Finally. Finally. After what feels like the longest and most contentious strip tease in automotive history, the Jaguar Type 01 has been revealed. Although I’ve been on my death bed with consumption or the vapors or some other equally glamorous ailment for the last couple of weeks, such is my dedication to you, the little people, that I managed to stay up until 1am last night, refreshing the Jaguar YouTube channel in anticipation of watching a glitzy, New York reveal.
And as my bedside clock ticked past the anointed hour, nothing happened. A quick Google revealed all the usual media outlets had posted their pre-prepared videos and stories, and as I was sick and grumpy, I looked at a few images and went to bed. Pouring over social media and the press images this morning, it all feels like a bit of an anticlimax. We already had a pretty good idea of what the new Jaguar was going to look like, because they had shown the Type 00 Concept over a year ago, and revealed the interior of the production version a few weeks back at Monterey Car Week. Whether this prolonged media strategy was planned or a result of the usual JLR asshattery doesn’t really matter. By the very nature of familiarity, the new Jaguar Type 01 exterior design cannot stun in the same way the concept did at Art Basel in Miami nearly two years ago.
I’m always saying that to truly understand a car you need to see it with your own eyes in the metal, and so it was when I finally saw the Type 00 Concept at the Goodwood Festival of Speed in 2025; I understood what Jaguar was trying to achieve. It was a car to make an impact. A wheeled cinder block chucked through the stained-glass window of automotive norms. The dreaded bold reimagining? Jaguar was burning the down the house and starting again in a completely different zip code. Amid all the brouhaha two years ago, I gathered my thoughts about why that was necessary here, but what is important to understand is Jaguar as a car company was fucked. In fact, they were turbo fucked with a capital F.

I highlighted in that piece that Jaguar’s problems went back decades. Although it was profitable in the mid-eighties, the company itself was a shambles with outdated working practices and ramshackle production facilities as a result of chronic under-investment by its founder, Sir William Lyons, and then latterly British Leyland. What I hadn’t realized at the time, but I have since learned because my current bedtime reading is a history of said British Leyland (it’s all rock and roll over here), is that Jaguar constantly blew it as early as the late sixties. Although labor disputes and gathering economic storms were beginning to affect the UK across all industries, Lyons’ ambivalence to his workforce and their unions, coupled with inconsistent government meddling, meant that although Jaguar had a world-beating product with the XJ, it could not be built fast enough or well enough. Waiting lists stretching to two years and cars rolling off the line with parts missing meant would-be XJ buyers soon got fed up and took their money to Mercedes with its outstanding new S-Class.

Basically, Ford massively overpaid for a pup and tried to recoup their losses by aiming for the Germans, a losing strategy that continued under Tata. If it wasn’t for the Land Rover side of the business keeping everything afloat, Jaguar would have been worm food years ago. Ian Callum has been doing the rehabilitation media rounds of late, lamenting what could have been, and talking about how much Jaguar spent on the suspension components of the XE in an attempt to ensure it drove better than a 3-series. Well, that’s all fine and dandy, but customers can’t see suspension components. What they can see is interiors, which in the XE is where the money should have been spent. But all that is ancient history now, and we are where we are. So with regards to the Type 01, where exactly are we?
The truth is nobody knows. The EV market overall is softening, and OEMs who bet big on the transition like VAG are now neck-deep in shit. While there is undoubtedly a core market that is settling down for EVs in terms of everyday runabouts and crossovers for normal people, beyond that it’s chaos. Porsche, whose product mix strategy seems to be changing on a weekly basis, is watching Taycan sales fall off a cliff and has recently offloaded Rimac and Bugatti in an attempt to balance the ledger and re-focus the brand. Lucid, probably the closest analog to what Jaguar is trying in terms of price and volume, continues to flounder and undershoot sales estimates. Lotus and Rolls-Royce have seen their EV cars plod along steadily, but Ferrari has stated the controversial Luce has sold out through to 2027. So what’s going on in the high-end EV market? To quote the immortal Private Hudson: you tell me man, I only work here.

In the face of all that current uncertainty, Jaguar’s decision to go all in on a new luxury EV is a strange one. But it probably seemed like the right move five years ago when the Type 01 was signed off for production. I’ve heard that clay modelers were working under social distancing conditions when sculpting the production models. When JLR Design Development Director Andy Wheel (full disclosure, he was my line manager) is talking about maintaining Jaguar heritage, I don’t think he meant the decade-plus it took to get the XJ40 into showrooms. The EV version of the full-size Range Rover, which was designed while I still had a high security pass, was repeatedly kicked down the road and finally launched last week, about three years too late. It seems the ghost of British Leyland casts a long shadow over its children.

The Type 01 was signed off in about 2021, and then the concept was reverse-engineered from that. This is an extraordinarily long development program, even for a completely new platform. Which makes it all the more surprising to me how compromised some parts of the Type 01 appear to be. For a start, it’s a big old bus at 5200mm (205”) long with a whopping 3200mm (126”) wheelbase. For comparison, the Cadillac Celestiq is 5517mm (217”) long with a 3308mm (130”). I was under the impression Jaguar was going to use this length, and the consequent expansive dash-to-axle ratio, to package the cells in front of the firewall. This would allow them to have a low roofline with no reduction in interior space. What they’ve actually done is kept the cells in the floor, removed some from the rear passenger footwell, and placed one cell pack and the battery management modules ahead of the firewall. And still kept the super low roofline. As a result, the Type 01 looks very cramped inside, making it a very large 2+2 GT. Exacerbating this are the pint-sized doors, meaning ingress and egress are a more awkward experience than it should be for a luxury car. The door openings themselves have extremely large radii, probably as a result of all-aluminum body construction. The amount of interior trim peeking out behind the frameless glazing is particularly noticeable on the front doors, which don’t benefit from a privacy tint. If this is Jaguar’s stiffest bodyshell ever, as they are claiming, why not do away with the B pillar and make it a two-door like the Rolls Royce Spectre, and have a fancy front seat tipping mechanism for access to the occasional rears?

That low roofline means the rear header rail is behind the passenger’s noggins, making a rear windshield an impossibility, so Jaguar have done a Polestar and not bothered, utilizing a rear-view camera instead. But the screen for this is centrally mounted on the cowl in the middle of the soundbar at the base of the windshield, where it appears to be partly obscured by the drivers display. Given the mildly interesting interior architecture with the central spine, I was hoping this would be used in an innovative way, but it’s just a fancy cupholder and storage console. The Allegro homage squared-off steering wheel does have haptic controls on the spokes and stalks, but everything else is via the touchscreen in front of the driver or the smaller one standing proud on that central spine. Again, this feels like a decision taken six years ago before we started pushing back against such nonsense.

I don’t want to give the impression that I don’t like the Type 01, or that I think this relaunch is a mistake. Jaguar had to do something different. I was playing around on the website this morning and selected black on black as my colorway. I immediately pictured myself pulling up outside Berghain on a rain-slicked Berlin night looking as sinister as all fuck, and it all sort of clicked. Slightly disappointingly though, all the other launch colors are variations of gnome laundry water. Jaguar has already pissed off the ruddy-faced traditionalists, so why not continue to give them the middle finger by offering the car in that Miami Pink? Really lean into the villain bit, which, lest we forget, is also a part of the Jaguar heritage.

I think this means we are seeing the beginnings of high-end car design moving beyond established norms of balance and good taste, toward something more targeted at particular cohorts of buyers. Some brands do this already; Lamborghini knows their customers are bored TikTok socialites and builds cars for them – and they sell every single one. The Luce isn’t meant for regular Ferrari customers; it’s for television housewives who can now say their new Ferrari was designed by the guy who did the iPhone. The Cybertruck might be a childish fever dream, but for its intended audience of techbros, it was exactly what they wanted. And this is where I think the Type 01 lands. To a certain type of customer who funds nebulous tech startups for a living and views regular people as an inconvenience on the way to the great tech utopia, the Type 01 is a perfectly brutal statement of hostility. Those sheer surfaces and extreme proportions will provoke onlookers, and once ensconced inside, the stripped-to-the-bone yet reassuringly digital interior will feel comforting and familiar.

We live in an age of flattened culture. The algorithm dictates aesthetics and taste. Coffee shops are all exposed bricks and string lights. You will drink a small-batch IPA. New consumer products invariably end up with rounded corners and come in various shades of griege. Human interactions have been replaced by apps with soft fonts and purple-to-orange gradient backgrounds. The flip side to this unthreatening bouba-slop norm is that it opens up space on the outside for hyper-targeted products aimed at very specific audiences. The splashy hyper-neon corporatism of Bungie’s Marathon is one of the most distinctive and original art styles seen in a computer game for decades, and like the Jaguar, it attracted eye-rolling amounts of outrage. But the people who love the game (myself included) really, really love it. By making the Type 01 exterior hostile to external audiences and the interior welcoming to LinkedIn AI thought leaders, Jaguar is undoubtedly counting on the buying power of Silicon Valley HNWIs to achieve the same result.
All images and top graphic image: Jaguar









Size is the issue. It’s hard fitting it into the techbro underground bunker elevator, and you can’t have the masses getting their grubby hands on it.
Their grubby hands don’t work after you’ve run them over.
I’m not sure what changes combine to make me think this way but this seems like one of the few times where a production car comes out looking much better than the concept.
old: https://images-stag.jazelc.com/uploads/theautopian-m2en/jagconcept1-e1733150258423.jpg
new: https://images-stag.jazelc.com/uploads/theautopian-m2en/SILVER_FRONT_7-8-e1791469513571.jpg
Fixed
Hot take: I agree.
So you actually preferred the concept car over this?
No, I agree with you, I think the production car looks better. But expressing any positive opinion about this thing seems like a hot take.
my bad, I first thought that colon was a comma and read that the wrong way
Thank you…I was scratching my head thinking “I swear it was a 2-door the last time I saw it.” It also explains my confusion about why I didn’t hate the design as much as I remembered.
“variations of gnome laundry water”
Excellent.
Yeah, not only the hot pink but the really bright blue are gone.
I think the photos in this article do the car more justice than any I’ve previously seen. The 1st rolling shot actually made me think “oh that looks kinda badass”. But I can’t get over the malaise era Lincoln massive bluntness of it or the somewhat cartoonish proportions. I get that they feel they need to really reinvigorate the brand with a statement piece but can’t help but wonder if this throws out too much heritage?
Their heritage was basically worthless to anyone under 70. I asked my class this morning and nothing. None of them had any idea. Only one mentioned the fifties Le Mans wins.
Hey now I’m Well Under 70 and I know a lot about their heritage of beautiful but unreliable and expensive-to-own designs!
Their heritage guarantees that I… err… never want to own one.
NVM…
Fair point, I was thinking as I read this that I don’t think I’ve known anyone younger than early gen-X who’s owned a Jaguar and the others were baby boomers or my grandparent’s generation. I suppose as an elder millennial I was able to catch their last gasps of relevancy in the ’90s but I’ve also never had any interest in owning anything modern of theirs due to the questionable reliability, and while I can dream about an XKE one of those has been unobtanium as long as I’ve been aware of them.
I get it. I get the reinvention. I get the design. I get that it’s intended to sell in limited numbers to a specific type of buyer. Given all that, I think they nailed it. The only things I don’t like are the oversized antenna on the roof, the massive charging door that overwhelms the front fender (wing), and the font used for the logo. Other than that, it’s perfect for what they are trying to achieve.
It’s as if the Austin Allegro was suddenly transformed into a Marvel superhero. I agree, I’m not their target customer, thank the rubber-tired deities.
I still can’t get past the mixed-case logo.
I can excuse ugly. I’ll gladly support ugly if it has an objective reason to exist.
I won’t excuse deliberate search of ugly though.
Deliberate ugly erodes my sense of beauty. It gnaws at it. It destroys it. It makes me concerned that I might miss beauty the next time I see it, because my eyes need to be washed from the ugly first.
Ergo the Cyberfuck. I would rather a Pontiac Aztec as at lest that ugly came with a tent attachment
You’d be surprised how much less puke-worthy the CT looks with them aftermarket bed-toppers if they are of the correct color.
The correct colour is fire as it consumes the whole truck.
As much as I hate the design of this car, it does indeed look sinister in black. But if I were to pull up outside Berghain on a rain-slicked Berlin night(never been there, but looks like my type of place), I think I’d like to have my old Mercedes-Benz 300 SDL back, except repainted in black(it was burgundy), maybe even converted into an EV. I even had bulletproof glass installed by a Russian I knew back in 2013(I’m more about actually being sinister, rather than looking it). Long story short, I had nowhere to continue keeping it after moving back home and had to sell it, and only having space for one car, kept my Triumph GT6 EV conversion, which is painted black.
For clubbing in Berlin, I’d go for a Wartburg 353 Tourist, in lime green. Was the mid-’80s facelift grille for it Jaguar’s inspiration?
Wartburg353_27.jpg (1200×675)
That’s not going to get you into Berghain. Or Slimelight.
Who drives to Berghain? You’d get stuck in the pack of Ubers navigating the drop off corner. And being seen getting out of this car drops your chances of getting through the door significantly. Take the SBahn and an umbrella
My Alexander McQueen umbrella should suffice.
You’ve posted pictures of it before. It’s adorable.
I just can’t get over the rear end. It looks like a hotel air conditioner.
At a cheap motel
Thanks. Now I can’t get that out of my head.
Ahhh, Uncle Adrian never ceases to keep my eyes on this site. If Jaguar is looking for a volume-seller, this ain’t it. Totally agree with you Adrian. While I find the Type 01 interesting (but not in a good way), it’s not something I would ever buy. As a follow-up question, thought on the Ineos Grenadier and Quartermaster?
Consensus is they are looking to sell about 10k pa.
The Ineos Grenadier is an ego-driven spite wagon built by a raging Brexiteer hypocrite and generally awful human being who can get in the fucking sea.
Tell us how you really feel.
That was the sugar coated version.
If by ‘get into the fucking sea’, you mean: hope a very strong undertow grabs the Ahole and pulls him under till it gets to Gibraltar, then yes.
…I want this in brown. Maybe with a cream roof.
Why? Well, let’s just say it’s square. Yes, I am aware people in red cars may call it a Dirty Object and wooden trestles might collapse under its weight but if it’s hip to be square, I guess…
Oh, who am I kidding? Were I rich and wanted square to be my thing, what I’d really want is a reproduction of an LNER J50. Not this thing.
(Though, admittedly, it probably wouldn’t look too bad in mocha and cream.)
L392 was going to be two tone.
I appreciate what they’re trying to do, especially with the exterior. They just seem to suck at it.
The 01 resembles more of a rolls royce than anything else, but the rear end really irks me. A big square grille feels lazy as if they said “well nothing else really works here so we’ll just fill it in”. And the interior isn’t any nicer than you’d get on a Kia these days. It certainly isn’t differentiated in any way from a low-to-mid-tier family sedan, and in the worst, most touch-screeny, cheapest way possible.
This Jag is the kid who wasn’t anywhere good enough to make the basketball team, so he showed up the next day with a brand new pair of shoes thinking it’d make all the difference.
This is wonderfully accurate. I think there’s room in the market for a long, slab-sided sinister looking EV, but not if it’s mid. It seems pretty clear that this is five years old at launch. What a bummer.
The big square “grille” kind of cements (sorry, couldn’t help myself) the massive, giant cinderblock look — Intentionally, I suspect. It’s all about oppressive visual mass. (Consider the stereotypical techbro compensating for something…)
They could have made the “grille” area more of a trapezoid, wider at the bottom, so that the corners harmonize a bit with the ends of the front splitter. It might have made for a kind of catfish-mouth look, but then the E-Type had a bit of that going on with the low oval grille so it kind of counts for stylistic heritage. Angle the whole front aspect back a bit from where the front splitter/fascia meets the rest of the bodywork, too for a sleeker aspect. But again, that would detract from the look of the battering-ram meant to bulldoze its way through the poors getting in the way.
I’d been eagerly awaiting this, and wasn’t disappointed in the least.
I think the big point about niche auto production fits with what we’re seeing at the lower end too. Ford went from being a full-range automaker to supplying only vehicles that can take advantage of government protection. The Stellantis portfolio is getting niche-ier all the time. I remain surprised that Nissan still sells the Z, as it seems too high end for the firm.
I think social critiques levelled at such cars very often fail to touch on the fact there has always been cars aimed at the super wealthy specifically designed to stir opinions and be noticed. Trying to design something conventionally pretty and practically logical doesn’t really give a whole lot of freedom to make it unique. We know what a conventionally pretty car looks like – there has been 100 years of them now. How do you find something new is a much more interesting question to me. Some will always reject new until they get used to it.
This i view as a spiritual successor to the Aston Martin Lagonda. Main thing about it is how it looks and that dramatic holy shit moment you see it in context among normal cars is all that matters here. I’m sure it’s a perfectly competent 2+2 GT, as long as it’s good quality – perceived and otherwise, i think it might succeed and sell enough to make some money.
Btw people on the internet hate anything new, you cannot please the outrage mob. Some of them love 70s and 80s boxy cars, yet would comment how this looks like a fridge. Then theyll shit on some other new cars and how everything is turning into blobby SUVs, they don’t know what they like/want. People here may comment how they despair at the rise of antisocial bunker shaped automobiles for the ultra wealthy, yet would probably shit their pants with excitement if they saw an LM002 or a Lagonda in person.
What i see here is an outrageously cool proportioned car with pretty fresh and nicely executed surfacing and details. If i was in the market for a Spectre or Conti GT, I’d seriously consider it.
The LM002 looked like that because it just kind of had to in order to fit that engine, and the Lagonda was actually beautiful.
People bemoan designs like this and the Cybertruck because there is essentially zero artistry involved. It’s just, “How do we make something look as intimidating and scary as possible?” and just doing that. It’s the design equivalent of blacking-out a car with Plastidip and thinking you did something cool and different. It’s just lazy design work for the sake of shock value.
I also disagree that this is somehow anything “new”. It was essentially designed during Covid and everything about it already seems dated. If you were to do a ground-up, clean-sheet design of a new luxury sedan right now, you would do almost the opposite of everything you see here. Touchscreens for everything are outdated, full-EV luxury cars are outdated, the slab look could have been innovative if it came out in ’21 but it didn’t, and the super-low ride height with super low-profile tires thing is also kind of on its way out.
All of this is to say nothing of what it will be like to live with as an actual car. JLR doesn’t usually top many quality lists, and it’s not like the Jaguar nameplate has been at the front of people’s minds for a while. If the thing has quality issues, which it will, it doesn’t matter how many tech bros you managed to dupe into buying the initial production run, it will eventually die on the vine. I know a lot of people have more money than sense, but Jaguar is wanting to stage an actual comeback here with lots of different models. They’re not going to do that if their first truly new car is a turd.
I don’t see how you could call a Lagonda beautiful while hating on the new Jag, honestly. There’s really nothing in common between the Cybertruck and the Jag.
Not much i can tell you if you’ve already made up your mind but it’s a very complex and refined design, if you look at it everything has been given love here. Much more than a Lagonda with that 0 plan shape taper which makes it look like it’s wrapping over itself in 3/4 view. And the front overhang of anteater proportions. Sometimes a striking design does a disservice to itself because ppl who aren’t into design don’t notice the care that went into it beyond the dramatic overall aesthetic.
Old cars are charming, almost never intimidating. High tech and new is intimidating. But a Lagonda or a Silver Shadow absolutely were perceived as such in their day. And there’s nothing particularly aggressive about the Jag, much of the graphics are quite static and pretty stern infact.
Design being frozen 3-4 years before release isn’t unusual, i’d say 5 a bit more so but not that much.
Full EV luxury cars aren’t any more outdated than EVs, which are the ultimate future and where things are going sooner or later.
Low height and massive wheels are the whole point here. Would you have preferred it have Ford Ecosport proportions or what?
I get the point about touchscreens, would’ve been better with some nice high quality switches, perhaps a topic for the facelift. But it probably saves them some money..
What care are you seeing in the design of the 01? Because I’m just seeing bad proportions, a lack of refinement, no concern for practicality/usability, and questionable aesthetic choices that either come from or lead to nowhere.
How is short front – long rear overhang, low and long bonnet, big wheels and a wide stance bad proportions? The car looks like a frickin sketch, that almost never happens. This package is a car designer’s dream.
Can you expand on the lack of refinement? It’s pretty clean and uncluttered. And what’s there generally follows the same theme and logic. Surfaces and lines have plenty of crown. Plan shapes are healthy. Radii sizes they used seem pretty consistent.
Jag was never going to make an S class or 7 series beater. If you want to stand out with a different aesthetic to them, you have to sacrifice some practicality and they took full advantage of it. Doesn’t make it a bad car, it’s got different priorities. Is a Countach a bad car because it only fits 0.7 people?
You can stretch proportions too far – for this big GT category something like the Mercedes SLR McLaren thing, or the SLS and even the AMG I would argue are right on the limit for dash-to-axle.
It’s all about balance – you don’t want one characteristic to dominate and overwhelm the rest of the design, otherwise you end up with a caricature.
WRT to refinement, those charge ports are egregious and look like an afterthought – and look very low so not ideal ergonomically. They could have integrated those much better.
I would argue the proportions are pushing the norm almost to breaking point, but it gets away with it because there is basically no drama happening anywhere else.
It was styled for me, because I think it looks absolutely sick. But it wasn’t designed for me, it’s a few multiples my budget.
It does look like it’s sick
That’s ok, it should depreciate like it’s on fire.
This doesn’t look in any way like it would be enjoyable to spend time in, let alone to drive in a spirited manner.
Apparently it drives very well (ignore the launch videos they were done on the Gaydon test track and limited to 50 mph).
Screams Green Hornet.
If it wasn’t for the absolutely hideous interior, I might actually be tempted by this thing. I have a fondness for long hooded sedans, and the exterior isn’t horrible. It’s not the best looking sedan on the market, but it’s acceptably “ok”.
The Cybersedan from Jaguar is going to be as big of a sales hit as the Cybertruck from Tesla.
Champagne corks would be popping in JLR headquarters if this hit Cybertruck sales numbers.
The Cybertruck has flopped in relation to their sales ambitions for it. But Jaguar would be thrilled with the 25k a year it’s been managing.
I just showed this to an XJ-owning co-worker (a millennial woman) and she stared at it and just couldn’t understand why Jaguar would do this. I couldn’t care less about Jags, but this was a current owner who has zero interest in this design language.
Well, anyway, good luck to them!
This does a good job of putting into words what I couldn’t – namely how and why they managed to make a car so utterly unappealing to me, who should (I thought) be squarely in their target demo.
Maybe the California tech guys will like it, I couldn’t say. I think it’s a tough sell elsewhere.
I agree that they messed up the timing horribly. If they had kept the whole thing under wraps and showed the actual production-ready version at Art Basel, opened order books that day, and had a configurator live, they maybe could’ve coasted off that hype for a while. As it is, you now have to effectively re-energize people for a less-cool, sedan-ified version of the concept car you showed 2 years ago.
I have no doubt they’ll sell a few to curious rich guys, but those early cars need to be basically flawless (which they won’t be) or the whole thing will be sunk.
“I was playing around on the website this morning and selected black on black as my colorway. I immediately pictured myself pulling up outside Berghain on a rain-slicked Berlin night looking as sinister as all fuck, and it all sort of clicked.”
My first thought the other day was “oh actually this would look pretty cool in black”
Darling everything looks better in black.
Unless it’s Dragon Blood Red.
Oh my that is a very intense colour. Would look terrifying on the Jaaag, so just do it.
Yup, Jag’s boned