Home » Get That *@#$!! Thing Out Of The Yard: 1964 Chrysler Newport vs 1991 Isuzu Rodeo

Get That *@#$!! Thing Out Of The Yard: 1964 Chrysler Newport vs 1991 Isuzu Rodeo

Sbsd 7 31 2023
ADVERTISEMENT

Good morning! I’m back, after some slight technical difficulties last week. Our entire neighborhood was without internet service all Thursday afternoon and night, but of course folks still have to watch their cat videos, so the mobile network was jammed up, too. It took me ages to get a message through to Autopian HQ, but luckily my distress signal made it all the way down to Australia and was picked up by our good pal Laurence Rogers, who came through in a huge way. Thank you again, Laurence!

Today’s cars have nothing in common except that they’ve both been exactly where they are for a long time. Which one is a more likely candidate to revive? We’ll see in a minute. First, let’s see how Laurence’s Aussie choices went over:

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

Screen Shot 2023 07 30 At 6.53.48 Am

Easy win for that Holden uuuuute. Personally, I’d rather have the Falcon; the extra length on the Commodore may be useful, but it looks goofy. Besides, as I mentioned in the comments, it would be fun to tell people you’re bringing a Ford Falcon to a car show, and then show up in that ridiculous thing.

I have one hard-and-fast rule when it comes to project cars of my own: they have to run and drive. This is partly practicality, because a flatbed tow truck can’t back up our steep and narrow driveway (found that out the hard way), but more importantly, because my wife wouldn’t stand for a non-running car sitting around. And that’s probably a good thing. My MG is currently breaking that rule – it’s taking up the entire garage, up on a QuickJack, while I replace the rear suspension bushings, repaint the wheels, and have new tires installed. But at least there’s a game plan; it’s not “I’ll get it running again eventually.” Our two choices today don’t seem to have such a plan, and I get the feeling they’re for sale under duress, because another member of the household is sick of looking at them. Here they are.

ADVERTISEMENT

1964 Chrysler Newport – $2,500

00q0q 9zin7lb7xxv 0gw0co 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 361 cubic inch overhead valve V8, three-speed automatic, RWD

Location: Hemet, CA

Odometer reading: 96,000 miles

Runs/drives? Probably not, but you can ask the spiders

ADVERTISEMENT

First, let me just say that I think Chrysler missed an opportunity recently: They should have called the base-model six-cylinder 300 the Newport. Back when this car was built, Newport was the name of the entry-level Chrysler model, still fancier than a Dodge or Plymouth, but a lot simpler and cheaper than a New Yorker, Imperial, or 300. With all the nostalgia tied up in the LX/LD platform, the Newport nameplate would have fit right in. But nobody asked me, I guess.

00j0j 1rpzogipi6h 0gw0co 1200x900

There was no such thing as a six-cylinder Chrysler in 1964, of course; that was reserved for common Dodges and Plymouths. This Newport is powered by a 361 cubic inch V8 and a push-button operated Torqueflite automatic transmission. Both are simple, stout, well-built units, but judging by the number of spiderwebs under this hood, this engine hasn’t turned over in a long time. Could it be brought back? Probably, if you threw enough new soft parts at it. Would it be easier to just drop in a known running engine from something else? Undoubtedly. But some folks like a challenge.

00h0h Evnjewxyewv 0gw0co 1200x900

It appears to have been dragged out of the weeds a little ways, anyway; I think this is an earlier photo, showing its original resting place, and the photo above is after they towed it out and aired up the tires. The body, thanks to that warm California sun, isn’t rusty except for some surface rust where the paint is gone. And surprisingly for a car left sitting out in the open like this, all the glass is intact. It’s not a bad-looking car, though personally I prefer either the earlier Virgil Exner craziness or the later fuselage-sided monoliths.

ADVERTISEMENT

00v0v Hf5m8j2dlk3 0co0gw 1200x900

Somewhat worryingly, this is the only photo of the interior that we’re given. Is that because only the right rear door opens? Or because the rest of the inside is a complete horror show? Only one way to find out, I guess.

1991 Isuzu Rodeo – $1,200

00303 9mclbfbj5vy 0ww0oo 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 2.6 liter overhead cam inline 4, five-speed manual, RWD

Location: Burleson, TX

ADVERTISEMENT

Odometer reading: 343,000 miles

Runs/drives? Ran when parked five years ago

I admit that I’m kind of jealous of people who can buy a new car and keep it for decades. I set out to do it once; I bought a brand-new base-model Mazda Protegé with the intention of keeping it forever, but circumstances changed, as they tend to do, and “forever” was actually only four years. The seller of this Isuzu Rodeo has held onto it eight times as long, racked up nearly 350,000 miles, and is finally letting it go after it has sat for five years with bad brakes.

01616 Ge607qlalul 0oo0ww 1200x900

This Rodeo is unusual in that it’s such a plain model; I’ve seen a few four-cylinder 2WD models before, but I had no idea they were available with a bench seat. It’s amazing how de-contented a “stripper” model actually was once upon a time: Not only were power windows and locks not part of the equation, but usually neither were air conditioning, intermittent windshield wipers, or even a radio. If carmakers today made such a plain no-options model, they’d sell a dozen of them to Luddites like me, who would almost immediately regret not springing for the fancier model.

ADVERTISEMENT

00m0m 5egbbiozk0d 0ww0oo 1200x900

One advantage of a car with one long-term owner is that every bit of its history is accounted for. Maybe not all of it is written down, or remembered, but there are no “I don’t know how the frame got tweaked; it was like that when I bought it” moments. This seller probably can’t tell you exactly how it acquired all of those 343,000 miles, but they can almost certainly tell you how it got that dent in the front, and they’re probably still embarrassed about it, or mad at someone else about it.

00i0i Fjl6br2uf8a 0ww0oo 1200x900

This truck was parked five years ago for a bad brake wheel cylinder, but it allegedly ran and drove just fine before that. Some work will be needed to wake it up, and then the entire brake system should probably be gone through. It also has a leaky exhaust manifold gasket that should be replaced.

Leaving a car sitting around in a non-running state isn’t something I would ever want to do, but I understand how it happens. “Life is what happens to you while you’re busy making other plans,” after all, and an extra car is often low on the priority list. But I can also understand how a patient spouse can walk by a derelict car only so many times before enough becomes enough. I don’t know for a fact that that’s the case with either of these, but it sounds plausible. Which one would you drag home and revive?

ADVERTISEMENT

(Image credits: Craigslist sellers)

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on reddit
Reddit
Subscribe
Notify of
58 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Myk El
Myk El
10 months ago

I vote “NOPE”

Bongo Friendee Harvey Park
Bongo Friendee Harvey Park
10 months ago

Counterpoint about reviving the Newport name: to me, Newport evokes a career diner waitress named Brenda who’s 57 but looks 70 and sounds like a blend of Lemmy and Marianne Faithfull when she calls you “hon” and has fascinating stream of consciousness conversations with the cook during their cigarette breaks, during which she burns through 6 Newports in 15 minutes and then chugs Listerine before going back to work the BoH until the frying smells cover up the smoke smells that have thoroughly permeated her outfit. She picked up the mouth wash habit back when she was still drinking the bottom shelf stuff, 1.5 liter plastic bottles of whatever was on sale. She quit the booze years ago but never stopped gargling, and the Newports are her way of coping with the cravings.

Brenda is super nice, but her trainwreck of a life depresses me to no end.

So no, not Newport.

On the other hand, maybe Brenda is a metaphor for Chrysler and Newport is a perfect badge. I dunno.

Laurence Rogers
Laurence Rogers
10 months ago

Another great match-up, Mark!

We had a ’98 Holden Rodeo which is the same as that Isuzu except with a turbo-diesel. It probably got to the same mileage, the odometer stopped working a little after 220,000 miles so who knows.

I picked the Newport, as being an old Chrysler from the 60s it is mechanically similar to the Valiants I muck around with. This is exactly the kind of car I’d love to fix up and roadtrip across the USA someday.

Morgan Thomas
Morgan Thomas
10 months ago

Until recently we had an ’89 Rodeo tray that would have been almost identical to that ’91 other than the body (although even that is the same back as far as the B pillar) – same 2.6 petrol 4cyl, same 5 speed and same 2WD chassis, and identical interior.
I’d go with the Newport too, even though it’s not a stylish as a 1961 Newport – I’m a sucker for pushbutton Torqueflites!

Last edited 10 months ago by Morgan Thomas
Timothy Swanson
Timothy Swanson
10 months ago

Hey, how fast can I go?
Got to catch that little red Rodeo…

Ricardo
Ricardo
10 months ago

Rodeo. These things are dead simple mechanically and run forever. Isuzu make things that last.

Gary Lynch
Gary Lynch
10 months ago

I need a big old Chrysler. Bigger the better. And Imperial would be best, but this will work. The more Shitbox, the better.

I’m sick of having to yield to the multitude of @$$hats that don’t know how to drive, and think they’re fricken Moses- everyone will part and get oit of their way.

Big old Chrysler don’t care. It goes where it wants you. It don’t yield to lesser dipsticks on the road. It Rules…

Yep. I need that car…

Freelivin2713
Freelivin2713
10 months ago
Reply to  Gary Lynch

Hell yeah! Well put

TriangleRAD
TriangleRAD
10 months ago
Reply to  Gary Lynch

As someone who has spent a little time behind the wheel of a ’67 Newport, I feel this.

ScottyB
ScottyB
10 months ago

That’s a horrid example, but man oh man what a great car was the 1964 Newport. I acquired a flawless example from the estate of the original owner and hate, no loathe, myself to this day for selling it. Factory air and the 318 drove like a modern car on the interstate at sustained speeds of 75-80.

https://www.hemmings.com/users/55957/ride/406.html

Geoff Buchholz
Geoff Buchholz
10 months ago

Rodeo, Frontera, Passport … yeah, it saw a lot of different names on the prow, but I always liked them. We’ll take the Isuzu; it’s (hopefully) less work than the Chrysler, and would be an excellent dirty-jobs machine.

Mr Sarcastic
Mr Sarcastic
10 months ago

I prefer a Vehicross or even Amigo over this Rodeo but even it looks better at to the moon and back than the 4 door Newport at 1/4 of the miles.

Cam.man67
Cam.man67
10 months ago

I may be the only one, but I quite enjoy doing brake work on cars. The Isuzu seems like more fun in my particular situation, though the interior is gonna need some love. Shame it’s not 4×4, but thats probably also the only reason it’s not beat to hell or rusted beyond DT’s level of acceptance.

Isis
Isis
10 months ago

They both look like they need the same amount of work. Newport just because of what you end up with after all that work and money.

ProudLuddite
ProudLuddite
10 months ago

I was ready to take the Newport, but the Isuzu has a manual and looks so much better from the outside. Then I saw the inside of the Rodeo. I don’t know what stained those seats, I don’t want to know, mold, excess human bodily fluids, decomposed small mammal, anyway I will take the mystery prize of the Chrysler interior over the skanked out Isuzu.

Shout-out to Mark for Luddite reference.

Last edited 10 months ago by ProudLuddite
Donald Petersen
Donald Petersen
10 months ago

I would consider the Rodeo as a character-building First Shitbox experience for my son, but my own days of interest in such an experience are many years and a dozen shitboxes behind me. I don’t wanna deal with getting any ’91 Isuzu to pass smog, and I really don’t wanna know what died and decomposed on that bench seat. The Chrysler isn’t my brand, but it’s straight enough and groovy enough, and my skillset is up to getting it running. Not a terrible price for what it is these days.

58
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x