Home » The Citroën CX Familiale Holds A Ridiculously Specific Automotive Record

The Citroën CX Familiale Holds A Ridiculously Specific Automotive Record

Cxvisors Top

Quick question: is it illegal to love Citroëns? Is it a crime? A capital offense? If so, then send me to the fucking chair, because I am absolutely, unrepentantly guilty. I’m even gonna say some badass shit as they throw the switch like “off to drive my Traction Avant through hell!” or something. Part of the evidence that would be used to convict me in this weird dystopia I’ve built in these sentences where Citroën-love is a crime is my admiration for this particular car, the Citroën CX Familiale. That’s because, alongside all of its other amazing qualities, it also happens to hold an automotive record for something absurdly specific. I’ll tell you if you read on.Untitled Cxfront11

The CX was perhaps the height of Citroën’s spaceship-iness, being introduced in 1974 as a replacement for the iconic DS, a car quite spaceshippy in its own right. The CX was the last Citroën designed and built before their bankruptcy and merger/takeover with Peugeot in 1976, and as a result the CX retains all of the strange, wonderful pure Citroën DNA from cars like the DS: hydropneumatic suspension, dramatically streamlined bodies that were like cybernetic speed-tortoises, odd but glamorous control decisions, sofa-on-a-lake-of-pudding-like comfort goals, the whole baguette.

Let’s just look at this bonkers-fantastic dashboard a moment, to drink in the essence:


That helps. There was a wagon version of the CX as well, known as the Familiale, and this is the car I want to talk about specifically, because it’s the car that I believe is a record holder for a very specific automotive metric. It’s not the fastest (the CX used the same engines as the DS, so it wasn’t exactly a rocket, despite the look) or the biggest or the quietest or whatever you usually think of for superlatives. But it did have the more of one particular feature than any other car before or since, at least that I can think of.

That feature? Sun visors.

The vast, vast majority of cars have two, up front, for each front seat. A few magical cars, well, one at least, has an extra set for the rear seat, the Porsche 928:


So, the count is mostly two, one four, maybe there’s a few other quad-visor stragglers out there, but I’m pretty sure there’s only one car with six. The Citroën CX Familiare:


Six! Look at that! There’s the two ones up front, and then Citroën engineers, having proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the rotation of the Earth causes the sun to appear to move across the sky, coupled with the fact that the completely-motile CX could be positioned in nearly any location that admits direct sunlight into any of its windows, realized that every passenger deserves to be able to block the powerful rays of the sun, and as a result, each window gets its own visors.

Well, except the back window. But still: six visors!

You’d think four would be enough, but the Familiale has provisions for a third-row jump seat, and those people have eyes that need visoring, too, so six it is.


Imagine if you owned a CX and then made it big somehow, and decided to treat yourself to some lavish new automobile, like a Rolls-Royce, arguably the Cadillac of motorcars. You get in, admiring the supple leather, the burled walnut, and then look in your rear view mirror as your friends and loved ones flail around in confusion, looking for rear seat sun visors that simply don’t exist.

Sobering, isn’t it? Nobody beats the CX. Well, at least about number of sun visors. I mean, maybe one of you in the comments know of some eight-visored car I missed, but until I hear that, nobody beats the CX.


(Thanks, Dave!)

Share on facebook
Share on whatsapp
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit

48 Responses

  1. The last set of images have a caption, “Familiale 8-seater.” But as I look over the seats in the photo with the translucent roof and note where the horizontal ridging is, I only count seven: two in the front row, three across the middle, and two in the way-back. The same goes with the line diagram and its little curves seemingly denoting where each butt goes in each seat. Am I missing something?

    1. You are not missing anything. The car was a 7-seater. The two extra seats at the back were great for kids but not really suitable for adults.

  2. Ah yes, the Citroen CX2000, the car that saved my life! From my 1st encounter, I wanted one of these magnificent machines in any iteration. I scored a 1976 CX as my daily driver for a commute of 100 km roundtrip. One bright summer day as I approached my autobahn entrance what should to my wondering eyes should appear, but a lumbering fuel tanker crossing my path at a mere 300 metres distance. Hard on the brakes as I steered for the drive duals on the tractor. Impact was a solid straight on hit that literally folded the CX in half as the engine wondrously disappeared below my feet. The CX slewed to the left and came to rest almost exactly at the point of impact.

    The driver of the truck unassed his truck in a flash, no doubt expecting a flash, as did I as soon as I had my bearings. Fortunately, no flames ensued. My beloved CX ended up in the impound lot and I was relegated to driving my wife’s 911 for the rest of the summer. Such are the hardships we are forced to bear.

Leave a Reply