Home » A New 2026 Chevy Trax Is Better Than A Nice Used Car And Probably Cheaper

A New 2026 Chevy Trax Is Better Than A Nice Used Car And Probably Cheaper

Chevy Trax Review Ts3

I did a remarkable thing the other day. I drove a press car that was darn near close to a base trim. I almost didn’t believe it when I glanced at the Monroney–the pedantic journalist name for a window sticker–and saw only a few options. That’s rare. Even better, one of the extras on this 2026 Chevrolet Trax 1LT was an inviting shade of blue metallic paint. Good colors are always worth the money.

A common complaint is that there are no great affordable new cars. That’s maybe true. There are, however, plenty of good, affordable new cars. The Chevy Trax is possibly the goodest of all of them. It’s not that it does anything in such a superior way that it distances itself from the competition. There’s no secret here. It’s just great packaging, with most of the stuff, at what’s now an excellent price.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

My biggest debate when I drive cars in this price bracket is whether or not the potential buyer would be better off with a good certified used car. In a rational market, that would probably be true more often than not. Currently, I don’t think that’s the case. I love data, so let’s look at data.

What Can You Actually Get In An Affordable Small ‘Crossover’ These Days?

Used Car Price Chart Large

The average used-vehicle listing price in the United States is $25,287, according to Cox Automotive. As you can see in the graph above, the pandemic-induced supply crunch and the collapse in leasing led to huge price increases in 2022 and 2023. The market is a little above where it was in 2024, which is not a good sign if you’re hoping to get a low-mileage, reliable used car, but it’s at least better than 2022-23.

The Trax I reviewed was almost perfectly priced at the level of the average used car, and in considering what I’d maybe buy instead, I thought of my Honda CR-V Hybrid. That’s a 2025 model and, truth be told, it’s much better than a new Trax. It’s also a class above the Trax, and it turns out, the prices aren’t even close. If I wanted to find a used CR-V Hybrid on Carvana, I’d have to go down to at least 2021 to acquire one for a price anywhere near the Chevy. That’s terrible. If you’re buying a used car, you’re almost certainly getting worse financing, which means you should really be shopping for something 10% cheaper than your budget for a new car.

I guess it’s comforting to see that my CR-V is somehow worth more than what I paid for it. That’s comforting to me. That’s not much consolation for someone in the market who wants to spend about $25-$27,000 and has to move real humans. Want to feel better? The Chevy Trax exists, and while it’s a little more expensive than it used to be, it’s still an excellent value.

2026 Chevy Trax 7 Large

If you had a certain level of flexibility and didn’t want a sedan, the $25-$30k space used to have some interesting options. That’s back when the hybrid Maverick XLT was less than $30k. It’s much harder to find an equivalent these days. An Impreza Sport gets you a little more legroom up front, a little less in back, as well as standard all-wheel drive. But that’s $29,690 out the door if you want blind-spot detection and some other basic safety features. It’s also a car. There’s the Nissan Kicks, which I’ve also reviewed recently and will write about soon, but that gets pricey rather quickly.

The non-hybrid Corolla Cross and HR-V are both options, and will almost certainly have higher resale value on the other end. That’s probably true of the Corolla Hatchback as well, if you’re willing to entertain a smaller car. The challenge is actually getting one. You may be able to find a Corolla Cross L, but you’re likely not finding one at a price that’s below a better-equipped Trax. Also, the base Corolla Cross is a lot like the base Honda HR-V in that both are hamstrung by mediocre CVTs and an average-at-best driving experience. The hybrid Corolla Cross solves a lot of these problems and offers better fuel economy, but that’s at least a $30,000 purchase.

You Get A Lot Of Car For The Money

2026 Chevy Trax 8 Large

Thomas did a full review of the Trax a couple of years ago, and, functionally, it’s the same car. What’s changed is the environment we live in these days. While the Trax is more expensive than it used to be, plenty of the cars in this price bracket have just disappeared. The Kia Soul is on the way out, and the Jeep Renegade has been gone for years. Even delightful weirdos like the Fiat 500X and Fiat 500L have vanished.

The Trax I had, in LT trim, started at $23,100 before a $1,395 destination charge. The “Driver Confidence” package was added, which, for $795, adds lane change and blindspot alert, adaptive cruise control, rear cross traffic alert, and rear park assist. That’s worth it just for the adaptive cruise control. For another $595, the “LT Convenience Package” brought heated seats, a heated steering wheel, keyless entry, and heated power mirrors. Again, a reasonable charge for those niceties.  The only other option was $395 for the Marina Blue Metallic paint, which I support. Fully kitted out and delivered, that’s $26,280. Not bad.

2026 Chevy Trax 10 Large

It’s an attractive crossover that looks bigger and nicer than it is. For some reason, GM now sells the also South Korean-built Trailblazer as the AWD subcompact crossover, and this as the FWD-only version. The Trailblazer looks slightly off to me, like a little metallic turd wearing a baseball cap. The Trax is far more handsome, better proportioned, and comes with these excellent 17-inch aluminum wheels.

The money and effort spent on the Trax are mostly in places you care about, like these cleverly patterned seats.

2026 Chevy Trax 15 Large

They’re just nice, comfortable seats with small triangles that get slightly smaller to give them some visual texture.

2026 Chevy Trax 18 Large

The interior isn’t all soft-touch plastics and contrasting fake wood as you’d find on a luxury car. There are just honest, smooth plastic surfaces with enough angularity and little details to not feel cheap or entry-level. There’s no punishment here for getting something that isn’t the most expensive car on the lot.

2026 Chevy Trax 13 Large

And the little matching pops of color on the vents are a nice touch.

2026 Chevy Trax 16 Large

The Trax also has something a lot of more expensive crossovers lack: Physical controls!

2026 Chevy Trax 14 Large

This little panel of buttons and knobs already makes the Trax a superior automobile, and these particular controls are extremely intuitive to use. Wild, right?

The 11-inch infotainment display offers up wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, which is all any reasonable human being wants, and it works with no noticeable lag or other issues found on many luxury cars these days. Is the six-speaker audio system going to make you feel like you’re at the Dokken concert in the front row? Nope. Just make the volume louder, and you’ll be fine.

Here Is The Funniest Feature On This Car

2026 Chevy Trax 3 Large

On the left are my totally average, easy-to-use Honda keys. On the right are the Chevy Trax keys. This is the keyfob equivalent of one of those cell phones for elderly people who don’t want a fancy smartphone. This is a Jitterbug-ass remote. If VTech ever sold a real car, this is what the key fob would look like. You know what? I like it. I don’t need a complex remote. I just want something that works.

This Is Maybe The Smallest Car In America That Doesn’t Feel Small

2026 Chevy Trax 2 Large

Driving around in the Trax, I didn’t get the feeling I sometimes have in traffic, where I start to wonder if I wouldn’t prefer just a little bit more mass. I liked the GR Corolla I had, but it felt small. A Miata, too, feels small and delicate when surrounded by massive SUVs.

I realize I should be more evolved than this. I often tell people they don’t need a crossover and would be happier with a small hatchback, but then I turned around and bought a decent-sized crossover. The size, the space, and the convenience of a large loading hatch at about knee height are real considerations.

2026 Chevy Trax 4 Large

No one in my family thought the car was small or ever remarked on the size, other than to acknowledge that there was plenty of room for our stuff. Behind the rear seats, there are 25.6 cubic feet of space, which is enough for a small family in most situations.

It’s Weak In All The Places Every Other Car In This Class Is Weak

2026 Chevy Trax 17 Large

I will level with you: None of these cars is great to drive. It used to be you could buy a Honda Civic Si or even a Mazda Protege for something that felt like an appropriate equivalent for the time. Those cars came with manual transmissions, were delightfully light, and were just remarkably fun to drive.

The Trax has a 1.2-liter turbo inline-three that makes 137 horsepower and 162 lb-ft of torque. It is not tuned for power; it is tuned for efficiency, and returns a reasonable 28 MPG on the EPA city test cycle and 32 MPG on the highway test. That’s pretty good for a non-hybrid. It is neither noticeably fast nor, thankfully, noticeably slow. (It’s worth mentioning that there is a lawsuit related to this engine claiming that it might catastrophically fail, although nothing has been proven yet.) The ride is neither too soft nor too harsh, the electronic power steering is communicative enough, and the brakes feel better than what you’d find on some nicer crossovers.

If there’s one place where the Trax shines relative to the competition, it’s in its transmission, which is a six-speed traditional automatic instead of a CVT. It goes a long way to differentiating the Trax in a class where most cars follow the same formula and can’t escape CVT harshness.

You Can Find Cheap Ones All Day, Every Day

2026 Chevy Trax 7 Large

If the past few years have taught us anything, it’s that an automaker might say it builds a cheap car, but it might not be possible to find that cheap trim for sale. Do you want a Trax LT similar to the one I drove? There are plenty out there advertised for a number below the already reasonable MSRP.

Badge snobbery might tell you that an equivalent Honda or Toyota is better, but my experience driving the other cars in the class for a week doesn’t support that bias. The Chevy is just as good and has a real transmission that makes driving it a little less annoying.

My original thesis is that this is better than most used cars you could get in this class, and I’ve gone back to Carvana to double-check this, and I stand by it (I recognize you might get a better deal from a private party, but Carvana is at least a consistent source of comparable cars). Something close might be this $25,000 Tuscon SEL with under 32,000 miles. There’s probably still some warranty left there, so I’d consider it.

A new Trax comes with a built-in warranty and the peace of mind of knowing every mile is a mile you put on it. What was once an alright deal has become an even better one without the car significantly changing at all.  It’s just quietly stayed a good car while its competition has either gotten way more expensive or ceased to exist.

Test my theory, can you find something that’s slightly used and roughly in this class that you’d rather have? Put a link in the comments.

All photos by the author unless otherwise noted

 

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
224 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chris D
Chris D
15 days ago

It’s not made in the US, or Canada, or Mexico, but in Korea.

My instinct would be to pay a few thousand more and get something that will last longer, and not make me feel like I’m using the cheapest store brand toilet paper instead of something better.

Anonymous Person
Anonymous Person
1 month ago

If you thought the funniest feature was the key, you should see the key on the LS model like mine:

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/RIEAAOSwI6RkyaOk/s-l1600.webp

Andiamo345
Member
Andiamo345
1 month ago

I bought a 2025 Trax LT equipped just like the one in this article. It’s a nice little car and does fine on the road. It’s got plenty of room, decent features and the little turbo 3 is actually pretty refined. Decent engine noises and minimal nvh in the cabin. There are some cheap spots in the interior but nothing worse than I’ve seen in some comparably priced vehicles. Consumer reports recommends Trax as of 2026… Car and Driver 10 best since 2024, and multiple good Autopian reviews to help seal the deal. As for reliability, I’ve read some horror stories on Reddit and other forums, but…I think the people who write in forums are the people who want attention for their horror stories. People going about their lives driving perfectly fine cheap cars aren’t out there posting about their perfectly fine car in the forums. Additionally GM has probably sold in the 100k volumes of these, so yes there will be failures but are they failing at high rates? I guess time will tell but for now I have no regrets. FYI – Previous owner of multiple gens of Honda Fit and current owner of a Toyota and a Hyundai in addition to this Chevy. If Honda still sold the Fit in the US I would probably own one! But for almost the same price as a 7 year old Fit I have modern tech and a full warranty.

Mr. Fusion
Mr. Fusion
1 month ago

I don’t know if this engine is inherently less reliable than others in the class, but all things being equal I would much rather have a torquey 3-cylinder engine than some droning NA 4-cylinder that can’t get out of its own way.

One of the things that makes a car a “penalty box” is NVH, and there is no getting around the fact that an inexpensive, low-output, high RPM 4-cyl is going to sound and feel like crap when you lay into it. But thanks to wonky physics, a 3-cylinder engine sounds a lot like a tiny V6 engine. And torque is what actually makes an engine feel usable.

Of course, if they can’t make it reliable then that is a shame; but it seems like the jury is out on that. (The 1.2T was introduced in the previous-gen Trax, and I haven’t heard of any mass-failures over the past 5 years.)

Bagpipe Putt
Bagpipe Putt
1 month ago

Why buy this when you could get a CX-30 for a grand more?

B3n
Member
B3n
1 month ago

I have one argument against the Trax, and that’s the wet timing belt.
As long as it’s under warranty, it’s not a bad deal. But after that… I think these will have a very steep depreciation curve.

Hugh Crawford
Member
Hugh Crawford
1 month ago

GM reliability, GM small high output technologically advanced engines.

I don’t really think both happen in the same car, not since they killed Saab anyway.

Hugh Crawford
Member
Hugh Crawford
1 month ago

“ CVT harshness”
My only experience with CVTs is on hay swathers and Toyota’s eCVT, and a bunch of non automotive devices like Shimpo pottery wheels, but I thought the criticism of CVTs was their LACK of harshness, with the engine running at approximately the same rpm as you accelerate.

In order of increased harshness:
CVT < slushbox automatic < manual < dogbox < Fraiser Nash ?

Am I missing something?

Mr. Fusion
Mr. Fusion
1 month ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

Toyota’s extremely poorly-named “eCVT” is not a CVT at all, but a planetary gearset similar to those used on many other hybrid vehicles. It has nothing to do with a conventional belt-driven CVT, which is confusingly what is used on the non-hybrid Corolla, HRV, etc.

Hugh Crawford
Member
Hugh Crawford
1 month ago
Reply to  Mr. Fusion

I am well aware of that, pointing it out to the point that I think others around here are tired of it.
Likewise, the belts on hay swathers are big rubber and fabric V belts used in tension, not metal things used in compression ( I always thought that being in tension was one of the things that defines a belt, but apparently not. ) so like I said, my experience is limited, hence the question.

And Toyota’s eCVT is great.

Mr. Fusion
Mr. Fusion
1 month ago
Reply to  Hugh Crawford

My point was just that Toyota’s eCVT should not have been called “eCVT” since it is mechanically unrelated to any traditional CVT design. As far as I know, it is otherwise an excellent transmission.

My personal experience with a belt-driven CVT was overall positive. This was a 2010 Nissan Rogue with the 2.5 engine. On the downside, acceleration felt weird compared to a torque converter automatic. If you didn’t want the engine to howl at the highest possible RPM, then you had to finesse the accelerator almost like driving a manual.

On the plus side, driving up long and/or steep grades on the highway was very pleasant. The transmission just dialed in the needed amount of torque relative to the engine speed, whereas a geared automatic would constantly downshift to maintain highway speed. But that 2.5 was a good torquey engine in a relatively lightweight car. I think the CVT experience gets less pleasant with weaker engines and/or heavier vehicles.

PlatinumZJ
Member
PlatinumZJ
1 month ago

I had a Trax last year as a rental on a family vacation; it served its purpose quite well! The customizable appearance of the gauges was an unexpected but nice touch. The only complaints were cabin noise (I would compare it to a hard-top Wrangler on a windy day) and non-adjustable seat belts (Mom gave an irritated huff every time she buckled up).

Mr. Fusion
Mr. Fusion
1 month ago
Reply to  PlatinumZJ

I wonder if the noise-cancellation setting was turned off in your rental.

Last edited 1 month ago by Mr. Fusion
TriangleRAD
Member
TriangleRAD
1 month ago

I have a bit of a history with the 1st-generation Trax. I rented one in the spring of 2015 to drive from NC to Disney World. My daily driver at the time was a Sentra Spec V, my daughter was young and we wanted a bit more space for the trip.

The trip convinced me of two things:

1) A B-segment subcompact crossover made a great family car for my small family and I would buy one for my next daily.
2) The B-segment subcompact crossover I bought would NOT be a Chevy Trax.

A few months later I plunked down $22k for the 1.4T 6MT Jeep Renegade that I’m still driving.

RAMbunctious
RAMbunctious
1 month ago

I love the look of these and am happy to see another hatchback on the market, but I wouldn’t buy one or recommend one. I think 30mpg avg is poor for a 1.2L FWD, and this thing just looks like it should be AWD. With the looks and stance this has, it should be a Crosstrek competitor, but it’s not.

Rather than the tiny turbo motor, I’d have liked to see a N/A 1.8 or 2.0-ish 4cyl.

It looks great but just seems too much like a throwaway car.

Pappa P
Pappa P
1 month ago

These do look nice on the road, but I don’t think they are a good buy.
In the Toronto area, you would get a 2024 RAV4 with about 30-40k miles for the same money.
For a few grand more, a brand new RAV4.
Not exciting I know, but in 2 years, the RAV4 would probably be worth double the Trax’s value.
The reason is not “badge snobbery.” It’s the simple fact that the RAV4 will be significantly more relibale, cheaper to fix when it does break, and simply cost much less to own.
It should definitely be noted that the RAV4 has 80-100hp more than this abysmally underpowered Trax.
I’m always optimistic that with each new generation of small cars, GM will decide to reverses their philosophy and copy what the people who are good at this are doing. The products always seem enticing, but the ownership experience seems to stay the same.
A buddy of mine has a newer Trailblazer with this powertrain. He is a GM die hard. After 2 years, he decided he wanted to trade up to a larger vehicle to support his expanding family. Unfortunately the vehicle wasn’t worth anyhing near what he still owed on it.
It’s about 4 years old now with about 65k miles and the exhaust front pipe already cracked due to the thin material used. A few years back, the electronic park brake caliper failed.
He’s ready to move on from GM.

Harveydersehen
Member
Harveydersehen
1 month ago
Reply to  Pappa P

A lot of people don’t have “a few grand more.”

A big reason cars with decades of well-documented inferior reliability still exist is because a lot of people don’t have “a few grand more.” By all rights, Kia, Hyundai, and GM (outside of trucks) shouldn’t be around at all if it wasn’t for their affordability.

Last edited 1 month ago by Harveydersehen
Pappa P
Pappa P
1 month ago
Reply to  Harveydersehen

You don’t need to spend “a few grand more” to get into a dramatically better vehicle. I just thought I would throw that in there because I was surprised at how close the price of this Trax is to a brand new RAV4.
My overall point is that cars like this do not have superior “affordability.” They are actually more expensive to own in most cases.

Rob Stercraw
Rob Stercraw
1 month ago

The powertrains in these are utter shite. One good example of a low-mileage failure: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXqwmtpmvzk&list=UUtAGzm9e_liY7ko1PBhzTHA&index=5&t=665s

Marty
Member
Marty
1 month ago

FWIW, the 1.2L is showing issues with head gaskets…

Scott
Member
Scott
1 month ago

I’m posting this to say ‘thank you Matt’ as I always appreciate car reviews by Autopian, yours especially. I also sort of like the Trax/Envista, though there’s a air of disposability in it (starting with the drivetrain) that gives me pause. As I said before, if this came with a decent, naturally aspirated four cylinder motor that could be expected to last a while, it’d be much more appealing to me personally. I think the Envista’s better looks are worth the price bump over the Trax, but that’s just aesthetics.

If the 1.3L actually is more likely to last 100kmiles than the 1.2, I’d actually consider a used Envista instead of a new Trax, especially if it happened to come in that great metallic copper color. 🙂

Last edited 1 month ago by Scott
224
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x