As cars get more expensive, what are the people who buy Gucci flip-flops going to drive? For the past decade, luxury automakers indulged in a move downmarket, spawning new entry level models that leased inexpensively enough for the aspirational first-real-job set. While some companies are walking this move back, others are re-upping in a world where the first hit is leased for 36 months. This is the new Mercedes-Benz GLA, and if the billboard-sized faux grille was any indication, it’s running electric-first towards the first-designer-item set with flashy ambient lighting and screens. However, the inevitable advertised lease specials won’t include the full complement of screens, instead filling a gap with something particularly sad.
Before we get into that, let’s talk about what makes this thing go. At launch, the range will start with the GLA 250+ Electric, with an 85 kWh nickel-manganese-cobalt battery pack, a single electric motor and 268 horsepower. While an EPA range figure isn’t available yet, Mercedes-Benz claims up to 408 miles on the WLTP cycle. That’s 10 miles more than the base Porsche Macan Electric, which is rated for up to 332 miles of EPA range. If 268 horsepower isn’t enough poke for you, there’s also the GLA 350 4MATIC which gains a second electric motor for all-wheel-drive, a combined output of 349 horsepower, and a claimed zero-to-60 mph time of 5.3 seconds. Both electric models can DC fast charge at up to 320 kW thanks to an 800-volt architecture, provided the right 350 kW DC fast charger is used.
However, if you can’t charge up at home, don’t tune out just yet. Like with the CLA, the new GLA will also be available with a rather unique four-cylinder hybrid powertrain. While a turbocharged 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine with a 1.3 kWh 48-volt system doesn’t sound like anything special, Mercedes-Benz claims that the relatively low-voltage hybrid system can drive the wheels alone at lower speeds through a 30-horsepower motor in the eight-speed dual-clutch transaxle.

So far, the new GLA sounds like a taller hatchback version of the CLA, and that’s the point. The old GLA used the same MFA2 platform, powertrains, and major interior components as the old CLA, so why mess with the recipe? This is Mercedes-Benz’s entry-level crossover after all, so taking advantage of economies of scale should keep it reasonably cheap.

Mind you, the carryover means that you also get the new CLA’s interior, and that’s not so good. Mercedes-Benz hopes you like screens, because there are up to three of them across the face of the dashboard. One for the gauges, one for the infotainment with climate and heated seat controls annoyingly placed on the touchscreen, and an optional one for the passenger in case they get bored of scrolling TikTok. You can spec more ambient lighting than a Twitch streamer’s bedroom, but that only distracts so much from the slightly confusing control layout. Mercedes-Benz has gone with Volkswagen ID.4-style window switches on the new GLA, with two switches and a touch pad operating four windows. The power seat controls are touch-sensitive too, as are most of the steering wheel controls, as is a small haptic bank in the console for volume control, bringing up the parking cameras, changing drive modes and whatnot. I’ve poked around the same setup in the new CLA and it’s all rather annoying. Would you want to pay Mercedes-Benz money to be mildly annoyed?

Without the passenger screen, the new GLA comes with a giant slab of monogrammed plastic that looks unbelievably tacky. It combines the shininess of a $70 off-brand phone with a litany of tiny three-pointed stars advertising the marque on a car you already paid for. It effectively amounts to an enormous bezel that spill all the way across to the far side of the dashboard, utterly devoid of usefulness and likely costing virtually nothing to make. This is one of the few cases where a passenger screen is actually useful because the absence of one is somehow less appealing. How bravely insidious.

On the plus side, the new GLA’s styling should be a little less controversial than that of the CLA. Instead of a trout mouth, it adopts the shield-style illuminated faux-grille seen on the new electric C-Class and GLC. Combined with the three-pointed star elements in the headlights that are completely unnecessary because there’s a giant Mercedes-Benz emblem in between them, the nose of this small crossover is very Louis Vuitton-ified. Not great, but if you cover up the front fascia and view the GLA from the front-three-quarters, it’s actually quite handsome. Strong longitudinal lines make the GLA look less stubby, and the chunky arches give a visual nod to the larger GLE and GLS.

Keep walking around the GLA, and things get weird again out back, specifically with the taillights. The three-pointed star motif returns, the LED lighting doesn’t run all the way across the heckblende, and the result just looks amateurish. It’s a shame because the rear valence is textbook modern Mercedes, and the smooth liftgate with the number plate recess set in the bumper looks expensive. Perhaps Mercedes-Benz’s baby crossover is just one facelift away from becoming a swan.

Still, you can expect the new GLA to be reasonably priced. Mercedes-Benz hasn’t released official figures, but all the information needed for reasonable speculation is already out. The outgoing GLA is priced within $1,250 of the combustion-powered CLA, and the new electric CLA starts at $49,400 in America. If Mercedes-Benz follows tradition, don’t be surprised if the new GLA starts around $50,000 in electric trim. That would be cheap enough for these to pop up at every dental office in America following its introduction in the second half of next year.
Top graphic image: Mercedes-Benz









I can’t believe I technically named myself after this company…
(Yes, I know I named myself after a person, but I wasn’t thinking of that when I chose the name.)
Still better than Dongfeng or Peugeot.
In your defense, they were probably still a decent company when you changed your name. I was a big fan leading up to and through the W123/124 years. But that three-pointed star has lost its luster ever since.
Over the years, I’ve nicknamed a few of my favorite cars after characters, real or imagined that worked with the cars’ names. Winnie the Peugeot. Genevieve Peugeot, Greta the Jetta, Henry and Jane (F)Honda. I couldn’t come up with one that felt clever for my Saab. Sister? That might have worked. But that car is long gone.
Wasn’t there a Nissan branded twin of the GLA or GLC a few years ago? If so, does it still exist and look this bad.
This entire design language (inside and out) needs to be thrown out with urgency. Looks are subjective, but it’s been years since I’ve seen even mixed opinions on a Merc design. It seems like it has zero appeal.
Is the single motor base car FWD or RWD?
That’s… actually an improvement. It still looks bad, don’t get me wrong, but not as bad as the 3rd useless screen
I dunno. I think it looks better without that third screen. Not good, but better.
That’s a pretty low bar.
Yeah this is a paradox in that typical Autopians want less screens but this article says more is better. It is never better.
Oh noes! A poors spec Merc GLA.
Leased to a district manager near you!
We should congratulate MB in the achievement of creating something that is both frumpy and gaudy. It’s both incredibly dull and tasteless at the same time. Hats off!
Gumpy? Fraudy? I think gumpy is better, let’s go with that.
The Mercedes GLA Looks Terrible
Fixed it for you.
I have no shame declaring that this is the hill I choose to die on. Of all the terrible UX decisions, I will stand in the rain holding a picket sign outside of your brand headquarters if I need to get my point across that I will never pay money for a vehicle that adopts this approach to window switches.
And there is no way it saves them money. You’re still wiring in the switches and the dumb touchpad. Two switches and a rocker to select would be fine or, of course, the familiar four switch layout. The rocker being wired in could not cost an appreciable amount less than the rocker and I don’t believe the four-switch system could cost more than the touchpad and two switch either.
I get that moving climate controls to the touchscreen actually saves money on switches (at a cost of safety), but this is a garbage decision with no justification.
A switch for every window?! Do you know how expensive that would make this thing? Why do you need that many switches, anyway? Such decadence! Do you think this is a luxury car??
/s Added because it can be awfully tough to tell nowadays.
I once again will say, when do BMW and Mercedes get to see their reputations permanently tarnished and thrown to the side like GM and Cadillac got? Right now I sure as hell would buy a caddy before one of these horrid pieces of Teutonic trouble
The difference is BMW’s cars are still good, reliability is better than it’s ever been, and their designs draw mixed opinions as opposed to being universally panned like Merc’s.
Long way down to go for BMW still.
The tide is turning. People are starting to associate screen-first UX with inexpensive products – niche luxury nerds are already buying pens, audio components, keyboards and mice for the perceived premium-ness of how they feel. In ten or twenty years, The Opulence will be ‘… the car has plated billet switches for each window, temperature regulated, weighed and in acoustically tuned enclosures. One set on each door and the center armrest, in case you get bored of one or the other …’
Even a plain old black plastic empty bin would be more useful, you’d at least get storage space where all the wiring and capacitors go.
I’d pay more if the interior looked like this:
https://flic.kr/p/2ssizM2
No thank you to this modern bullshit. Touch-sensitive seat controls with haptic feedback can bite me.
The exterior was equally honest and tasteful. The floormats in the picture posted are a bit for me, but the dash, from port to starboard, is damn near perfect.
Yo dawg, I heard you like three pointed stars…
*scratches neck feverishly* Yo dawg, you got any more of them emblems?
Honestly, I’d rather have a pre-2026 Mazda CX-5.
The overal shape and size of the GLA is fine, but the big fake illuminated grill and awful, screencentric dash/interior are deal-killers, even if I were attracted to the EV specs and impressive
accelerationdepreciation.300+ miles of range and kW of charging? I was kind of interested…until you started describing the interior. Mercedes has put on a masterclass in how not to design a car interior here.
Maybe they can make some sort of kit that they customer can install themselves to change the color or features or style in this area.
But for now, it’s a Blank Slate.
What really sucks is that by current German luxury car standards I actually think this is fairly attractive. It’s not a weird bucktoothed monstrosity like a BMW or Gray Blob 274329 from Audi. Entry level luxury crossovers are often either weird looking or totally anonymous and I actually think this stands out in a positive way. And I’ll be damned, German press photos of a car that’s in an actual color. I’m sure Dieter is big trouble with marketing for that choice…
Hell, the powertrains seem interesting too. You’ve got two levels of EV with range that’s on the high end of average or a hybrid option. In today’s market I think that’ll do just fine. They’ve come closer to a compelling product here than they usually do these days.
But of course everything is ruined by a cheap as shit, tech overburdened, soulless interior. Buttons? We don’t need no stinkin buttons. We’ve got NIGHT CLUB LIGHTING! Don’t like total screen overload? Have a slab of plastic, idiot. You’ll still lease it won’t you, you stupid piece of shit?
In the age of enshitification I’ve decided that the least I can do is avoid products from hideous corporate entities that outright insult me. This right here is a product from a deeply cynical company that openly thinks its customers are troglodytes. There’s still a supply of #flexers that’ll lease these for long enough to get a few Tik Toks out of the equation, but as economic conditions continue to worsen those folks are going to dry up…and the people that are smart enough to stay afloat know better than to spend their money on slop like this.
Mercedes is on borrowed time and at this rate I won’t even shed a single tear when they fold. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
I find the hybrid powertrain very interesting from a technical perspective, and the exterior is fine if rather anonymous. The interior though…my word it’s bad
Huge missed opportunity to make that space into a fold down tray . Luxury is having a tray table in your car. I have severe lack of tray tables in my life and the GLC could have fixed that.
Cadillac fixed that all the way back in 1957 and through in a cocktail set for good measure.
Magnetic too!
Holy distraction Batman.. is this really what cars look like these day??? I am so turned off but yet so happy. I am happy that i dont have 80k laying around to waste on a rolling LED billboard that gives me ads. I am going to keep my E46 as long as the world will allow.
e91 and e88 for me, but I am right there with you. Pry them from my cold, dead fingers.
I just sold my one car with a screen (not even a touch screen, Mercedes Comand) and I won’t miss it one bit. That one was tolerable, even if Comand isn’t as good as iDrive. But I prefer none at all. The only thing I need a screen for is navigation, and that works delightfully right from my phone, no car integration necessary.
Correction, that litany of tiny three-pointed stars is advertising the marque on a car you are STILL paying for.
Looks to me more like an older MB and less like a Chinese-market car. Maybe add more physical controls and shrink the existing screen as a prelude to focusing on build quality as the signifier of luxury? Nah…
A coworker of mine ditched a C class for a CLA. The C was getting up there in miles and guess he wanted a new ride, so he switched. Both were black, so I didn’t even notice for a bit, not paying a huge amount of attention to what was parked in his spot. But then I went on a ride with him…what a huge difference. I don’t know if he had to have a three pointed star adorned vehicle in his driveway, but I know he could’ve afforded something better and suspect while he won’t admit it, he’ll be getting out of the CLA as soon as possible.
I’ve rented a couple of CLAs. I’d rather have a Jetta.
Or Herpes
I wouldn’t go quite that far. It’s not a BAD car, it just isn’t better than one that costs 20-50% less.
And now it seems the CLA is EV-only? WTF?