There aren’t a lot of cases in economic history of anyone ultimately winning a trade war they started. It’s typically the countries that don’t engage that, over time, end up doing better than the belligerents. With the United States and Canada having failed to make a deal, who is really going to win here?
My guess is that the biggest winners in a Canadian-US trade war are probably Mexico, Europe, and China. How did we get here when, according to last week’s Morning Dump, the two countries were so close? A little disagreement over a very large truck.
Chinese automakers have their own issues with large vehicles, which is to say that even their mid-sized vehicles are super heavy due to battery weight. The country’s cars are going to have to go on a diet. Volkswagen is also undergoing a big transformation, though it looks like it’ll be shedding more jobs than pounds.
Americans continue to be delinquent on auto loans at a super high rate, yet lending is easing up. What’s going on there?
Canadian Parts Association Alleges The US Is Trying To ‘Get Rid Of Auto Manufacturing In Canada’

As of Thursday, it seemed as though the United States and Canada had a trade deal all but complete. That’s what the American side said, at least; the Canadians were a bit more circumspect.
Let me just check Truth Social to see what kind of normal things the President is saying about the deal:
Canada has been ripping off the United States of America for years. Their ridiculously high tariffs on our Farmers and farm products has made life impossible for these great American Patriots, and has long created a 60 Billion Dollar Deficit between our two Countries. Not sustainable, and NOT ANYMORE! On January First, 2027, Tariffs on all Cars, Trucks, both large and small, Automotive Parts, and Steel, will be increased to 50%. Build in the U.S. and there are ZERO TARIFFS. Canada will be treated like a State no longer! On Trade, and in other ways, also, they are among the worst Nations in the World to deal with. They feel entitled, and yet, WE DON’T NEED CANADA, THEY NEED US! They do 95% of their business with the U.S., with us, the exact opposite! Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
That’s not great. I don’t want to get too deep into responding to everything the President says, because this President says a lot of things and often they are not true. I would like to address the 95%/5% thing, because, as the economists at TD Bank point out, the US is a major consumer of Canadian petroleum products, but also a large exporter of goods to Canada, which clouds the concept of a trade deficit:
Last year, Canadian exports of energy products (oil, natural gas, power) to the U.S amounted to nearly $170 billion, or almost 1/3 of total shipments. In contrast, energy accounted for only 6% of all U.S. imports. Put simply, Canadian sources are critical to U.S. energy security. Remove Canadian energy exports from the equation and the trade story flips. Ex-energy, the U.S. enjoys a trade surplus with Canada of around C$60 (US$45 billion).
When looked at through the lens of automotive production, Canadians are relatively small producers of cars, yet large consumers for US-built automobiles (which, due to aligned safety standards, can’t be sold a lot of other places). Before the trade war started, Canada produced 14 models and consumed 325. Looking at final assembly, Canadian production accounts for less than 10% of cars sold in the United States, whereas Mexico is historically double that number.
The US economy is many times larger than the Canadian economy, so it’s true that the US market is more pivotal to the Canadian one than vice versa, but there’s still a ton of trade that US businesses rely on that’ll be impacted by tariffs. According to the Office of the United States Trade Representative, the trade of goods between the two countries was fairly close last year:
U.S. goods trade (exports plus imports) with Canada totaled an estimated $715.5 billion in 2025. U.S. goods exports to Canada in 2025 were $333.6 billion, down 4.8 percent ($17.0 billion) from 2024. U.S. goods imports from Canada totaled $381.9 billion in 2025, down 7.2 percent ($29.8 billion) from 2024.
During the first Trump presidency, the three largest countries that make up North America further linked their automotive production, which makes the automotive industries highly reliant on one another.
So what happened? According to this Bloomberg report, representatives for the US and Canada disagreed at the last minute over whether or not the lowering of tariffs from 25% to 15% would extend to medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. Specifically, Canadian representatives wanted to make sure the F-350, which is built at the Oakville, Ontario plant, wouldn’t be subject to tariffs.
The Americans said this was a last-minute request from the Canadians, the Canadians say the exclusion of medium- and heavy-duty trucks was something the Americans decided to change without notice. I wasn’t there, so I’m not sure what happened, but someone quoted by Bloomberg thinks they know:
“At the last minute, the Americans pulled that classification out of the class of product that would get a reduced tariff,” Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association, told the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. Saturday, referring to super-duty pickup trucks such as the Ford F-350s.
Volpe suggested the impetus may have been to “get rid of auto manufacturing in Canada.”
That sounds like a wild theory until you remember President Trump has frequently said he doesn’t see the need for Canadian cars.
So what happens next? It’s always hard to predict with this administration, but it sounds like the Canadian government is going to wait out the midterm elections to see if they have more leverage for a deal. In the interim, any hope of having Canada and Mexico team up to help combat China’s growing influence seems to have gone out the window. Canada already opened the door to warmer relations with China, which feels more logical at this point.
Chinese Cars Have To Get Lighter

While Chinese EVs have taken over the globe, the huge advantage automakers in that country have enjoyed are derived in large part from a robust supply chain and cheap labor, as opposed to a purely technological advantage. Specifically, Chinese EVs tend to run a little heavy.
S&P Global Mobility predicts the Chinese industry is going to follow other industries in trying to find ways to make its cars lighter:
The added vehicle mass has created challenges related to energy efficiency, material utilization and the long-term funding of road infrastructure maintenance. As a result, industry experts and policymakers in mainland China have increasingly discussed reforms to vehicle taxation and road-use charging mechanisms, including approaches linked to vehicle mass, to encourage more sustainable vehicle development.
Against this backdrop, mainland Chinese automakers are pursuing vehicle lightweighting strategies to improve efficiency. These efforts range from increasing the use of lightweight materials such as aluminum and magnesium to incorporating advanced high-strength steels in place of conventional steel when feasible. They are also redesigning vehicle architectures to eliminate unnecessary structures and integrate multiple functions into single components, giving rise to a multimaterial, highly integrated BIW strategy.
Taxing vehicles by weight would be a quick way to encourage automakers to Zepbound their production.
The Next Few Weeks Are ‘Crucial’

I gave space on Friday for the head of VW’s main union to say that Volkswagen’s management is reportedly in ‘cloud-cuckoo-land‘ due to its margin forecasts. I’ll give some room for CEO Oliver Blume to, via Bild, explain why the company has to change:
In an interview on the company intranet, Blume prepared employees for bad news: “The situation is more than critical.” While the company is capable of acting, it also has an urgent need for action, Blume said. He told BILD: “The next few weeks are crucial: everyone has to pull together. We have launched the biggest transformation plan in the history of the Volkswagen Group.” The Group’s 2030 vision is “a comprehensive, global program for products, technologies, competitiveness, structures, and growth. The next few years will determine who stays in the race and who takes the lead.”
And further: “The global automotive industry is in a mega-crisis. And the Volkswagen Group is right in the middle of it. Geopolitics, trade barriers, regulations, weak markets and fierce competition are challenging everyone.” Now it’s time to roll up our sleeves: “For the people, our company and the competitiveness of Germany as a business location.”
It’s going to be an epic fight between a management that sees huge challenges and a workforce tired of management screwing up and relying on cutbacks to balance the books.
Lenders Seem To Care Less About Auto Delinquencies

With loans extending out towards the horizon and everything getting more expensive, the increase in automotive delinquencies feels like the natural result. What’s less natural is how lenders are shrugging them off. The rate of serious delinquencies (more than 90 days) was at 5.5% in Q2, the second highest level since the Federal Reserve Bank of New York started tracking that figure (the highest was Q1 of this year).
Lending, though, seems to be expanding. What’s going on here?
Lenders’ willingness to extend credit during a time when more debt is late on payments seems paradoxical. But “there’s nothing in the data that says lenders are being reckless,” said Jonathan Gregory, senior director of economic and industry insights for Cox Automotive.
The abundance of auto credit in the face of high delinquencies could stem from the fact borrowers do eventually pay the bill, Gregory said.
Default rates haven’t tracked delinquencies as closely as they did before the COVID-19 pandemic, he said.
“More borrowers are behind on their payments, but then fewer are actually defaulting,” Gregory said. “That’s just a gap that we’re keeping our eye on.”
As I’ve said before, all this is fine until it’s not. If the economy stays strong enough, then we’ll all survive. If the global economy hits a snag, well, it’ll probably be terrible.
What I’m Listening To While Writing TMD
My daughter is learning to play the electric bass, and my dad suggested I play her “Tighten Up” by Archie Bell & The Drells. It does have a great, driving bass note. If I ever end up making my Houston movie, this is the opening song, for sure.
The Big Question
How much does your car weigh? Is it heavy? Is it light?
Top photo: Ford









2014 Mazda3 Hatch: 2815 lbs
2020 Highlander Hybrid: 4515 lbs
It’s kind of amazing that they get about the same gas mileage.
Didn’t see anything here about the Trump administration trying to strip the country (or at least parts of it) of protections of their French language, heritage and culture. And the ability for Canada to do its own thing when trading with countries not bordering it. And I’m fairly confident there were a number of other ludicrous demands.
We’re represented by a bunch of crazy a$$holes and I hate it.
2003 bmw 525i manual: Curb weight: 3450 lbs.
That is light compared to its modern equivalent, a bmw 530i 2wd at 4041 lbs. 600lbs of weight gain over 23 years isn’t as bad as I suspected, especially since the new version is larger, more powerful, and laden with tech that e39 designers couldn’t have imagined.
Now my other car is a 2022 ram 2500 gas, she’s a heavy pig.
Another young bass player, awesome! Best wishes to her.
Re Tighten Up, I’m in a band that has used it for band intros, since it’s a vamp song that lends itself to that. However the bass line is deceptively harder than you might think for someone who isn’t a pick player. I say that as a 97% fingerstyle player. Its feel is not rhythmically close to anything Jamerson-ish, almost mechanical aside from the fact that the original bassist messes up a lot — seems to be at his or her limit.
Please don’t rely on BILD for news. BILD is really the lowest-quality journalism you can find.
Agree. And for those Americans not familiar with BILD, it’s similar to the “National Enquirer.”
TBQ:
1994 Mitsubishi Mighty Max – 2,580 lbs
2020 Mercedes C63S – 3,900 lbs
2024 Honda Civic Type R – 3,188 lbs
My wife drives a Sierra and it feels like any two of my cars added together.
The Big Question is heavy.
My 78 Bronco Ranger XLT specs at around 4700 lb and gets 9 mpg. It costs about $130 a month in gas to drive.
My 22 Polestar 2 AWD Long-Range says it’s around 4800 lb and gets about 3 miles per kWh. It costs about $30 a month in electricity to drive.
Both are way too much fun.
Love this. We have an ‘82 Jeep Scrambler and a ‘23 Hyundai Ioniq 5. Both rock, in their own way.
2020 Civic Sport Hatch – 2881 lbs
I guess it’s light for a car these days, but it’s a tank compared to my old 1987 CRX – 1713 lbs
TBQ:
1987 Alfa Romeo Milano Gold – 2908 lbs
2013 Porsche 911 C4S PDK – 3230 lbs
2017 BMW 330xi Sportwagen – 3867 lbs
2020 Mini Cooper S 4-door – 2963 lbs
That averages to 3242, which is way less than the current new car average of 4,441 lbs.
2014 Ford Raptor Crewcab : 5774 lbs
2024 Mazda CX-90: 4800 lbs.
I would say these both qualify as heavy.
2012 Honda Civic GX ~ 2700 lbs.
Suggest you start more simply on bass lines for a beginner, a good Queen song would be “Another One Bites The Dust”. “Green Onions” is a nice and straightforward instrumental. But maybe you have to come with something she’s more familiar with for it to click better with her if none of these appeal.
23 Wrangler 4xe at just shy of 5100 lbs. She’s heavy by Wrangler standards, but inline with the gas only competition from Ford and Toyota, so I’m unsure of what to make of that
How do you like the 4xe?
I like it a lot. Power is great, and commuting on 90% electricity is cheap. I would not recommend it to anyone though. Mine seems to have avoided the issues that plague the series, but I suspect buying a used one would be like playing roulette with half the chambers loaded.
The Trump administration is nothing more than white punks on dope. Now there’s a 70s music reference for you.
My daily driver 2015 F-150 is 4800# according to Google, the 2025 Mustang GT is 3827#. The 2001 Corolla I used to own was 2455#, 1998 Grand Marquis was 3917#, 1995 Crown Victoria was 3762#, 1995 Explorer was 4189#, 1983 F-100 was 3600#. I miss the fuel economy of the Corolla, sadly it was totaled when someone with no insurance pulled out in front of me.
My MB C300 and my Maverick are both about 3700 pounds. I found it a little surprising that they’re both about the same weight. I think the sedan is heavy while the pickup is lightish.
My Fiat Spider (named Boris, by the way) is a light little beast at about 2300 pounds.
The details on this site of the US/Canada trade debacle is the most well-written and detailed analysis I’ve read so far, and I’ve read a lot of other sites’ analyses.
TBQ:
~2700lbs. Mazda Protege5
~4450lbs. 2018 Honda Odyssey (~4800lbs. with all the goldfish, fries, and other junk my kids hide in the back all the time.)
I would like to comment on the US/Canada tariff row, but the stupidity of the US administration is too freaking depressing.
“How much does your car weigh? Is it heavy? Is it light?”
My C-max Energi is about 4000lbs. It’s the heaviest car I’ve ever owned. So in relation to my past vehicles, it’s heavy. But compared a lot of oversized vehicles these days, it’s light.
But also note that in spite of the weight, it’s also the most energy-efficient vehicle I’ve ever owned.
Putin’s plan is working to perfection. Domestically not so much, but his Manchurian Candidate is doing fine work.
According to the back of my napkin, my adventure truck (04 chevy 2500hd+camper) is about 8300. Which is closer to the GVWR than I really want tbh. Should have gone 3500.
Interesting
My 1971 Coupe deVille at over 20′ long weighs in at a tick over 4800lbs
The 2023 Volvo S60 Recharge 4450lbs
2018 Honda Clarity just over 4000lbs.
2022 Mazda3 hatch: Just a hair under 3100 lbs, which I feel is a lot for a car that size.
Still, it puts me in the cheapest tier for my state’s weight-based registration fees, so I’m not complaining.
It’s about 500 less than the ’00 300m it replaced, but nearly 700 more than the ’98 Neon I had before that.
My poor driveway has to handle 3 vehicles physically which amount to like 19 reasonably sized cars or something.
Vantruck 1: 6800
Vantruck 2: 6400
The lomg one: No way it’s under 7000
My Civic Type R was 3173 on the scales at an autocross national tour event, the Miata was 2290, and my wife’s Pilot Trailsport is 4709.
For the record, a vast majority of F350s (and the other Super Duties) are built in Louisville, Kentucky at Kentucky Truck Plant. The rest of them (primarily base fleet trucks and chassis cabs) are currently built at Ohio Assembly Plant outside of Cleveland. Oakville is supposed to add roughly 100k units of production which would be about 1/3rd of KTPs capacity with production slated to be kicking off any minute now.
4330# for the Voyager, while heavy, is pretty reasonable considering that it’s sort of enormous. 3400# for the Forester. Would love something a little less porky.