Home » Italian-American Droptops: 1992 Cadillac Allanté vs 1989 Chrysler TC by Maserati

Italian-American Droptops: 1992 Cadillac Allanté vs 1989 Chrysler TC by Maserati

Sbsd 8 11

Welcome to another exciting episode of Shitbox Showdown! Today’s contestants both attempted to combine Italian style with good ol’ American know-how to create luxury convertibles. Did they succeed? Well, we’re featuring them here, aren’t we?

Yesterday’s basket cases elicited some entertaining comments. Let’s see how the voting went down:

Screen Shot 2022 08 10 At 5.17.13 Pm

Looks like it’s the Bradley. I think that’s the right call. As several commenters pointed out, a Cosworth Vega in decent shape is actually worth some money, so restoring one is a “do it the right way or don’t do it at all” proposition. With a VW-based kit car, there is no “right way,” because you’re making it up as you go along, and any future owner needn’t care about originality.

Today, you’ll be relieved to know that both our contestants are intact, drivable, and don’t even look all that bad. I got a tip from our very own shitbox-whisperer S.W. Gossin about a Cadillac Allanté for sale. After thinking about it for a while, I determined there was only one possible contender worthy of this sleek Italian-American machine: its crosstown rival, the Chrysler TC by Maserati. And lo and behold, the internet classified gods smiled upon me, and I found one of the only 7,000 or so ever made, running and driving, in our price range. It was meant to be. Let’s check them out.

1992 Cadillac Allanté – $2,500

00q0q Iqt4fv5i1tgz 0ci0t2 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 4.5 liter V8, 4 speed automatic, FWD

Location: Wilmington, NC

Odometer reading: 110,000 miles

Runs/drives? Doesn’t explicitly say, actually…

“You know what would make a lot of sense? Let’s have a legendary Italian coachbuilder make bespoke bodies for a niche-market convertible, then build special airplanes to carry them across the Atlantic back to Detroit so we can finish assembling them, and sell them for a massive premium over our other mechanically-identical cars.”

Said no one ever.

00j0j Gpahcmnpytjz 0t20ci 1200x900

Cadillac’s Allanté was yet another attempt to appeal to a younger demographic than the golf-then-dinner-at-4-pm crowd. It was a 2-seat convertible aimed at Mercedes SL buyers. The body was styled and built by legendary Italian coachbuilder Pininfarina, then flown to Michigan aboard modified Boeing 747s for final assembly. It was a horribly inefficient way to build cars, but it did result in arguably the prettiest Cadillac of its era.

00d0d Aupj9pf92tpz 0t20ci 1200x900

Mechanically, the Allanté didn’t break any new ground, and that’s just fine: Cadillac’s HT-series engines were tried-and-true by 1987 when the Allanté was introduced. This car features a 4.5 liter variant with multi-port fuel injection and a standard-issue four-speed automatic, all well within GM’s wheelhouse. The seller doesn’t specifically say anything about the running state of this Allanté, but they do call it “awesome,” which indicates to me that it is, in fact, mobile. Most cars lose their awesomeness about the time they fail to start.

00101 Bbvyz3e2adqz 0t20ci 1200x900

The outside of it looks nice, although it’s a shame about the boring color. Allantés look best to me in either black or silver, with a red interior in either case. This “Suburban Camouflage” beige doesn’t do the crisp Pininfarina styling justice. Inside, a few popped seams and some wear and tear show the years and miles, but it’s not awful. There is an awful lot of electronic frippery in the dashboard of an Allanté, however, and one would be wise to test it all before purchase.


1989 Chrysler TC by Maserati – $1,895

00j0j Hxwytlrbeycz 0ci0t2 1200x900

Engine/drivetrain: 2.2 liter turbocharged inline 4, 3 speed automatic, FWD

Location: Shelton, WA

Odometer reading: 119,000 miles

Runs/drives? Yep!

Meanwhile, across town at Chrysler, typically shrewd and on-point auto executive Lee Iacocca was ramming this vanity project down his company’s throat. The TC by Maserati was meant to be a flagship for Chrysler, to shake off the blue-collar K-car image and regain some of the glory of the 1950s and ’60s. Instead, it was essentially a LeBaron with portholes.

00k0k 4ednpmhowtbz 0ci0t2 1200x900

The TC’s body was also made in Italy, by Innocenti, and final assembly was done by Maserati in Milan. Chrysler shipped engines, transmissions, and other components to Italy, rather than flying half-completed cars back to America. I guess that made more sense? What never did make sense, to me at least, is the crass mishmash of the two firm’s logos into one unbelievably tacky emblem. It looks like a made-up emblem from a John Hughes movie car.

00b0b 7xcplikrjtz 0ci0t2 1200x900

As a first-year TC, this car is powered by Chrysler’s own 2.2 liter turbo engine, here coupled to a Torqueflite three-speed automatic. A special run of 500 TCs received a more exotic variant of this engine, with a twin-cam head designed by Maserati and made by Cosworth in England, coupled to a Getrag five-speed manual transmission. But this isn’t one of those.

00i0i Ijzuvu8qly1z 0ci0t2 1200x900

The seller has spent some recent money on this car in the form of new tires, a new windshield, and some other mechanical work, and says it “runs good.” Cosmetically, it’s passable: the pale yellow paint is in decent shape give or take a few bumps and bruises, but the fancy leather interior has quite a few rips and tears in it. And the dashboard appears to have melted. Not sure what’s going on there. Hopefully it at least still has the radio.

These cars share, apart from their Italian-American heritage, the sense of the optimism bordering on hubris of the American auto industry slowly getting its groove back after the doldrums of the ’70s. Both were a gamble, and neither gamble paid off, but now thirty years later, at the bottom of the depreciation curve, they both look like pretty nice cheap old cars. Which one is more your style?


Image credit: Facebook Listings

Share on facebook
Share on whatsapp
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit

55 Responses

  1. I have to go with the TC, I know, K-car, Lebaron, but nevertheless it seems to catch the exotic European flavor both were shooting for better to me than the Cadillac. Maybe just cause they added Maserati to the name IDK, but the TC for me.

  2. This is an old post so it’s a moot point now, but anyone who might have been thinking of voting for the TC should consider this: We could’ve had our own version of the Renault Alpine GTA if it had never existed.

  3. I thought that building coupe 944s in one factory, then transporting them to another factory to have the roofs cut off, then transporting them back to the first factory to be finished was the dumbest car building plan possible. I was wrong.

  4. I wonder how difficult it would be to squeeze an LS4/6-speed auto in the Allante.
    I can’t think of an equivalent swap for the TC.

    Winner: Allante.

  5. Someone in my town has a VERY clean TC that they’ve been driving all summer.
    I saw it back in June when I was driving my sister to our grandmothers and all I could say was “there ain’t no fuckin’ way!” when I saw it.
    TC’s are underrated, tbh.

  6. I was all in on the TC (2.2 Turbo II + A413 combo is not at all bad. It’s not A555 good, but it’s certainly not terrible either.) Paint is good, engine is clean but not too clean, clearly a good runner! Awesome!
    And then I saw the interior.
    100% of the destroyed parts in there are absolutely unobtanium. Remember, I’m an expert in these. If the part exists, I can find it. I cannot get you even half the parts you need. I cannot get you seat covers. Center arm rests. Dash pads. Wood trim. Glass. Window regulators are a maybe. And believe me, that thing is NOT drivable with the interior in it’s current condition.

    The Allante has the 4.5 V8 which is… it’s bad. No two ways about it. But it’s not so bad. More importantly, you can easily find all of the parts you need to make it livable as a shitbox. You can get seat covers or even complete seats from a junkyard easily enough.
    The 4.5 V8 is absolutely fucking terrible – less HP per liter than the notoriously awful Mitsu 6G72. The 3L V6 that barely made 160HP? Yeah, meet a 4.5 that makes 200. I shit you not. But it’s NOT a Northstar. Northstar came from it in part, but this is the old High Technology engine. It’s gutless and miserable, but it’s not particularly unreliable.

  7. Both cars were horrendous ideas, I choose death.

    Also, 93 Allante had the Northstar? Isn’t that the horrible engine you had to remove the entire intake assembly off of to change the starter?

Leave a Reply