive quickly. There’s a specific high-speed curve I use as a safe benchmark for measuring composure, which is the unheralded yet most important characteristic in a fast car. Most people think power is key, but power without grip is just wasted heat, and grip without a good sense of where it ends is just an invitation to make someone’s Cars & Coffee reel go viral.
Attempt to throw a Rivian R2 around a corner, and it’ll probably save you from embarrassing yourself using a “brake lock differential” to do what torque vectoring or a limited-slip differential might do in a different vehicle. Is that fun? Not really. Under pressure, the hefty SUV jolts and dives like a USC freshman tight end, but in this situation you’re not the tight end, you’re one of the hapless Ohio State defenders. There’s not a lot of feel there, because there’s not a lot of feel with most good electric cars, so you just hang on while the car straightens itself out.
So What Makes It Fun?

If the driving of the Rivian R2 is nice, though not particularly fun, then every other part of the experience will have to make up for it. Thankfully, for most Rivian owners and even grizzled autojournalists like me, the rest of the car more than delivers.
I had the R2 for Halloween, and got to use the Halloween Mode I wrote about last week. You can see video of it below, or by clicking here.
I can’t film the different modes from outside the car, so I had my ultimate frisbee buddies sit in the car and hit the various buttons of Halloween Mode for me, and you’ll notice them dancing with joy. I was too busy trying to film without tripping that I hadn’t noticed their wild gesticulations, but that’s basically the feeling you get when you have a car that’ll turn itself into Ecto-1 (or Ecto-R2 in this case) just for funsies.

Even the main cluster makes the R2 look like a little ghost-fighting ambulance, which made me smile while driving it. It’s even better when parked, because you can put it in “Trick or Treat Mode” and have it tell you ghost stories, give you a Ghostbusters-themed soundboard, and will let you smush little Stay Puft Marshmallow guys on the big infotainment screen. My daughter happily proclaimed, “This is one of the best cars you’ve ever gotten” after playing with it for ten minutes.
While this may seem slight, and even childish, it’s not something most cars can really do! This is a silly yet powerful way to demonstrate that Rivian’s value proposition is, in large part, due to its completely integrated brain. In a normal car, everything is controlled by overtaxed ECUs attempting to make a bunch of different supplier-coded systems work together. Rivian wrote all the code, and it can therefore blink the lights like a ghost trap, play a siren, and turn the lights inside green (Tesla, too, has some similar abilities, and my friend played ghost noises from his Model Y to try and scare/amuse our kids during Halloween).
I love old Volvos. To me, old Volvos are fun. That’s difficult to explain to people sometimes, but there’s a joy in clever packaging and stout capability.

The frunk on the Rivian is wide enough, and deep enough, to toss in all my frisbee gear so that it’s not stinking up the rest of the SUV. IT also has a delightful opening action, and almost seems to be smiling at you when you do it.
Can a color be fun? This particular R2 has Borealis, which is a light-shifting color not that dissimilar from Ford’s Mystichrome, just without the green infill. It is a fantastic hue, and people went out of their way to turn their heads to look at it when I passed.
It’s also a neat trick that the rear glass can drop into the hatch, which allows the Rivian to be used as a portable sound system or, if hanging out after the game enjoying a beverage, a place to hang out.
This isn’t the most traditional sort of fun, and it requires a change in perspective, which is why I think so many electric car fans are people who weren’t gearheads before this moment. I can totally accept that what I find exhilarating–controlled slides and barely controlled tire destruction–is unappealing to many people.
What you taste in your mind when you hear ‘American cookie’ may not be what I taste in my mind, and that’s fine. I don’t want to yuck your yum if you won’t yuck mine. What the R2 shows is that, if you’re willing to broaden your tastes a bit, you might find something worth a second bite.
Top photo: Author






“Fun” is such a subjective concept. What’s fun for one person isn’t necessarily going to be fun for someone else. I, for myself, think that the Fiat 500e is a ton of fun to chuck around It’s zippy, easy to fling around, and it looks cheerful. I also think that my BMW i4 is fun. It’s got a great ride, plenty of punch, and drives like a RWD BMW, but what’s really fun is that I don’t have to worry about rod bearings or oil leaks. I actually find it more fun to drive than my Panamera, because I’m always a little worried about mechanical mishaps with it. The Panamera might be a little sharper and have a little better seats and stereo, but it feels more fragile, and I’m always more worried about driving it.
Long story short, part of MY personal calculus for “fun” is that I can drive it and not worry. Also, I like being comfortable, and I, again personally, find EVs more comfortable to drive.
This is definitely one of those “your mileage my vary” topics. I also really don’t enjoy EVs pretending to be combustion-engined. I just don’t like it, and I think it’s annoying.
It’s like putt-putt. The fun courses are fun because of the charm that is intrinsic to the course; whether they’re the simple ones or ones with crazy obstacles. They can be rundown or nicely kept and they’re still fun
Meanwhile, the newer trend of indoor “we can charge $15 per themed cocktail,” places are just joyless cash grabs built for the ‘gram stuffed with tchotchkes.
EVs/hybrids can bring their own kind of fun. When driving my wife’s new Carnival Hybrid, I enjoy chasing the best possible fuel mileage I can muster. That said, doing so is like playing a video game in a way, constantly trying to get it into EV mode and not burn that precious gas.
Of course, this is countered by the fact that I just bought an Elantra N. It is not an EV. And it is a freaking hoot.
Recently read that salt is added to many sweet, baked goodies because it enhances the sweetness in the mouth. It does this by diminishing or blocking the bitter receptors on the tongue. Whatever it does, kosher salt sprinkled on a warm chocolate chip, browned butter & coffee cookie is exceptional.
I think the ridiculous acceleration of evs, will one day bring back fun to drive cars.
Hear me out, 1.9 sec 0-60 isn’t going to be a benchmark for ice cars, mid 4 sec 0-60 is just your average ev. Once people stop chasing specs, and just accept it’ll never be as quick as an ev, fun cars can focus on being fun. Not worried that it has to chase a certain metric.
Love that purple. That alone makes it more fun than 95% of cars on the road.
There are many kinds of fun. An ICE car is fun in its way. A potato-launcher is also fun, but in a different way. An EV could also be fun, but it may not be the same kind of fun. I feel like if EV makers want their cars to be fun, they’re ultimately going to have to find a different way than just mimicking an ICE.
Call me an old man if you want (I’m 33, I don’t think that’s old anyway) but I just can’t see myself enjoying a software defined vehicle. I sit in front of two computer monitors all damn day for work. The last thing I want is to get in my car only to see and interact with…more screens. My car is my escape from that. The small screen in my car runs AA and the only thing I use it for is nav and the backup camera. That’s all I need.
It’s like vinyl records. Streaming music couldn’t be easier, and I imagine most of us do so. But owning a physical record has appeal, even though it’s objectively worse: there can be static, they’re easily damaged, they take up space, record players occasionally need adjustment and new needles, etc. And yet vinyl sales are up, and they’ve been outselling CDs for a while now. I’ve been collecting records since I was 13. I like the physical, manual process of playing records, and the way they sound. Just like I prefer a car with physical, tactile controls, that is engaging to drive. Even if it’s “worse” than a software defined EV.
Give me an EV that’s not a bunch of gimmicky screens and features, and we can talk.
This is exactly where I’m at (38). I’m currently in front of two gigantic monitors. I have been since 6am. I will be till 5pm. Getting into a vehicle that’s chock full of screens is sort of a nightmare for me. I’ve always kept a turntable and records (granted that was a habit from before the vinyl resurgence as my dad managed record stores in the 80s and is a big music nerd) as there’s a real value in actual, tangible things that bring senses to life that digital copies just don’t do for me.
This is also why I read real, tangible books goddamnit. Lol.
Couldn’t agree more. I’m amazed that people still love dicking around on their touchscreens as much as they apparently do. Any vehicle that revolves around them and software in general is a hard no for me.
I’ll put in another vote for avoiding software and screens outside of work. I do like my bolt ev I’ve had for almost a decade, but the things I don’t like the most about it are using the touchscreen and even slow responding buttons that remind me that I’m interacting with software. It isn’t as engaging as a manual transmission, but grabbing a shift lever to change regen between D and L, and the regen paddle on the steering wheel adds more interaction than basically any automatic transmission ICE car. It certainly seems possible to have an EV that hides the necessary software, and has a more analog feel.
I am an old man (60) and have a Chevrolet Bolt as my only car for 7+ years. It is a blast to drive every day.
I like the 30 Rock ref. Well done.
Here comes the funcooker!
Murderer
This is firmly at the top of my shopping list next go-around…but the fact that it’s within spitting distance of an Ioniq 5 N or GV60 *Dr. Evil voice* Magma means the unconventional fun bits are going to have to outweigh the very conventional ones that those vehicles offer.
They got soooo close to being the ultimate daily for me (and so many others), but there are a couple of big misses IMO:
1) Lack of Carplay/Android Auto. Yes, Tesla/Rivian fans will lash back at that one, but I have grown accustomed to Carplay/AA. To get the most of the Rivian infotainment, they require a subscription. I do not like subscriptions.
2) No sunroof cover. This is a baffling miss. On David’s initial test drive, they were cooking inside the car when it was in the 80’s. Rivian’s test track is near me in sunny Surprise, AZ, where summer heat can be over 110F. How did the test engineers not die? I am sure that the aftermarket will solve this (much like for Teslas), but it’s annoying.
3) The dang automated door handles. Yes, there is an aerodynamic advantage to these, but they are annoying long-term.
All complaints aside, props to Rivian for making an affordable(adjacent) car that has a sense of humor, has good range, some basic softroading capability, and tons of room/storage. It’s just about the perfect car for most.
The door handles are annoying in the short term too, my buddy’s R2 has already had to go back to the dealer because the door handles stopped working after a few weeks. After he got it back, the dealer said to be sure to not close the doors using the handles. Why do they even put on door handles if you can’t use them for 50% of the duty of door handles?