A long time ago, I told the world something I believed: supercars are stupid. That goes for hypercars, too, or whatever we want to call that class of hyperexpensive stupidcars with dramatic doors. There’s a new hypercar company out there, Sanrivatti, that is absolutely doing its part to keep proving that thesis of mine correct. I do have to hand it to them, though, they’re doing it in a new and novel way, even if it sort of is a way I predicted almost a decade ago. As a joke.
Sanrivatti is a Dutch hypercar startup with a CEO who came from Donkervoort, a company that does make a remarkably cool-looking car, the F22. But Sanrivatti (which is not affiliated with Sanrio, if you were hoping this would be somehow Chococat-related) is taking a very different approach than making cool-looking cars. They’re focusing on putting the driver in a stupid position nobody really wants, a position they call the “Apex Position.”
This is what the Apex Position looks like:

…and this is from a silly article I wrote back in 2017:

It’s not exactly the same, but the same basic idea: driver prone on some padded hump, head-forward. Sanrivatti has a whole press release talking about their big idea to build a car that makes nobody want to ride with you:
Revolutionary ‘Apex Position’ totally reimagines ultra-high-performance car ergonomics. The head-forward driving position blends superbike with hypercar, enabling a step change in field of vision, more precise vehicle placement on track and a deeper connection between driver and machine.
…
For decades, hypercar development has focused on increasing performance through greater power, advancing aerodynamics and ever-more sophisticated technology. Yet one fundamental aspect of the driving experience has remained consistent: the position of the driver.
Sanrivatti began by asking a different question: what if the way we position the human body inside a high-performance car limits the connection between driver and machine?
Today, the pioneering brand reveals its answer: The Apex Position. A unique, world-first driving concept that completely rewrites the rulebook for ultra-high-performance car ergonomics and places the driver at the very centre of the hypercar experience.
Okay, okay, calm down. I get it. It’s like a superbike, but in a car. You know who has been clamoring for that?
Nobody.
Nobody, at least when it comes to a hypercar like this. Sure, maybe for a purpose-built racing car or speed-record car or something like that, okay, as a one-off or whatever, but that’s not what hypercars are. Sanrivatti must be sort of delusional about who buys hypercars and why. People don’t race these things. Someone at the factory tests them to fantastic speeds, or maybe one goes to a special driver hired by a media outlet for a speed run, and they get video of it going 300 mph or whatever, and everyone has a wank, and then the rich dillholes who buy these tell every single person they see that it can go 300 mph.

Hypercars are sophisticated machines that are either parked in climate-controlled garages or slowly driven between restaurants and movie premieres so people can see the fancy owners and their dates emerging from a three-foot-high car with doors that unfold like a metal origami Georgia O’Keeffe painting, and, yes, I know what she was really painting. That’s it.
People who buy hypercars don’t race them. Pagani doesn’t build race cars, for example: they build incredibly capable cars that owners could use on track days, if they wanted to. Do they? I have no idea, but I suspect if they do, it’s not often. Are people racing Bugatti Chirons all over the place? No. There aren’t racing series based on hypercars, because that’s not what they’re for. So what’s the point of a seat like this?

Most hypercars seat two people, because what’s the point of a hypercar if you can’t use it to lure in people of your preferred type and give them rides in hopes that they’ll be intoxicated by all the drama and status and then, you know, put out. But in this thing? Where’s your date supposed to sit? Behind you? Staring at your ass? Beside you, where they can’t really see your face or talk to you?
And why is the driver wearing a helmet in these sketches? Is it because of the inherent safety issues that come from making your head the first thing to get hit? Who the hell wants to wear a helmet in their hypercar? I guarantee the people who could buy this have complex and lavish hair; it’d be a crime to hide those luxuriant manes under helmets!

Maybe I’m being a curmudgeon here. Maybe this is the best thing to happen to hypercars since the invention of the scissor door. I did have an even worse idea for supercar driving positions back in the day, too:

So, it could be worse! Am I being a jerk here? Is there some appeal to this I’m missing? If so, tell me in the comments!
Top graphic image: Sanrivatti









This is a South Park episode, isn’t it? For the actual answer to the question they were asking, you can look at what solutions human-biology-limited performance vehicles (ie- jet fighters and space craft) actually use: sitting highly reclined or flat on the back. Turns out we know the best position to resist g forces is…. and it’s not the Apex.
A driver in this position would be prone to accidents.
Driving is serious business!
No drollery allowed!
the only benefit to the sportsbike position is being able to steer/lean using your body weight which is wrapped around the bike. There’s zero benefit to this in a 4-wheel car. Or even a 3-wheel car. Your neck would hurt and your vision would be slightly impaired
i thought this was going to be related to jason’s “cars the movie” theory and i think it was the homunculus theory
https://www.jalopnik.com/this-disturbing-theory-explains-pixars-cars-1791834045/
That’s what I was thinking too.
That last picture…
That made literally snort and thankfully I wasn’t drinking at that moment.
I hope there’s nothing long, hard, and / or sharp under the steering wheel . . .
I spat out a mouthful of noodles when I saw that, for instant fear of laughing and choking
But does it come with a crotch vent?
If not, count me out.
The “Apex” position is basically the position Gary was in when he was flying with Ace in those SNL skits.
So two things.
1) I laughed. A lot. fantastic spot of writing Jason.
2) Where does the passenger sit? Atop the driver, a la doggy style.
I bet if you cut that car down by half you could get some really wicked performance out of it, maybe open up the roof while you’re at it.
like maybe something where you kind of hunch over the top it, instead of being inside of it even?
Epic Apex.
You know, you might be on to something there.
It’s just the first step to making the Torchinsky homunculus theory come to life. Ka-chow!
They should call it the Lucy
They misspelled “missionary position.” It’s not a stupid position, per se, but there are more imaginative positions.
Chaparral did it for GT7. With friggin’ lasers, or whatever, so four years of virtual R&D is already complete. Their name also makes sense and kind of seems like a confession: Sangria vs. Audi. No sober person designed this while thinking it’d ever work.
I can’t wait to see the version with a back seat
It would make a great Duomobile for the reboot, now that Colbert’s available
Ok, im in. Perfect car, but the controls for the gadgets must be used by the passenger using a joystick mounted low and in front of the driver
Aww, for a moment I thought you were going down the Cars-morphic (forgot what you called it..) road again 😀
…the perfect car for anime girl mecha pilots. At least, from what I used to see on DeviantArt before it went full AI…
Seriously, I have no idea where that style of cockpit came from and don’t necessarily want to.
Also, prone pilot fighter experiments had been conducted in the immediate post WWII time frame. I believe vertical gee tolerance was improved, at the cost of neck injuries.
The F-16 has a reclined seating position to help with g-load on the pilot.
It is, but not nearly as much as actually being fully prone on your stomach or back. The F-22 is also reclined, but less so due to complaints from F-16 pilots about…neck pain.
Open wheel racecars, on the other hand, are arguably more reclined, largely due to the driver being an aerodynamic inconvenience. Gotta put the feet up high so we have more room for the T-tray and stuffing air under the floor…
Didn’t see something like that in a South Park episode?
As I recall Mr. Garrison controlled it strictly by using his mouth…
Not surprised one bit though.
I guess I like the trend of stuff being built for rich idiots being SO stupid I am electrochemically incapable of envy. Makes being happy with my life WAY easier.
I like your perspective on it.
I am feeling extremely validated right now.
The absolute dumbest billionaire’s codpiece EVER.
Tron motorcycle for poptarts who need airbags.
There’s just no way that would be comfortable or safe. You have no head support unless you rest on your chin. You can’t wear a seatbelt because you can’t reach behind you to lay it over yourself and buckle it. Every time you brake your body is pushed back up, and you can’t really have shoulder supports to help that without blocking your vision (and splintering your shoulders in a crash). It’s not even lower profile than laying supine.
I get that it’s purely a status thing, but I doubt it’s cool enough to outweigh the massive drawbacks.
If I want a crotch rocket, I’ll buy a crotch rocket. This just seems needless.
Did someone ride Tron at Disneyworld one too many times and thought this would be a great idea for a car?
The disney adult special!
Now that I think about how crazy Disney adults are, yea build this, slap some Mickey or Tron marketing on it, it will sell.
This wouldnt be the first Disney Edition cars either, Hyundai\Kia did it but didnt go all in, they just stuck some Disney logos on it, it need to be all in.
So, as a dude, I keep looking at this idea and wondering about what happens if I run into anything. What exactly is keeping me from going forward? Do I WANT this portion of my anatomy to be front line in my restraint?
I hope they make it. I hope the buyers drive them.
Not that I would be happy if billionaires died in low-speed accidents from broken necks, but I would not be sad.
The few billionaires I have respect for would never go for this sort of nonsense, so I am right there with you.
I dunno, I could see MacKenzie Scott zipping in one of these distributing donations to worthy causes around the world.
She seems more down-to-earth than that. And Bill Gates is much more a Porsche guy.
If this was really better, F1 or some other racer would have done it years ago
ding ding!!
Or a fighterjet.
Gloster Meteor F8 “Prone Pilot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloster_Meteor_F8_%22Prone_Pilot%22
And the Lockheed EF-80A (USA) which was apparently to embarrassing to photograph.
And hang gliders.
Even Smokey Yunick’s 1664 Indy pod racer wasn’t that nuts